Civil society at G20 gathering: 'No democratic society with huge unemployed population'
Image: Itumeleng English/Independent Newspapers
With just over 23 weeks left before South Africa gets to host the G20 Summit in November this year, more than 14 working groups from diverse civil society organisations gathered at The Capital on the Park in Sandton as part of the C20 South Africa Launch on Sunday.
Chairperson Thulani Tshefuta highlighted the group's role not as adversaries of the government but as crucial partners who advocate for those most vulnerable in society and emphasised the need for advocacy work to align with South Africa's medium term development plan and the United Nations' agenda for 2030.
His call for a mass-based, people-centred approach resonated throughout the launch, pointing to the urgent need for comprehensive consultations that address the issues faced by communities across the country.
"We are not anti-government as we have been labeled as friends of government. When we have to respond to the plight of the poor, we are told this is expensive we can't afford that, but ours is to press on.
"'m not about to pretend when we do our advocacy at community level. our work must align with the medium development plan and the agenda 2030. Our strategic approach should be truly mass-based, people centred and imbued with awareness of our advocacy issues. The challenge is that we must rise above our immediate challenge and look at strategic development instruments, we must be big and wide in our consultation," he said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
The 14 working groups include Women and Gender Equity, People to people interaction and Solidarity, Poverty Alleviation and Food Sustainability, Democratic governance, Civic Space, Anti-Corruption and Access to Justice, Cultural Diversity Recognition and Embracement, Trade and Sustainable Development, Digital and Inclusive Economies, Sustainable and Resilient Communities and Disaster Risk Reduction.
These working groups also include four themes that include youth empowerment, addressing issues affecting women, meaningful inclusion of persons with disabilities and ensuring that LGBTQI+ people are not left behind.
Tshefuta said intentional actions are needed to reverse the tide of poverty and unemployment, adding that this cannot be done without active market policies.
"There will be no democratic society with such a huge population which is unemployed and idle. Poverty is real. Poverty is alive. There are people we refer to as being vulnerable, but we say nothing anything about those who are fully marginalised. It is a struggle to keep them surviving in the marginst," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
How does South Africa's education stack up in the G20?
An empty classroom. Educational challenges remain one of the key talking points that the country has been focusing on as part of its G20 presidency, building on what has come before and helping shape solutions in the process. Image: Courtney Africa/Independent Newspapers (Archives) Educational challenges remain one of the key talking points that the country has been focusing on as part of its G20 presidency, building on what has come before and helping shape solutions in the process. The G20 Education Working Group (EdWG) was established during the Argentinian Presidency in 2018. Subsequent presidencies all incorporated the EdWG as a permanent Working Group of the Sherpa track. Since 2018, several educational challenges have been dealt with by the G20 EdWG, including: strengthening learning outcomes; equitable access; technological tools, digitalisation and digital technologies in education, universal quality education, financing, partnerships for education; international cooperation; skills for life and work; early childhood care and education (ECCE); universal quality education; and a focus on education for sustainable development. The country is hosting the EdWG, cognisant of the fact that South Africa, as part of the troika from 2024 to 2026, will build upon the achievements of India and Brazil to ensure continuity in taking forward the development agenda. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ South Africa's three priorities for education are: 'Inclusive Economic Growth, Industrialisation, Employment and Inequality', 'Food Security' and lastly 'Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Innovation for Sustainable Development'. The country has also embraced the theme 'Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability' for its G20 presidency. Basic Education Minister, Siviwe Gwarube, has been playing her part to make sure that education stakeholders across the country are being heard by holding a series of indabas across the provinces, which fit into South Africa's education agenda, ahead of a planned national indaba. While at the Western Cape Provincial Education G20 Indaba, Gwarube sat down to not only tackle the topic of South Africa's education priorities, but also how South Africa is faring against the rest of the nations in the G20. 'I think the strategic opportunity for having the G20 presidency is that we are not only pushing our three themes, but we also have an opportunity now to put some of the things that we think are pertinent in education on the global stage. Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube. Image: Supplied 'For instance, the mutual recognition of skills would be a massive game-changer for South Africa, because it would mean that South African young people who acquire skills in a particular field can be recognised across the world. If we can get that agreement, amongst the G20 countries, that would be great, especially for young people who've acquired particular qualifications,' Gwarube said. She added that the presidency also allows South Africa to put ECCE on the global stage. 'Many of the G20 countries that are going to be coming here have made the strategic reorientation years ago, where they're focused on the foundations of learning, where they've done the investment, and I think with us and Brazil and India, we're going to be some really powerful voices in the global South that says, 'look, we want to follow suit'.' Gwarube explained that the focus on foundational learning can yield up to 2% GDP growth for a country, fix the literacy crisis, and impact on learners' ability to tackle historically challenging subjects like maths and science. 'We may not be on par with many of the G20 countries that are coming here, but we are certainly having the conversation and saying, it's not that we don't want to be benchmarked against the best of the best; we will continue benchmarking ourselves against the rest of the world.' Universities themselves are having to contend with the impact of technology, where in one instance, Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Teaching and Learning at the University of Cape Town (UCT), Professor Brandon Collier-Reed, announced that the Senate's Teaching and Learning Committee endorsed the UCT AI in Education Framework in June 2025. Collier-Reed said the endorsement of the framework was a result of UCT moving with the times, as 'artificial intelligence technologies are becoming part of our daily lives'. 'Staff and students are using tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in innovative and productive ways; while at other times these technologies present significant challenges, requiring us to rethink teaching pedagogies, assessment practices and the fundamentals of what a university experience should be, and what our qualifications should signify in a changing world,' he said. Professor Maniraj Sukdaven from the Faculty of Theology and Religion at the University of Pretoria, with attendees at the G20 Interfaith Forum last week. Image: G20 Interfaith Forum / Facebook Professor Maniraj Sukdaven from the Faculty of Theology and Religion at the University of Pretoria echoed how technology has impacted education, and said that across the education spectrum, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is leaving its mark. 'It plays a significant role, but it also has cut down research time for students, and there is a downside to that. When AI is used in the instances of education, more specifically in the Master's and PhD programmes, AI is what it is - it is artificial. Simply meaning is that sometimes the citations and referencing don't correspond with what they are saying.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
New political donation limits raise concerns over increased private interests in the country's politics
Political analysts say the doubling of the limit and threshold for political donations will deepen secrecy in political funding and make it easier for private interests to have an influence on politics. Image: Leon Lestrade / Independent Newspapers The new limit and threshold for political donations, which means political parties can accept more money from donors, could see more influence exerted on government institutions and politicians. Political analysts said although money is needed in politics, the capture of government and politics could broaden and become further entrenched. This was after President Cyril Ramaphosa signed a proclamation to double the threshold and annual donation limit in the Political Funding Act (PFA). The annual donation threshold to political parties by an individual donor has increased from R15 million to R30m. He has also allowed for donations to political parties below R200,000 to remain undisclosed, up from R100,000. These amounts were set in a government gazette dated August 6. Ramaphosa said he made these decisions in terms of the PFA and was also acting on a resolution adopted by the National Assembly on May 20. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Political analyst Zakhele Ndlovu said although money is necessary in politics, this means more capture of policy, law, political party and politicians, as well as government institutions. Ndlovu said this is because there is already secrecy and influence in the country's politics. 'The secrecy is already there. How many people know the funders of the ANC, DA, EFF, MKP etc. Do voters even care that some of these political parties are funded by the same families and corporations? Private interests are already influencing our politics. The Guptas' influence was too obvious but in most cases such influence is subtle,'' he said. Ndlovu added that it was obvious that private interests corrupted policymakers and lawmakers. 'In short, more money in politics means more policy capture, more law capture, more capturing of individual politicians, political parties and institutions of the state. People want to know who captured and infiltrated institutions of the criminal justice system. If we stretch our imagination, it becomes clear that money has been used to capture political parties,'' he said, adding that this is taking the country back to greater secrecy. 'Even scarier, the accountability of elected representatives is with private interests instead of the public and national interests.' Governance expert and political analyst Sandile Swana supported the sentiments, saying the rich determine who takes the office and increase their wealth. Swana said this was demonstrated by the sealed CR17 files. 'The president we have today was decided by the billionaires and multimillionaires of South Africa. It was decided by the big businesses and white business-class. It was not a decision of the majority because politics are decided by money, meaning that the concentration of wealth determines who will run the country and how it should be governed,'' he said, adding that those taking the office are there to preserve and increase the wealth of the rich. Lobby group My Vote Counts (MVC) said it is awaiting judgment in its case that was heard in the Western Cape in February this year, in which it challenged various aspects of the Act. These included the irrationality of the two limits and the power of the president to have the final say in setting the limits. The group wants political parties and independents to disclose all private donations, regardless of the amount. It also wants both 'natural and juristic persons' to be obliged to disclose donations they have made in excess of the annual threshold, and the annual upper donation limit to be significantly lowered. MVC said while awaiting judgment, it is considering other legal options to address Ramaphosa's action. 'We will also be writing to the President to request that he release the reasons and full record of factors that were considered as he applied his mind to this matter,'' said Joel Bregman, MVC project lead on money in politics. Bregman warned that this will deepen secrecy in political funding and make it easier for private interests to influence 'our' politics and for corruption to occur. The group said R200,000 is an enormous sum of most South Africans and donations of such amounts should be made public knowledge to facilitate scrutiny of parties' relationships with donors and ensure that donors are not receiving anything in return.
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
As G20 host, SA cannot afford to allow whistle-blower protection to remain rhetorical
As South Africa assumed the presidency of the G20 this year, it finds itself at a historic crossroads. Among the many issues on the agenda, none carries greater immediacy for our domestic governance landscape than the protection of whistle-blowers. This issue has been consistently prioritised at the G20 level since the Seoul Summit in 2010, with Japan's 2019 presidency placing particular emphasis on strengthening whistle-blower protection frameworks. Under Japan's leadership, the G20 endorsed the High-Level Principles for the Effective Protection of Whistle-blowers, drawing upon existing standards developed by the United Nations and regional bodies. These principles provide governments with a road map for legislation and policies that safeguard individuals who courageously expose corruption, maladministration and other unlawful conduct. For South Africa, the timing could not be more fortuitous — or more pressing. Our existing whistle-blower ecosystem, anchored in the Protected Disclosures Act of 2000 and related statutes, is manifestly inadequate. While the act sought to create a legal shield for employees who disclose misconduct in good faith, its scope and implementation has fallen short, with glaring gaps in anonymity, physical safety, financial support and legal assistance. Too often, those who step forward in the public interest face intimidation, job losses, harassment and, tragically, even assassination. The euphoria sparked by the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development's 2023 discussion document on strengthening whistle-blower protection quickly dissipated, replaced by characteristic inertia. Draft proposals have not translated into legislative reform, while real lives remain in peril. With South Africa now in the international spotlight as G20 host, the government has both an opportunity and an obligation to demonstrate leadership by urgently overhauling our whistle-blower protection framework in line with the G20 High-Level Principles. The G20's work on this issue is not abstract. The Anti-Corruption Working Group explicitly tasked the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2011 with preparing a 'Study on Whistle-blower Protection Frameworks, Compendium of Best Practices and Guiding Principles for Legislation'. Since then, several G20 presidencies have reinforced the importance of robust protections, culminating in Japan's 2019 High-Level Principles. These principles reaffirm the collective commitment of the world's most powerful economies to ensuring that whistle-blowers are not left to bear the burden of public accountability alone. The principles are not a prescriptive checklist. Instead, they encourage states to: Ensure safe and confidential reporting channels. Provide external avenues for disclosure. Protect whistle-blowers from retaliation, dismissal and blacklisting. Offer remedies such as compensation and reinstatement. Extend protection to contractors, suppliers and witnesses. Foster a culture of integrity where whistleblowing is an ethical duty, not a betrayal. South Africa has endorsed these principles, yet the gap between aspiration and reality remains cavernous. The stakes for our country are extraordinarily high. Corruption continues to siphon billions from public coffers, depriving communities of basic services. The Zondo Commission laid bare the extent of State Capture and the indispensability of whistle-blowers in exposing it. Yet many who bravely came forward continue to face economic ruin, psychological trauma and threats to their lives. The tragic assassinations of whistle-blowers in recent years underscore the urgency of the moment. When witnesses and whistle-blowers are silenced through violence or intimidation, the justice system itself is imperilled. If potential whistle-blowers conclude that silence is safer than speaking truth to power, the fight against corruption collapses at its foundation. Hosting the G20 provides South Africa with a singular opportunity to demonstrate tangible commitment to the principles it has endorsed on the global stage. Aligning our frameworks with the G20 High-Level Principles would send a powerful signal that we are serious about rooting out corruption and protecting those who act in the public interest. Concrete steps are available: Amend and strengthen the Protected Disclosures Act to broaden its scope, enhance anonymity and guarantee remedies and whistleblowing incentives. Implement the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council's recommendation to establish an Office of Public Integrity as part of the legislative overhaul. This office could serve as an independent authority to receive disclosures, ensure follow-up action and provide direct support to whistle-blowers. President Cyril Ramaphosa should act with urgency to translate this recommendation into law. Introduce whistle-blower protection funds to provide financial, legal and psychosocial support. Institutionalise independent reporting channels outside employer structures to guard against retaliation. Prioritise security for high-risk whistle-blowers and witnesses, including relocation or protective services where threats exist. Foster a cultural shift that affirms whistle-blowers as defenders of democracy, not traitors. These measures are neither novel nor unattainable. They are drawn directly from international best practice and from South Africa's own advisory bodies and civil society. What is required is political will, not more deliberation. If South Africa were to emerge from its G20 presidency having taken decisive steps to align its whistle-blower protections with the High-Level Principles and implement the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council's recommendation for an Office of Public Integrity, it would represent a crowning glory for our international engagement. Such a move would not only bolster our credibility abroad, but also strengthen our democratic fabric at home. Conversely, continued inertia risks deepening cynicism among citizens and reinforcing perceptions of state complicity in corruption. The cost of inaction will not be measured merely in reputational terms, but in human lives. South Africa stands at a pivotal juncture. As host of the G20 Summit, it cannot afford to allow the protection of whistle-blowers to remain rhetorical. The time for discussion papers has passed. What is needed now is bold, urgent reform — anchored in the G20 High-Level Principles and complemented by the creation of an Office of Public Integrity. To do less is to betray those who, often at great personal cost, have chosen to serve the public interest by exposing wrongdoing. To act decisively is to affirm the principles of integrity, accountability, and justice at the heart of our democracy. The government must seize this moment with vigour and pace. In doing so, it can make South Africa's G20 presidency not merely a diplomatic exercise, but a milestone in our nation's unfinished journey toward ethical governance. DM
