
Fury as award-winning police officer is sacked after showing knife-carrying teen who 'assaulted elderly man' a 'lack of courtesy and respect' as he arrested him
An award-winning police officer has been fired after he was accused of showing a lack of courtesy and respect to a knife-carrying teenager he arrested for assault.
The decision to dismiss PC Lorne Castle has prompted fury after he was found to have committed gross misconduct - with critics calling it 'bloody madness' and 'perverse'.
The officer swore at and threatened the 15-year-old suspect as he arrested him for allegedly assaulting two people, one of whom was an elderly man.
PC Castle, 46, pinned the youth up against a wall before taking him to the ground - both techniques which were later deemed lawful.
The boy, known as Witness A, screamed in the officer's face and resisted arrest while on the floor.
The officer of nine years then called him a 'b***h' and threatened to 'smash him in' while straddling him - and at one stage he placed his hand on the boy's face and jabbed his finger at him, a disciplinary panel heard.
During the commotion a Stanley-type knife fell out of the teenager's waistband.
But the panel has now ruled PC Castle made the boy feel 'frightened and intimidated' and showed him a 'lack of courtesy and respect' during the arrest in Bournemouth in January last year.
Pc Castle (right) won an award for saving a person from drowning, as well as previously being named Neighbourhood Police Officer of the Year
Senior officers later reviewed the bodycam footage and placed PC Castle under investigation which took 16 months.
The officer admitted that he 'lost control' during the arrest and tearfully apologised for his 'out of character' actions at a police disciplinary hearing.
But the panel, led by Dorset Police Assistant Chief Constable Deborah Smith, found him guilty of gross misconduct.
They said he failed to act with self-control, did not treat the boy with courtesy or respect and that his 'shouting, swearing, finger pointing, taking hold of the boy's face suggested use of leg restraints was not necessary, reasonable or proportionate'.
It was alleged the officer also grabbed the boy's throat but this was not proven.
PC Castle was dismissed without notice and barred from serving again - in a verdict that has now fuelled fury.
Norman Brennan, a retired police officer and founder of the campaign group Protect the Protectors, accused Dorset Police of throwing PC Castle 'under a bus'.
He said: 'Senior officers at Dorset Police have taken leave of their senses.. This decision epitomises how they have lost touch with the danger and reality of frontline policing. It is bloody madness.
'Police officers when facing volatile or violent situations will at times swear and use some unsavoury words.
'All arrests involve some form of force and pushing someone even in the face during a struggle is not always intentional and even if it is its part and parcel in many arrests when restraining a suspect. No arrest is without some sort of force.
'I'm sick and tired of officers being disciplined for things like this and I think the majority of the public would think this is absolutely bonkers.
'Many senior officers kowtow to the constant criticism of the police in a sort of appeasement and often throw officers under the bus or to the wolves as sacrificial lambs. Cases like this are more likely to deter people from joining the police.
'Thousands of officers have and are already throwing the towel in as they have lost faith and confidence in their leadership who in turn are detached from the dangers and stresses of front line policing in Britain in this very violent age that we live in.'
The incident that led to PC Castle's sacking happened in Bournemouth town centre at 5.30pm on January 27 last year.
The boy was suspected of assaulting an elderly man while riding an e-scooter and then getting embroiled in a fracas with another youth outside McDonalds - while ge was also alleged to have run away from town rangers who tried to apprehend him until police arrived.
PC Castle, who has twice won a national bravery award including one for saving an elderly woman from drowning in a swollen river in 2023, spotted the suspect walking up Richmond Hill in Bournemouth.
Bodycam footage showed PC Castle run up to the suspect and push him against the wall before bundling him to the ground and sitting on top of him.
He told the youth to 'show me your f*****g hands' and then put his hands and finger in the teen's face - and when the boy was unable to move his arms, PC Castle told him to 'stop screaming like a little b***h'.
Neither the boy or his family complained about the arrest but PC Castle's colleagues reported concerns about his conduct to senior officers.
Giving evidence, PC Castle said he became 'overwhelmed and scared' when the boy resisted as his mind flashed back to his arrest of a county lines drug dealer 18 months earlier which led him fearing for his life.
As the officer struggled with the dealer, his associate who was stood behind was being told to 'cut him' - before an off-duty officer intervened to defend him.
PC Castle admitted he had overstepped the mark with his language and aggression and broke down in tears as he said: 'I'm embarrassed by the video and I apologise for my actions.
'Anyone who knows me in public or private life knows that is not how I behave. When he started screaming and resisting I panicked and became overwhelmed.
'I did not choke the suspect and I did not get him in a headlock. I was trying to keep his head still with the palm of my hand so he did not hit his head.
'I did not put my full weight on him as my knees were on the concrete. I only applied enough weight to keep his body still.
'During the arrest I saw the knife fall out of his waistband so he was arrested for a knife offence. I think the arrest needed to be made but I lost control of the situation.'
Mark Ley Morgan, representing Dorset Police at the hearing, said the knife was not relevant as PC Castle did not know the boy had it when making the arrest.
Mr Morgan said: 'PC Castle breached standards of professional behaviour by failing to act with self control and failing to treat him with courtesy or respect.
'He abused his power and authority and his behaviour undermined confidence in the police.
'It was totally unnecessary and disproportionate, and it is so serious that dismissal would be justified.'
After the hearing, Dorset Police Deputy Chief Constable Rachel Farrell acknowledged that officers did a 'tough job' but said PC Castle let the force down by his actions.
She said: 'I have never been in any doubt that PC Castle's actions were excessive, aggressive and inappropriate and I can understand the communities we serve will be concerned about this case.
'PC Castle has let the police service and his colleagues down and he does not represent the many hard-working officers and staff of Dorset Police.
'The outcome reflects the seriousness of this matter and ensures that he will no longer hold a role in policing and the privilege of constable.
'I am grateful to the officers for having the courage to do the right thing and report their concerns about PC Castle's actions.'
But campaigner Mr Brennan called the officer's punishment disproportionate, adding: 'I am astounded that the matter reached a formal disciplinary hearing.
'A senior officer should have pulled him aside and given him words of advice about how the public may perceive officers when arresting somebody before letting him go back on the streets.'
PC Castle worked as a community patrol officer in Bournemouth before he joined Dorset Police in about 2016.
He was once named community officer of the year and last year was awarded a Royal Humane Society's testimonial on parchment for saving the woman in the River Avon at Christchurch.
The citation stated how he entered the fast-flowing water and used a rope and life ring and managed to get it close enough to the woman to grab it, saying: 'The brave actions of the officers undoubtedly saved her life.'
Outside of policing he has run a successful boxing training academy with his wife of 24 years, Denise Castle.
Following the panel's verdict, Mr Castle said he was still processing the outcome of the case - while also thanking members of the public who backed him him.
He said: 'I have had an unbelievable amount of public support, from people I know and don't know, which has really kept me going.
'All I will ever do is to try my best. I'm going to think about it (the outcome) and process it a little longer.
'I can't say how much the messages and public support has meant to me because it has been a tough time which has been hard on me and my family.'
Social media users have been among those expressing backing for him - while raising concerns that the outcome could embolden other youngsters with weapons.
Sara Louise posted on social media: 'What message does this send out to all the youngsters who do already or will now carry knives?
'They know they are untouchable if an officer challenges them. What message does this send out to any officer faced in a similar situation. Is it worth the challenge?
'Welcome to Dorset - a county where you can carry a knife but if an officer points their finger at you or calls you a nasty name they will lose their job/career. I'm appalled.'
Jo Holland wrote: 'So a thug carrying a knife has been made into a victim and the officer protecting the public has been made into a criminal. And we wonder why society is going the way it is. Disgraceful decision.'
Ray Venner posted: 'This is a good honourable officer doing a fantastic job in a very difficult dangerous environment. Shameful, absolutely shameful.'
Fiona Lawrence posted: 'Surely dismissing someone with such a good previous record and has saved lives on numerous occasions isn't the correct judgement.'
Other comments have included 'Travesty', 'He should be given a medal not the boot.''No wonder no one wants a career in the police - let's protect the villains'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
38 minutes ago
- Times
Public will pay price for police funding squeeze, say chiefs
Officer numbers will have to be cut as the public 'pay the price' for the lack of funding for policing in the spending review, police chiefs said. Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to restore neighbourhood policing is 'some way off' they said, after Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, announced that police funding would increase by £2.1 billion between 2026 and 2029 — an average real-terms increase of 1.7 per cent. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) said this would leave a shortfall of £1.2 billion and lead to forces 'cutting headcount to balance the books'. The Police Federation said the public would 'pay the price', while the Police Superintendents' Association (PSA) accused the government of a 'shameful abandonment of the police service'. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is understood to be planning to review police funding in the autumn, when she will pressure the chancellor for extra money to meet Labour's pledge to recruit 13,000 police officers. Police chiefs said that without extra funding, the money would have to be found through rises in council tax or cuts to other policing services. Gavin Stephens, the NPCC chairman, said the funding rise would 'cover little more than annual inflationary pay increases' and that progress on the prime minister's key missions, such as halving violence against women and cutting knife crime, would be slower. Sir Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said police numbers would fall, adding: 'I remain concerned that this spending review could result in insufficient funding for the Met and fewer police officers.' Starmer's promise to recruit 13,000 neighbourhood police officers was one of Labour's flagship policies in last year's general election. Paul Sanford, chairman of the NPCC's finance co-ordination committee, said: 'While we are looking at a 1.7 per cent increase, once pay is accounted for, once our non-pay pressures are accounted for, we think it will be incredibly difficult for the commitment to deliver the additional 13,000 neighbourhood police officers within this funding envelope. 'We've made some progress. We have a good 3,000 already recruited but based on this settlement, that does look a real challenge for us … Certainly we are going to be some way off unless some significant levers are going to be pulled. Any further progress towards the 13,000 without new money would only come from making savings in our budgets.' Sanford said it was impossible to predict what the neighbourhood policing shortfall would be. Labour's initial announcement said the 13,000 officers would comprise 4,000 police community service officers, 3,000 special constables, 3,000 existing officers and 3,000 new police constables. Stephens added that 'the size and shape of the police workforce will inevitably have to change'. He said: 'The amount falls far short of what is required to fund the government's ambitions and maintain our existing workforce. This is against a backdrop of increasing crime rates, with new and escalating threats from organised crime and hostile states, and more offenders being managed in the community as a result of an overstretched criminal justice system.' Sanford said the overhaul of sentencing laws, which will scrap short prison sentences and release some prisoners after they have served just a third of their sentence, would pile further pressure on police budgets. Additional investment in the Probation Service to monitor offenders would take time to phase in, he said, leaving police to deal with the consequences of more criminals on the streets. 'There isn't any additional money to deal with that. This will increase the workload of police officers.' Tiff Lynch, acting national chairwoman of the Police Federation, accused the chancellor of failing to listen to police officers or the home secretary. She said: 'This spending review should have been a turning point after 15 years of austerity that has left policing, and police officers, broken. Instead, the cuts will continue — and it's the public who will pay the price. 'As rank-and-file officers kit up for night duty this evening, they'll do so knowing exactly where they stand in the government's priorities. It is beyond insulting for cabinet ministers to call on police to 'do their bit' when officers are overworked, underpaid and under threat like never before. 'They are facing blades and bricks, managing mental health crises, while battling to protect their own, and carrying the weight of trauma and financial stress home with them every day.' Nick Smart, president of the PSA, said it was a 'shameful abandonment of the police service' and warned that the government was failing in its first duty of keeping public safe. He said: 'Today's funding announcement is a huge blow to the police service, which has once again been placed at the bottom of the government's list of priorities. It is the first duty of government to keep its citizens safe, yet today we see no evidence of a commitment to doing this. 'Many of the government's election pledges centred around a commitment to 'safer streets', promising the public that it would meet ambitious targets such as halving knife crime. Yet the lack of investment announced today means we will continue to struggle to deliver the basics, to maintain officer numbers, cover inflationary costs, cover pay awards and function as we are, let alone move forward on new public safety and transformation initiatives.'


The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump doesn't rule out arresting California Gov Gavin Newsom over LA riot chaos and says he had to save city from mob
DONALD Trump refused to rule out arresting California Governor Gavin Newsom over his handling of the Los Angeles riots. The pair have been trading blows since Newsom slammed Trump's decision to send federal troops into the city to quell immigration raid rioters. 8 8 8 8 Trump has sent around 4,000 of the National Guard and 700 Marines into LA, where they have clashed violently with protesting mobs and been given to make arrests The Governor accused Trump of manufacturing the flare-ups, saying his actions were "akin to authoritarian regimes" - and was dismissed as "incompetent" in return. He vowed his state is "suing Donald Trump" for "creating fear and terror to [...] violate the US constitution". Trump has previously toyed with the idea of arresting Newsom, and refused to rule it out in an interview with the New York Pos t. Trump's border czar Tom Homan had warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal law enforcement. On Sunday, Newsom goaded Trump over the threats, saying in a MSNBC interview: "Come after me, arrest me. Let's just get it over with, tough guy." Asked directly if he is going to arrest and charge Gavin Newsom, Trump said: "Well, he's not doing a good job. "In theory you could, I guess. It's almost like a dissipation of duties. Nobody's ever seen anything like it." Before Wednesday's interview, Newsom shared his thoughts on the arrest threats. He said: "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. Anti-ICE raid protest carnage spreads across US as Texas deploys National Guard & LA declares curfew after riots "This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Trump follow up with a brutal takedown of Newsom's record in office - which included blaming him for the devastating wild fires that ravaged parts of LA in January. Trump said: "First he had his wildfires that burned down half the place [...] I told them water, get the water from the pacific north west [...] I got the water to go down. "They were using environmental as a reason not to give water. They were protecting a certain type of fish - which by the way has not done well. "He should have done it [redirected the water supply] in my first term. You wouldn't have had the fires." 8 8 8 Interviewer Miranda Devine then asked about a much-disputed phone call between Trump and Newsom - with each swearing to a different version of events. The President claimed he rang to discuss sending in National Guardsmen - but Newsom branded him a "stone-cold liar". Newsom insists he "kept trying to bring up" the situation in LA, but that Trump veered onto other subjects. However, Trump doubled down today and said: "Of course I did [talk about it]. The phone call was to deploy the troops. "I said: 'You're city is burning down, your state is in bad trouble.' "All I want is him to do a good job [...] he's doing a poor job." In an effort to checkmate Newsom, Trump brandished a screenshot showing a 16-minute call between the two at 1:23am on June 7. Newsom does not dispute that the call happened - but maintains that Trump "never once brought up the National Guard". Trump landed other personal jibes, mocking the California High-Speed Rail project which has run over budget and claiming that, without him, Newsom "wouldn't have LA". He said: "Between the fires and the riots, there would be nothing left. You have a governor that's incompetent, a mayor that's highly incompetent." 8


Sky News
39 minutes ago
- Sky News
Ballymena riots latest: Fire started 'after vandalism' at leisure centre as water cannon deployed in third night of disorder in N Ireland
Disorder has broken out in Northern Ireland for the third successive night, after police said people are "waking up with genuine fear for their lives" following two nights of violence in Ballymena and other areas. Follow the latest.