
Trump will slow, but may not stop the rise of electric vehicles
General Motors
and other automakers are increasing production of big pickups and SUVs. Republicans have killed incentives for electric vehicle purchases.
Electric vehicles have clearly lost momentum in the United States. And combustion engine cars and trucks are enjoying a renaissance to the dismay of environmentalists who worry about air pollution and greenhouse gases.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
But there's reason to believe that electric vehicles will remain a significant part of the U.S. car market and that sales of these models will eventually grow again in the coming months.
Electric vehicles from
Tesla
and some other automakers are less vulnerable to President Donald
Trump
's tariffs than many conventional cars because more of their parts are made in the United States. Advocacy groups are conducting marketing campaigns to emphasize the lower fuel costs and other advantages of electric vehicles. And automakers appear to realize that they cannot give up on electric cars if they hope to remain competitive globally.
Washington has become hostile to electric cars.
Live Events
Government policy on electric vehicles has reversed since Trump was elected. For consumers, the most visible change is the elimination of tax credits of up to $7,500 for electric vehicle purchases and leases.
The credits, which have existed in various forms since the early 2000s and were revived by Democrats when Joe Biden was president, will now expire at the end of September under the big policy and tax law that Trump signed in July.
The president in June described the federal incentives for electric vehicles as a "mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody wanted." The Biden administration's goal was for half of new car sales to be electric by the beginning of the next decade, meaning it would still have been easy to buy a gasoline car.
Analysts expect a spike in electric vehicle sales as people rush to take advantage of the credit, but a sharp decline afterward. By 2030, there will be 8.3 million fewer electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids on U.S. roads than there would have been if incentives had remained in place, according to a study led by Jesse Jenkins, an assistant professor at
Princeton University
.
Republicans have also abolished penalties for violations of clean air standards, which had pushed carmakers to produce electric vehicles. That has given carmakers a green light to produce more big pickups and SUVs that tend to be very profitable.
GM is among companies exploiting such policy changes. The carmaker, American's largest, is investing $900 million to manufacture V-8 engines near Buffalo, New York. Vehicles that run on gasoline or diesel now have "a longer runway," Mary T. Barra, GM's CEO, said last month.
But carmakers cannot give up on electric models.
U.S. electric vehicle sales rose just 1.5% in the first six months, according to Cox Automotive. But globally sales rose 28% to 9.1 million vehicles, according to
Rho Motion
, another research firm. That figure includes the United States and Canada as well as China and the
European Union
.
Carmakers that ignore this fast-growing market may not be in business 10 years from now. Barra acknowledged as much. "Despite slower EV industry growth, we believe the long-term future is profitable electric vehicle production," she said.
The growth of autonomous driving technology favors electric vehicles because it is much easier to integrate self-driving software into a car where all the systems are electronic.
"If you don't electrify fast enough you're also losing out on the autonomous transition, whenever that happens," said Anil Khurana, a professor at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business.
The quandary for GM and other automakers is that they do not yet make money from electric vehicles. Development costs are high, and sales volumes are too low to achieve the cost savings that come from mass production.
Ford said this week that it lost $1.3 billion on sales of electric cars during the second quarter, although it edged closer to profitability. Now that U.S. government policy has shifted in favor of fossil fuels, it will take longer for carmakers to turn a profit on electric vehicles.
Many groups remain committed to electric vehicles.
The tide has turned against electric vehicles in the halls of power, but there is still a political movement behind them.
Veloz, an organization whose members include automakers, utilities and charging companies, unveiled a video advertisement last month narrated by Nick Offerman, the actor best known for playing Ron Swanson on the sitcom "Parks and Recreation."
The ad highlights the easy maintenance of electric vehicles, which don't require oil changes. "EVs have fewer parts, fewer repairs and are less expensive to drive," Offerman says. The ad is part of a $43.5 million marketing campaign funded by Electrify America, a subsidiary of
Volkswagen
that operates fast chargers in the United States and Canada.
Many states still offer rebates of several thousand dollars on electric vehicle purchases, as do some utilities. Residents of California, one of the most generous states, can receive up to $12,000 toward the purchase of an electric vehicle or plug-in hybrid if they scrap an older vehicle with a combustion engine and meet certain income limits.
But electric vehicle bashing by Trump, who has called them "lunacy" and a "hoax," could be pushing some Republicans away from the technology, said Mike Murphy, the CEO of the
EV Politics Project
, a group that seeks to end what it calls "the needless partisan divide over EVs."
Republicans have long been skeptical of electric vehicles, but some showed more openness to the technology after Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, spent hundreds of millions of dollars to help elect Trump, Murphy said, citing survey data. Republican aversion to electric vehicles rose again after Musk and Trump fell out.
"The bashing does have an effect on Republican consumers," said Murphy, who previously worked as a Republican consultant.
EVs are getting better and cheaper.
Tesla's sales have been declining since last year, falling 14% in the April to June quarter. But the decline stems, in part, from the company's reliance on two older designs, the Model 3 and Model Y.
It is pretty clear that there is strong demand for electric vehicles if they are affordable, stylish and able to travel 300 miles or more between charges. GM more than doubled its sales of electric vehicles in the second quarter, helped by the Chevrolet Equinox, which has a starting price of around $35,000.
Tesla's decline creates an opening for other carmakers to convince buyers to try electric models.
Erin Keating, an executive analyst at Cox Automotive, describes herself as an "EV skeptic," but was impressed by a
Hyundai
Ioniq 9, a large electric SUV, that she drove recently. "It looks familiar to me," she said. "I'm not looking at it like it's a spaceship."
Keating said she expected sales of electric vehicles to grow gradually as more people like her become comfortable with the technology.
Electric vehicles typically cost thousands of dollars more than cars fueled by gasoline, but the tariffs that Trump has imposed on imported vehicles and parts could narrow the gap. Six of the 10 most American-made cars are electric, according to Cars.com, an online car buying site. The top four are Teslas. Volkswagen's ID.4 and
Kia
's EV6, which roll out of U.S. factories, also made the list.
"Certainly the more that a vehicle uses U.S. parts, the less impacted they are by tariffs," said David Greene, an industry analyst at Cars.com. But he added that retail prices would depend on how carmakers spread the cost of tariffs among different models.
The number of public chargers is growing even though the Trump administration has blocked federal funds that cover some of the cost. Nearly 17,000 new fast charging ports, which can recharge an electric vehicle in half an hour or less, will go into operation this year, the most in a single year, according to Paren, a research firm. Fear of not being able to charge is a big reason many people hesitate to buy electric vehicles.
Robert Barrosa, the CEO of Electrify America, said that some of its stations were in almost constant use, and there are still not enough chargers. That provides a strong incentive to keep building more.
"When you look at this more from a global perspective, the EV space is taking off," he said. "As much as people may try to push back against it, it's coming."
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
Despite war and warnings, US traded more with Russia than ally Ukraine
United States President Donald Trump on August 6 announced an additional tariff of 25 per cent on India, taking the total to 50 per cent, making tariffs on India one of the highest in the tariffs, as per Trump, are a sanction against India for importing fuel from Russia. Trump alleges that India, by doing this, has been financing the Russian invasion of data by the US Census Bureau presents a different picture.A deep dive into the monthly trade data of the US with Russia and Ukraine reveals that the US has been doing more trade with Russia than it is with since the war began in February 2022, the US-Russia total trade has stood at USD 25.233 billion, while the trade with Ukraine stands at a mere USD 9.69 we merely look at import data for the two nations, as Trump's major concern is India financing Russia through imports, we see a trend that exposes US hypocrisy. In 2022, US imports from Russia stood at USD 14.43 billion, while imports from Ukraine stood at $1.503 billion In 2023, US imports from Russia stood at USD 4.57 billion, while imports from Ukraine fell to USD 1.39 billion In 2024, US imports from Russia stood at USD 3 billion, while imports from Ukraine stood at USD 1.17 billion In 2025, till June, US imports from Russia stood at USD 2billion while imports from Ukraine stood at merely USD 769 trend is clear, in terms of imports. Even though substantially reduced, the US continues to buy from Russia more than it does from all, the US has imported goods worth over USD 22 billion from Russia, ever since Ukraine was attacked, while has only imported goods worth USD 4 billion in the same time period from we take a look at the percentage increase in Indian trade cooperation with Ukraine, when it comes to Ukrainian imports to India, since the the war began during FY 2021-22, India imported USD 3.38 billion worth of goods from Ukraine, as per data published by the Indian Embassy in Kyiv, while in 2024-25 this data stood at USD 1.2 billion, which stands more than what the US buys from the war-torn the data is clear: While the US has accused India of arming and financing the Russian war, it is the US which is financing Russia more than it is financing Ukraine through trade, while India is balancing its partnership without taking a side and without financing any one side.- EndsTune InMust Watch


New Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump delivers a steady stream of wins for his conservative Christian base
In his first half-year in office — amid his tariff campaign, government-slashing moves and immigration crackdown — President Donald Trump has also repeatedly delivered for conservative Christians, who form the bedrock of his Republican support. While he has made overtures to Jewish, Muslim and other religious groups, his Christian supporters have been among his most high-profile surrogates and appointees. The Trump administration has green-lit political endorsements from the pulpit and encouraged religion in the federal workplace. Trump has established faith-focused entities with numerous influential Christian appointees. He's energised supporters with assaults on cultural and academic targets long seen as liberal bastions. His administration and his Supreme Court appointees have expanded areas for religious exemptions and expression in the public square. "We're bringing back religion in our country," Trump contended at a Rose Garden event on the National Day of Prayer in May. His faith adviser, pastor Paula White-Cain, proclaimed that in his administration, faith "has been brought back to where it always belongs, and that is centre." Critics say he's eroding the separation of church and state. "The ones celebrating this are the ones leaning toward this Christian nationalist bent, this ideology that Christians should have dominion over the United States government," said the Rev. Shannon Fleck, executive director of Faithful America, a progressive Christian group. "A president with a true Christian agenda would be most concerned with uplifting those in our country who have been cast aside," she said. "The most vulnerable among us are not billionaires. Those most vulnerable among us are not these manipulators of Christianity that are seeking nothing but power."


Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's tariffs on India and US–Russia trade: A double standard? What data reveals
The Indian government and the country's top leaders called out the "double standards" of the United States and the European Union, which criticised India for buying oil from Russia. US President Donald Trump on August 6 imposed a 25 per cent additional tariff on India and also threatened penalties for doing trade with Russia 'at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine'. With India's sharp response to Trump's "unjustified" and "unreasonable" tariff, the focus has now shifted to the trade the US itself does with Russia while condemning India for doing it. India said in a statement on August 4 that the US 'continues to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in its nuclear power industry, palladium, fertilisers and chemicals'. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor also pointed out that the US continues to import uranium, palladium and various other products from Russia. Notably, both the US and the EU have sharply scaled back their trade ties with Russia since it launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The US also banned oil imports from Russia in March 2022. However, they still import billions of euros worth of Russian energy and commodities, including liquefied natural gas and enriched uranium. According to the United States Census Bureau, US imports from Russia fell to around $2.50 billion in the first half of 2025 (June 2025) from $14.14 billion four years earlier. "In May 2025, the US exported $51.4 million and imported $540 million from Russia, resulting in a negative trade balance of $488 million," The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) revealed. According to the United States Trade Representative, US goods and services trade with Russia totalled an estimated $5.2 billion in 2024 — down 25.8 per cent ($1.8 billion) from 2023. $3.5 billion: US total goods trade (exports plus imports) with Russia in 2024 $528.3 million: US goods exports to Russia in 2024 $3.0 billion: US goods imports from Russia 2024 $2.4 billion: US goods trade deficit with Russia in 2024 $1.6 billion: US total services trade (exports plus imports) with Russia in 2024 $1.3 billion: US services exports to Russia in 2024 $384 million: US services imports from Russia in 2024 $873 million: US services trade surplus with Russia in 2024 Source: According to OEC, in May 2025, the US' main imports from Russia were radioactive chemicals, nitrogenous fertilisers, and platinum ($122M). Here are key products the US reportedly imported from Russia in 2024, as per OEC data, Trading Economics and other reports: 1. Fertilisers/nitrogenous fertilisers: Fertilisers were the most-imported commodity to the US from Russia in the first 11 months of 2024, as per Statista. Last year, the US imported around $1.27 billion of Russian fertilisers, up slightly from $1.14 billion in 2021. 2. Radioactive chemicals: The US imported enriched uranium and plutonium from Russia worth around $624 million in 2024, down from $646 million in 2021. 3. Palladium: Russia exported palladium to the US for around $878 million in 2024, down from $1.59 billion in 2021, according to Reuters. Source: OEC Some other products imported by the US from Russia are: 1. Precious stones and metals 4. Wood and articles of wood 5. Nuclear reactors and machinery (HS code 84): $80.81 million 8. Aircraft, spacecraft & parts thereof 10. Oil seeds and oleaginous fruits The US recently imposed a whopping 50 per cent tariff on Indian product imports. US President Donald Trump even threatened unspecified penalties against India for buying Russian oil. India, meanwhile, justified buying Russian oil and said on Wednesday, "...our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India." Taking a dig at the US and the EU over "unjustified" and "unreasonable" targeting of India, the Ministry of External Affairs said that the "very nations" criticising the country for buying Russian oil are 'themselves indulging in trade with Russia.'