Judges question whether Trump tariffs are authorized by emergency powers
U.S. appeals court judges sharply questioned on July 31 whether President Donald Trump's tariffs were justified by the president's emergency powers, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., is considering the legality of "reciprocal" tariffs that Trump imposed on a broad range of U.S. trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico.
In hearing arguments in two cases brought by five small U.S. businesses and 12 Democratic-led U.S. states, judges pressed government lawyer Brett Shumate to explain how the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, gave Trump the power to impose tariffs.
More: Trump's final stumbling blocks for countries hoping to avoid tariff hikes: Live updates
Trump is the first president to use IEEPA to impose tariffs.
"IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them," one of the judges said.
Shumate said that the law allows for "extraordinary" authority in an emergency, including the ability to stop imports completely. He said IEEPA authorizes tariffs because it allows a president to "regulate" imports in a crisis.
The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners - mark the first test before a U.S. appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices.
Trump has said the April tariffs were a response to persistent U.S. trade imbalances and declining U.S. manufacturing power.
More: Trade whiplash: Appeals Court allows Trump to keep tariffs while appeal plays out
He said the tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing U.S. borders. The countries have denied that claim.
"Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again," Trump wrote in a social media post on Thursday. "To all of my great lawyers who have fought so hard to save our Country, good luck in America's big case today."
The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued that they are not permissible under IEEPA and that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes.
The case is being heard by a panel of all of the court's active judges, eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by former Republican presidents. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Trade negotiations
Tariffs are starting to build into a significant revenue source for the federal government, with customs duties in June quadrupling to about $27 billion, a record, and through June have topped $100 billion for the current fiscal year. That income could be crucial to offset lost revenue from Trump's tax bill passed into law earlier this month.
But economists say the duties threaten to raise prices for U.S. consumers and reduce corporate profits. Trump's
on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted U.S. companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices.
Dan Rayfield, the attorney general of Oregon, one of the states challenging the levies, said that the tariffs were a "regressive tax" that is making household items more expensive. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that challenged Trump. It said that the IEEPA did not authorize tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits.
The Federal Circuit has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan, following smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam.
Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations, while other Trump officials have said that negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set an August 1 date for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals.
There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California.
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump in one of those cases, and no judge has yet backed Trump's claim of unlimited emergency tariff authority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BAE Systems (LON:BA.) Is Due To Pay A Dividend Of £0.135
The board of BAE Systems plc (LON:BA.) has announced that it will pay a dividend of £0.135 per share on the 3rd of December. The payment will take the dividend yield to 1.8%, which is in line with the average for the industry. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. BAE Systems' Projected Earnings Seem Likely To Cover Future Distributions Solid dividend yields are great, but they only really help us if the payment is sustainable. The last dividend was quite easily covered by BAE Systems' earnings. This means that a large portion of its earnings are being retained to grow the business. Over the next year, EPS is forecast to expand by 44.9%. Assuming the dividend continues along recent trends, we think the payout ratio could be 37% by next year, which is in a pretty sustainable range. See our latest analysis for BAE Systems BAE Systems Has A Solid Track Record The company has been paying a dividend for a long time, and it has been quite stable which gives us confidence in the future dividend potential. The annual payment during the last 10 years was £0.205 in 2015, and the most recent fiscal year payment was £0.33. This means that it has been growing its distributions at 4.9% per annum over that time. Slow and steady dividend growth might not sound that exciting, but dividends have been stable for ten years, which we think makes this a fairly attractive offer. The Dividend Looks Likely To Grow The company's investors will be pleased to have been receiving dividend income for some time. We are encouraged to see that BAE Systems has grown earnings per share at 12% per year over the past five years. Since earnings per share is growing at an acceptable rate, and the payout policy is balanced, we think the company is positioning itself well to grow earnings and dividends in the future. BAE Systems Looks Like A Great Dividend Stock Overall, we think this could be an attractive income stock, and it is only getting better by paying a higher dividend this year. Distributions are quite easily covered by earnings, which are also being converted to cash flows. All of these factors considered, we think this has solid potential as a dividend stock. Investors generally tend to favour companies with a consistent, stable dividend policy as opposed to those operating an irregular one. Still, investors need to consider a host of other factors, apart from dividend payments, when analysing a company. Taking the debate a bit further, we've identified 1 warning sign for BAE Systems that investors need to be conscious of moving forward. Looking for more high-yielding dividend ideas? Try our collection of strong dividend payers. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
From flag poles to a $200 million ballroom: Inside Trump's ‘legacy project' at the White House
Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump held plenty of meetings at the White House this summer: with foreign delegations striking trade deals, Cabinet members plotting a government overhaul and industry executives seeking tariff relief. But amid the various audiences, he's also found time for discussions of a different purpose. In recent weeks, Trump has gathered officials with varying responsibilities on the White House campus — including from the National Park Service, the White House Military Office and the Secret Service — to talk over his ideas for transforming the building and its grounds to his liking. His specifications have been exacting, including finishes that closely resemble his gold-trimmed private clubs — or, in some cases, have been shipped directly from Mar-a-Lago. His ambitions extend well beyond a temporary cosmetic makeover. 'It'll be a great legacy project,' he said Thursday of his plans to construct a 90,000-square-foot ballroom off the East Wing of the mansion. 'And I think it'll be special.' No president in recent memory has put his physical imprint on the executive mansion or its plot of land as much as Trump has done this year. Barely six months after reentering office, his aspirations to dramatically alter the White House have now entered an advanced stage. Two large flagpoles now tower over the North and South Lawns, their massive stars-and-stripes visible even to passengers landing at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport five miles away. Trump personally dictated the poles' galvanized steel, tapered design and interior ropes, and oversaw their installation in June. The Rose Garden has been stripped of its grass and paved over with stone, an attempt to replicate the patio at Mar-a-Lago, where Trump dines al fresco during his weekends away from Washington. The president made frequent check-ins this summer with the orange-shirted workers tearing out the grass and reinforcing the ground underneath, at one point inviting them into the Oval Office for a photo. Presidential seals have been embedded into the stone, and the drainage grates are styled like American flags. The Oval Office itself is adorned with lashings of gold decoration, which Trump ordered up from a craftsman in Florida who'd worked on his Palm Beach estate, people familiar with the matter said. Tiny gold cherubs looking down from above the doorways came straight from Mar-a-Lago. And soon, construction will begin on the new ballroom, whose footprint will amount to the first major extension of the White House in decades. Trump said he, along with other private donors, will foot the $200 million bill. (He also has said he paid for the flag poles and funded the Rose Garden renovations through private donations, without disclosing the price tag of either.) 'President Trump is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail,' White House chief of staff Susie Wiles said in a statement this week. 'The President and the Trump White House are fully committed to working with the appropriate organizations to preserving the special history of the White House.' Renderings provided by the White House depict a vast space with gold and crystal chandeliers, gilded Corinthian columns, a coffered ceiling with gold inlays, gold floor lamps and a checkered marble floor. Three walls of arched windows look out over the White House's south grounds. The gold-and-white style closely mimics the Louis XIV-style main event room at Mar-a-Lago. Trump has not shied away from drawing comparisons to his clubs. 'No president knew how to build a ballroom,' Trump said last weekend, meeting the European Commission president in another of his crystal-draped ballrooms, this one at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. 'I could take this one, drop it right down there, and it would be beautiful.' Trump's impulse to make his own improvements is animated by several factors, he and his aides say. One is a builder's instinct, cultivated over decades in real estate and never quite extinguished when he entered politics a decade ago. 'I love construction,' Trump told reporters as he was watching his new flagpoles going up in June. 'I know it better than anybody.' Another is Trump's genuine belief that aspects of the White House can be improved, even as he voices reverence for the building itself. 'It won't interfere with the current building,' he said of the new ballroom this week, which the White House says will triple the amount of indoor ballroom space and eliminate the need for temporary tents to host state dinners. 'It'll be near it, but not touching it, and pays total respect to the existing building, which I'm the biggest fan of. It's my favorite place.' The alternative, he said, was an unpleasant solution that he said didn't match the dignity of a state affair. 'When it rains, it's a disaster,' he said. 'People slopping down to the tent — it's not a pretty sight, the women with their lovely evening gowns, all of their hair all done, and they're a mess by the time they get (there).' Trump said last week that a new ballroom had long been an aspiration of his predecessors. But officials in previous administrations said the concept never arose. 'We never had the desire nor did I ever hear or participate in a conversation to build a ballroom on the White House lawn. We were focused on issues that actually affected people and communities,' said Deesha Dyer — who, as social secretary in President Barack Obama's administration, was responsible for organizing major events like state dinners. The vision of a new White House ballroom has been floating in Trump's mind dating back at least to 2010, when he called Obama's White House proposing to build one. Officials at the time weren't quite sure what to make of the offer. 'I'm not sure that it would be appropriate to have a shiny gold Trump sign on any part of the White House,' then-press secretary Josh Earnest, who confirmed the offer, said in 2015. Trump, however, was serious about it and seemed affronted to be turned down. 'It was going to cost about $100 million,' Trump said during his first term. 'I offered to do it, and I never heard back.' By the time he was in office for his first term, Trump has said he was too consumed with defending himself from his perceived enemies to get it done. 'I had to focus,' he said earlier this year. 'I was the hunted. And now I'm the hunter. There's a big difference.' Now in his second term, Trump says he is unencumbered by naysayers questioning his design ambitions. And he has forged ahead with the most extensive reshaping of the executive mansion in decades, dictated mainly by his own tastes. While his cosmetic changes to the Oval Office will likely go with him when he departs in 2029, the other changes he's made could be more lasting. Removing the flagpoles could risk appearing unpatriotic. Tearing out the Rose Garden pavers would be costly. And once a nearly quarter-billion-dollar, 650-person ballroom is built, it's unlikely to be torn down. 'People's tastes differ. I will say this about presidential changes: Some are long-lasting and embraced by the American people. And some just disappear,' said Tim Naftali, a presidential historian at Columbia University. He cited Theodore Roosevelt's addition of mounted moose and elk heads in the State Dining Room as a detail that didn't withstand time. 'What President Trump does inside the Trump ballroom may not survive the Trump presidency,' Naftali said. 'As long as the bones of the structure are good, future presidents will be able to redesign that space as they see fit.' In Trump's own telling, the additions will contribute to his legacy — akin to the Truman Balcony the 33rd president added to the second floor of the building, or the Lincoln Bedroom the 16th president used as an office. Nearly every president has put his own mark on the building, either through individual fancies or practical necessity, going all the way back to its construction in 1792. 'The White House has been shaped by the visions and priorities of its occupants, from Jefferson's colonnades to Truman's monumental gutting,' wrote White House Historical Foundation President Stewart McLaurin in a recent essay. 'Each change, whether Jackson's North Portico, Arthur's opulent redecoration, or Clinton's security measures—has sparked debate, reflecting tensions between preservation and modernization, aesthetics and functionality, and openness and security.' McLaurin said often, in time, the changes have come to be accepted by the public. 'Media and Congressional criticisms have often focused on costs, historical integrity, and timing, yet many of these alterations have become integral to the identity of the White House, and it is difficult for us to imagine The White House today without these evolutions and additions,' he wrote. For Trump, making the additions integral to the White House's identity is part of the plan. He has raised questions about the renovations even in meetings ostensibly meant for other purposes. 'Who would gold-leaf it?' he asked members of his Cabinet in early July, gesturing to ceiling moldings in the West Wing. 'Could you raise your hands?' One member of his Cabinet, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., offered a several-minute aside during the start of a speech this week to praise the president's updates. 'I've been coming to this building for 65 years and I have to say that it has never looked better,' said Kennedy, the nephew of President John F. Kennedy and his wife Jacqueline. Like Trump, Jackie Kennedy took intense interest in improving the White House. She undertook an extensive redecoration of the State Floor, including procuring antiques and paintings from wealthy philanthropists to improve the building's grandeur. Much of her designs remain in place today. She also oversaw a redesign of the Rose Garden with the help of heiress and famed horticulturalist Rachel 'Bunny' Mellon, turning the space into a grassy and floral respite from the Oval Office nearby. Now, the grass is mostly gone. Trump, who had voiced concern about women's high heels sinking into the soil during events, selected light-colored square pavers to replace the lawn. 'It's always extraordinary to go into that sacred space, but I have to say that it looked kind of drab in the pictures,' Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said of looking back on old family photos of the Oval Office during his uncle's era. 'It looks the opposite of drab today.'
Los Angeles Times
23 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. city leaders are in high-stakes negotiations on Olympics costs
Los Angeles city leaders are at a critical juncture ahead of the 2028 Summer Olympics, with potentially hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars at stake. They are in negotiations with LA28, the private committee overseeing the Games, for the use of the city's police, traffic officers and other employees during the Olympics and Paralympics. Millions of visitors are expected to pour into downtown L.A., the Sepulveda Basin and the Westside when the Olympics kick off in July 2028. Security, trash removal, traffic control, paramedics and more will be needed during the 17-day event and the two-week Paralympics the following month. Under the 2021 Games agreement between LA28 and the city, LA28 must reimburse the city for any services that go beyond what the city would provide on a normal day. The two parties must agree by Oct. 1, 2025, on 'enhanced services' — additional city services needed for the Games, beyond that normal level — and determine rates, repayment timelines, audit rights and other processes. LA28 has billed the Games as a 'no cost' event for the city. Depending on how 'enhanced services' are defined, the city, which is in a precarious financial state, could end up bearing significant costs. One of the biggest expenses will be security, with the LAPD, as well as a host of other local, state and federal agencies, working together to keep athletes and spectators safe. Overtime for Los Angeles police officers, and any other major expenses, would be acutely felt by a city government that recently closed a nearly $1-billion budget deficit, in part by slowing police hiring. The city continues to face rising labor costs and diminished revenues from tourism. At the same time, President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, recently passed by Congress, includes $1 billion for security and planning of the Games. But what those funds will cover — and what will be covered by LA28 — are not yet known. Against that backdrop, civil rights attorney Connie Rice sent a six-page letter dated July 17 to Mayor Karen Bass and other city leaders, asking questions about the enhanced services agreement and urging the city to take a tough stance. Rice said city staffers reached out to her because they were worried that the agreement wouldn't adequately protect the city. 'Los Angeles faces multiple fiscal hazards that many current leaders negotiating this and other Olympics agreements, will not be around to face,' Rice wrote. 'The City cannot afford an additional $1.5 billion hit in 2028 because city officials inadequately protected taxpayers in 2025.' Rice's letter asks if LA28 and the city have resolved differences about the definition of venue 'footprints,' or perimeters around sporting events, with the footprint changing depending on whether it's defined by a blast radius, a security perimeter or other factors. The letter questioned why LA28 isn't paying the city up front for costs, using money in escrow, and asked if LA28 has provided the city with a budget for security, transit and sanitation. Rice, in an interview, said she wants to ensure the Games are indeed 'no cost.' Both Paul Krekorian, who heads Mayor Karen Bass' major events office, and an LA28 representative declined to directly address Rice's letter. 'The City and LA28 have been collaborating for years to ensure that all Angelenos benefit from the Games for decades to come,' said Krekorian. 'While the [agreement] is currently under negotiation, we fully expect that LA28 will be successful in its fundraising efforts to deliver the Games.' The city routinely provides police officers and traffic officers for major events, such as Dodgers games and the Grammy Awards. In 2022, the Rams reimbursed the city $1.5 million for resources it provided for the team's Super Bowl parade, according to City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo. Last month, Szabo's office released a document on the city's investor website outlining potential liabilities facing the city, including some related to the 2028 Games. The document noted that roughly $1 billion in security costs will have to be paid by the city if they are not covered by LA28 or the federal government. Jacie Prieto Lopez, LA28's vice president of communications, told The Times that security and other planning costs haven't been finalized. Rice's letter questioned whether LA28 would cover the cost of security. Prieto Lopez didn't directly answer when asked by The Times if LA28 will cover the LAPD's expenses. 'We are grateful that the Administration and Congress recently appropriated $1 billion in security funding and we will continue to work with our partners at the federal, state and local levels, including the City of LA, to ensure a safe, secure and successful Games,' Prieto Lopez said in an email. How the $1 billion from the Big Beautiful Bill is distributed will be determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency through the Homeland Security Grant Program, which is focused on preventing terrorism and other threats. Anita Gore, a spokesperson for the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, told The Times that she expects those funds to be managed by the state through the Homeland Security Grant process. The Office of Emergency Services is the 'coordination hub' for the Games and is overseeing a statewide task force focused on security, traffic management and more, Gore said. At a recent hearing in Sacramento, LA28 Chief Executive Reynold Hoover said the nonprofit continues to push for federal support for the Games. He said the $1 billion recently approved by Congress will 'help us with that initial funding requirements for security.' Hoover told a Senate subcommittee in June that LA28 is asking the federal government to fully reimburse the public agencies that will provide critical security at the Games. A representative for the Department of Homeland Security declined to answer questions about how the $1 billion will be used. Trump's mercurial nature and past attacks on California make it difficult for some city leaders to gauge how his administration will handle funding for the Games. Rep. Nellie Pou of New Jersey, the top Democrat on the Congressional Task Force for Enhancing Security for Special Events, held a public hearing last month on preparing for the World Cup and Olympics. She told The Times that she has not received any specifics about the $1 billion. 'This administration has withheld and frozen other federal funding appropriated by Congress, so we cannot simply assume that World Cup or Olympic security funding will make it to our communities,' she said. Krekorian, when asked about Pou's concerns, said the city 'is in direct communication with state and federal partners, as well as LA28, about the allocation of these funds.'
