
"I Can't Believe It Got Made Then, Much Less Now": 33 Movies That Aged Worse Than Milk On A Hot Summer Day
A while back, Reddit user mnightshamalama2 asked r/moviecritic about movies that have aged poorly, and there were a LOT — ranging from the '80s right up until just a few years ago. Here are some people can't even stomach watching in 2025.
1. 1988's Big, starring Tom Hanks, which has a romantic plot revolving around a child (in a grown man's body) with an adult woman:
"It's super creepy with the romantic interest and implied sex. And then when Tom Hanks turns back into a kid, the adult girlfriend drops him off near his house and watches him walk home."
— u/downhillderbyracer
"Aww, she just fucked a 13-year-old in a man's body, then watched him turn back into a 13-year-old…"
— u/fasting4me
2. 1994's Blank Check, which includes an FBI agent in her twenties kissing a child:
Walt Disney Pictures / Via youtube.com
3. 2017's The Greatest Showman, which paints P.T. Barnum, played by Hugh Jackman, in a way better light than he deserves:
" The Greatest Showman is a wonderful musical movie that immediately falls apart if you know anything about how much of a piece of shit PT Barnum was. Like most of the movie is totally decoupled from reality, so why is Hugh Jackman playing P.T. Barnum specifically? Why not make a name with a similar cadence so that the whole movie is clearly fictional? E.G. Tartan would be a totally fine name for this fictional inspirational circus ringleader."
4. 1994's Milk Money, which includes a sex worker (played by Melanie Griffith) showing preteen boys her bare chest:
" Milk Money (1994), where preteen boys pay a sex worker (Melanie Griffith) to see her topless. She goes along with it, and then one of the kids tries hooking his Dad (Ed Harris) up with her. If genders were reversed, it would never be shown again."
— u/No-Building-3798
"It was creepy when it came out; now it's another level of messed up."
— u/Coffeecupsreddit
5. 1995's Dangerous Minds, which is just a massive white savior movie starring Michelle Pfeiffer as a teacher in a disadvantaged community:
"I was at a cabin with a bunch of VHS movies, and we picked Dangerous Minds. It was some more white savior bullshit. The part that got me was when Michele Pfifer's character was confronted by the mother of some of the kids, saying something along the lines of, 'My kids don't need no school! They gots bills ta pay!'"
— u/superanx
6. And 2011's The Help, starring Emma Stone and Viola Davis, which centers on a white woman in a story about Black maids in the South:
7. 2001's A Beautiful Mind, starring Russell Crowe, which is just extremely inaccurate:
"A Beautiful Mind is basically a hit piece on John Nash and did him dirty. Basically, most of the stuff they used to portray him as out of his mind was not factual in any way. No, he didn't see invisible people... for fuck's sake, man. If you rewatch it now, it is wild it won Best Picture."
— u/drawkbox
8. 2015's Stonewall, which completely erased the role of trans people and BIPOC in the Stonewall riots, replacing them with a cisgender white man played by Jeremy Irvine:
9. 2016's Me Before You, which stars Sam Claflin instead of a disabled actor in the leading role, and also has a super problematic message:
" Me Before You has the underlying message that you are better off killing yourself if you are disabled with a non-disabled partner because ending your own life is the romantic thing to do. ... Disabled actors still suffer a lot of prejudice and rarely get cast in roles where disability is not the storyline, and yet non-disabled actors took most of the disabled roles."
— u/Imaginary-Mammoth-61
10. 2011's Crazy Stupid Love, starring Steve Carell, which ends with a 17-year-old giving a 13-year-old her nudes:
"For the most part, the movie's alright — not great but alright — but holy shit, the ending. How was that allowed? In the movie, there are a bunch of different love triangles. ... Steve Carell's children's babysitter, who is 17, is in love with him, and his son, who is 13, is in love with her. Steve Carell doesn't know she's in love with him, so to get his attention, she takes nudes. This is already fucking weird for a movie, but here's where it goes from fucking weird to illegal. At the end of the movie, when Steve gets back together with his wife in this standard rom-com format, the kid goes and talks to the babysitter. They have a parting moment, and she gives the kid her nude photos to look at. Keep in mind she's 17 in the movie, and he's 13. And Steve Carell and his wife are fine with it. I'm like wtf, how did Chris Hanson not appear and make them take a seat?"
— [deleted]
11. 1999's American Beauty, which stars Kevin Spacey as he develops a sexual obsession with his daughter's teenage friend:
"Kevin Spacey seduces a teenager who was more talk than she was action and ultimately was unprepared for an adult relationship. Yeah…"
— None
"The plot point about Kevin Spacey being mistaken as a closeted gay man that preys on teenage boys is too on the nose."
— nbwoodelf
"I tried watching that twice in the last year, but I couldn't get past the first quarter of the movie. I keep hearing what a great movie it is, but I'm not feeling it."
— u/Comfortable-Owl-5929
12. 1999's American Pie, which features sex crimes played for laughs:
"When they filmed the exchange student undressing, they were creating child sex abuse images."
— u/reckless-ryean
"A friend and I watched this movie recently, excited to relive it after watching it as teenagers. When they set up that webcam to spy on Nadia, we were fucking mortified. I genuinely forgot about that movie and looking back now, good lord is that scene fucked-up. Not just the child sex abuse images, like you said, but the utter violation of her privacy. Gross."
— u/Positive_Laugh6946
13. 2016's Passengers, which features a man (played by Christ Pratt) accidentally waking up on a 120-year-long trip to another planet, then condemning a female passenger (played by Jennifer Lawrence) to the same fate by waking her up as well because he's lonely:
"Chris Pratt forces Jennifer Lawrence to wake up from induced sleep meant to get her to a new planet and condemns her to spend the rest of her life with him as there's no way to put her back to sleep. Then she falls in love with him anyway, even after she finds out what he did."
— u/Unusual_Resident_784
"It's a great premise…for a horror movie."
— u/zorionek0
14. 1984's Revenge of the Nerds, which uses a rape scene as a triumphant moment for a main character:
15. Similarly, 2005's Wedding Crashers, which includes a scene where Gloria (played by Isla Fisher) rapes Jeremy (played by Vince Vaughn):
16. 2011's Horrible Bosses, which also plays male rape for laughs when it comes to Jennifer Aniston and Charlie Day's characters:
New Line Cinema / Rat Entertainment / Via youtube.com
"The female boss sexually harasses Charlie Day's character, and we're supposed to think it's funny because she's Jennifer Aniston, and she's hot."
— u/Xalbana
17. 2000's Dude, Where's My Car, starring Seann William Scott and Ashton Kutcher, which has a bunch of racist moments:
20th Century Fox /Courtesy Everett Collection
"I still love this movie despite it all, but I showed it to my best friend, who's Asian, with her younger brother. I felt so embarrassed to have hyped up the movie so much; I definitely didn't catch all the racist remarks because I just looked at it like a goofy movie. It opened my eyes in a bad way."
— u/pombasion
18. 1994's Ace Ventura: Pet Detective, starring Jim Carrey, where the villain (played by Sean Young) turns out to be a man living as a woman to escape capture by the police...leading to this moment when Ace realizes he kissed a man:
Morgan Creek Productions / Via youtube.com
— u/Cthulus-lefttentacle
19. 2003's Anger Management, starring Jack Nicholson and Adam Sandler, which is just offensive all around:
Columbia / courtesy Everett Collection
"I'm frankly a little horrified that I ever found Anger Management even slightly amusing. It's sexist, anti-gay, and treats sexual assault like a joke. That film is fucking disgusting."
— u/LordCamelslayer
20. 2009's 17 Again, starring Zac Efron, which includes multiple scenes of a teenager unknowingly trying to seduce her own father (who is in a 17-year-old's body):
New Line Cinema / Offspring Entertainment / Via youtube.com
"A 40-year-old goes back to high school, and his own daughter tries to hook up with him…no thanks."
— u/BoldNorthMN
21. 2010's The Switch, starring Jason Bateman and Jennifer Aniston, where a man switches in his sperm for his friend's chosen donor's sperm, leading her to get pregnant with his child instead:
Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures / Via youtube.com
"Bateman's character fathers Aniston's character's baby without her knowledge/consent by replacing the donation sperm she uses to self-impregnate with his own. The movie plays as a romcom, and I can't believe it got made then, much less now."
— u/pheboglobi
22. 1995's Heavyweights, which is about a children's weight loss camp:
Richard Cartwright / Buena Vista Pictures / Courtesy Everett Collection
"Not in the same vein as a lot of the others mentioned, but Heavyweights was a 90s DISNEY movie about a kids 'fat camp' starring Ben Stiller, and in today's body-positive times, I feel it wouldn't have been received the same way."
— u/mountlax12
23. 1995's While You Were Sleeping, which is about a woman (played by Sandra Bullock) pretending to be a comatose man's fiancé:
Hollywood Pictures / Caravan Pictures / Via youtube.com
"Getting fake-engaged to a vegetable is creepy. Keeping up the charade and nearly tricking him into marrying you for real after he wakes up is downright rapey. Then you get engaged to his brother whom you've known for all of 1-2 weeks? That's only marginally better. Also, it's set in Chicago, but you only see 2-3 Black people in the entire movie."
— u/Ms_Rarity
24. 2000's Road Trip, which features a man trying to intercept his sex tape with another woman before his girlfriend sees it...and has lines like this:
The Montecito Picture Company / Via youtube.com
"The plot is very dated. It is still a favorite of mine."
— u/K-Toon
25. 2006's Lucky Number Slevin, starring Bruce Willis, Lucy Liu, and Josh Hartnett, which is just constantly casually anti-gay:
The Weinstein Company LLC/Courtesy Everett Collection
"I just rewatched Lucky Number Slevin, and it's pretty jarring how casually anti-gay the main characters are. I can still enjoy the movie to a certain degree. But woof. Very bad in retrospect."
— u/themilkywayfarer
26. 1987's Overboard, starring Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell, which has a wildly problematic premise:
MGM/UA Distribution Co. / Via youtube.com
"A rich married woman falls off a boat and gets amnesia. Her husband takes the opportunity to pretend he doesn't know her. Kurt Rusell shows up at the hospital, claims her as his wife, and then takes her home to help raise his four kids."
— u/Modredastal
27. 2005's Hitch, which stars Will Smith as a major creep:
Columbia Pictures / Via youtube.com
"It's still held up as a cute romantic comedy, but Hitch is just fricken creepy. The first scene involves kidnapping a dog and pretending it gets hit by a car to trick a lady into liking the guy who 'saved' it. The whole movie's creepy."
— u/TvAzteca
28. 2009's (500) Days of Summer, which unfairly paints Summer (played by Zooey Deschanel) as the villain even though Tom (played by Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is clearly in the wrong:
Fox Searchlight/Courtesy Everett Collection
"Horrible movie. Joseph Gordon-Levitt's character is a proto-incel."
— u/yourfriendkyle
"I loved that movie when I was younger. The older I get, the more I realize how Summer was upfront about what she did and did not want, but Tom kept trying to force her into what he wanted. He even has the nerve to try and make it seem like she mistreated him and his feelings."
— u/Remy149
29. 1999's Never Been Kissed, where a teacher falls for a student (played by Drew Barrymore) not knowing she's 25:
Fox 2000 Pictures / Via youtube.com
"Never Been Kissed is about a teacher essentially grooming a student and then is angry with her when she isn't a teenager but is actually a grown woman."
— u/highly88
30. 2010's Knight and Day, which features Cameron Diaz's character getting repeatedly drugged by Tom Cruise's character:
Frank Masi / 20th Century Fox / Courtesy Everett Collection
" Knight and Day?! Anyone?! I feel like no one sees this movie as problematic when it's literally based on Tom Cruise repeatedly drugging and kidnapping Cameron Diaz 😭😭 it always seriously disturbs me when I see it on TV."
— u/sunny_d55
31. 2004's The Notebook, starring Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams, which focuses on a wildly toxic love story:
Gran Via / Via youtube.com
"The dynamic between the main couple was LOADED TO THE BRIM with red flags. And people thought THAT was romantic!?"
— u/Far-Revolution3225
32. 1984's Sixteen Candles, which includes a guy "giving" his drunk girlfriend to a classmate:
Universal Pictures/Channel Productions / Via youtube.com
"One boy gives another boy his unconscious girlfriend to rape, and everyone is just okay with it in the morning, including the girlfriend. So wrong."
— u/StarMom94
33. And finally...2020's Hillbilly Elegy, starring Gabriel Basso, Glenn Close, and Amy Adams, which is a portrait of the people of Appalachia based on a memoir by one of the most hateful people on Earth:
Lacey Terrell / Netflix / Courtesy Everett Collection
"I'm going out on a limb and say Hillbilly Elegy."
— u/kyflyboy
"Looking like Hillbilly Elegy is on its way to turning into a hunk of gorgonzola."
— u/MisterMasque2021
What movie do you think has aged really, really poorly? Let us know in the comments below!
Comments have been edited for length/clarity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hollywood enters AI scraping wars with new lawsuit from Disney and NBCUniversal
Disney (DIS) and NBCUniversal sued an artificial intelligence developer for allegedly infringing on their protected works, the first Hollywood corporate titans to join a mushrooming legal war pitting copyright holders against AI upstarts training their models with data scraped from the internet. In a lawsuit filed on Wednesday in a Los Angeles Federal District Court, Disney and NBCUniversal said that AI image-creating platform Midjourney pirated images without authorization. Midjourney obtained copies of Disney's Star Wars, Minions, and other characters through unauthorized libraries containing works from two Hollywood studios, according to the complaint. Its software allows people to create images from the companies' popular fictional characters, the suit said. The companies included AI-generated images of characters ranging from Darth Vader and Buzz Lightyear to the Minions and Spider-Man. 'Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing,' Disney said in its complaint. Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company is defending itself in another federal case in California brought by artists who allege Midjourney illegally trained its AI image generation models on their copyrighted works. The latest confrontation expands the number of high-profile cases from copyright holders seeking to guard their works from the reach of technology firms. A question at the heart of all these lawsuits: Can artificial intelligence companies use copyrighted material to train generative AI models without asking the owner of that data for permission? Another such clash came earlier this week when social media site Reddit (RDDT) sued AI startup Anthropic ( a company backed by tech giants Amazon (AMZN) and Google (GOOG, GOOGL) that created the AI language model Claude. Reddit is claiming in the new lawsuit that Anthropic intentionally scraped Reddit users' personal data without their consent and then put their data to work training Claude. Reddit said in its complaint that Anthropic "bills itself as the white knight of the AI industry" and argues that "it is anything but." Anthropic said last year that it had blocked its bots from Reddit's website, according to the complaint. But Reddit said Anthropic 'continued to hit Reddit's servers over one hundred thousand times.' An Anthropic spokesperson said, "We disagree with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously." Anthropic is also defending itself against a separate suit from music publishers, including Universal Music Group (0VD.F), ABKCO, and Concord, alleging that Anthropic infringed on copyrights for Beyoncé, the Rolling Stones, and other artists as it trained Claude on lyrics to more than 500 songs. Courts haven't settled on a definitive answer to the question of whether artificial intelligence companies can use copyrighted material to train generative AI models without permission. However, last February, the US District Court for Delaware handed copyright holder Thomson Reuters a win in a case that could impact what data training models can legally collect. The court granted Thomson Reuters' request for summary judgment, saying that its competitor, Ross, infringed on its copyrights by using lawsuit summaries to train its AI model. The court rejected Ross's argument that it could use the summaries under the concept of fair use, which allows copyrights to be used for news reporting, teaching, research, criticism, and commentary. One big name featuring prominently in some of these clashes is OpenAI ( the creator of chatbot ChatGPT that is run by Sam Altman and backed by Microsoft (MSFT). Comedian Sarah Silverman has accused the companies in a lawsuit of copying material from her book and 7 million pirated works in order to train its AI systems. Parenting website Mumsnet has also accused OpenAI of scraping its six-billion-word database without consent. But perhaps the most prominent case targeting OpenAI is from the New York Times (NYT), which in 2023 filed a lawsuit accusing OpenAI and Microsoft of illegally using millions of the news outlet's published stories to train OpenAI's language models. The newspaper has said that ChatGPT at times generates query answers that closely mirror its original publications. Last week, OpenAI called the lawsuit "baseless" and appealed a judge's recent order in that case requiring the AI developer to preserve 'output data' generated by ChatGPT. OpenAI and Microsoft are using a defense similar to those raised in other AI training copyright disputes: that the Times' publicly available content falls under the fair use doctrine and, therefore, can be used to train its models. Getty Images is trying to chip away at that same argument in lawsuits in the US and United Kingdom filed in 2023 against AI image generation startup Stability. The UK case went to trial on Monday. Stability argues that fair use (or "fair dealing" as it's known in the UK) justified training its technology, Stable Diffusion, on copyrighted Getty material. That same defense has hallmarks of justification that Google has been asserting for the past two decades to fight lawsuits claiming it violated copyright laws when pulling information into results for users' search queries. In 2005, the Authors Guild sued Google over millions of books that the tech giant scanned and made available in 'snippets' to online searchers. Google didn't pay for the copyrighted information but did provide word-for-word pieces of the copyrighted works in search results. The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reasoned in a decision that Google's scanning project tested the limits of fair use but was 'transformative' and therefore protected under fair use law. In 2016, Getty Images sued Google over similar claims, alleging that Google violated its copyrights and antitrust law by displaying Getty's high-resolution images in Google search results. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hollywood enters AI scraping wars with new lawsuit from Disney and NBCUniversal
Disney (DIS) and NBCUniversal sued an artificial intelligence developer for allegedly infringing on their protected works, the first Hollywood corporate titans to join a mushrooming legal war pitting copyright holders against AI upstarts training their models with data scraped from the internet. In a lawsuit filed on Wednesday in a Los Angeles Federal District Court, Disney and NBCUniversal said that AI image-creating platform Midjourney pirated images without authorization. Midjourney obtained copies of Disney's Star Wars, Minions, and other characters through unauthorized libraries containing works from two Hollywood studios, according to the complaint. Its software allows people to create images from the companies' popular fictional characters, the suit said. The companies included AI-generated images of characters ranging from Darth Vader and Buzz Lightyear to the Minions and Spider-Man. 'Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing,' Disney said in its complaint. Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company is defending itself in another federal case in California brought by artists who allege Midjourney illegally trained its AI image generation models on their copyrighted works. The latest confrontation expands the number of high-profile cases from copyright holders seeking to guard their works from the reach of technology firms. A question at the heart of all these lawsuits: Can artificial intelligence companies use copyrighted material to train generative AI models without asking the owner of that data for permission? Another such clash came earlier this week when social media site Reddit (RDDT) sued AI startup Anthropic ( a company backed by tech giants Amazon (AMZN) and Google (GOOG, GOOGL) that created the AI language model Claude. Reddit is claiming in the new lawsuit that Anthropic intentionally scraped Reddit users' personal data without their consent and then put their data to work training Claude. Reddit said in its complaint that Anthropic "bills itself as the white knight of the AI industry" and argues that "it is anything but." Anthropic said last year that it had blocked its bots from Reddit's website, according to the complaint. But Reddit said Anthropic 'continued to hit Reddit's servers over one hundred thousand times.' An Anthropic spokesperson said, "We disagree with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously." Anthropic is also defending itself against a separate suit from music publishers, including Universal Music Group (0VD.F), ABKCO, and Concord, alleging that Anthropic infringed on copyrights for Beyoncé, the Rolling Stones, and other artists as it trained Claude on lyrics to more than 500 songs. Courts haven't settled on a definitive answer to the question of whether artificial intelligence companies can use copyrighted material to train generative AI models without permission. However, last February, the US District Court for Delaware handed copyright holder Thomson Reuters a win in a case that could impact what data training models can legally collect. The court granted Thomson Reuters' request for summary judgment, saying that its competitor, Ross, infringed on its copyrights by using lawsuit summaries to train its AI model. The court rejected Ross's argument that it could use the summaries under the concept of fair use, which allows copyrights to be used for news reporting, teaching, research, criticism, and commentary. One big name featuring prominently in some of these clashes is OpenAI ( the creator of chatbot ChatGPT that is run by Sam Altman and backed by Microsoft (MSFT). Comedian Sarah Silverman has accused the companies in a lawsuit of copying material from her book and 7 million pirated works in order to train its AI systems. Parenting website Mumsnet has also accused OpenAI of scraping its six-billion-word database without consent. But perhaps the most prominent case targeting OpenAI is from the New York Times (NYT), which in 2023 filed a lawsuit accusing OpenAI and Microsoft of illegally using millions of the news outlet's published stories to train OpenAI's language models. The newspaper has said that ChatGPT at times generates query answers that closely mirror its original publications. Last week, OpenAI called the lawsuit "baseless" and appealed a judge's recent order in that case requiring the AI developer to preserve 'output data' generated by ChatGPT. OpenAI and Microsoft are using a defense similar to those raised in other AI training copyright disputes: that the Times' publicly available content falls under the fair use doctrine and, therefore, can be used to train its models. Getty Images is trying to chip away at that same argument in lawsuits in the US and United Kingdom filed in 2023 against AI image generation startup Stability. The UK case went to trial on Monday. Stability argues that fair use (or "fair dealing" as it's known in the UK) justified training its technology, Stable Diffusion, on copyrighted Getty material. That same defense has hallmarks of justification that Google has been asserting for the past two decades to fight lawsuits claiming it violated copyright laws when pulling information into results for users' search queries. In 2005, the Authors Guild sued Google over millions of books that the tech giant scanned and made available in 'snippets' to online searchers. Google didn't pay for the copyrighted information but did provide word-for-word pieces of the copyrighted works in search results. The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reasoned in a decision that Google's scanning project tested the limits of fair use but was 'transformative' and therefore protected under fair use law. In 2016, Getty Images sued Google over similar claims, alleging that Google violated its copyrights and antitrust law by displaying Getty's high-resolution images in Google search results. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Patricia Arquette on If Cobel Did a Better Job Than Mr. Milchick, and Why Mrs. Selvig Is So Bad at Recycling
Patricia Arquette is really, really into the world of Severance. What she's really, really not into is discussing fan theories. Not because she doesn't care, rather because she cares too much to risk spoiling anything. In another world, Arquette might be racking up karma way down your Reddit rabbit hole. But in this world, Lumon (and Apple TV+) is listening. More from The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio' Guest Star Martin Scorsese Thought a Scene Was "Wrong" But Didn't Want to Be a "Backseat Director," Says Creator 'Echo Valley' Review: Julianne Moore and Sydney Sweeney Star in Apple TV+'s Satisfyingly Tense Domestic Thriller Ted Sarandos' 'Studio' Appearance Is a Wink - And a Flex Here's the thing though: with all due respect to other terrific (and eligible) dramas like The White Lotus and The Diplomat, Severance deserves all of the Emmys. But first, it needs the votes. Part of that process includes putting talent front-and-center in the press. Fear not, fellow Outties, we've got you. Was season one or more of a challenge for you as an actor? I don't even know how to really parcel out the first season from the reality of the world of the first season. We were shooting during COVID. I got contact-traced, I don't know, six or seven times or something. So I ended up— I kept getting put alone in a room for like 10 days at a time, and I started to kind of lose my cool. We didn't have [vaccines] yet. We were all wearing those plastic masks. Nobody could see you smile. It was a very dystopian experience on the set. Should viewers be rooting for Cobel at this point? Do you want fans of the show to like her? I don't really care if they like you or not like you. I mean, people go through life making 'the bad guy,' making 'the good guy,' and then the bad guy's the good guy and the good guy's the bad guy. She just has to have her perspective on why she's doing what she's doing. We go through life looking at people in the certain way that we frame them, and then they say or do something, and we reframe them. And so I think that we're going to do the same thing with Cobel. Cobel is at a very weird precipice right now where it's like it really could go either way. She could go to supporting Mark and all those guys, sticking one to Lumon, or she could consolidate her power at Lumon, get more respect there and be in a more powerful position, like she had been at one point in time. Did Mrs. Selvig legitimately care for Mark Scout? Yeah. I mean, I approached Mrs. Selvig in many ways. Yes, I think both sides of her care about Mark and are interested in what he's doing, both personally but also academically. What she was surprised by with Mrs. Selvig was— she got to put down the laws of Lumon. So it's like, 'Oh, we're kind of chummy. Is this what it's like to be not indoctrinated into this? Is this how people make friends? We're real friends and we're going somewhere together and it's not to a Kier Remembrance Day.' So, yeah, I think there's a part of her that's really fascinated and comes alive, but it's awkward and uncomfortable because it doesn't really know what it's doing. It's also that weird mixture of stalker and friend…there's a weird energy to that. Why is she so bad at recycling? We definitely talked about making her fumbling, bumbling. To insinuate yourself into someone's life, the biggest manipulators act like the most innocent victims. The most dangerous manipulators act like they're just this sweet, innocent, couldn't-hurt-a-fly person. That really can be very scary. She's got some element of that, like, I have to disarm him by being the fumbling, bumbling aunt from next door. And, 'Oh, I need your help' and 'I'm an older woman than you' and 'Oh, you don't have to worry about me.' So there is a damsel in distress device. Did Cobel do a better job than Milchick? Oh yes, come on now! What kind of question is that? Yeah, I mean, I think that like such a horrible betrayal to her. Because she felt like he was under her tutelage. And even though she was a tough and mean kind of boss, sometimes she was doing it for his own good. And she was also weird in this way, of like, almost like a drill sergeant. They're supposed to be kind of mean. It's a little bit part of the protocol within Lumon — of the old school, especially that she came up in — there's a certain way of treating people you're training. But she's pretty sad that Milchick stabbed her in the back. That he usurped her. Why is the MDR team allowed to roam the halls of Lumon so freely? I've had that conversation also, a concern in a weird way, where the viewer would be like, 'Wait a minute, wouldn't [Cobel] have seen this? They're doing that — can't Cobel see that?' There's something about— I don't know, I don't want to give away things. What they do, informs. Also, here's the thing. I don't think Lumon was so aware of what Cobel was doing and experimenting with. They have a very fine, limited view of what they thought was going on in this experiment, which is not the same idea of the experiment as to what Cobel is doing. How did you come up with Cobel's unique affectation? I was like, watching Maude and all these weird shows. It was sort of a little bit of a tip of the hat to Bea Arthur. And this idea of, like, this world where upper management sounded a certain way. That power sounded a certain way. And maybe how that wouldn't quite be right — it wouldn't sound exactly authentic if it came from a poor kid who was looking up at this rich family, imagining what they sounded like, imagining what they talked like, imagining what this thing was. So, yeah, it's not completely authentic. But she also grew up in this school in a weird way, like with nuns, or with, you know, being indoctrinated by these kind of people who were zealots. So they sounded the most like this. This is her child interpretation of that. You're really into this world huh? I am really into it. But I have to say, Cobel is— she has a whole things going on on her own. She is not somebody who feels comfortable telling people, letting people in, or any of that. And yet she also has incredible hubris and is driven and convinced that she's right. So it's like, in a weird way, it's very lonely, because she's got her whole own agenda, and she doesn't share it with anybody. This might be a stupid question, but did you write any of Cobel's notebook? I love this question, actually. Oh, thank you. It's part of what I love so much about being in the movie business and all the different departments. Our prop department is off-the-hook insane accomplished. Cat (PMG Property Master Catherine Miller) is amazing. So, no. They actually hire people to write stuff. Like, 'I need 10 pages written about blah, blah, blah.' I've seen it throughout my career on different sets. On some, they're actually sticking with the agenda of what the scene is about. And some they're just writing shit so you're rifling through and they're like, 'It's 4 a.m. I'm so sick of this job. How many more pages left do I have to write?' They're pretty hilarious. But this— anything on [Severance] is really drilled-down right. You actually could focus on each page. You could print a book out of it. What they're coming up with and writing is really good. This interview has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series 22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise