Ukraine claims advances in Sumy halted as Lavrov says Nato spending rise will not affect Russian security
Nato
's decision to increase defence spending will not significantly affect
Russia
's security, foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday.
Meanwhile,
Ukraine
has said it stopped Russian advances in the northern region of Sumy, while Russian troops took control of a village in eastern Ukraine located close to a lithium deposit.
Nato allies on Wednesday agreed to raise their collective spending goal to 5 per cent of gross domestic product over the next decade, citing what they called the long-term threat posed by Russia and the need to strengthen civil and military resilience.
'As for the impact of this 5 per cent goal on our security, I don't think it will be significant,' Mr Lavrov told a press conference.
READ MORE
'We know what goals we are pursuing, we don't hide them, we openly announce them, they are absolutely legal from the point of view of any interpretation of the principles of the UN Charter and international law, and we know by what means we will always ensure these goals.'
[
Zelenskiy appoints new commander to tackle Ukraine's troop shortages
Opens in new window
]
Nato adopted the higher spending target in response to pressure from US president
Donald Trump
for European members to pull their weight within the alliance, and in response to European fears that Russia poses a growing threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Russia, which is spending more than 40 per cent of this year's budget on defence and security, denies any intention to attack a Nato state.
Ukraine's forces stopped Russian advances near the Sumy border this week, the country's top general said in a statement on Thursday.
'The advance of Russian troops in the border areas of Sumy region has been halted, and the line of combat has stabilised,' Oleksandr Syrskyi said in the statement about his visit to the front.
Russia in April said it had ejected Ukrainian forces from the western Russian region of Kursk, and president
Vladimir Putin
has ordered his forces to follow up by carving out a 'buffer zone' in the adjoining Sumy region.
After Russian advances there in early June, Ukrainian president
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
said his troops were repelling the attacks and had recaptured the village of Andriivka.
Russian troops have taken control of a village in eastern Ukraine which is close to a lithium deposit after fierce resistance from Ukrainian forces, a Russian-backed official said on Thursday.
The village of Shevchenko is located in Donetsk, one of four Ukrainian regions – in addition to Crimea – that Moscow has claimed as its own territory in annexations that Kyiv and western powers reject as illegal.
The Russian defence ministry announced earlier on Thursday that Shevchenko had been taken along with another settlement, Novoserhiivka.
The battlefield report could not be independently confirmed and there was no immediate comment from Ukraine. Open source mapping from Deep State, an authoritative Ukrainian military blogging resource, showed Shevchenko under Russian control.
Soviet geologists who discovered the lithium deposit there in 1982 suggested it could be significant. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Ireland's defence spending is labelled a 'bad joke'
Ireland's continuing low level of defence expenditure — stuck at 0.2% of GDP — has been described as a 'bad joke' just a day after EU partners in Nato agreed to boost their target spend from 2% to 3.5% of GDP. The development comes as Tánaiste Simon Harris, minister for foreign affairs and defence, is on Friday expected to announce plans to join the EU's new security procurement mechanism to accelerate the acquisition of defence equipment. Ireland is not yet joining the loan part of the mechanism — with a total fund of up to €150bn available — but the Government is expected to consider this in the coming weeks, with Mr Harris believed to be keen to explore the prospect. Figures provided to the Irish Examiner by the Department of Defence show defence expenditure was 0.2% of GDP in 2024. It has remained at that rate since 2021, and is slightly lower than 2020 (0.3%). Gross National Income (GNI) is considered a more accurate estimate of national wealth than GDP in Ireland, as it excludes global profits of international companies sent to Ireland for tax purposes. The department figures show Ireland's defence spend is 0.4% of GNI (twice as much as GDP), with the latest figure for 2023. It is the same rate as 2022, and slightly lower than previous years (0.5%). The estimates are despite increased defence budgets since the report of the Commission on Defence Forces in February 2022. This followed the Government's adoption of the commission's 'Level of Ambition 2' (LOA2) investment. This involves increasing the budget from €1.1bn in 2022 to €1.5bn, in 2022 prices, by 2028. The Irish Examiner reported last February that Ireland had the lowest defence spend of 38 European countries in 2024 — by far the lowest based on GDP, and joint lowest with fellow neutral Malta based on GNI. Our GNI-based spend was more than half that of another EU neutral state, Austria. The Department of Defence said the international comparison of military expenditure was 'made difficult' by the lack of publicly available data and the differences between nations' defence policies. As such, it said international perspective is 'best used for context rather than comparison' between militaries. Responding to the department figures, the association representing officers in the Defence Forces said the department "continually refers to the 'record allocation' in the defence budget'. Lieutenant Colonel Conor King, general secretary of Raco, said: 'With Ireland still far below the levels of investment of comparator EU countries, despite the increasingly unstable global security environment, and with the personnel levels so low, how can we be satisfied that this level of spend remotely addresses Ireland's needs to defend our citizens? If we're honest, we can't.' He added: 'Look at the Nato commitment to 5% ([3.5% on national defence and 1.5% on critical national infrastructure and resilience]. Now look at us at 0.2% of GDP or 0.4% of GNI. We are so far away from reality it's like a bad joke. And many of those countries are our EU partners so it's not just a 'Nato thing'.' The Raco general secretary said the capabilities of the Defence Forces was in a very poor state: 'With our naval service unable to put to sea, our air corps grounded after dark, and huge difficulties in staffing overseas, not to mention our technician strengths below 50% in most areas, which capabilities are we delivering on fully? And at what cost?' The Tánaiste is expected on Friday to sign up to the EU Security Action for Europe (SAFE) in a bid to speed up, possibly by two years, the acquisition of key defence capabilities, such as: ammunition; artillery systems; critical infrastructure protection; air defence systems and maritime capabilities. Mr Harris is focusing of using SAFE to address gaps in specific equipment, particularly through joint acquisitions with other member states.
Irish Daily Star
5 hours ago
- Irish Daily Star
Best U.S. state to live in if WW3 breaks out
As the threat of nuclear warfare looms over international politics, a growing number of Americans are seeking the safest havens within the country to move their families. Previously, states like Vermont were considered the ultimate sanctuaries for post-apocalyptic survival , but now Nebraska seems to be the top choice for those fearing a nuclear winter. With Russia's ongoing conflict in Ukraine, persistent turmoil in the Middle East, and various other violent clashes worldwide, concerns are escalating about the possibility of a nuclear attack on American soil . A map suggests that Nebraska's moderate climate and fertile soil make it an ideal place to avoid nuclear attacks - and potentially rebuild society afterward. Read More Related Articles Health concerns swirl as Trump is spotted limping up the stairs to Air Force One Read More Related Articles Lip reader reveals world leaders' brutal 6-letter gossip about Trump at NATO summit Ragusa highlighted spots like Northern California, Florida, and Texas as prime selections (Image: Getty Images) The most dangerous places during an all-out war with a nuclear power would be densely populated urban areas, shopping districts, and regions with extensive public transportation systems. Military bases or data centers could also be likely targets for foreign hostility, making Arlington, Virginia, the most likely candidate for a nuclear strike, according to Mirror US. Additional maps pinpoint areas most at risk in a nuclear strike, seemingly concentrated in the East and along California's coast. They suggest Montana and North Dakota as pivotal locations due to their numerous nuke sites and launch facilities. With a plethora of targets mapped out on security charts, Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming sit squarely in danger zones, revealing vital infrastructure like active nuclear plants, which also exist in Alabama, Arizona, Maryland, New Jersey , Pennsylvania , and Tennessee — states that collectively house around 90 such installations. Americans are on edge as the threat of nuclear war looms (Image: Getty Images) In response to potential nuclear threat areas, Andrew Ragusa, CEO of REMI Realty in Long Island , shared some pearls of property-buying wisdom with Daily Mail readers: "What used to be important when purchasing a home such as great school district, close to shopping, and near public transportation, has now changed to warm climate, access to food, and access to water." Ragusa highlighted spots like Northern California , Florida , and Texas as prime selections due to their ideal conditions that align with the updated homebuyer's checklist. He pointed out Nebraska as the top refuge for real estate that could withstand a global war calamity. Moreover, Ragusa identified states along the Mississippi River such as Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Missouri as solid choices because of their access to drinking water sources. The Rocky Mountains area is gaining focus from real estate professionals as a key retreat in the event of a nuclear conflict, thanks to its rugged landscape that could shield from direct hits and high altitudes that may help disperse radioactive fallout after a blast. Chair of the Agent Editorial Board, Jasen Edwards, pinpointed Nebraska as America's optimal haven, noting its "geographical location offers protection against nuclear fallout." For the latest local news and features on Irish America, visit our homepage here .
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ukraine claims advances in Sumy halted as Lavrov says Nato spending rise will not affect Russian security
Nato 's decision to increase defence spending will not significantly affect Russia 's security, foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday. Meanwhile, Ukraine has said it stopped Russian advances in the northern region of Sumy, while Russian troops took control of a village in eastern Ukraine located close to a lithium deposit. Nato allies on Wednesday agreed to raise their collective spending goal to 5 per cent of gross domestic product over the next decade, citing what they called the long-term threat posed by Russia and the need to strengthen civil and military resilience. 'As for the impact of this 5 per cent goal on our security, I don't think it will be significant,' Mr Lavrov told a press conference. READ MORE 'We know what goals we are pursuing, we don't hide them, we openly announce them, they are absolutely legal from the point of view of any interpretation of the principles of the UN Charter and international law, and we know by what means we will always ensure these goals.' [ Zelenskiy appoints new commander to tackle Ukraine's troop shortages Opens in new window ] Nato adopted the higher spending target in response to pressure from US president Donald Trump for European members to pull their weight within the alliance, and in response to European fears that Russia poses a growing threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Russia, which is spending more than 40 per cent of this year's budget on defence and security, denies any intention to attack a Nato state. Ukraine's forces stopped Russian advances near the Sumy border this week, the country's top general said in a statement on Thursday. 'The advance of Russian troops in the border areas of Sumy region has been halted, and the line of combat has stabilised,' Oleksandr Syrskyi said in the statement about his visit to the front. Russia in April said it had ejected Ukrainian forces from the western Russian region of Kursk, and president Vladimir Putin has ordered his forces to follow up by carving out a 'buffer zone' in the adjoining Sumy region. After Russian advances there in early June, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy said his troops were repelling the attacks and had recaptured the village of Andriivka. Russian troops have taken control of a village in eastern Ukraine which is close to a lithium deposit after fierce resistance from Ukrainian forces, a Russian-backed official said on Thursday. The village of Shevchenko is located in Donetsk, one of four Ukrainian regions – in addition to Crimea – that Moscow has claimed as its own territory in annexations that Kyiv and western powers reject as illegal. The Russian defence ministry announced earlier on Thursday that Shevchenko had been taken along with another settlement, Novoserhiivka. The battlefield report could not be independently confirmed and there was no immediate comment from Ukraine. Open source mapping from Deep State, an authoritative Ukrainian military blogging resource, showed Shevchenko under Russian control. Soviet geologists who discovered the lithium deposit there in 1982 suggested it could be significant. – Reuters
