logo
Australia's renewables push makes us poorer while super-polluter China cancels out any climate benefit

Australia's renewables push makes us poorer while super-polluter China cancels out any climate benefit

Sky News AU15-07-2025
Australia's renewables crusade has cost taxpayers $29 billion in the last decade and only lowered energy emissions by a measly six per cent.
To make matters worse, during the same period, China increased emissions by 1,970 million tonnes, 87 times more than the tiny amount gained from Australia's renewables push.
The latest data from the Energy Institute revealed between 2014 and 2024, Australia's carbon emissions from energy dropped by just 22.6 million tonnes—from 381.0 Mt to 358.4 Mt.
While Australia posted modest gains, China's emissions exploded from 8,647 Mt to 10,617 Mt, creating the equivalent of several new Australian economies.
The figures paint a sordid picture of the uphill battle to lower emissions while the worst emitters in the world are moving in the opposite direction, cancelling out any gains.
Climate science is based on global emissions, not domestic output. This means despite enormous investment, Australia has made no progress towards limiting the impact of climate change at all.
The figures come after the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) found taxpayers and energy customers funded billions in renewable subsidies over the ten years to 2022–23.
According to the CIS report, Counting the Cost: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, the total spend was $29.178 billion and the return on investment was meagre at best.
CIS Senior Energy Policy Analyst Michael Wu told Sky News the government's 'modest emissions reduction' had been 'cancelled out' by China.
'Even more concerning is that doubling down on renewables has not delivered the promised reduction in power bills, exacerbating the cost-of-living crisis,' he said.
The effort to transition towards renewables has also 'driven out energy-intensive industry and jobs, similar to what we've seen in Germany', Mr Wu said.
Despite the eye-watering spend, Australia's emissions cut accounted for less than 0.1 per cent of global energy CO2 output. China misses UN climate deadline
The revelations come as China failed to meet a UN deadline to submit updated climate targets intended to outline their 2035 emissions reduction pledges.
The delay has sparked concerns over the credibility of global climate efforts, given China remains the largest carbon polluter, responsible for a third of global emissions.
President Xi Jinping said in April that China would announce its new goal before COP30, without specifying a date.
China's foreign ministry did not respond to Sky News' requests for comments on their timeline.
Despite this, the CEO of Australia's Smart Energy Council John Grimes recently praised the Chinese Communist Party's approach to renewable energy.
'One thing you can say about the Chinese system is that China plays as a team,' he told the National Press Club.
'And Australia spends all of our time trying to tear each other apart. That is no way to compete for Team Australia.
'If the (energy) transition of the world were a marathon race, then countries like Australia and Japan… would be like the runners at the start line, limbering up.
'But the only problem was that that race began an hour ago. That's how far ahead China is in this race.'
According to the Energy Institute, China and India alone were responsible for 62 per cent of the global emissions increase in 2024. Labor still mulling 2035 target
As global superpowers ramp up pollution, the Albanese government has been considering its own 2035 climate target, with an announcement expected in September.
The new climate target could be put as high as a 75 per cent emissions reduction by 2035 from 2005 levels as internal deliberations and departmental advice continue.
Sources told Sky News earlier this year that a 65 per cent cut was more likely, in line with the 65-75 range floated by the Climate Change Authority.
Meanwhile, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry has warned against overly ambitious targets.
"We will only support something that's realistic, that's affordable for the Australian economy," ACCI CEO Andrew McKellar told Sky News on Tuesday.
'We have got to be realistic about the contribution that we can make. There's no point driving our economy into the ground.'
ACCI's submission to the Productivity Commission argued any target above 65 per cent would jeopardise the viability of small businesses and industry.
Shadow Energy Minister Dan Tehan recently condemned the Albanese government for overseeing what he called a botched energy transition.
'Well, the problem is that (Energy Minister) Chris Bowen's made a complete mess of our electricity transition,' he told Sky News.
'Everywhere you look, it's a mess. And the one thing that he doesn't want to answer is, what is the cost of this mess?
'We know that his plans don't take into consideration the cost of this rollout of new poles and wires. He won't put a figure on it. We now know that that's delayed.
'So, what does that mean when it comes to the grid's reliability going forward, and also what does it mean for consumers?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High-end heist: Australians caught up in Louis Vuitton data breach
High-end heist: Australians caught up in Louis Vuitton data breach

Sydney Morning Herald

time19 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

High-end heist: Australians caught up in Louis Vuitton data breach

'The Louis Vuitton breach is just the latest in a string of cyber incidents for the sector, with big names like Tiffany, Dior, Adidas, Victoria's Secret and Cartier disclosing incidents since just April. Ransomware group ShinyHunters is likely behind some, but not all of these.' Loading ShinyHunters, which was formed in 2020 and named after a Pokemon, has claimed credit for some of the most significant data breaches globally, affecting millions of people including Australians. It hasn't yet claimed responsibility for the Louis Vuitton breach. 'ShinyHunters' MO is stealing large datasets. Often, they sell these datasets to other criminals; sometimes, they leak them as a publicity stunt,' Mansted said. She said CyberCX was seeing far fewer businesses in Australia, and globally, pay ransoms to cybercriminals. The criminals aren't stopping, however, but are instead operating in sectors and places more willing to pay ransoms or changing their service offerings. Some are reverting to stealing and selling data to make money. 'The retail sector is in a sweet spot for cybercriminals,' she said. 'The sector hasn't faced the same regulatory pressure to uplift cyber maturity as banks, telcos and other critical providers. But at the same time, it holds huge consumer datasets. These datasets are highly valuable – whether transacted by powerful data brokers, or unlawfully on the dark web by criminals. 'The high-end retail heist also highlights a growing problem confronting all businesses: third-party cyber risk. We're still understanding these incidents, but it's very possible that the source of at least some of these breaches is a third-party vendor commonly used across the sector.' Australian companies now face fines of up to $50 million for serious breaches of the Privacy Act, after high-profile data breaches affected Optus and Medibank customers. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner was contacted for comment. The latest breach comes after 5.7 million Qantas customers had their information accessed by hackers this month, including information on frequent flyer accounts, addresses and food preferences. The airline said last week it had found no evidence yet of stolen data being released, but it was 'actively monitoring'. Cybersecurity researcher Jamieson O'Reilly said while no passwords or financial data had been taken, the scope of stolen Louis Vuitton data still presented significant opportunities for exploitation. 'That is especially true when the breached entity is a high-profile luxury brand with a highly engaged and brand-loyal customer base,' he said. Jamieson, who runs cybersecurity consultancy DVULN, said he had already noticed online chatter and victim reports indicating that Louis Vuitton customers had received phishing emails impersonating the company. 'Notably, this email referenced a known artist, Clara Bacou, who previously published conceptual NFT artwork for Louis Vuitton back in 2021,' he said. Loading 'Anyone who searched the artist's name would find legitimate links tying her to Louis Vuitton, giving the email a false sense of authenticity. Combined with accurate customer data from the breach, the setup is precise enough to fool even security-aware recipients.' He said it was highly likely that threat actors are already using the stolen data for nefarious purposes. 'While breaches are frequent, that does not make them acceptable,' he said.

High-end heist: Australians caught up in Louis Vuitton data breach
High-end heist: Australians caught up in Louis Vuitton data breach

The Age

time19 minutes ago

  • The Age

High-end heist: Australians caught up in Louis Vuitton data breach

'The Louis Vuitton breach is just the latest in a string of cyber incidents for the sector, with big names like Tiffany, Dior, Adidas, Victoria's Secret and Cartier disclosing incidents since just April. Ransomware group ShinyHunters is likely behind some, but not all of these.' Loading ShinyHunters, which was formed in 2020 and named after a Pokemon, has claimed credit for some of the most significant data breaches globally, affecting millions of people including Australians. It hasn't yet claimed responsibility for the Louis Vuitton breach. 'ShinyHunters' MO is stealing large datasets. Often, they sell these datasets to other criminals; sometimes, they leak them as a publicity stunt,' Mansted said. She said CyberCX was seeing far fewer businesses in Australia, and globally, pay ransoms to cybercriminals. The criminals aren't stopping, however, but are instead operating in sectors and places more willing to pay ransoms or changing their service offerings. Some are reverting to stealing and selling data to make money. 'The retail sector is in a sweet spot for cybercriminals,' she said. 'The sector hasn't faced the same regulatory pressure to uplift cyber maturity as banks, telcos and other critical providers. But at the same time, it holds huge consumer datasets. These datasets are highly valuable – whether transacted by powerful data brokers, or unlawfully on the dark web by criminals. 'The high-end retail heist also highlights a growing problem confronting all businesses: third-party cyber risk. We're still understanding these incidents, but it's very possible that the source of at least some of these breaches is a third-party vendor commonly used across the sector.' Australian companies now face fines of up to $50 million for serious breaches of the Privacy Act, after high-profile data breaches affected Optus and Medibank customers. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner was contacted for comment. The latest breach comes after 5.7 million Qantas customers had their information accessed by hackers this month, including information on frequent flyer accounts, addresses and food preferences. The airline said last week it had found no evidence yet of stolen data being released, but it was 'actively monitoring'. Cybersecurity researcher Jamieson O'Reilly said while no passwords or financial data had been taken, the scope of stolen Louis Vuitton data still presented significant opportunities for exploitation. 'That is especially true when the breached entity is a high-profile luxury brand with a highly engaged and brand-loyal customer base,' he said. Jamieson, who runs cybersecurity consultancy DVULN, said he had already noticed online chatter and victim reports indicating that Louis Vuitton customers had received phishing emails impersonating the company. 'Notably, this email referenced a known artist, Clara Bacou, who previously published conceptual NFT artwork for Louis Vuitton back in 2021,' he said. Loading 'Anyone who searched the artist's name would find legitimate links tying her to Louis Vuitton, giving the email a false sense of authenticity. Combined with accurate customer data from the breach, the setup is precise enough to fool even security-aware recipients.' He said it was highly likely that threat actors are already using the stolen data for nefarious purposes. 'While breaches are frequent, that does not make them acceptable,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store