
Intern spends ₹30,000 to join Gurugram startup, sacked in 23 days: 'Regret believing the founder'
According to the post, the startup's founder had assured the intern of close mentorship and a full-time role after three months, with a starting salary of at least ₹ 40,000. However, less than a month in, those promises collapsed.
"I was shocked... I regret believing the founder," the intern wrote, calling the experience 'a disaster.' Now unemployed and disheartened, they are struggling through a tough job market in Gurgaon's competitive startup ecosystem. The post has since sparked debate on scial media. Here are some of the reactions. Screengrab from the viral post.
Supportive responses poured in from fellow Redditors. "Something similar also happened with me. Please don't let negative thoughts get into your head and start applying mindlessly on LinkedIn, though 90% of job listings are fake there, but you can very well get 2-3 calls a month if you keep applying daily," one user commented.
Another added, "It happens. If you go back in time and think about it, you would still have accepted this offer. At that point in time this was the best decision you could take given the information. Talk to the founder and see if he has founder friends that are looking for someone like you. Don't get disheartened. In this economy, you will have to fight harder, but you will find something eventually."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
No pay, no empathy? Boss's cold reply to intern's emergency leave request goes viral
Credit: iStock 'Boss expects seriousness from his interns even though he doesn't treat them seriously…' A recent viral Reddit post has fuelled the conversation around unpaid internships, toxic work culture, and the growing disconnect between professional expectations and personal emergencies. The incident happened when an intern asked her boss for a day off to take care of her sick parents-and was shamed and accused of lacking 'seriousness.' In this viral WhatsApp chat, an intern was seeking short-notice leave approval from her boss, mentioning that her parents were on bed rest and promising that the same thing 'won't happen again.' The boss replied: 'When you are interning somewhere, there is a responsibility too… Three days before a big event, you've gone missing… Anyways, your choice…. This shows seriousness towards your work.' The message left the internet with three questions: Is it possible for emergencies to come with a prior schedule? Where does empathy vanish in the disguise of power dynamics? Unpaid internship with full-time expectations? Unpaid Internship and exploitation When unpaid internship opportunities often come with the promise of 'exposure' and 'experience' concerns have been raised repeatedly in recent days. In this context, the internet raised even more eyebrows over the fact that the intern in question was working without pay — a detail that converted online sympathy into full-blown outrage. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Salma Hayek, 58,Shows Her Huge Size In New Photos Boite A Scoop Undo Despite her unpaid status, she was held to the standard of a full-time employee and was slammed for asking for leave just days before a big event. One comment read: 'If the place falls apart by an intern taking a day off, they really shouldn't be keeping interns!' Passive aggression in the workplace Another interesting aspect of the boss's message wasn't the rejection itself, but the passive aggression decoded from the tone of the text. Some referred to it as a classic example of gaslighting, where the boss made the intern doubt her own decision, reality, and judgment through psychological manipulation. Being in an authoritative position, he didn't directly say 'no' to the intern. Instead, he wrote: 'Anyways, your choice… This shows seriousness towards your work,'-suggesting that taking care of one's parents during a health emergency somehow reflects poorly on one's dedication. Call for a much-needed reset? At its core, the reason for the virality of this post isn't just about one unpaid intern or one dismissive boss. It's about the normalization of undervaluing emotional intelligence in the workplace, and the view that time equals LinkedIn, one user asked: 'Why in India do people still feel ashamed to take their deserving leaves?' Some viewed the boss's response as a lesson in professionalism. One comment read: 'It's just a way of showing urgency and having a proper divided workload. Nothing else.'-even though it was criticized for its unkind tone. The internet united on one point: emergency situations need to be dealt with sensitivity and kindness- without making employees feel guilty for choosing to care for their family


Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
NRI willing to return to Punjab village after 11 yrs asks, Is ₹1 crore ‘enough'? Internet reacts: ‘Check tax before…'
An NRI sought suggestions online after expressing his willingness to return to his home country after 11 years with savings of ₹ 1 crore. In a Reddit post, the user said that he moved to New Zealand when he was 19 but now wants to return to India permanently with $200K NZD (or ₹ 1.03 crore) savings. The Non-Resident Indian stated, 'I been living in New Zealand since I was 19 and now 30. When I left India (2013) 1 crore seems like a big money. How about these days? Reason I am asking this question because I want to return back to India permanently. Have around $200K NZD in savings, will that be enough to survive in a Punjab village as I own house there. (sic)' He further provided information about his wealth status and income flow. 'I own 1 Shopify store which generates around 100K NZD per year (so you can call it a remote job/business),' the NRI added. The NRI yearning to return to his native state further noted that he owns US stocks worth about $138K NZD. NRI seeks advice on plans to return to Punjab village with ₹1 crore. A varied range of comments poured in, including, 'Depends on your lifestyle.' Another user commended his Shopify store business and said, 'Your sales are impressive.' A third user wrote, 'One crore is not retirement money. But if you plan to invest and generate passive income, it can be doable with a decent lifestyle. If you want to do that, I suggest you first identify what you want to do or where you want to invest. Try and see if it works out or generates enough income. Then decide on switching.' A fourth piece of advice stated, 'As someone who splits time between India and NZ, you won't be able to have an NZ-like lifestyle if you aren't planning to do any other job. I would say find a remote job with an NZ company and then move. There are plenty.'


Economic Times
42 minutes ago
- Economic Times
IITian gets trolled for using death in IIT to talk about his startup: 'Can't even let him rest in peace'
Synopsis An IIT Bombay graduate is facing criticism. His LinkedIn post about a student's death sparked controversy. The post mourned Rohit Sinha's death. It then promoted the founder's recruitment startup. Reddit users accused him of insensitivity. They felt he exploited the tragedy for business. Rohit Sinha, a final-year student, allegedly died by suicide. Agencies An IITian recently received backlash from Reddit for using a fellow IITian's death to promote his company. An entrepreneur, who graduated from IIT Bombay, has found himself at the centre of a storm on the Reddit forum LinkedIn Lunatics for an emotionally charged tribute post that many accused of being self-promotional. The founder, who helms a recruitment startup, took to LinkedIn to mourn the death of Rohit Sinha, a fourth-year student from IIT Bombay, who died at the age of 22. While his message began with sorrow, it quickly shifted focus to his company and its mission to support students in securing employment—drawing ire from netizens who felt it was an insensitive pivot. The alumnus opened his post by expressing grief over the passing of Sinha, who was a student of metallurgical engineering at IIT Bombay. The student reportedly died by suicide at Hostel 17 (H17) on campus. Although the specific cause behind the incident has yet to be determined, the entrepreneur noted how the tragedy hit close to home, emphasizing shared experiences within the same reflected on the high-pressure environment in elite academic spaces, particularly concerning internships and job placements. He described how the intensity and isolation that come with such expectations had once affected him deeply too. It was from that difficult emotional terrain, he claimed, that his recruitment startup was born—to offer support and job pathways for students navigating similar his closing lines, he encouraged struggling students to speak to friends or family and to seek help if burdened by academic or placement-related anxiety. He emphasized that life is valuable and that his platform is open for users did not take kindly to the post. Comments on the LinkedIn Lunatics subreddit skewered the founder for what many saw as an opportunistic move. One sarcastically paraphrased the tone as, 'Rest in peace, dead guy. Now let me tell you about my startup.' Another mocked the shift in narrative with, 'Let's centre this tragedy around me.'Another quipped, "Can't even let him rest in peace."Some compared the tone of the post to exploitative advertising, with one user imagining a commercial message wrapped in grief—likening it to someone announcing a child's death followed by a diaper discount promo. Another respondent commented bitterly that the deceased student likely would not have appreciated his memory being used as a segue to market a Sinha was a final-year student in the Meta Science department at IIT Bombay and hailed from Delhi. As per a statement from the Mumbai Police, Sinha allegedly jumped from the rooftop of his hostel building. He was rushed to a hospital but was pronounced dead on arrival. Authorities confirmed he had recently completed his BTech degree and was awaiting job placement. No suicide note was found at the scene. This tragic loss has reignited conversations around mental health, pressure in academic institutions, and the responsibilities of public figures when speaking about sensitive issues.