Pro-Kremlin Russian Military Correspondent Yurii Kotenok: 'It's Very Likely That After Iran, They Will Be After... Us!'
Russian military correspondent Yuri Petrovich Kotenok. (Source: Tsargrad TV)
The following is a translation of Kotenok's Telegram posts:[1]
"The IRGC... Has Proved Impotent In Matters Of Defense"
"1. Iran is trying to respond to Israel, but the enemy methodically destroys not just military infrastructure, but infrastructure in general. An analysis of military actions between Israel and Iran evidence that Tehran, surprisingly, did not invest in air defence, did not build it, however, as well as the Air Force. Iran was investing in missiles.
"2. It appears that Israel, contrary to the media, has not yet succeeded in destroying the stockpile of Iranian missiles (warehouses) that was accumulated over the past years. It is difficult to reach them [hidden] in the rocks. Israelis try to block the entrances to missile stockpiles carved in mountains with strikes; they also hit teams trying to clear the rubble in the adits.
"3. There is a roughly similar case with the very same nuclear facilities. The main ones have not been destroyed by the enemy. Provided the Zionists cannot not reach the target, they carry out accompanying strikes: They take down electricity [systems] to block the facility, curb its operational possibility, etc.
"4. There is no evidence of Iran's air defense system working. Perhaps the military bureaucracy is to blame for all of this and/or, considering the example of the gaps in Tehran's defense, the idiocy of the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps], which grabbed all the functions of the state, from selling [illegal] drugs to providing security for the elites and cities. Tehran was guarded only by the IRGC, and now Tehran has to endure [the Israeli strikes]... IRGC, this omnipotent structure, which infiltrated all institutions of the country's economic and political life, has proved impotent in matters of defense.
"5. Meanwhile, Iran continues to launch missiles, showing that it has the power and means to terrify Israel, which gives Iran credit.
"6. Iran's saturation with Zionist agents, which are involved [in Israel's operation] has its effect. Unfortunately, Iran turned out to be not ready for war, having lost the support of Hizbullah and Hamas. The very same Houthis, possessing territory and forces much smaller than Iran, managed to build a system [of operations], fought and 'bit' to the last and, in general, remained with what they had. Despite the fact that two U.S. carrier strike groups and some of their allies were fighting them. Both even suffered some losses."
"If The Iranian Regime Collapses, A Monstrous Migration Blow Will Be Dealt To Armenia, Azerbaijan, And Through Them, No Doubt, To Russia"
"7. If Iran were willing to fight to the last man, like the Houthis, to inflict defeat on the enemy, coordinating strikes across the Iranian network, the situation would look different by now. The problem is that Tehran has buried this network with its own hands over the last two to three years – it allowed Hamas and Hizbullah to be defeated and the Assad regime to fall. Unfortunately, the IRGC is to blame for this too. This power structure has infiltrated all institutions of political and economic life, trying to pass all political and non-political solutions, and as a result has drowned in its own bureaucracy. And now the losses in the army and navy are far from that of the IRGC. And the army continues to strike Israel.
"8. Trump has claimed that [Israel's] dominance has been established in Iranian airspace. It is very likely that the US will directly participate in the conflict, conducting strikes because Iran's air force has been virtually destroyed. We can with high probability expect an attempt at regime change in Iran. Trump is already demanding capitulation.
"9. With such tendencies, Iran will be defeated. And the situation, in my opinion, will not be changed by Pakistan's promises to intervene in the conflict. So far, with our very eyes we see attempts at dismantling China's main asset – Iran.
"10. If the Iranian regime collapses, a monstrous migration blow will be dealt to Armenia, Azerbaijan, and through them, no doubt, to Russia.
"11. Provided the world plan-maker goes further, trying to change the [Iranian] regime, it is very likely that after Iran they will be after... us! The temptation is great – Russia is encircled. They will subvert the internal situation, creating challenges and threats along the border. They will try to continuously penetrate the border in batches of several tens of thousands of refugees. This will lead to excesses at the border territories, which will resonate throughout the country.
"12. There is nothing good that the ancient Persian civilization is being crushed before our eyes. It is the most intelligent, softest, the most non-confrontational of Muslim civilizations with the deepest history. The state in which it now exists is in danger of collapse. Unfortunately, Iran has practically no moves left that could confound the enemy. Joint missile attacks, on which Tehran was counting, are currently only possible with the help of Yemen, and even then, will have a limited scale. At the moment, Iran can do little, alas... only fight to the last..."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Memri
36 minutes ago
- Memri
Fmr. Chairman Of Iran's Broadcasting Authority Mohammad Sarafraz: We Can Choose War – And Eventually Nuke Israel – Or We Can Conduct Negotiations With The U.S., But Both Options Are Bad; Instead, We S
Iranian official Mohammad Sarafraz, member of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace and former IRIB (Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting) chairman, said in an August 18, 2025 interview with Entekhab on YouTube that if Iran follows the path of war, it would not end well and could lead to a world war. He said that in the worst case, Iran might use a nuclear weapon, try to annihilate Israel, attack U.S. bases in the region, threaten European countries, and attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz. In contrast, he argued, If Iran had conducted negotiations earlier, when its proxies were not so weakened and the internal crisis had not reached such dire levels, such as the collapse of its water and electricity systems, it could have negotiated on more equal terms with the United States. He added that Iran could even have scored points on the nuclear issue, whereas today negotiations with the U.S. would not be on equal terms. Sarafraz called for deep, fast, and fundamental reforms in Iran, saying Iranian society is like a body afflicted with cancer that cannot be treated with painkillers. It is worth noting that following his resignation as IRIB chairman, Sarafraz alleged that IRGC intelligence and even members of Supreme Leader Khamenei's family had intervened in the broadcaster's financial and organizational affairs. Mohammad Sarafraz: "One scenario is to turn to the path of war, to welcome war, like some movements in our country are trying to promote. The outcome will be an endless war whose outcome is unknown. This scenario will probably lead to a world war. "In the worst case scenario, Iran might use a nuclear weapon, and will try to advance its endeavor to annihilate Israel. In addition, Iran will try to attack U.S. military bases in the region, to make security threats against European countries, and to somehow shut down the Strait of Hormuz. [...] "Ultimately, and considering the accumulation of problems we are facing, I don't think this will end well at all. [...] "Another scenario is to conduct negotiations with America. If we had done this in the past, we could have benefited greatly: The pro-Iran [proxy] groups would not have taken a hit – Hizbullah in Lebanon, the Iraqis, the Yemenis, and the Palestinian groups, including Hamas, would not have reached such a pathetic state. "Iran's status and power in the region would have been much higher, and we would not have suffered domestic problems in the water and electricity systems, like we do now. Had we conducted negotiations, we could have won points in the nuclear and other issues. Now, however, negotiations with the U.S. would not be on equal terms at all. We would negotiate with someone who wants to impose his positions and will on Iran. [...] "The third path – the one which I claim our country needs to take – is one of introspection. I call it, in a nutshell, a revolution in the ruling system. In other words, there should be deep, fast, and fundamental reforms in this country. These include a reform in the constitution, a reform in our approach to things, and even a reform in the goals to which we have dragged our country. Consequently, there should be a reform in the management of the country. All of these need to happen. [...] "Our society is currently like a sick man, or like a body afflicted with cancer. This problem cannot be resolved with painkillers."
Memri
36 minutes ago
- Memri
The Trump-Putin Meeting And Pseudo-Negotiations In Alaska
The Alaska summit is an event in world diplomacy shrouded in mystery and, let's face it, devoid of any apparent meaning. The awkwardness of this meeting, replete with non-verbal signals, was not only due to the obvious stiffness in front of the eyes of the world community, which was expecting, if not a ceasefire, then at least a hint of the possibility of achieving one. The problem was rooted in the logic and format of the Anchorage rendezvous: instead of first conducting painstaking work by experts and preparing a joint communiqué, the leaders exchanged firm handshakes and pompous statements. First, a symbolic rapprochement, and then... silence. These were "upside-down negotiations," without any guarantees of further execution of joint documents and development of clear solutions. The incompetence of the American delegation, disregard for expert opinion on the "Russian issue," and complete dependence on President Donald Trump's fickle mood led to a complete failure. And this despite the fact that Secretary of State Marco Rubio demonstrated signs of common sense shortly before the summit, proposing a "ceasefire – peace talks" scheme. Where did this principle go on the way to Anchorage? Russian FM Sergey Lavrov arrives in Alaska wearing "USSR" sweater (Source: X) Another Meaningless Telephone Conversation Would Have Been Enough Russian diplomats, who have long forgotten how to play a subtle diplomatic game and have mastered the rhetoric of Soviet propaganda during the Cold War, did not set the goal of reaching specific agreements. Their task was to "charm" Trump. The goal was achieved, but the question arises: Do the parties even have specialists capable of solving practical issues? This is especially important in the context of resuming the dialogue on arms control and nuclear non-proliferation – this requires completely different skills than waving a sweater with the inscription "USSR" or threatening statements from the UN rostrum. Have these skills been lost? And are they needed at all? In fact, with such a result of pseudo-negotiations, it was not necessary to travel so far – another meaningless telephone conversation would have been enough. Expectations fueled by the media collapsed overnight. Society was thirsty for peace. Peace did not come. Even on terms that would not suit someone. The Anchorage summit became a reflection of the crisis of modern diplomacy, where form prevails over content, and political populism replaces painstaking work on building trust and finding compromises. Instead of a deep analysis of existing problems and developing a roadmap, the parties limited themselves to a superficial exchange of pleasantries, behind which was hidden the absence of a common strategy and understanding of the prospects for further cooperation. Elvira Vikhareva Ideological Cliches The meeting in Anchorage revealed not only the lack of political will for real changes, but also a shortage of professional personnel capable of conducting complex negotiations and developing mutually beneficial solutions. Disregard for expert opinion, the replacement of reasoned discussion with ideological cliches and the desire for short-term political dividends led to the summit turning into an empty formality that did not bring any tangible results. In an era of global challenges that require coordinated efforts and constructive dialogue, such an approach to international relations seems extremely short-sighted. Without a serious reassessment of values and the rejection of outdated stereotypes, the world risks finding itself in a situation where even the most complex problems remain unresolved, and opportunities for cooperation are missed. The Anchorage summit should be a lesson for future generations of diplomats and politicians, a reminder that only painstaking work based on mutual respect and a desire for compromise can lead to real results. Without this, any meetings and negotiations are doomed to remain just an empty phrase, unable to change the world for the better. *Elvira Vikhareva is a renowned Russian opposition politician based in Russia. In 2023, she was poisoned with heavy metal salts.
Shafaq News
5 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Lavrov: Putin open to Zelenskyy meeting with conditions
2025-08-21T14:42:23+00:00 Shafaq News – Moscow Russian President Vladimir Putin is willing to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, but only after thorough groundwork by ministers and experts, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov confirmed on Thursday. Speaking at a press conference alongside Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Lavrov emphasized that Putin has repeatedly expressed readiness for talks — including with Zelenskyy — provided that all key issues are carefully examined and prepared at the highest level. 'Before any future agreements can be signed, the legitimacy of the Ukrainian representative must first be resolved,' Lavrov asserted, referencing ongoing concerns in Moscow over Zelenskyy's legal mandate, where the Ukrainian president has not yet revoked a decree he issued three years ago that explicitly bans negotiations with Putin. Lavrov accused Zelenskyy of avoiding serious negotiations, claiming he has chosen instead to stage 'theatrical performances like those he once delivered in university theater and in the Kvartal 95 comedy troupe before entering politics.' Earlier, US President Donald Trump remarked that the responsibility for ending the war in Ukraine rests squarely with Putin and Zelenskyy, arguing that the United States is too far removed from the battlefield to dictate a solution.
