logo
Rival groups face off outside migrant hotel - as asylum seekers 'blow kisses' at protesters

Rival groups face off outside migrant hotel - as asylum seekers 'blow kisses' at protesters

Sky News14 hours ago
Several demonstrators have been detained after rival groups faced off over a hotel accommodating asylum seekers in north London, with police breaking up brief clashes.
The Metropolitan Police has since imposed conditions on the protest and counter-protest outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in Islington.
The protest was organised by local residents under the banner "Thistle Barbican needs to go - locals say no".
The group of several hundred people waved union flags and banners, and one man chanted: "Get these scum off our streets."
A larger group staged a counter demonstration to voice support for asylum seekers, bearing a banner that read: "Refugees are welcome."
People inside the hotel, believed to be migrants, watched on, with some waving and blowing kisses from the windows.
A man wearing an England football shirt was detained by police after getting into an altercation with officers.
There have been nine arrests so far, seven of which were for breaching conditions police put on the protests under the Public Order Act.
Rival groups separated by police
Another protest was scheduled in Newcastle on Saturday, outside The New Bridge Hotel, as anti-migrant sentiment ripples through some communities around the country, also flaring up recently in Epping.
4:09
The counter-protest in London was organised by local branches of Stand Up To Racism, and supported by former Labour leader and Islington North MP Jeremy Corbyn.
Other community groups including Finsbury Park Mosque and Islington Labour Party were also involved.
Groups online that backed the original protest include "Patriots of Britain" and "Together for the Children".
At one point, a large group of masked protesters dressed in black, calling themselves anti-fascists, appeared from a side street and marched towards the rival group outside the hotel.
The two groups briefly clashed before police rushed in to separate them.
Why are asylum hotels used?
The government is legally required to provide accommodation and subsistence to destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being decided, most of whom are prohibited from working.
A jump in the use of hotels since 2020 has been attributed to the impacts of the COVID pandemic, a backlog in unresolved asylum cases, and an increase in the number of migrants crossing the Channel in small boats.
However, the number of asylum seekers living in hotels has fallen recently, from 38,079 at the end of 2024 to 32,345 at the end of March 2025, according to the Refugee Council.
How police tried to keep groups apart
The police imposed conditions on both groups in London to prevent "serious disorder" and minimise disruption to the community.
Those in the anti-asylum hotel protest were told to remain within King Charles Square, and to gather not before 1pm and wrap up by 4pm.
Those in the counter-protest were to required to stay in an area in Lever Street, and assemble only between 12pm and 4pm, but were still in eye and ear shot of the other group.
Chief Superintendent Clair Haynes, in charge of the policing operation, said: "We have been in discussions with the organisers of both protests in recent days, building on the ongoing engagement between local officers, community groups and partners.
"We understand that there are strongly held views on all sides.
"Our officers will police without fear or favour, ensuring those exercising their right to protest can do so safely, but intervening at the first sign of actions that cross the line into criminality."
Meanwhile, the protest in Newcastle was promoted by online posts saying it was "for our children, for our future".
The "stop the far right and fascists in Newcastle" counter-protest was organised by Stand Up To Racism at the nearby Laing Art Gallery.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

List of key Jersey 2026 and 2027 election dates published
List of key Jersey 2026 and 2027 election dates published

BBC News

time7 minutes ago

  • BBC News

List of key Jersey 2026 and 2027 election dates published

A list of key election dates for 2026 and half of 2027 in Jersey has been published by the Privileges and Procedures Committee (PPC). Officials said it was hoped releasing the list now would help prospective candidates with forward planning further into the 20 April 2026, the electoral candidate nomination period begins, with it closing just two days later at 17:00 BST. Then, on 7 June, is the public election of all 49 States members, with the first meeting of the newly-elected States Assembly and the election of a chief minister designate due on 19 June. campaign manager Emily Thomas said: "Throughout the Plan To Stand campaign, has provided prospective candidates support and encouragement to mobilise early and prepare for a fair and competitive election in 2026. "Having advance notice of the key dates associated with the 2026 election is a huge help for people who are already making plans for their election campaign."

Reeves is cynically squeezing us dry– without raising taxes
Reeves is cynically squeezing us dry– without raising taxes

Telegraph

time37 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Reeves is cynically squeezing us dry– without raising taxes

The Chancellor has not had much luck with some of her tax rises. Rachel Reeves was expecting to raise up to £3.2bn each year, or around £12.7bn in this parliament, with the scrapping of non-dom status – a policy announced by her Conservative predecessor Jeremy Hunt and then ramped up by Labour. She is heading for disappointment. With the exodus of more than 10,000 millionaires from the UK last year and an expected 16,000 this year, Reeves has been warned that the move may in fact reduce rather than increase tax receipts. Speculation is thus rife that the measures may be further watered down; there has already been some initial tweaking and softening earlier this year. The imposition of VAT on school fees is likewise now widely expected to raise less than the predicted £1.7bn by 2030, due to more than expected numbers of children transferring to the state sector and becoming a burden on education budgets. The spate of independent school closures – not just as a result of the VAT change but also employer National Insurance rises, the loss of business rate relief for schools with charitable status and the gamut of extra regulation affecting all businesses – will inevitably make this worse. But, ironically, Reeves may have been rather more adept at boosting Treasury revenue with some of the tax measures she did not actually implement. Before last year's Halloween Budget there was much speculation that rates of capital gains tax (CGT) would be brought into line with those for income tax. This would have meant that higher-rate taxpayers earning over £50,270 would have had to pay 40pc instead of 24pc on taxable property gains and 20pc on other assets. Additional rate taxpayers, earning over £125,140, even worried they might be faced with a full 45pc levy on any uplift. The fear that these rates would be aligned was an entirely rational one. The great Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson in his 1988 Budget had done just that – although the medicine that year was very much sweetened by the scrapping of all income tax rates over 40pc at the same time. Labour's manifesto, while pledging not to raise the rates of income tax or employee National Insurance, was silent about CGT. And after winning the election, Sir Keir Starmer and Reeves never tired of talking up a £22bn 'black hole' the Tories had allegedly left them. This would soon need filling – and Reeves did nothing to dampen down speculation that CGT rises and changes to the pension regime would be how she would achieve at least part of this. In the event, the Chancellor took less drastic action. She raised the rate of CGT for non-property gains from 10pc to 18pc for basic-rate taxpayers and 20pc to 24pc for those on the higher and additional rates. In other words, she aligned the rates for different asset classes to the one already levied on property. But the speculation alone did pay dividends for Reeves. In October last year, the month running up to the Budget, CGT receipts on residential property disposals was £408m – more than double that of most other months in the last tax year. Revenue from CGT is notoriously volatile when compared to other taxes. In the 2023-24 tax year, for example, CGT liabilities were 18pc down from the previous year. But the surge in the run-up to the Budget was vast. The best explanation for the Treasury's October windfall is that residential landlords sold up in advance of a clobbering that did not materialise. As Chris Etherington, of accountants RSM, has noted: 'It is clear that anticipation of CGT changes can distort taxpayer behaviour... the Chancellor benefitted from an inadvertent windfall... Reeves does not necessarily need to increase CGT rates to raise revenues. It's potentially possible to maximise CGT receipts by simply saying very little on the subject.' The Chancellor will insist that she cannot speculate about what moves she will be making in future Budgets – due to such information having an impact on the markets. But that argument does not quite wash. She is more than happy to rule out some fiscal moves, such as raising the rate of income tax. So why not others? Is it too cynical to suggest that Reeves has found her own third way? She can benefit from increased inflows without actually raising taxes. But such tactics are far from victimless – the uncertainty and disruption caused comes at a high price. Additionally, it makes it much more difficult for people to plan for the future and may make them take unnecessary decisions that they will live to regret. In other circumstances, allowing speculation to rip may in fact hurt Treasury coffers. Not closing down current Labour Party debates about a wealth tax will surely mean more wealthy people leaving the UK in anticipation of such a move. This will not only hurt our economy but also mean lower tax yields, resulting in less money for public services.

Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge before police stop rally citing safety fears
Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge before police stop rally citing safety fears

The Guardian

time37 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge before police stop rally citing safety fears

Huge crowds of pro-Palestine marchers, including Julian Assange, Bob Carr and Ed Husic, have marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge in the rain to protest against Israel's conduct in Gaza and to speak out about the children starving there. The world-famous landmark was closed to traffic at 11.30am on Sunday, with protesters gathering in Lang Park in the city centre in chilly weather before walking north to Bradfield Park across the bridge. About 3pm NSW police sent out a mass text message to phones throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Message from NSW Police: In consultation with the organisers, the march needs to stop due to public safety and await further instructions,' the message read. A police helicopter hovered overhead with instructions for the hordes of protesters to turn around and walk back towards the city. A second text message read: 'After consultation with the protest organisers, we are asking that everyone stops walking north. As soon as the march has stopped, we will look at turning everyone around back towards the city BUT it needs to be done in a controlled way in stages to keep everyone safe. Earlier the Indigenous actor Meyne Wyatt and the former Socceroo and Australian of the Year Craig Foster were among tens of thousands of people marching in the wet weather, while the Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi spoke passionately before the walk began. Faruqi, who has been an outspoken critic of the federal government's action in relation to Israel's conduct in Gaza, commended protesters for 'defying Chris Minns' after the New South Wales premier said: 'We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos.' 'Thank you for defying Chris Minns,' she said. 'This is a man who wants you to stay home and be silent in the face of a genocide. 'It was never about logistics. It was never about traffic. It was never about communications or anything else. It was always about stopping us and silencing us. It was always about protecting Israel and the Labor government from accountability.' Police had rejected an application from organisers for them to facilitate the march, arguing there was not enough time to prepare a traffic management plan and warned of a potential crowd crush and huge disruptions. But on Saturday the NSW supreme court ruled the march could go ahead. On Sunday protesters turned out carrying pots and pans – to highlight the starvation in Gaza – while many carried Palestinian flags and signage along with their wet weather gear and umbrellas. One protester that Guardian Australia spoke to, a British man called Dan, held a sign reading 'Gay Jews 4 Gaza'. 'I grew up in a north London Jewish community, and I think there's a widespread Zionism that exists within the Jewish community that is difficult to separate from religion,' he said, adding: 'I think it's important for people within the community to stand up and raise their voice against the state of Israel because they're not representative of the Jewish community as a whole.' Guardian Australia also spoke to Philomena McGoldrick, a registered nurse and midwife, who has spent stints working in Gaza and described her heartbreak at images circulating of starving children. 'Innocent babies have no colour, no religion, no language. In this day and age … it's heartbreaking … But it's nice to meet people standing on the right side. The tide has changed.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The WikiLeaks founder was also spotted in the crowd, one of few public appearances since Assange arrived home in Australia after a decade-long extradition battle. He was photographed alongside Carr, the former NSW premier and federal foreign affairs minister who last week told Guardian Australia the federal government should sanction the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and move quickly to recognise Palestinian statehood. Carr said it would send 'a message that we are turned inside out with disgust by what appears the deliberate starvation' of Gaza. Carr's call was echoed by Husic, a federal Labor MP and former cabinet minister, who joined the rally to march across the bridge alongside the five state Labor MPs who defied Minns. Labor's Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D'Adam, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine were among 15 NSW politicians who signed an open letter on Thursday evening calling on the government to facilitate 'a safe and orderly event' on Sunday. Meanwhile, pro-Palestinian protesters in Melbourne's city centre, who had planned to shut down King Street Bridge in solidarity with the Sydney protest, appeared to have been blocked from crossing the bridge. Video shared on social media by the protest organisers showed police in riot gear and shields blocking the bridge with trucks. Victoria police were approached to confirm the bridge had been shut down; a spokesperson said a statement would be released at the end of the day. In Sydney, Transport for NSW urged people to avoid non-essential travel around the central business district and northern parts of the city.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store