Police respond to shooting on Syracuse's Westside
SYRACUSE, N.Y. (WSYR-TV) — Syracuse Police were called to a reported shooting on the West Side of Syracuse on Thursday, April 24.
This shooting comes after Syracuse Police also responded to two other shootings in the city around 24 hours prior.
PHOTOS: SU rally after student visas revoked
Police respond to shooting on Syracuse's Westside
Syracuse taking owners of Nob Hill Apartments to state Supreme Court
Your Stories Q&A: An update on the future of Beck's Hotel in Mexico
Calling all guidos and guidettes: DJ Pauly D added to NYS Fair lineup
According to 911 dispatchers, officers were called to the 300 block of Kellogg Street around 5 p.m. on Thursday.
NewsChannel 9 crews at the scene said they saw an ambulance leaving the scene with a police escort.
This story will be updated as we learn more.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Utah killer with dementia is competent enough for death sentence to be carried out, judge rules
A convicted killer in Utah who developed dementia during his time on death row is competent enough to be executed, a state judge ruled on Friday. Ralph Leroy Menzies, 67, was found guilty and sentenced to death in March 1988 for the 1986 killing of Maurine Hunsaker, a 26-year-old mother of three. Judge Matthew Bates said Menzies "consistently and rationally understands" what is happening and why he is facing execution, despite his recent cognitive decline. "Menzies has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that his understanding of his specific crime and punishment has fluctuated or declined in a way that offends the Eighth Amendment," which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, Bates said in his court order. Suspect Charged With Murdering Israeli Embassy Staff Could Face Death Penalty Menzies selected the firing squad as his method of execution and will become only the sixth U.S. prisoner executed by firing squad since 1977 — three in Utah, with the last one in the state carried out in 2010, and two in South Carolina this year. Read On The Fox News App The Utah Attorney General's Office is expected to file a death warrant soon. Menzies' lawyers had argued their client's dementia was so severe that he could not understand why he was being put to death, adding that they plan to appeal Friday's ruling to the state Supreme Court. Cop Killer Dies After 'Botched' Execution; Witness In The Room Reveals How It Happened "Ralph Menzies is a severely brain-damaged, wheelchair-bound, 67-year-old man with dementia and significant memory problems," his attorney, Lindsey Layer, said in a statement. "It is deeply troubling that Utah plans to remove Mr. Menzies from his wheelchair and oxygen tank to strap him into an execution chair and shoot him to death." The U.S. Supreme Court has previously spared death row inmates with dementia from execution, including an Alabama man in 2019 who was convicted of killing a police officer. Since his sentencing 37 years ago, Menzies' attorneys have filed multiple appeals that delayed his death sentence, which had been scheduled at least twice before it was postponed. Menzies had abducted Hunsaker in February 1986 from the convenience store where she worked, just three days after he was released on bail over an unrelated crime. Hunsaker was later found strangled with her throat cut at a picnic area in the Wasatch Mountains of northern Utah. When he was later jailed on unrelated matters, Menzies had Hunsaker's wallet and several other items that belonged to her. He was convicted of first-degree murder and other crimes. Matt Hunsaker, who was 10 years old when his mother was killed, said Friday that his family is overwhelmed with emotion to know that justice will finally be served. The Associated Press contributed to this article source: Utah killer with dementia is competent enough for death sentence to be carried out, judge rules
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jesse Watters Trots Out Dehumanizing Analogy for Kilmar Abrego Garcia's Return
Fox News host Jesse Watters criticized the Trump administration for bringing Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to the United States, saying the wrongly deported man's return was like taking a rental car to the car wash. 'I don't think they should have brought him back,' Watters said on The Five, shortly after news broke that Abrego Garcia is facing two counts of human smuggling in Tennessee. 'This is a national security situation. The guy is a designated terrorist. He belongs somewhere else. What are we going to do? We're going to spend two years and $50 million trying this guy and imprisoning this guy, feeding him, giving him healthcare, and then flying him home?' Watters said incredulously. 'This is like renting a car and taking it to a car wash before you return it,' he added. 'What's the point? It's not your car, and it's going back anyway.' Attorney General Pam Bondi said Abrego Garcia would first serve time in a U.S. prison if convicted, then be removed from the country once again. Garcia had been held in El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center even after the Trump administration admitted his deportation was an 'administrative error.' When the Supreme Court ordered that it 'facilitate' his return, the White House insisted that it was powerless to do so. Friday's events proved the administration was lying, The Five co-host Jessica Tarlov said Friday. '[White House Press Secretary] Karoline Leavitt—as well as other members of the administration, from the president himself to Kristi Noem—lied to the American people when they said they couldn't bring him back,' Tarlov said. 'Well, I guess you could get him back.' Andrew Rossman, a lawyer for Abrego Garcia, made the same point. 'Today's action proves what we've known all along—that the administration had the ability to bring him back and just refused to do so,' he told The New York Times. 'It's now up to our judicial system to see that Mr. Abrego Garcia receives the due process that the Constitution guarantees to all persons.' Abrego Garcia was sent to Tennessee, where the indictment was filed in May and unsealed Friday. The Times reports that an imprisoned man's information about Abrego Garcia moved the case forward. Prosecutors couldn't agree how to proceed, however, and one ended up resigning.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court to consider use of multiple IQ tests in case of Alabama death row inmate
WASHINGTON − More than two decades after the Supreme Court said inmates who are intellectually disabled can't be executed, the court will consider how to deal with multiple intelligence tests in evaluating close calls. The court on June 6 said it would take up the case of Alabama death row inmate Joseph Smith, who was convicted and sentenced to death for a brutal murder in 1997. Smith's IQ scores have ranged from 72 to 78. Because IQ tests have an error range, lower courts said Smith's IQ could be below 70, one of the factors for defining intellectual disability. But the state argues that when five test scores are all above 70, it's unlikely that Smith's IQ is 70 or below. The Justice Department similarly told the Supreme Court that some lower courts are confused about how to evaluate multiple IQ tests under Supreme Court rules for what counts as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. "That confusion prevents states from implementing lawful capital punishment," lawyers for the Justice Department wrote in a brief urging the court to get involved. Lawyers for Smith countered that the Supreme Court has previously said there's no precise math equation for determining an intellectual disability. Related: Alabama sets date to execute Gregory Hunt This isn't the first time the high court has considered a request from Alabama to take up Smith's case. After sitting on the case for more than a year, the court in November ordered the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to clarify why it backed the trial judge's determination that Smith is intellectually disabled and can't be executed. Related: Alabama executes James Osgood for 2010 rape and murder In a brief opinion, the court said it couldn't tell if the appeals court used a holistic approach to weighing the evidence about Smith's disability or relied primarily on his lowest-possible IQ score. The justices noted that the Supreme Court hadn't previously said how courts should evaluate multiple IQ scores. In response, the appeals court said it considered the entire record. In addition to IQ, other factors that define intellectual disability are 'significant or substantial deficits in adaptive behavior' and the onset of those qualities before age 18. 'Clinicians who attempt to diagnose whether an individual has significantly subaverage intellectual functioning do not limit themselves to IQ tests,' the appeals court wrote. Multiple IQ tests with similar results are not sufficient, the court said, because the test itself may be consistently flawed or improperly given. Smith was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of Durk Van Dam, who received 35 blunt force injuries and wounds from a saw on his neck, shoulder and back. U.S. District Judge Callie V. S. Granade called the evaluation of Smith's mental functioning a 'close case' but wrote 'the evidence indicates that Smith's intelligence and adaptive functioning has been deficient throughout his life.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court to consider use of IQ tests in Alabama death row case
