logo
Penalty burden eases on private university that built campus illegally in Aravalis

Penalty burden eases on private university that built campus illegally in Aravalis

Time of India14-07-2025
Gurgaon: The penalty on a private university for using over 13 hectares of protected forest land in Faridabad without full permission is likely to come down sharply after the Centre decided to apply its new, relaxed rules in the case.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The Aravali land, located along the Badkhal-Surajkund Road, was protected under Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), 1900. The university — Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS) — used this land for construction before getting prior clearance, as mandated, under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. But after the FCA was amended in 2023, the campus became among the first to get post facto approval.
During a meeting on June 12, the Union environment ministry's advisory committee recommended applying the 2023 forest rules for calculating the fine, replacing the stricter 2019 guidelines. Under the 2019 guidelines, the penal Net Present Value (NPV) — a form of financial compensation — was calculated from the actual date the forest land was used, with an additional 12% simple interest for each year of violation until payment was made.
This meant that if an agency began using the land without formal clearance in 2019, it would incur a penalty for each subsequent year, significantly increasing the financial burden.
However, under the revised 2023 guidelines, the Union environment ministry introduced a key change — penal interest would now be applied only from the date the penalty demand was officially raised, not from the date of the original violation.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
This adjustment substantially reduces the total payable amount in delayed cases.
After this change was implemented, the Haryana govt sought clarification from the Centre on which set of rules should apply to the Manav Rachna forest diversion case, where the land was used before final approvals were granted.
The state govt specifically enquired if the stricter 2019 rules or more lenient 2023 norms should govern the calculation of the penal NPV — a decision with financial implications.
This query was a focal point in the June 2025 meeting of the forest advisory committee, where the ministry reaffirmed its Nov 2024 clarification in favour of applying the 2023 norms.
Approval & penalty reduction:
The Centre had granted in-principle approval for the land diversion on Dec 29, 2023, but also flagged that the university violated forest norms by starting work prematurely. The main query was how much the varsity should pay as a penalty (NPV) for using forest land without permission.
This recommendation was made because construction of the university began in 1991, well before the 1996 cut-off date. Last year, Parliament revised the Forest Conservation Act (FCA), stating if construction occurred prior to Dec 12, 1996, the Act would not be applicable.
Under the 2019 rules, the penalty would have been calculated from the year the land was first used — potentially as early as 2019 or 2020 — and would include 12% annual interest, resulting in a total fine of approximately ₹20 crore.
However, under the new 2023 rules, interest is counted only from the date the fine was officially demanded, reducing the fine by 2.5 times — around 60% less than what the institute would have paid earlier.
Activists flag green concerns:
While the move provides relief to the university, it has raised concerns among environmental activists. They argued that it could encourage more illegal use of protected land, particularly in fragile zones like Aravalis.
Former forest conservator (south Haryana) RP Balwan criticised the decision, stating it violates the Supreme Court orders from 2008 and 2019, which prohibit construction in the Aravalis. "The Centre, too, has acknowledged the protected status of Aravali land earlier.
In 2008 and 2009, reports by the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which guides the govt on key decisions, said the entire Aravali region of Gurgaon and Faridabad are prohibited zones under FCA and construction can only be allowed to install power lines and build village link roads.
So, entertaining the FCA case is wrong, forget about reducing penalties," said Balwan.
Activists also said reducing the penalty by 2.5 times sends a message that violations can be rectified with money, weakening forest land protection. Chetan Agarwal, a forest analyst, said, "The land in question is village Shamlat common land that appears to have been dubiously privatised. The govt should restore the land to the gram panchayat or Faridabad corporation in line with SC judgments in Jagpal Singh v.
State of Punjab (2012) and Jai Singh v.
State of Haryana (2022) and take possession of the buildings in public interest." He proposed that any forest clearance granted to Manav Rachna University should be provisional, subject to the outcome of ongoing or future ownership cases.
What's next?
Before receiving the final clearance, the university must fulfil several conditions. It should plant trees on an equivalent area of non-forest land (14ha), repair damage on 0.19 ha of encroached land, properly mark the diverted land with boundary pillars and comply with the Forest Rights Act and Environment Protection Act. Till these requirements aren't met, the land cannot be legally transferred to the varsity.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Income Tax: Only evaders should fear invasive tax probes
Income Tax: Only evaders should fear invasive tax probes

Mint

time3 hours ago

  • Mint

Income Tax: Only evaders should fear invasive tax probes

Next Story Mint Editorial Board India's Income Tax bill is broadly welcome for simplifying this direct levy, but it has also raised some concern over digital privacy. We should tighten the operating framework under Section 247 to reassure earnest taxpayers. To minimize the scope for Section 247 to become a tool in the hands of venal elements, the taxman's bar for search and seizure operations should be set high. Gift this article When finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced during her 2025-26 Budget speech that the government was planning to overhaul the existing Income Tax Act and introduce a new tax bill, there was a round of applause from all taxpayers. When finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced during her 2025-26 Budget speech that the government was planning to overhaul the existing Income Tax Act and introduce a new tax bill, there was a round of applause from all taxpayers. The old Act had become cumbersome, difficult to navigate and abstruse across many parts, leading to differing interpretations and irreconcilable disputes. 'The new bill will be clear and direct in text," promised the finance minister, '[…] close to half of the present law, in terms of both chapters and words." This commitment was roundly welcomed, given the difficulties taxpayers and tax authorities faced in dealing with confusing provisions. The revision's basic aim was to simplify the law's language and retire redundant parts, while retaining the extant tax rates, definitions and framework for offences and penalties. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | Income tax: How close should authorities look? When the new bill's draft was unveiled, it came as a breath of fresh air: it proposed to reduce the number of chapters from 47 to 23 and of sections from 819 to 536. But then, on closer scrutiny of the draft, alarm bells started going off in various accounting shops and law firms. Accompanied by lobby groups, they started raising a red flag over Section 247, which was viewed as a potential breach of the right to privacy. This contentious section empowers the taxman to access an assessee's digital assets and online spaces during search and seizure operations with the authority to override any password or access code. This would cover email servers, social media accounts, online investment and trading accounts, and also cloud storage of asset ownership details. The bill was referred to a select committee of Parliament headed by Bharatiya Janata Party member Baijayant Panda. In their depositions to this panel, Indian tax authorities and finance ministry officials argued that even the current Act allows officials to not only enter and search buildings, but also to break open locks of physical storage spaces for closer scrutiny of their contents. Given the proliferation of virtual spaces and digital assets, the same provision needs an upgrade to help tax officers ferret out undisclosed income. The authorities also argued that Section 247 does not conflict with the right to privacy, especially if we apply the three-fold test laid down by the Supreme Court's nine-judge bench that heard the K.S. Puttuswamy vs Union of India case. While the select committee has approved Section 247, with Parliament now expected to debate its fine details, it must be pointed out that history is witness to many such well-intentioned provisions turning into slippery slopes in the absence of sufficient guard-rails. In its present form, the bill appears to grant too many officers the authority to sanction forced access under a diffused command and accountability structure. This framework could prove prone to misuse, as the past has shown, and should be tightened. For example, publicly revealed instances of phone tapping have shown the innovative misuse of standard operating procedures whose original intent was noble. To minimize the scope for Section 247 to become a tool in the hands of venal elements, the taxman's bar for search and seizure operations should be set high. This would reassure earnest taxpayers and honour the five-letter foundation of India's proposed Income Tax law: trust. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands
NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands

The National Green Tribunal ( NGT ) issued notice on a plea from The Citizens Foundation, which alleges widespread non-compliance with the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, by manufacturers of gutkha, pan masala, and tobacco products. The petition claims that banned plastic packaging materials are still being used and calls for strict enforcement of existing regulations. This includes the closure of units violating the rules and the recovery of environmental compensation. A judicial bench led by Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Expert Member Dr. A. Senthil Vel has issued notices to relevant authorities, including the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), seeking their responses. Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that, despite the CPCB's earlier directives, issued on October 22, 2021, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to 25 manufacturers to halt operations unless they adopted eco-friendly packaging, these directives remain unimplemented. The CPCB had instructed the defaulting companies to submit a timeline for switching to sustainable materials and to pay Environmental Compensation (EC) with interest for any delays. The plea highlights violations of Rules 4(f) and 4(i) of the 2016 Rules, which prohibit the use of plastic sachets and specific polymers in packaging gutkha and related products. CPCB's previous reports suggested that such non-compliance could result in stern penalties, including seizure of goods, shutting down of factories, and levies of Rs 5,000 per ton of plastic used. Repeat offences could attract additional fines of up to Rs 20,000 per ton. The applicant also cited a CPCB report from January 2021, which outlines enforcement under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime. According to this, delayed EC payments could be penalised with annual interest ranging from 12 per cent to 24 per cent. Delays exceeding three months could lead to factory closures and criminal prosecution under Section 15(1) of the Environment Protection Act. Recognising the gravity of the environmental concerns raised, the NGT has scheduled the next hearing for September 26, 2025. The applicant must serve notices on the remaining respondents and file an affidavit of service one week prior to the scheduled date, as stated by the Tribunal.

Karnataka MP says new amendment to Income Tax Act will impact services of Chartered Accountants
Karnataka MP says new amendment to Income Tax Act will impact services of Chartered Accountants

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Karnataka MP says new amendment to Income Tax Act will impact services of Chartered Accountants

Member of Parliament G. Kumar Naik believes that the new amendment to the existing Income Tax Act proposed by the Central Government would adversely impact services providing by Chartered Accountants. He was speaking during a discussion held by the District Commerce and Industries Association and Chartered Accountants Association about new amendments to the Act, in Yadgir on July 26. 'The Central Government has proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act. But, it could have conducted a wide discussion with experts before taking a decision,' he said, and added that if Chartered Accountants provide a detailed report on how the new amendment would impact their work, he would raise the issue in the Lok Sabha. Most of the chartered accountants, who spoke at the event, said that digital device technology would impact their personal lives, and therefore, the Central Government should keep this in mind while amending the Act. Dinesh Kumar Jain, Chairman of YDCCI, Vivek Totloorkar, Tax Committee Chairman, and Channamallikarjun Akki were among those present at the event.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store