Trump administration cancels plans to develop new offshore wind projects
More than 3.5 million acres had been designated wind energy areas, the offshore locations deemed most suitable for wind energy development. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is now rescinding all designated wind energy areas in federal waters, announcing on Wednesday an end to setting aside large areas for 'speculative wind development."
Offshore wind lease sales were anticipated off the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Maine, New York, California and Oregon, as well as in the central Atlantic. The Biden administration last year had announced a five-year schedule to lease federal offshore tracts for wind energy production.
Trump began reversing the country's energy policies after taking office in January. A series of executive orders took aim at increasing oil, gas and coal production.
The Republican president has been hostile to renewable energy, particularly offshore wind. One early executive order temporarily halted offshore wind lease sales in federal waters and paused the issuance of approvals, permits and loans for all wind projects. In trying to make a case against wind energy, he has relied on false and misleading claims about the use of wind power in the U.S. and around the world.
The bureau said it was acting in accordance with Trump's action and an order by his interior secretary this week to end any preferential treatment toward wind and solar facilities, which were described as unreliable, foreign-controlled energy sources.
Attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbis are suing in federal court to challenge Trump's executive order halting leasing and permitting for wind energy projects. His administration had also halted work on a major offshore wind project for New York, but allowed it to resume in May.
The nation's first commercial-scale offshore wind farm, a 12-turbine wind farm called South Fork, opened last year east of Montauk Point, New York.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Barron Trump has not been seen with his dad Donald in months
Barron Trump has not attended an official White House event or appeared alongside his father Donald Trump in months. The 19-year-old NYU student was last seen by his dad's side at his inauguration on January 20, where he seemed cool and confident as he put on a show for the cameras. But since then, Barron hasn't stepped out with the 79-year-old president - and his noticeable absence has prompted speculation over his whereabouts. Daily Mail has contacted the White House for comment. Despite not being seen out with his dad, Barron has been photographed in and around Manhattan. In April, he was pictured showing off a shaggier, more relaxed mane as he strode with purpose to university classes. The towering NYU's Stern School of Business freshman - who stands at 6ft7 - also sported a loose sweater, jeans, and Adidas sneakers. Barron reportedly commutes to college from the Trump Tower apartment, home to his father and doting 54-year-old mother Melania. To get him to class, a motorcade of black SUVs drives him 20 minutes to Tisch Hall, Stern's undergrad building. While Barron hasn't been by his father's side, Trumps older children, Donald Jr Trump, 47, Ivanka Trump, 43, and Eric Trump, 41, have showed their support. Earlier this week, the president was joined by his sons Donald Jr and Eric, daughter-in-law Lara Trump, and grandchildren Chloe and Spencer, for the opening ceremony of Trump International Golf Links near Aberdeen, Scotland. His family members joined him for the trip to Scotland - that was part vacation, part work - as he stayed at his Trump Turnberry golf course. 'This has been an unbelievable development,' Trump said before the ribbon cutting. He also heaped praise on Eric, who designed the course, who in return said it was his dad's 'passion project.' Eric has appeared by his dad's side for numerous events, including the Super Bowl in New Orleans in February. Eric's sister Ivanka was also in attendance for the UFC 316 event in New Jersey, and was accompanied by her husband Jared Kushner. In April, Ivanka's children Arabella Rose, 13, and her son Theodore, nine, hung out with Trump on the South Lawn of the White House at an event celebrating the Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles NFL football team. While Barron hasn't been by his dad's side at official events, that hasn't stopped the president from talking about him. In May, Trump revealed that his youngest son will be attending at least some of the FIFA World Cup matches next year. 'These events will attract millions of passionate fans around the world, including my son. I have a son that loves soccer – Barron,' Trump said. He then joked with the room: 'Nobody's ever heard of Barron, right? Have you ever heard of Barron? He's a good soccer player, too. He's a little tall for soccer, but that's okay,' the president conceded.
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Trump's ‘Tariffmaggedon' is back… and with a vengeance
Looked at as a version of a real estate deal, Donald Trump has done very well with his tariffs policy. In many cases, the deals he has struck, or the regime he has imposed unilaterally, have seen foreign markets open up for US goods with more zero tariff rates and claimed reductions in non-tariff barriers. By contrast, pretty much every trading partner sees higher tariffs imposed on their exports to the United States. The Donald shook them all up on April 2nd, so-called Liberation Day and then messed around with threats and bluffs until they mostly capitulated – abolishing tariffs, agreeing to invest in the US (though no one can be sure how much more than they would have invested anyway), and buying huge amounts of US defence kit and energy for the provolone of access to the vast American market. This is all supposed to count as an American/Trump/Maga win, and, for example, a great loss for the European Union. Like when he used to buy and seek property, Trump and his allies see international trade as a zero sum game. But it is not, and that's why pushing US tariffs to their highest level since 1934 is a disaster for the world economy and for Americans. It's a lose-lose scenario. Even if there are benefits for boosting American manufacturing, you have to ask the question, too often left unposed, why Trump wants to get Americans working in factories all over again – making garments in New York, or building cars in Detroit. It's not going to be as highly paid as it was in the immediate post-war glory years, because other countries can still undercut US wage rates even with tariffs. It's sometimes argued that if US workshops still can't compete with imports (because Vietnamese labour costs are a multiple lower), then superior American automation and artificial intelligence can regain the competitive edge. That's fine – but where are the jobs going to come from if the robots are doing all the grafting? Who benefits? Answer: the people who own the robots, not the people whose jobs they've taken. It's bad if you get supplanted by some guy in China, but no different to being replaced by one of Elon's cyberworkers. American manufacturers also rely on foreign inputs – and always have. Many of these, such as copper and timber from Canada – which has seen its tariffs rise to 35 per cent, reputedly as payback for Mark Carney announcing this week he is to recognise a state of Palestine – will inevitably be more expensive than in the past, ironically making American industry pay more. Of course some can be substituted by American raw materials, components or semi-finished goods, but they too will be pricier than before (free of foreign competition), and not necessarily of the same quality or usefulness. This all adds up to a serious disruption of free markets, and a consequent misallocation of resources – trying to force the US back into a 1950s world where it was the industrial superpower, before Europe recovered from war, and when China and India basically left the world economy. If it's natural and cost-effective for Honda to make its vehicles in China, Japan and Mexico, for the benefit of its customers as well as its shareholders, then why coerce it into doing so in America? You don't have to be Adam Smith or David Ricardo to scratch your head about this. It's the strangest thing – Trump turning America into a command economy where he says what it should be producing, not market forces. Tariffs always have been and always will be about protecting the producer interest – shielding relatively inefficient firms, and the innocent workers employed by them, from foreign competition. In many societies, such protectionism for the producer interest is also linked to political interest – because workers are voters, and should be grateful enough to support the party that 'saved' their jobs. In that sense, it's a fairly corrupt sort of bargain – but, unfortunately, it can work. But what about the consumer interest? This is where Trump's policy is so badly misguided, and will have the opposite effect to what is being boasted about. Because, in the end, countries and companies don't pay for tariffs as much as consumers do. Tariffs are a purchase tax levied on goods that happen to have been imported. Sometimes, the original manufacturer or the importing company may take a bit of a hit on their profit margins and 'absorb' some of the shock – but they can't absorb the kind of hikes Trump is imposing. Chances are that, if he's slapping 25 per cent on the cost of a Bentley from the UK, then most of that will be paid by the American who ends up gliding out of the showroom in it. He or she could buy a US made Cadillac instead – but it's presumably not what he or she wants. One way or another, the consumer pays. That means inflation is higher than it would otherwise be, and, as the chair of Fed, Jerome Powell points out, that means interest rates will have to stay higher for a bit longer, to suppress the tendency to put retail prices up. As propaganda about America First and how the US is being 'cheated' by foreign powers, and a way to win votes in states lucky enough to benefit from this industrial distortion, tariffs are, as Trump might say, 'smart'. As a way to keep Americans prosperous by buying the best value available from world markets, building a truly competitive economy, and forging strong international partnerships, any obstacles to free trade such as import taxes are decidedly stupid. Impoverishing trade partners and allies in this lose-lose game makes them less able to buy US gear and help fight its wars. Many will turn to China instead. The last time the world thought tariffs were an answer to its problems, in the 1930s, we ended up in a world war. Couldn't happen again, could it?
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Virginia Giuffre's family stunned over Trump's Epstein claim
The family of Virginia Giuffre, who was among Jeffrey Epstein's most well-known sex trafficking accusers, said that it was shocking to hear President Donald Trump say the disgraced financier 'stole' Giuffre from him. Giuffre, who had accused influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by Epstein, has been a central figure in conspiracy theories tied to the case. She died by suicide this year. Her family's statement is the latest development involving Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019, facing federal sex trafficking charges. Donald Trump, a one-time friend, denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he severed ties years ago, with questions persisting. Trump said he was upset with Epstein for poaching workers and stealing Ms Giuffre from his Palm Beach, Florida, club. 'It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago,' the family's statement said. 'We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this,' it continued. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt noted the president was responding to a reporter's question and didn't bring up Giuffre himself. 'The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees,' she said. The family's statement comes shortly after the Justice Department interviewed Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking and other charges and is serving a 20-year sentence in Tallahassee, Florida. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed Maxwell in a Florida courthouse, though details about what she said haven't become public. Maxwell's lawyers have said she testified truthfully and answered questions 'about 100 different people." They have said she's willing to answer more questions from Congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony and if lawmakers agree to satisfy other conditions. A message seeking comment about the Giuffre family's statement was sent to Maxwell's attorney on Thursday. In a CNN interview Thursday evening, Giuffre's family also spoke out. 'She wasn't stolen, she was preyed upon at his property, at President Trump's property … stolen seems very impersonal. It feels very much like an object, and the survivors are not objects, women are not objects,' said Sky Roberts, Giuffre's brother. 'She was preyed upon, and it certainly makes you kind of ask the question, you know, how much he knew during that time?' A Trump administration official said the president is not currently considering clemency action for Maxwell. Giuffre said she was approached by Maxwell in 2000 and eventually was hired by her as a masseuse for Epstein. But the couple effectively made her a sexual servant, she said, pressuring her into gratifying not only Epstein but his friends and associates. Giuffre said she was flown around the world for appointments with men including Prince Andrew while she was 17 and 18 years old. The men, including Andrew, denied it and assailed Giuffre's credibility. She acknowledged changing some key details of her account. The prince settled with Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum, agreeing to make a 'substantial donation' to her survivors' organization. The American-born Giuffre lived in Australia for years and became an advocate for sex trafficking survivors after emerging as a central figure in Epstein's prolonged downfall. Her family's statement said she endured death threats and financial ruin over her cooperation with authorities against Epstein and Maxwell.
