Sri Lanka raises electricity price in line with IMF bailout
COLOMBO: Cash-strapped Sri Lanka on Wednesday announced a 15 percent increase in the electricity price to shore up revenues for the state-run utility, in line with conditions imposed by an IMF bailout. The Public Utilities Commission said it allowed the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) to charge the higher rates from Thursday, six months after a controversial reduction that pushed the utility into the red. The government had forced a 20 percent price cut on the CEB in January, despite fears that it would cause the government-owned company to lose money and undermine the national budget.
Ensuring cost-recovery and doing away with subsidies is in line with the conditions set by the International Monetary Fund, which granted a four-year, $2.9 billion loan to help salvage Sri Lanka's economy. The country had declared bankruptcy after defaulting on its $46 billion foreign debt in April 2022, having run out of foreign exchange to finance even the most essential imports, such as food, fuel and medicines. Months of protests over shortages led to the toppling of then-president Gotabaya Rajapaksa in July 2022.
His successor, Ranil Wickremesinghe, secured the IMF bailout and proceeded to cut subsidies and raise taxes. Wickremesinghe lost the September election, but his successor, Anura Kumara Dissanayake, is pushing ahead with the IMF-backed reforms. Inflation, which peaked at nearly 70 percent in September 2022, has dropped sharply, and the country has been experiencing deflation since September. The IMF says Sri Lanka is slowly emerging from its worst meltdown and that the economy has turned around, although risks remain.- AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
11 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
India faces tough choices under US tariff pressure
NEW DELHI: India faces an ultimatum from the United States with major political and economic ramifications both at home and abroad: end purchases of Russian oil or face painful tariffs. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, leader of the world's most populous nation and its fifth-biggest economy, must make some difficult decisions. US President Donald Trump has given longstanding ally India, one of the world's largest crude oil importers, three weeks to find alternative suppliers. Levies of 25 percent already in place will double to 50 percent if India doesn't strike a deal. For Trump, the August 27 deadline is a bid to strip Moscow of a key source of revenue for its military offensive in Ukraine. 'It is a geopolitical ambush with a 21-day fuse,' said Syed Akbaruddin, a former Indian diplomat to the United Nations, writing in the Times of India newspaper. New Delhi called Washington's move 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. Modi has appeared defiant. He has not spoken directly about Trump but said on Thursday 'India will never compromise' on the interests of its farmers. Agriculture employs vast numbers of people in India and has been a key sticking point in trade negotiations. It all seems a far cry from India's early hopes for special tariff treatment after Trump said in February he had found a 'special bond' with Modi. 'The resilience of US-India relations... is now being tested more than at any other time over the last 20 years,' said Michael Kugelman, from the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. Russia accounted for nearly 36 percent of India's total crude oil imports in 2024, snapping up approximately 1.8 million barrels of cut-price Russian crude per day. Buying Russian oil saved India billions of dollars on import costs, keeping domestic fuel prices relatively stable. Switching suppliers will likely threaten price rises, but not doing so will hit India's exports. The Federation of Indian Export Organizations warned that the cost of additional US tariffs risked making many businesses 'not viable'. Urjit Patel, a former central bank governor, said Trump's threats were India's 'worst fears'. Without a deal, 'a needless trade war' would likely ensue and 'welfare loss is certain', he said in a post on social media. Modi has sought to bolster ties with other allies. That includes calling Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who said they had agreed on the need 'to defend multilateralism'. Ashok Malik, of business consultancy The Asia Group, told AFP: 'There is a signal there, no question.' India's national security adviser Ajit Doval met with Vladimir Putin in Moscow, saying the dates of a visit to India by the Russian president were 'almost finalized'. Modi, according to Indian media, might also visit China in late August. It would be Modi's first visit since 2018, although it has not been confirmed officially. Beijing's foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said in response to an AFP question on Friday that 'China welcomes Prime Minister Modi' for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit. India and neighboring China have long competed for strategic influence across South Asia. Successive US administrations have seen India as a key partner with like-minded interests when it comes to China. 'All those investments, all that painstaking work done by many US presidents and Indian prime ministers, is being put at risk,' Malik said. 'I have not seen the relationship so troubled since the early 1990s, to be honest. I'm not saying it's all over, not in the least, but it is at risk.' Modi faces a potential domestic backlash if he is seen to bow to Washington. 'India must stand firm, put its national interest first,' the Indian Express newspaper wrote in an editorial. Opposition politicians are watching keenly. Mallikarjun Kharge, president of the key opposition Congress party, warned the government was 'disastrously dithering'. He also pointed to India's longstanding policy of 'non-alignment'. 'Any nation that arbitrarily penalizes India for our time-tested policy of strategic autonomy... doesn't understand the steel frame India is made of,' Kharge said in a statement. However, retired diplomat Akbaruddin said there is still hope. New Delhi can be 'smartly flexible', Akbaruddin said, suggesting that could mean 'buying more US oil if it's priced competitively, or engaging Russia on the ceasefire issue'. — AFP
Kuwait Times
15 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Armenians caught between hope and distrust after Azerbaijan treaty
Reservations about plan to create a transit zone to Nakhchivan region YEREVAN, Armenia: The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan Saturday because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. 'It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice,' said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. 'We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan,' he said. 'This accord is a good opportunity for peace.' Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact 'acceptable', provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. 'If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement,' she added. But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. 'We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another,' she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region.' Anahit also criticizes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for 'making decisions for everyone' and for his 'endless concessions to Azerbaijan'. 'We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us,' she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement 'is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia.' 'We can't trust Azerbaijan,' Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having 'turned his back' on Russia and Iran. 'It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize.' According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed 'to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity.' For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement 'certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come.' But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, 'I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term,' she said. – AFP
Kuwait Times
15 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Trump: Court halt of tariffs would cause ‘Great Depression'
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump speaks about the economy in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC. -- AFP NEW YORK: US President Donald Trump warned Friday of cataclysmic consequences on the US economy if a court rules that his imposition of sweeping tariffs constitutes an illegal power grab. If a 'Radical Left Court' strikes down the tariffs, 'it would be impossible to ever recover, or pay back, these massive sums of money and honor,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'It would be 1929 all over again, a GREAT DEPRESSION!' he said. Trump's hyperbolic statements come as a US appeals court weighs the legality of his broad use of emergency powers to enact sweeping tariffs on trading partners. A lower court ruled against Trump in May, but the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit put the ruling on hold as it considers the case. Trump on Friday touted billions of dollars in tariff revenue 'pouring' into the Treasury—paid by US importers—and recent stock market records, as proof his levies had created 'the largest amount of money, wealth creation and influence the USA has ever seen.' Many economists meanwhile worry the tariffs are stoking inflation and see trade policy uncertainty as slowing investment. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has announced a slew of new tariffs, seeking to force a reordering of global trade that he has long claimed is biased against the United States. In addition to sweeping tariffs invoked under declarations of economic emergencies, he has also instituted sectoral tariffs of between 25 percent and 50 percent on steel and other items. Those levies have generally followed government investigations and are not at issue in the pending litigation. At a July 31 hearing, members of the appeals court appeared skeptical of the Trump administration's arguments that it had broad discretion to declare national economic emergencies and invoke tariffs as a remedy. To invoke his so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs on many US trade partners, Trump declared a national emergency over 'large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits.' Opponents to the White House policy have argued that such a reason does not qualify under the law Trump has cited for the tariffs, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. They also argue that levying blanket tariffs on imports requires the consent of Congress under the US Constitution. The case is likely to end up in the Supreme Court, where conservatives enjoy a 6-3 majority, though analysts say the outcome is uncertain. – AFP
