LNG stocks jump after European Union agrees to massive U.S. energy purchases
LNG exporters Cheniere and Venture Global were up about 3% and more than 4%, respectively. NextDecade and New Fortress Energy, which build LNG infrastructure, jumped more than 2% and about 3%.
EU President Ursula von der Leyen said the purchases would help reduce the bloc's dependence on Russia for natural gas.
"Purchases of US energy products will diversify our sources of supply and contribute to Europe's energy security," Von der Leyen said in a statement over the weekend. "We will replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of US LNG, oil and nuclear fuels."
The energy purchases are part of a broader trade deal stuck between the EU and the U.S. over the weekend. The deal imposes 15% tariffs on EU exports to the U.S. In addition to the energy purchases, Brussels has agreed to invest $600 billion in the U.S. above current levels.
President Donald Trump said "energy is a very important component" of the deal during a meeting with von der Leyen on Sunday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Technologies Can Help You Stay Compliant With SDS Regulations
COO at SapientPro. AI expert building scalable tools like an SDS platform with smart search, alerts&workflows adaptable across industries. Last year, in enterprises across 28 European countries, over one-third of safety data sheets (SDS) were non-compliant with legal requirements due to data gaps and inaccurate entries. One of the main reasons is the increasing number of SDS that conflict with safety regulation standards. In the following, I'll break down some smart tactics to respond to these challenges. Common Pain Points In Daily SDS Management SDS files contain full information on the chemicals used in pharmaceuticals, food production, oil and gas, logistics and beyond. As those industries expand and safety regulations update, traditional file management is being pushed to its limit. Companies rely on these SDS files, which span everything from PDFs, scans, region-specific templates and multilanguage copies—rarely sharing a common structure. Right-to-left scripts such as Hebrew or Arabic can complicate the translation process. Regional compliance tweaks drive standards further apart. To solve this, some companies are turning to automated solutions that use artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to analyze and restructure the documents. These tools can convert each file into a standardized format, making the data easier to work with. Even though the Global Harmonized System (GHS) was meant to simplify and unify chemical safety paperwork, in practice it has made SDS creation and maintenance more complicated. Rapid rule changes at national and U.N. levels result in firms struggling to keep current. Other standards to contend with include: • The Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in the U.S. • REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) in the EU • Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHMIS) in Canada Always-on AI services can help spot stale data, highlight gaps and show live status dashboards per product. Overall, you want a system that indexes in any language and applies standards-locked templates with automatically generated locale-specific SDS. Research and development (R&D), health, safety and environment (HSE) and logistics teams each tend to store their own copies of SDS, often without shared access or version tracking. Also, many jurisdictions mandate that SDS be stored domestically. Dropping them in a global public cloud can expose enterprises to data loss and penalties. To avoid this, companies can deploy on-premises hardware, use a private cloud hosted within the country or adopt a hybrid model—storing sensitive data locally while sending less critical files to public cloud providers. Adding tailored access controls further strengthens compliance and security. Furthermore, different systems—like enterprise resource planning (ERP) for vendor updates, laboratory information management systems (LIMS) for testing and product lifecycle management (PLM) for lab checks—often manage their own SDS separately. This can lead to disconnected records that can quickly fall out of sync, risking non-compliance. Costs Of Ignoring SDS Standards Monetary hits are just one fallout for firms that overlook SDS rules: OSHA still ranks hazard communication failures, including incomplete or absent SDS, among its 10 most-cited violations. In 2025, each serious offense can cost up to $16,550. But inspections often uncover multiple issues, driving total fines potentially into six figures. Companies may also face lawsuits, suspended licenses and long-term brand damage. In 2021, an Alabama chemical plant accident claimed two lives and poisoned a third employee. Officials later confirmed that the company had neither monitored air contaminant levels nor trained staff on handling risks. OSHA responded with a fine of $232,000 for 10 violations. Absent or faulty SDS documentation delays shipments and triggers product pullbacks. This, in turn, translates into costly rework for companies, piling up reproduction expenses, logistics, penalties and refunds. Сase-Based Strategies To Solve SDS Challenges The following examples show how companies in different industries addressed these issues by rethinking workflows and aligning documentation practices with regulatory demands. While each context is unique, the underlying strategies offer insights that other organizations can adapt. I worked with a Swiss medical company to tackle a number of SDS pain points: outdated files, language barriers and scattered access across partner sites. When it comes to an issue like this, I've found three clear moves that can help turn scattered safety sheets into a working system: 1. Inventory your files. List storage spots, duplicates and search faults; use the findings to shape a clean SDS library. 2. Expose term clashes. For multimarket firms, track where terms drift across tongues and pin down the biggest misalignments. 3. Put roles in charge. Add role‑based access with version history so every tweak ties to the right standard: GHS or regional. Another manufacturer I worked with had 600-plus SDS documents scattered across multiple construction sites. They needed a single repository, standard formatting and role-based access. Rolling out SDS full service hinged on three basics: a clear inventory of all sheets, unifying the file formats and the implementation of role‑driven entry rights. Replicating this model elsewhere means building a central console, plugging in extra languages where needed and creating a rights system that can grow with your business. A pesticide manufacturer I worked with operates in 50 countries and ships to 150. Because of its reach, the company struggled to make SDS compliance rock-solid. Every jurisdiction rewrote the rulebook, labels appeared in half a dozen languages and no central admin held the reins. As a result, the SDS library was left unruly; copies multiplied, records fell out of sync and audits became a guessing game. We solved it with a sync-in-place system tied to standard operating procedures. Order was restored through shared templates, real‑time refreshes and airtight logs. For small businesses, the logic scales down, too: one access point, template uniformity, tracked edits and rights‑based access. The Cornerstone Of SDS Leadership According to McKinsey, companies in tightly regulated industries should adopt a forward-looking approach, future-proofing their workflows against the risk of SDS non-compliance. This means not only reacting to current standards but actively building systems that can adapt to new regulations, technologies and markets. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Wall Street Journal
35 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Europe's TTF Gas Price Drops Ahead of Alaska Summit
1358 GMT – European natural-gas prices drop to their lowest in more than a year ahead of a closely watched summit between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The benchmark Dutch TTF contract trades 3.1% lower to 31.13 euros a megawatt hour and is on track for a 4% weekly loss. If successful, the meeting could pave the way for further talks between Trump, Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Traders see little chance of Russian pipeline gas returning to Europe quickly, even if a Ukraine peace deal is struck. However, any progress toward ending the conflict is expected to put further pressure on energy prices and ease fears that U.S. sanctions could disrupt Russian flows. ( 0923 ET – U.S. natural gas futures are recovering ground on short profit-taking, while remaining on track for a moderate weekly loss. Shorts were encouraged to take profits after the front month held at support around $2.77 following yesterday's above-average storage build, Eli Rubin of EBW Analytics says in a note. 'A continued test higher is possible near-term, and a larger gain from short profit-taking cannot be ruled out.' Nymex gas is up 3% at $2.927/mmBtu. (
Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
Legal Clarity in Real Estate Tokenization: Key Challenges and Practical Solutions
Real estate tokenization is reshaping how properties are owned, traded, and financed. By converting real estate assets into blockchain-based tokens, investors gain fractional ownership, faster transactions, and global access. However, as this innovation moves from concept to mainstream adoption, the legal challenges become just as critical as the technology itself. Without clear compliance strategies, even the most advanced tokenization project can face costly delays or shutdowns. Below, we outline five major legal hurdles in real estate tokenization and provide practical ways to address them—ensuring projects stay secure, compliant, and ready for growth. Before any token hits the market, it must be legally defined. Tokens representing real estate should clearly outline what rights they give the holder—whether that's ownership, rental income, or profit sharing. The safest approach involves structuring tokens through Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) or Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities hold the property and issue tokens backed by legal agreements. This not only helps in jurisdictions with unclear token regulations but also gives investors legal recourse in disputes. Best Practice: Work with legal teams to draft token terms and conditions aligned with local property laws. aligned with local property laws. Maintain clear documentation linking each token to a tangible asset. linking each token to a tangible asset. Use a regulated entity as the token issuer for added legitimacy. In many jurisdictions, real estate tokens can be classified as securities. This triggers strict compliance obligations, including investor protection, disclosure requirements, and registration with regulators. A popular method to determine security status is the Howey Test in the U.S., alongside exemptions like Reg D or Reg S. In the EU, frameworks such as MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) offer guidance. Misclassifying tokens can result in hefty fines and legal action. As detailed in the article Top 5 Legal Challenges in Real Estate Tokenization — and How to Overcome Them, navigating compliance is key to success. Best Practice: Conduct a regulatory assessment before launch. before launch. Register offerings with securities authorities or use valid exemptions. or use valid exemptions. Implement investor verification to ensure eligibility. Real estate tokenization naturally attracts global investors—but this comes with the challenge of multi-jurisdictional compliance. Each country has its own securities, property, and tax laws, and non-compliance can halt international sales. Geo-blocking technologies can help limit access from high-risk regions, while Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks ensure legal onboarding. Some projects opt for regional offerings instead of open global sales to reduce exposure. Best Practice: Define a target market and tailor compliance accordingly. and tailor compliance accordingly. Use geo-restriction tools for restricted jurisdictions. for restricted jurisdictions. Partner with local legal counsel in each key market. One of the biggest operational gaps is the lack of direct integration between blockchain records and official land registries. Since most registries don't yet recognize blockchain transactions, token ownership may not equal legal property ownership unless backed by legal agreements. Workarounds include having SPVs or trusted custodians hold legal title, with token transactions updating internal records. Some jurisdictions are experimenting with pilot programs to bridge blockchain with public records—an important step for future-proofing projects. Best Practice: Use notarized documentation to validate token transactions. to validate token transactions. Store legal property records in secure, auditable systems . . Monitor government registry pilot programs for integration opportunities. Smart contracts can automate token transfers, revenue distribution, and compliance checks. However, courts don't always recognize blockchain code as a legal agreement. This means disputes could become complicated if there's no plain-language backup contract. Smart contracts should be paired with traditional legal documents that include arbitration clauses and jurisdiction rules. This ensures that automated transactions have enforceable legal protection in real-world courts. Best Practice: Draft parallel legal agreements that mirror smart contract terms. that mirror smart contract terms. Include dispute resolution clauses . . Regularly audit smart contracts for security vulnerabilities. A successful tokenization project combines innovative technology with robust legal compliance. The smartest projects invest early in legal clarity—working with both blockchain specialists and traditional real estate lawyers. For more insights on tokenization trends and legal frameworks, visit the blog. Staying ahead of evolving laws ensures projects not only launch smoothly but also thrive in the long term. Key Takeaways: Define tokens clearly and link them to legal structures. Treat compliance as a core operational function , not an afterthought. , not an afterthought. Adapt to jurisdictional differences in property and securities law. in property and securities law. Build bridges between blockchain and official property records. Ensure smart contracts are legally enforceable. As regulations evolve, staying informed is the most effective defense against costly legal missteps. Token issuers, legal advisors, and real estate innovators who prioritize compliance will be the ones who shape the future of tokenized property markets. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
