When do new episodes of ‘Dexter: Resurrection' come out? Release date, time, how to watch
The "Dexter" revival series features other Hollywood stars earning sinister tabloid monikers, including "How I Met Your Mother" star Neil Patrick Harris and "Modern Family" star Eric Stonestreet.
"They don't all live in New York City, but let's say they've been invited there; it's a gathering," said "Dexter" creator and executive producer Clyde Phillips, who stocks the revival show with new uber-villains. "This season is a unique launching pad for however many years this series will be going."
Here's what to know about Season 1 of "Dexter: Resurrection.'
What is the 'Dexter: Resurrection' Season 1 episode schedule?
Here is the full list of episode release dates for Season 1 of "Dexter: Resurrection:"
How to watch 'Dexter: Resurrection' Season 1
New episodes of Season 1 of "Dexter: Resurrection" will premiere on Paramount+ Premium on Fridays at 12 a.m. ET / 9 p.m. PT.
Paramount+ offers two flexible plans to fit your streaming needs. Paramount+ Essential is just $7.99 per month and gives you access to thousands of episodes, movies and live NFL on CBS (with limited ads).
Paramount+ Premium is $12.99 per month and includes everything in the Essential plan plus Showtime originals, blockbuster movies and live TV with fewer ads.
Watch the 'Dexter: Resurrection' Season 1 trailer
Contributing: Bryan Alexander, USA TODAY.
Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Tom Hanks reacts to the death of Jim Lovell, astronaut he portrayed in 'Apollo 13' movie
Tom Hanks is sharing a touching sendoff for Jim Lovell, the Apollo 13 commander Hanks portrayed in the Oscar-winning film of the same name 30 years ago. Hours after news of Lovell's death at 97 on Aug. 7 became public, Hanks, 69, took to Instagram to share a tribute for the decorated astronaut. "There are people who dare, who dream, and who lead others to the places we would not go on our own. Jim Lovell, who for a long while had gone farther into space and for longer than any other person of our planet, was that kind of guy," Hanks wrote. The message continued: "His many voyages around Earth and on to so-very-close to the moon were not made for riches or celebrity, but because such challenges as those are what fuels the course of being alive – and who better than Jim Lovell to make those voyages. On this night of a full Moon, he passes on – to the heavens, to the cosmos, to the stars." The Oscar-winning actor concluded his statement by writing, "God speed you, on this next voyage, Jim Lovell." The Ron Howard film released on June 30, 1995, told the story of the Apollo 13 crew's return to Earth after an oxygen tank exploded during the voyage, leaving them with dangerous levels of carbon dioxide in an April 1970 NASA mission. It was a hit in Hollywood and beyond, earning $355 million at the box office globally as well as two Oscars. 'Apollo 13' in IMAX: Jim Lovell died months before movie's return to theaters Tom Hanks attended President Clinton's ceremony honoring Jim Lovell Hanks and Lovell's paths crossed several times over the decades. Hanks and son Colin Hanks were in the Oval Office when then President Bill Clinton presented Lovell with the Congressional Space Medal of Honor on July 26, 1995. "What you did up there and what you have accomplished in your life back here on Earth continues to be an inspiration to all your fellow Americans," Clinton said. Hanks also attended the unveiling of Lovell's portrait during a 2010 ceremony in Chicago awarding the astronaut with the Lincoln Leadership prize. Knowing Jim Lovell 'a tremendous honor' for 'Apollo 13' director Ron Howard The creatives behind the "Apollo 13" film adaptation also paid tribute to Lovell in an Aug. 8 statement shared with USA TODAY. "Rest in peace, Commander Lovell. Navy test pilot, Gemini 7, Gemini 12, Apollo 8 and, of course, Apollo 13," Howard said in his message. "Simply knowing Jim has been a tremendous honor. His combination of intellect, courage and commitment to duty made him one of the most remarkable individuals I've ever met. His support of our movie-making efforts inspired authenticity and elevated our process in so many ways." Howard then thanked Lovell "for your service to our country and to humankind." Producer Brian Grazer said: "Jim Lovell was a true American hero whose courage, intellect, and grace under pressure inspired a nation. He was not only a legend in space exploration, but also an incredibly generous, kind and inspiring man." "Apollo 13" was the first film to be remastered for IMAX release in 2022, according to Universal Pictures. It will be released again in IMAX theaters on Sept. 19 to mark the 30th anniversary of the movie's release.
Los Angeles Times
10 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Disney's settlement with ‘Mandalorian' actor Gina Carano isn't capitulation. Firing her was
Actress Gina Carano, Lucasfilm and its parent company Walt Disney Co. have settled the federal lawsuit filed in which Carano claimed that, in 2021, she was wrongfully terminated from her role in 'The Mandalorian' after she expressed her conservative political views on social media. The settlement details have not been made public, but Lucasfilm released a statement praising Carano's on-set professionalism and expressing the hope of 'identifying opportunities to work together with Ms. Carano in the near future.' I am here to beg everyone to remain calm and avoid using the four Cs: cancel culture (is this the end of it?) and corporate capitulation (is this another example of it?) No and no. Cancel culture has long been an amorphous and often recklessly applied term, used to describe a litany of events, including but certainly not limited to male predators losing their jobs, students protesting their school's choice of graduation speakers and outrage over J.K. Rowling's stance on transgender women. Recently, however, it has taken a far more concrete shape that looks astonishingly like the White House where President Trump continues to literally cancel all manner of things, including U.S. membership in the World Health Organization, the regulatory power of the Environmental Protection Agency and huge portions of Medicaid. Recently, he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after the bureau documented weaker than expected numbers for July and downward revisions for the previous two months. Corporate capitulation, too, is alive and well, with law firms, universities and media companies falling like dominoes before Trump's lawsuits and threats of defunding. Last year, Trump sued ABC and its parent company Disney for defamation after anchor George Stephanopoulos wrongly stated on air that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping E. Jean Carroll — Trump had been found civilly liable of sexually assaulting and defaming Carroll. Disney settled for $15 million, paid to Trump's presidential foundation and museum. Even more troubling was Paramount Global's decision to pay a $16-million settlement in what many consider a frivolous lawsuit brought by Trump against '60 Minutes.' After late-night host Stephen Colbert called the move a 'big fat bribe' designed to ensure Paramount's recent acquisition by Skydance, CBS, which is owned by Paramount, announced that 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' was being canceled due to financial considerations. So while it is tempting to see Disney settling with Carano as a piece of a larger and very worrisome whole, particularly when Elon Musk financed her lawsuit, it was in fact simply the right thing to do. Carano is a former mixed martial artist turned actor who has been vocal about her support for conservative causes and President Trump. In 2020, she had caught some flack for posting 'beep/bop/boop' as her pronouns in her Twitter bio, which some took as her way of mocking trans people. She denied this, changed her bio and expressed support for the trans community. There were also posts that criticized masking policies and shutdowns during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as one calling for an investigation into voter fraud after the 2020 election. But it was a repost on Instagram that cost her her job — in February 2021, she reposted a famously horrific image of a half-naked Jewish woman fleeing from a mob with a moronically simplistic message about divisive politics: 'Most people today don't realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?' Landing just a month after then-President Trump sent an armed mob to attack the Capitol in the hopes of overturning an election he refused to believe he had lost, the post, which appeared to compare MAGA supporters in 2021 America with Jews in Nazi Germany, sparked #FireGinaCarano. And that's exactly what Disney did. Calling her posts 'abhorrent and unacceptable,' Lucasfilm excised her character from 'The Mandalorian' and canceled an upcoming spinoff in which she was to star. Her talent agency, UTA, dropped her and Hasbro canceled a line of toys based on her 'Mandalorian' character. It was an overreaction that smacked of fear and pandering. I do not agree with the sentiments Carano expressed in her posts, but compared with the blithely toxic abuse regularly used on social media, they are relatively benign, based far more on genuine ignorance — most people are in fact aware of the vicious antisemitism leveraged by the Nazis as well as their institutionalized tactics of fear — than anything else. Of course, those who attempt to be politically provocative on social media (and reposting a photo of a victimized Jewish woman in such context is the definition of political provocation) cannot then feign shock and dismay when people are provoked, especially at a time when far-right tweets, including the president's, had led to a violent attack against lawmakers. (Hence the irony of Musk's support — the platform he renamed X was in large part built on its ability to harness all manner of just and unjust hashtag campaigns.) But as my colleague Robin Abcarian noted when Carano filed her lawsuit in 2023, the social media mob's decision that a woman, who was far from a household name, deserved to lose her livelihood, and more important, Lucasfilm's agreement with that decision, was extreme. Bad publicity is never good for an entertainment property and whether it was explicit in her contract or not, Carano did represent, to a certain extent, 'The Mandalorian,' Lucasfilm and Disney. Unfortunately, the entertainment industry's increasing reliance on social media has created a world in which actors and other creative types are expected to amass millions of followers on platforms that tend to reward the outspoken and outrageous over the thoughtful. Encouraged to reveal themselves 'authentically,' stars can find themselves prodded by fans to comment on current events and excoriated when they refuse or respond in a way that certain followers consider insincere or politically incorrect. Telling people to stay off social media is not the answer; neither is regulation by hashtag campaign. While Carano's case is certainly reflective of many perils that face us at the moment, the fact that she reached a settlement, including an apparent promise of more work, is not a sign of further deterioration. The fear that our cultural landscape is being attacked by political forces that would strangle the notion of free speech and competing ideologies is real and justified. But in this case, the capitulation came not when Disney and Lucasfilm decided to settle with Carano, but when they fired her in the first place.
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
'Weapons' comes out: What critics say about the 'spine-tingler' horror movie
Film critics agree writer and director Zach Cregger excelled at building suspense with the pacing in "Weapons" and crafted an "outlandish" ending for the thriller movie. Looking to get your thrills at the theaters? "Weapons" might be your best bet. The latest offering from "Barbarian" director Zach Cregger released Aug. 8 and is getting horror movie buffs in movie theater seats – and maybe even startling fans out of their IMAX chairs. Running just over two hours, "Weapons" is told from six characters' perspectives. It stars Julia Garner as a third grade teacher, Benedict Wong as the school's principal and Josh Brolin as a student's dad. The film's logline is: "When all but one child from the same class mysteriously vanish on the same night at exactly the same time, a community is left questioning who or what is behind their disappearance." The mystery thriller has earned an impressive 96% certified fresh score from film reviews compiled by Rotten Tomatoes and boasts a 90% rating from theatergoers as of release day. Here's what the critics are saying about "Weapons:" Join our Watch Party! Sign up for USA TODAY's movie and TV recommendations 'Weapons' is a 'spine-tingler' that maintains suspense Manohla Dargis, the New York Times' chief film critic, called "Weapons" a "spine-tingler" in her review. Noting Cregger succeeds in "creating and maintaining an ominous mood," Dargis assured horror fans will be kept on the edge of their seats with drawn-out plot reveals. "He winds you up, keeps you on edge, calms you down only to wind you up again," Dargis wrote. "The tension tends to pulse on and off like a hard-working blender." Amy Nicholson from the Los Angeles Times also commented on the film's suspense, writing, "Cregger is great with details. He gets a fantastic, audience-wide gasp just from the noise of a door opening off-screen." Benjamin Lee, east coast arts editor for the Guardian US, agreed "Weapons" offers "some wonderfully rattling shocks and moments of seat-clenching unsureness." Though he was not too impressed by Cregger's 2022 solo directorial debut, "Barbarian," he came away with a "better" feeling about this follow-up, Lee wrote in his review. Rating "Weapons" three out of five stars, he agreed the film's pacing and suspense succeeded. "It's a tantalizing set-up, pitched somewhere between Stephen King and the Brothers Grimm, and Cregger's careful slow build keeps us in thrall for the most part," he wrote. Shouting out the "excellent cast," Lee applauded the "magnetic drip-feed mystery plot that unravels so compellingly that it takes us a while to notice how empty it all is." Staying home? From 'The Pickup' to 'The Monkey,' 10 movies you need to stream The ending of 'Weapons' is 'outlandish,' 'grotesquely funny' For her review in The Times, Dargis called "Weapons'" ending "a shocker of a finale that's so outlandish." But she acknowledged the lead-up to the resolution might not work for some people. "The stuff in between the start and the finish isn't as successful, including a murder that edges into gleeful sadism and some disappointingly creaky horror-film clichés," she argued. Nicholson with the LA Times agreed the thriller is not immune to "clichéd beats." But, she noted, "The ending is strong and satisfying and leaves you discontented in all the right ways." The Guardian's Lee wasn't as impressed and wrote: "The finale might up the violence to a wince-inducing level but it doesn't cut anywhere near as deep as it could have, chaos without meaning." Bilge Ebiri, a film critic for Vulture and New York Magazine, teased the ending is "a great release" and features "one of the more grotesquely funny climaxes in recent horror." But, like Nicholson, he also warned: "If we leave Weapons with more questions than answers, that's surely intentional."
