Siroya slams Hariprasad for casting aspersions on apex court
'Whether Hariprasad's comments constitute contempt of court is not for me to decide, but as a politician, I recognise a very organised propaganda of the Congress under Rahul, which is trying to assault institutions like the Election Commission of India and the Supreme Court of India. To save their party, they want to spread lies and anarchy,' Siroya said responding to Hariprasad's remarks.
The BJP MP said, Hariprasad, in his Kannada 'X' post, said that the Supreme Court's remarks on Rahul is indicative not just of the falling standards of the court, but is also of its support to a dictatorial attitude.
'Hariprasad also says that the court has disrespected a person who is recognised by our Constitution as 'shadow PM'. How can someone who holds a constitutional post disrespect another person who holds a constitutional post, he says, targeting the judge.
At the end, he shockingly says the Supreme Court and some High Courts are making politically inspired observations and judgements in recent times,' the BJP MP said, referring to Hariprasad's remarks. He said Rahul's indiscretions are well known, and he is certainly not above the law. If Rahul has to be respected, he too should display maturity, decorum, and propriety that his constitutional post expects, the BJP MP said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Legacy of U-turns: Timeline of Nitish Kumar's alliance shifts over a decade
With Bihar elections due in late 2025, speculation mounts over whether the state's longest-serving chief minister, Nitish Kumar, will stay the course with the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) or rewrite political equations yet again. Once hailed as a governance reformer and now equally known for his alliance U-turns, Kumar has, over three decades, shaped—and reshaped—Bihar's politics through a string of strategic shifts between the NDA, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and Lalu Prasad Yadav's RJD-led alliances. The man once hailed as 'Sushasan Babu' is now equally known for his alliance acrobatics. From 1994 to 2025, Nitish has rewritten coalition logic in Bihar—and, at times, reshaped national politics. Here's a look back at the flipbook of flips that defined his career—and what it could mean for Bihar in 2025. Why it matters Nitish Kumar's frequent alliance shifts aren't just a Bihar story—they've disrupted national opposition strategies, unsettled BJP-Congress dynamics, and altered the arithmetic of anti-BJP coalitions. In Bihar, each realignment resets governance priorities and voter trust. To some, Kumar is a master strategist navigating fractured mandates; to others, an opportunist looking to seize power at every turn. Either way, his next move could once again reshape both state and national politics. Who is Nitish Kumar? Born in 1951 in Bakhtiyarpur near Patna, Nitish Kumar entered politics during the JP Movement of the 1970s. A qualified electrical engineer, he was first elected to the Bihar Assembly in 1985 and soon rose to national prominence. By the 1990s, he was a central figure in the post-Mandal political order, aligning with George Fernandes to form the Samata Party—a precursor to today's Janata Dal (United), or JD(U). A career of realignments Nitish Kumar's first brush with power came through his association with Lalu Prasad Yadav during the JP Movement in the 1970s. Their partnership, forged in student politics, brought Yadav to power in 1990 with Kumar's backing. But in 1994, the alliance fractured. Citing concerns over Lalu's growing control of the Janata Dal, Kumar and George Fernandes formed the Samata Party, marking the beginning of Kumar's independent political journey. By 2000, Kumar aligned with the BJP, briefly becoming chief minister. Though that government lasted just seven days, it set the stage for a more stable NDA regime in 2005. The alliance won re-election in 2010, riding on Kumar's image as a governance-focused leader who had improved law and order and launched schemes for marginalised groups like Mahadalits and EBCs. The first break: 2013 In 2013, Kumar severed ties with the BJP after Narendra Modi became the head of the party's campaign committee and was declared its prime ministerial candidate. Calling for a 'Sangh-mukt Bharat,' he said the BJP's leadership no longer reflected the secular image the NDA once held. ' Mitti mein mil jaayenge, BJP ke saath wapas nahi jaayenge (We will perish but won't join forces with BJP again),' he famously declared. The JD(U) continued briefly with outside support from the Congress and CPI, but Kumar resigned as CM in 2014 following the party's Lok Sabha losses. Mahagathbandhan and its collapse In 2015, Nitish Kumar returned as CM with backing from the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) party and Congress under the Mahagathbandhan banner. The alliance swept the Assembly elections, defeating the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (nda). But in July 2017, amid allegations against then Deputy CM Tejashwi Yadav, Kumar resigned and returned to the NDA. The move drew sharp criticism, with the RJD calling it a betrayal and accusing Kumar of using the corruption probe as a pretext. Tensions within the NDA The BJP-JD(U) alliance persisted through the 2020 elections, though the JD(U)'s reduced seat tally. partly attributed to Lok Janshakti Party rebel candidates, soured relations. Less than two years into his term, Nitish Kumar once again resigned in August 2022, accusing the BJP of trying to destabilise his party and government. He stitched together a fresh alliance with RJD, Congress and Left parties—returning as CM for the eighth time, with Tejashwi Yadav as deputy. His re-entry into the opposition camp was seen as a national move. He hosted the first INDIA bloc meeting in Patna in 2023. At the time, he was regarded as a potential convenor of the alliance, even fuelling quiet speculation about his prime ministerial ambitions. RJD leader Shivanand Tiwary summed up the Grand Alliance's view: 'If Nitish chooses to dump NDA, what choice do we have except to embrace him?' January 2024: Return to NDA again On January 28, 2024, Nitish Kumar joined the BJP-led NDA again, marking his third formal tie-up with the party since 2000. The immediate impact was political disarray within the INDIA alliance, of which Kumar had become a key figure. His exit followed Mamata Banerjee's Trinamool Congress announcing its decision to go solo in West Bengal. According to Business Standard 's editorial on January 29, Kumar's return to the NDA 'may not change the fortunes of Bihar,' but it effectively 'spells the decimation' of INDIA. The editorial also highlighted internal tensions, including the Congress's failure to consult key allies before launching the Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra. While critics saw Kumar's moves as driven by political expediency, supporters argue they reflect a realism about regional and caste dynamics. The BJP, for its part, responded with tactical moves—appointing deputy chief ministers from Koeri and Bhumihar communities and affirming commitment to caste inclusion. Assembly elections overview The Bihar Legislative Assembly is made up of 243 seats. In the 2020 Assembly elections, the NDA led by the BJP and JD(U), along with partners like VIP and HAM(S), secured a slim majority with 125 seats. The Mahagathbandhan (RJD–Congress–Left parties) captured 110 seats, with the RJD emerging as the single largest party at 75 seats, closely followed by the BJP at 74 seats, and the JD(U) winning 43. What next for Nitish Kumar? Despite his age and repeated suggestions of grooming Tejashwi Yadav as his successor, few are willing to write off Kumar's ability to surprise. As Bihar heads toward elections in 2025, the central question remains: Will Nitish Kumar remain with the NDA, or is another pivot still possible? Timeline: Nitish Kumar's alliance shifts 1994: Broke from Lalu Prasad Yadav's Janata Dal and founded the Samata Party with George Fernandes. 2000 (March): Became chief minister for the first time, backed by the BJP-led NDA; the government lasted just 7 days. 2003: Formation of Janata Dal (United) through a merger of the Samata Party, Lok Shakti, and a faction of Janata Dal; remained in alliance with the NDA. 2005 & 2010: Won two consecutive full terms as CM in alliance with the BJP, establishing himself as a governance-focused leader. 2013 (June): Split from the NDA after Narendra Modi was named BJP's prime ministerial candidate; distanced himself over ideological concerns and moved toward forming a new alliance. 2014 (May): Resigned after JD(U)'s poor performance in the general elections; Jitan Ram Manjhi briefly took over as CM. 2015 (February): Returned as CM after internal party dissent; later that year, the JD(U), RJD, and Congress formed the Mahagathbandhan, which won the Assembly elections. 2017 (July): Exited the Mahagathbandhan amid corruption charges against RJD leaders and rejoined the NDA; began his sixth term as CM. 2020: Re-elected as CM with NDA support, though the BJP won more seats than JD(U), altering the power balance within the alliance. 2022 (August): Broke ties with the NDA again, accusing the BJP of undermining allies; rejoined the RJD, Congress, and Left parties to form another Mahagathbandhan government—his eighth term. 2024 (January): Left the Mahagathbandhan once more and rejoined the NDA, forming a new government—his ninth term as chief minister.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
We should impose 50% levy on US goods: Shashi Tharoor on Trump tariffs
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Thursday said that India should also increase tariffs on US-made goods to 50 per cent after the first tranche of Donald Trump administration's 25 per cent tariffs came into effect. Tharoor's remarks were in response to the additional 25 per cent tariffs imposed by Trump on account of India's oil imports from Russia. Speaking to reporters, the Thiruvananthapuram MP questioned India's decision to levy a 17 per cent tariff, adding that New Delhi should not be intimidated by such actions. "It will definitely have an impact because we have a trade of $90 billion with them, and if everything becomes 50% more expensive, buyers will also think why should they buy Indian things? If they do this, we should also impose a 50% tariff on American exports... It is not that any country can threaten us like this," Tharoor was quoted as saying by news agency ANI. "Our average tariffs on American goods are 17 per cent. Why should we stop at 17 per cent? We should also raise it to 50 per cent... We need to ask them, do they not value our relationship? If India doesn't matter to them, they should also not matter to us," Tharoor noted. Trump imposes 50 per cent tariffs on India On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order, announcing an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, bringing the country's total to 50 per cent. The executive order issued by the White House cited India's continuous imports of Russian oil as an 'unusual and extraordinary threat' to the United States. India calls the increased tariff move "unjustified" Responding to the increased tariff rate, India on Wednesday released a statement, calling the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". "The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia,' the MEA said. 'We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India", the statement added.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Siddaramaiah slams Trump's tariffs, accuses PM Modi of ‘headline management' over national onterest
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Thursday criticised the United States' decision to impose a 50% tariff on Indian goods, calling it 'economic blackmail' and a direct consequence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's focus on image-building rather than serious diplomacy. : Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. (PTI) Take a look at Siddaramaiah's post In a post on social media platform X, Siddaramaiah backed Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's sharp attack on the Modi government's foreign policy. 'Rahul Gandhi raised timely alarms on multiple national issues, from GST to demonetisation and COVID mishandling. His warnings were dismissed, but time has proven him right. Now, he's been proven right yet again on the Trump tariff issue,' Siddaramaiah wrote. Also Read - Massive traffic jam on Bengaluru's Outer Ring Road leaves school kids stranded, sparks outrage Referring to the former US President's tariff hike and additional penalties over India's Russian oil imports, the Congress veteran said the developments were not mere trade measures but a strategic failure by the Modi government. He echoed Gandhi's criticism of the move as a pressure tactic aimed at coercing India into an unfair trade agreement. 'Donald Trump's decision to impose a 50% tariff on Indian products is not diplomacy, it's blackmail. And it's the result of PM Modi's obsession with headline management instead of defending national interests,' Siddaramaiah said. He further alleged that since 2019, the prime minister had gone out of his way to appease Trump, referencing Modi's campaign-style slogan "Abki Baar Trump Sarkar" during the 'Howdy Modi' event in the US and the grand welcome at the 'Namaste Trump' rally in India, held just as the COVID-19 pandemic was surfacing. 'Modi tried to create a personal equation, even coining terms like MIGA (Make India Great Again), in line with Trump's MAGA pitch. But Trump viewed these moves not as diplomacy, but as weakness,' Siddaramaiah said. He went on to highlight Trump's actions that undermined India, including repeated claims of mediating peace between India and Pakistan, cozying up to the Pakistani military leadership, and remaining indifferent to issues that directly affected India's security and dignity. Also Read - 'India must retaliate': Shashi Tharoor says 'hidden message' in US tariffs, cites China's oil purchases 'While Trump undermined India internationally, Modi chose silence to remain in Washington's favour. There was no protest, no resistance, just submission,' the CM alleged. Siddaramaiah also criticised Modi's outreach to Elon Musk, suggesting that it was part of the same flawed strategy, especially given Musk's alignment with Trump. Calling on the Prime Minister to 'grow up and act in India's interest,' Siddaramaiah accused the BJP government of ignoring early warnings and putting India's economic and diplomatic strength at risk.
