Anne Burrell, Food Network star and host of 'Worst Cooks in America,' dies at 55
Burrell died Tuesday at her home at her home in Brooklyn, her team said in a statement.
'With her trademark spiky blonde hair and sparkling personality, Anne Burrell was the hugely popular and fan favorite host of Food Network's hit show, 'Worst Cooks in America,'' the statement said. 'Burrell was an industry veteran and passionate teacher who prided herself on her work in the culinary world.'
A cause of death was not provided.
Her family called Burrell 'a beloved wife, sister, daughter, stepmother, and friend' in a statement, adding that her 'light radiated far beyond those she knew, touching millions across the world.'
'Though she is no longer with us, her warmth, spirit, and boundless love remain eternal,' they said.
Burrell was a staple of the Food Network for two decades. A former teacher at the Institute of Culinary Education, she started her TV career by appearing as a sous chef on 'Iron Chef America' in 2005 and later launched her own show, the Emmy-nominated 'Secrets of a Restaurant Chef,' which aired from 2008 until 2012.
She appeared regularly on 'Chef Wanted,' 'Chopped,' 'Food Network Star' and others programs before she began hosting 'Worst Cooks in America' in 2010.
She recently competed on Food Network's 'House of Knives,' which premiered in March 2025.
'Anne was a remarkable person and culinary talent — teaching, competing and always sharing the importance of food in her life and the joy that a delicious meal can bring,' says a Food Network spokesperson. 'Our thoughts are with Anne's family, friends and fans during this time of tremendous loss.'
Burrell also wrote two bestselling cookbooks, 'Cook Like a Rock Star' and 'Own Your Kitchen: Recipes to Inspire and Empower.'
She is survived by her husband Stuart Claxton, whom she married in 2021, and his son, Javier, along with her mother, Marlene, sister Jane and brother Ben.
Throughout her culinary journey, she often said, 'I feel so lucky to be able to share my true passion in life with others.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Fringe may have to live with Murrayfield clashes after Oasis
The two tourists waiting patiently behind me to get into a late night comedy show at the Banshee Labyrinth - where Richard Gadd performed before his Golden Globe, Emmy and Bafta success – are sporting garb that has become increasingly familiar sight around the Fringe in recent days: black t-shirts emblazoned with the logo of the band Oasis. Read more: It is almost a year since the Britpop icons confirmed their comeback was definitely on and would be heading to Edinburgh at the height of its festival season. At that time, I was not alone among those involved in Edinburgh's festivals in feeling a sense of despair that much of the next 12 months would be dominated by the three instantly sold-out shows. The questions began to pile up almost immediately across the post-festival landscape which had barely had chance to draw breath after the 2024 season had drawn to a close. Who agreed to that? How on earth will Edinburgh cope? Where will everyone stay? Who is going to be able to afford to come to the Fringe? The levels of excitement about Edinburgh landing some of the biggest reunions shows in the history of British rock music were almost drowned out by the groans about their potential impact on the city's annual cultural fixtures, particularly the Fringe. On the final day of the festivals, the then Fringe Society chief executive Shona McCarthy published a bleak open letter warning that emerging artists, risk and ambition were being 'squeezed out' of the event due to the impact of a 'relentless rise in the cost of everything' and an unhelpful policy environment. Within days, the Fringe was facing the prospect of three Oasis shows sending accommodation prices soaring, not just on the days of the band's concerts, but across the board in Edinburgh. In February, it was confirmed that a fourth Murrayfield concert would be clashing with the August festivals, this time involving rock legends AC/DC playing their only UK show in Murrayfield. By then, Ms McCarthy was in her final weeks in the job, her impending departure, announced in early October, seeming to herald a new, perhaps more uncertain, era for the festival. If those Murrayfield concerts and the rise in hotel prices have undoubtedly dampened demand from some artists and performers to come to Edinburgh this August, there is little evidence of it in how its programme has taken shape in recent months. Published in early June, the final printed programme boasted 3352 shows, the fourth biggest in the 78-year-old history of the event, with 49,512 shows across 265 venues. Remarkably, the festival has grown significantly in the space of the last two months, despite widespread reports over the crippling cost of accommodation in the city. The Fringe Society tell me their latest figures have grown to 54,921 performances of 3913 shows – the highest tally on record - across 308 venues. The big question, as ever, is how ticket sales have gone, especially given the single biggest new addition to the festival calendar since the first events were staged in 1947. As I waited to get the tram home from the city centre on Sunday night, it suddenly struck me that Edinburgh was winding down from what must have been its busiest ever weekend of live events in the city. As far as I could tell, things could not have gone better at Murrayfield. Just three reports were reported from the two concerts – all on the first night – and the vast operation to get almost 70,000 fans in and out of Murrayfield, and in many cases in and out of the city, seemed to go smoothly. Just one Fringe venue operator, Assembly founder William Burdett-Coutts, was prepared to discuss the impact of the Murrayfield concerts on their box office performance, suggesting that the Oasis effect was not as bad as some had feared or predicted. However, tellingly, the Fringe Society has made it clear that it would not be keen on any future Murrayfield concerts clashing with the Fringe in 2026 and beyond, telling The Herald that this year's run has been 'unnecessary pressure on an already busy city.' DF Concerts, the promoters of the Oasis shows, are acutely aware of the biggest issue, the cost of accommodation, which has clearly impacted on fans of the band, who have of course paid eye-watering prices for their tickets, and many of those who have been working on the gigs. So what are the prospects of any similar happening in future years? Pretty strong, I reckon. Senior officials at Scottish Rugby, the game's governing body, was discussing ambitions to host up to 12 concerts a year at Murrayfield in future. There would have been six this year had Billy Joel not cancelled his planned show due to illness. DF Concerts told me the weekend shows and gone 'incredibly well on all fronts.' It will be no surprise if they are inundated with more approaches to use the stadium throughout the year and August is prime time for large-scale outdoor shows. I suspect that everyone involved in the Fringe, the other festivals and the city council will have to live with a new reality of having to grapple with the impact of the Murrayfield concerts, which are nowhere near any other venues hosting events. This will, of course, do nothing to reverse the trend of Edinburgh becoming an increasingly expensive place to visit, especially during its festivals. The need to come up with imaginative, viable solutions, as would happen during major sporting events, seems more pressing than ever, especially given their 80th anniversary is looming in 2027. The Herald has teamed up with to make the purchase of tickets for the Edinburgh Festival Fringe so much easier. To buy tickets, please click here.
Scotsman
6 hours ago
- Scotsman
Film reviews: Materialists
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Materialists (15) ★★★★ Weapons (18) ★★★★ If you've seen the trailer for Materialists you might mistake Celine Song's follow-up to her Oscar-nominated debut Past Lives for the sort of formulaic rom-com studios used to churn out every other month. Materialists | Contributed There's Dakota Johnson's professional matchmaker on a meet-cute with a rich and handsome potential client (Pedro Pascal) while her hunky cash-strapped ex (Chris Evans) pines for her in the wings. Wind the clock back 20 years and it could have been a vehicle for Jennifer Lopez, Kate Hudson or Sarah Jessica Parker, with Matthew McConaughey no doubt popping up shirtless somewhere in the mix. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This is deliberate of course, but also a bit of a ruse. Within minutes of the film opening with a Kubrick-style wild-swing prologue (it involves early human hunter-gatherers), it's clear that while Song is working within the framework of a more obviously commercial movie, she's adapting the genre to her tastes, not letting it subsume her voice. Set in the brutally frank world of the New York dating scene, the film revolves around Johnson's character, Anna, as she starts to question her own proven track-record of helping successful singles find romantic partners that check enough of their boxes to convince them that happiness is possible. The catalyst for her encroaching existential crisis is Pascal's Harry, whose earnings, height and attractiveness make him a 'unicorn' in her industry, the sort of too-good-to-be true man every straight woman is apparently desperate to marry. Harry, however, only has eyes for her, but she's also got unresolved feelings for her ex-boyfriend John (Evans), a struggling actor who re-enters her life the same night she meets Harry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That in itself feels pretty clichéd, especially for a filmmaker who's already deftly explored the complexities of a love triangle in Past Lives. But there's something about the way she lays bare the transactional nature of the New York dating scene that gives it a pleasingly sharp edge; even when she's embracing the pleasures of the genre – paying homage to When Harry Met Sally, say, or revelling in the film's upscale New York locations – she's simultaneously stripping away the gloss to present a more finely textured portrait of modern romance. Materialists may end up in a predictable place, but it doesn't get there in a predictable way. Weapons | Contributed Weapons finds writer/director Zach Cregger following up his outré debut Barbarian with a horror film that subverts expectations on an even grander scale. It's built around a creepy premise: one night, all but one of the kids in the class of a new primary school teacher mysteriously disappear, leaving the town in shock, the parents angry and the teacher, Justine (played by Julia Garner), the focus of everyone's suspicions and confusion. Intriguingly, though, Cregger doesn't then turn it into an anguished missing children movie. Instead, starting with Justine, he decides to zero in on a handful of characters, incrementally exploring the mystery from overlapping perspectives and immediately wrong-footing those looking for a straight-up supernatural chiller. Owing more to Tarantino's novelistic storytelling style, this is a film that takes its time establishing characters, using jump scares and creeping moments of dread sparingly to punctuate the sprawling tale, before going all out with a crazy ending. Whether it has anything more to offer than this is up for debate. In the context of a film about children disappearing en masse, the title and some of the imagery hint at some larger reality involving school shootings. Yet this turns out to be more of a red herring, which is perhaps that's no bad thing. So-called elevated horror too often feels like a thesis in search of a movie. Cregger's more like an old-fashioned carnival barker, confident in his ability to deliver something entertainingly freaky.
Daily Mirror
16 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Succession star Brian Cox emotional over gameshow contestants - 'they didn't make it'
Brian Cox continues his Bond-like antics as The Controller in 007: Road To A Million for the game show's second season. But he hasn't quite moved on from its first series... He's conquered the worlds of TV, stage and cinema but Brian Cox reckons his role as The Controller in 007: Road To A Million is one of his finest dramatic creations to date - he even keeps former contestants in his thoughts. The Emmy-winning actor returns to guide (and torment) a new batch of contestants in their quest for James Bond -worthy glory – and a shot at winning the £1 million jackpot. However, this isn't just a repeat of the first series. 'There's more interaction between me and the contestants, which is a great improvement,' says Brian Cox, 79. 'It's also infinitely more Bond-related.' The premise of 007: Road T o A Million is as bold as it is brutal: eight pairs of everyday people – ranging from married couples and siblings to best friends, father and son – travel the globe to take on a series of high-octane, nerve-wrecking challenges directly inspired by the Bond franchise. From climbing sky-high towers to facing sharks and decoding clues, the contestants must push their limits and tackle each mission as a team before knocking out the competition, knowing the two slowest pairs will face off in the dreaded Killer Question – an elimination riddle that lays everything on the line. 'It's infinitely more dramatic than it was the last time,' Brian says. And he would know. As The Controller, Brian is the ever-present puppet master, coolly orchestrating the chaos from the shadows. Contestants don't meet him until they absolutely have to – and it's often under emotionally charged circumstances. 'They were nervous,' says Brian. 'It's entertaining because you have this mysterious guy who's running the show, and you don't know where he's coming from. He can be very strict but he's also open.' This series the show expands its James Bond-verse further, with locations including London's Freemasons' Hall, the picturesque peaks of Switzerland and the lush terrain of Thailand. And Brian's lair has had an upgrade of its own. 'I now have an assistant, which feels very Bond,' says Succession star Brian. 'She gives me information about the contestants as I watch them on monitors. She did a great job.' Though emotionally reserved, The Controller isn't immune to the human drama that unfolds before his eyes. 'That's part of the character,' Brian says. 'He looks at these people and he sees the human flaws. Of course, the human flaw is exacerbated by the ambition of the individual human. 'One father and son made a mistake at one point. I felt empathetic to that because it was such a disappointment to them both, and I could identify with their frustration and their pain,' Brian reveals. 'One isn't unaware of how the show affects people. That's something The Controller is also aware of. He's not openly compassionate, but he's not without sensibility and sensitivity to who they are.' Off-screen, Brian says it's highly unlikely that he would sign up for a globe-trotting obstacle course himself. 'Personally, I would never want to put myself into that situation,' he says. 'I'm not very competitive. I love watching sports, but I'm not a particularly sporty person, and I would never bungee jump in a million years.' The show requires more than just physical courage, Brian says. 'Not only is it physically demanding but they're exposing themselves to scrutiny constantly, and that's tough. I'm not sure that's something I would particularly like to do. I have respect for the contestants, because they put themselves in that frame of mind.' Brian imagines his competitive strengths would lie in something less physical and more cerebral. 'That's where I would excel, because I understand how people tick, and I understand people's strengths and weaknesses,' he explains. Ultimately for Brian, it's the emotional depth of the show – not just the drama – that keeps him engaged. 'I remember in the last series I was particularly touched by Josh and Kamara who went through quite a lot together. I was very affected by them. 'They didn't end up making it to the final, but there was something very touching about them coming together. People in the show, when they're under a certain scrutiny, they behave in a certain way that is quite moving.' And, of course, this wouldn't be a Bond-inspired adventure without its signature flair. Each episode is sprinkled with nods to the franchise's most iconic films, from Thunderball and GoldenEye to Casino Royale and Spectre – but can you spot them all?
