logo
Driven: 2026 Mercedes-Maybach SL680 Puts the Driver in Focus

Driven: 2026 Mercedes-Maybach SL680 Puts the Driver in Focus

Car and Driver13-05-2025
For those of us whose splurges tend to be more outlet mall than oceanfront property, it can be hard to imagine a world where the regular old $188K Mercedes-AMG SL63 isn't a posh-enough droptop to demonstrate one's status. It's got an adjustable center screen, massaging seats, and Airscarf vents in the headrests. What else do you need, rose-gold details and a monogrammed hood? According to Mercedes-Maybach, which operates in a realm where the yachts have yachts and it's superfluous to say "private" before "island," the answer is yes, you need those precise things and more. The latest addition to its fleet of floaty, two-tone VIP carriers is the 2026 Mercedes-Maybach SL680, which offers everything we didn't realize was missing from the SL63. Namely, monograms.
It's a surprising choice to add a two-seat sports-car option to the long wheelbases and reclining rear seats of the current Maybach lineup, which has S-class, EQS, and GLS versions. Maybach is associated with high-end limousine service and chauffeured transport, making the SL an unexpected model in the lineup. Daniel Lescow, head of Mercedes-Maybach, says the decision to add a car more suited for self-driving (in the old-fashioned sense, not the autonomous one) came directly from customer feedback. The interest is there, Lescow says, and Maybach exists to meet the desires of the hoi oligoi.
In this case, Maybach soothed the savage beast of the AMG SL with a softened suspension, more sound deadening, and a dialed-back performance tune while amping up the visual impact with two-tone paint schemes and Maybach-specific design elements. The drivetrain remains physically unchanged from the nonhybrid SL63. It's the same twin-turbo 4.0-liter V-8 making 577 horsepower and 590 pound-feet of torque backed by a nine-speed automatic, all-wheel drive, and four-wheel steering. The drive modes and chassis tune are unique to Maybach, though, offering a plusher ride with less focus on high-speed lateral action and flag-drop finishes.
We've previously described the AMG SL cars as having "tough-guy-in-designer-duds styling." The Maybach SL is still well dressed and well muscled, but now it's less prone to losing its temper.
While the overall body of the Maybach SL is not radically different from the SL63's, it gets a different personality through a unique front end and Maybach-specific 21-inch forged wheels, in five-hole monoblock or spoked designs. Where the standard SL has a GT-like shark mouth flanked by wide air inlets, the Maybach fills its maw with delicate slats. Below is an open lower fascia that, on closer inspection, is composed of a mesh of interlocking Maybach logos. The Maybach pattern will be a recurring theme around the car. From the fabric top to the optional printed pattern on the hood, experiencing the Maybach SL is a bit like driving away in a high-end handbag. Even tiny details, like the coppery housings over the LED headlights or the chrome badges along the side, leave no opportunity to mistake this SL for anything but a Maybach.
While Maybach buyers will obviously have the chance to customize their SL through Mercedes's Manufaktur bespoke services, the debut SLs come in two ready-made Monogram Series specs, White Ambience and Red Ambience, which sound like opposing queens in an Alice in Wonderland adventure. We recommend not offing anyone's heads, however, since the only interior layout includes Crystal White nappa leather and fluffy white carpets. Truly, is there anything that screams "disposable income" more than white floor mats? You'd need a carpet cleaner on retainer. They can live on one of your yachts. Neither of the Monogram paint schemes is a subtle package, but then again, who buys a convertible (and a Maybach, for that matter) to blend in?
Inside, Maybach removed the SL's tiny rear seats in favor of a leather-covered package tray. The front seats remain in the same location, so there's no major increase in legroom, but the change makes the interior less cluttered, so we suppose you could claim that it offers some additional mental space. The remaining front seats are softer than in the Mercedes version, with additional padding in the backrest and the bottom cushion. It's noticeable and appreciated, especially on the roads around Ibiza, Spain, where the only thing more popular than a sick beat was a speed bump. Not that too many of those bumps made their way through the retuned suspension of the SL680. Maybach sacrificed some of the road-hugging sharpness of the SL63 in favor of road-absorbing comfort, with a decrease in camber, revalved dampers, softer springs front and rear, and increased cushioning around the suspension mounting points to soak up vibrations before they reach the cabin.
Maybach's drive modes are comfort focused as well, with relaxed steering feel and even some luxury lag in throttle input—but only in Maybach mode. In Sport mode, the adaptive dampers tighten up, the steering quickens, and the throttle offers instant response, although Maybach claims that the SL680's Sport mode is still softer than even the Comfort mode in the SL63. These changes—plus the additional weight of the SL680's sound deadening and rose-gold details—should add close to a second to the 3.0-second 60-mph time we got from the SL63. Since this is your island-only car, there are surely plenty of track monsters in your mainland garage.
It may be off-brand to admit it, but there were things we liked better about the softened-up SL. In the user-configurable Individual mode, with Sport's responsive throttle and Maybach's relaxed suspension setup, the SL680 swooshed around corners with none of the jitters or sidestepping of its more athletic competitors. It's almost a forgotten pleasure, to go fast without feeling every pavement imperfection drummed up your spinal column. If this is luxury, we like it. Certainly, it's a delight from the right seat, where a harsh ride feels worse when there's no driving task to distract. Passenger princes and princesses will be suggesting the Maybach for all outings.
So what's the downside to Maybaching it up? Well, there's the price, which, while not currently available, is likely to be considerably more than the AMG SL63's $188,300. On that note, should Maybach have done more? While we loved the cushioned ride, are a flashy hood and softer springs enough to differentiate the Maybach SL680 from the AMG SL63?
In some ways, the buyer gets less for more—no rear seat, less impressive performance numbers, likely a paltry 15-mpg EPA combined fuel-economy rating—and none of the specialty features of the larger Maybach offerings. With no rear seat or extended cabin, there's no place to showcase a reclining lounge seat or a refrigerated wine cooler. The niceties of the Maybach SL are shared with the Mercedes SL. A warming Airscarf from the headrest, massaging seats, a convertible top that can be raised or lowered in 15 seconds, a center touchscreen that can be tilted to avoid glare—all are fabulous conveniences, but none of them are unique to the Maybach. One wonders whether the Maybach buyer might simply opt for the top-of-the-line SL63 S E Performance plug-in hybrid and consider that enough.
Specifications
Specifications
2026 Mercedes-Maybach SL680 Monogram Series
Vehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 2-door convertible
PRICE (C/D EST)
Base: $250,000
ENGINE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection
Displacement: 243 in3, 3982 cm3
Power: 577 hp @ 6500 rpm
Torque: 590 lb-ft @ 2500 rpm
TRANSMISSION
9-speed automatic
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 106.3 in
Length: 184.9 in
Width: 75.4 in
Height: 53.5 in
Trunk Volume: 8 ft3
Curb Weight (C/D est): 4700 lb
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST)
60 mph: 3.8 sec
100 mph: 7.9 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.0 sec
Top Speed: 161 mph
EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST)
Combined/City/Highway: 15/13/20 mpg
Reviewed by
Elana Scherr
Senior Editor, Features
Like a sleeper agent activated late in the game, Elana Scherr didn't know her calling at a young age. Like many girls, she planned to be a vet-astronaut-artist, and came closest to that last one by attending UCLA art school. She painted images of cars, but did not own one. Elana reluctantly got a driver's license at age 21 and discovered that she not only loved cars and wanted to drive them, but that other people loved cars and wanted to read about them, which meant somebody had to write about them. Since receiving activation codes, Elana has written for numerous car magazines and websites, covering classics, car culture, technology, motorsports, and new-car reviews. In 2020, she received a Best Feature award from the Motor Press Guild for the C/D story "A Drive through Classic Americana in a Polestar 2." In 2023, her Car and Driver feature story "In Washington, D.C.'s Secret Carpool Cabal, It's a Daily Slug Fest" was awarded 1st place in the 16th Annual National Arts & Entertainment Journalism Awards by the Los Angeles Press Club.
Read full bio
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pump the Brakes on E-Bikes
Pump the Brakes on E-Bikes

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Pump the Brakes on E-Bikes

I applaud the efforts in New York City to adopt an e-bike speed limit of 15 miles per hour, paralleling safety actions abroad ('New York Has a New E-Bike Speed Limit—and Can't Enforce It,' Page One, Aug. 8). Scientific literature from Europe, Asia and the Middle East documents the severe neurosurgical, orthopedic, maxillofacial and other traumatic injuries associated with the higher rate of speed for e-bikes compared to traditional pedal bicycles. The U.S. should learn from this experience and spare the public repeated tragedies. New York can continue to lead the way by implementing new requirements for licensure and registration for those e-bikes that travel at higher speeds more closely resembling mopeds and motorcycles. This will enable law enforcement to identify these vehicles in traffic flow and restrict their use to the roadway instead of bike lanes and sidewalks, where they are more likely to collide with pedestrians in densely populated areas.

Volvo Needs Core Model Success To Restore Profits
Volvo Needs Core Model Success To Restore Profits

Forbes

time6 hours ago

  • Forbes

Volvo Needs Core Model Success To Restore Profits

Volvo, struggling in an automotive market undermined by weak sales, Chinese competition and tariff upheavals, needs solid sales from core models like XC60 SUV and the electric EX30 and EX40 (see review) to return to profitability. Volvo retains its awesome reputation for safety, but its sustainability claims have taken a hit since it postponed its plan to make only electric vehicles by 2030. Volvo invented the three-point seatbelt in 1959, crumple zones in the 1960s, and inflatable curtain airbags late in the 1990s. Volvo is owned by Chinese giant Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and faces myriad problems like just about every big Western carmaker. Sales are sliding in Europe. It recently removed its CEO and reverted to Hakan Samuelsson. It lost about €1 billion ($1.2 billion) in the second quarter and has started a cost-cutting program. Electric vehicle sales aren't up to expectations and lack profitability. U.S. tariffs are forcing it to move production of the big-selling XC60 SUV to the U.S. plant in Ridgeville, South Carolina. EX30 output has been moved to Belgium from China to avoid EU tariffs. U.S. plant underused French automotive consultancy Inovev said the U.S. plant has been underused, with 16,000 cars produced in 2024 compared with its 150,000 capacity. This plant also makes the EX90 SUV and the Polestar 3 SUV. Geely owns Polestar, British sportscar maker Lotus, Chinese brands Lynk & Co and Zeekr, electric taxi maker London Electric Vehicle Co, commercial vehicle maker Farizon Auto, and half of Malaysia's Proton carmaker. Frank Schwope, automotive industry lecturer at the University of Applied Sciences FHM Berlin, describes Geely as a complex brand conglomerate. 'Volvo stands out to a certain extent. However, the brand is somewhere in the middle of the pack, not really a premium manufacturer, but far too small to be a true mass producer,' Schwope said in an email exchange. Volvo Owner Has 10% Mercedes Stake 'In addition, the Polestar brand is causing confusion. It is quite possible that these two brands will move closer together in the future. Geely Group has a lot of money and staying power. In addition, Geely owner Li Shufu is a 10% shareholder in Mercedes-Benz. It is quite possible that Volvo and Mercedes-Benz will also work more closely together in the future,' Schwope said. Volvo abandoned its all-electric-only pledge by 2030 last year and replaced it with 90 to 100% of sales to be 'electrified' by that date. That means plug-in hybrids, regular hybrids and gasoline-powered 'mild hybrids', as well as EVs. Sales in Europe were sharply lower in the first half of 2025 – down to 170,100 from 2024's 195,000 – in an overall market which slid 1.9%, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA). Volvo's U.S. sales were up 6% to 64,700 in the first half compared with the same period last year. Too many models, too many variants Volvo's critics say it has too many models and variants and needs to appeal to a broader range of customers. According to Automotive News, Volvo has already started rationalizing its U.S. range, removing slow-selling sedans and wagons and concentrating on gasoline-powered SUVs which can also be said to be 'electrified'. The EC40 electric SUV has been stopped, while the larger EX40 will continue through 2028. The smaller EX30 is likely to be the lead-selling EV, according to Automotive News. Volvo has high hopes of the EX30. Last year it sold 69,000 in Europe. This is expected, according to Inovev, to slide to 45,000 for 2025. But Ghent production should allow lower prices and a surge in sales in 2026. Gabriel Juhas, Head of Product at Germany's Dataforce, said there is no easy future for Volvo, and much depends on Geely's plans. 'With the EX30 Volvo managed to conquer new groups of customers, but still with their current model line-up and the resurging competitors from Europe and China it won't get any easier, so I don't think that will be enough,' Juhas said. 'Even postponing the EV-only plans for 2030 and concentrating on hybrids might not be enough. From my point of view it's all about Geely's decision if they want to weather the storm with Volvo or not.'Sales target looks elusive 'As Europe was the only market they were growing in 2025 and now they're approximately 15% down in the first half of 2025, I doubt they'll manage to reach their initial 1 million (global) vehicles target in the near future or by 2030,' he said in an email exchange. An analyst who declined to be named agreed the EX30 was pivotal for Volvo to reach its 2025 target of 800,000 to 850,000 sales. The analyst pointed to problems with the big and expensive EX90 electric SUV, with a starting price of more than €80,000 ($94,000 after tax) in Europe. This analyst cautioned that moving the EX30 to Belgium will increase costs and raises questions about Volvo's competitive pricing ability. Volvo targets an EBIT (earnings before interest and tax) profit margin of between 7 and 8% by 2026 and cost control is the key to profitability. This requires solid sales from Volvo's top performers the EX30, EX40 and XC60, the analyst said. Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Ranger RWD Ultra Electric motor – 252 hp Torque – 420 Nm Battery – 78 kWh Drive – rear wheels Acceleration – 0-60 mph 7.1 seconds Top speed – 112 mph Price – £58,410 ($79,000 after tax)

Carbesity How Cars Get Bigger And Heavier And Why It Matters
Carbesity How Cars Get Bigger And Heavier And Why It Matters

Forbes

time6 hours ago

  • Forbes

Carbesity How Cars Get Bigger And Heavier And Why It Matters

Carbesity, carobesity, autobesity… no matter what you call it, cars get bigger and heavier, with significant negative consequences for people, cities and the climate. But there are hopeful signs, as this article shows. Other cars are huge. That is a lasting impression when driving the lightest car that money can buy, the English Caterham Super Seven. In its lightest form it weighs just 440 kilos; not even a fourth of the average new car sold in Europe. We sit almost directly on the ground, the windscreen lower than the wheel arches of most other cars, and a regular parking spot almost fits two of them. It still transports two persons, which is more than what is on average used, it is incredibly fast and hilariously fun. And in times of carbesity it has lessons to share with us. Not that the Caterham Super Seven is for everyone; while it does have a hood in case it rains, heats up really fast due to the proximity between engine, driver and passenger and even has a heated windscreen, few would use it as their everyday car (yes few, there are those who only have the Seven). Cars get bigger and heavier Remember when the Smart was a two-seater city car, parkable everywhere? Well not anymore, its latest offering is a 5 meter long, two meter wide SUV. It may be an extreme example, but cars are getting bigger year by year, on average becoming 1 centimeter wider every two years, as Forbes has previously reported. The average width of cars is now well over 180cm, incompatible with most parking spaces, while the length is creeping in on 5 meters. There are now more than 150 car models sold in Europe that are too big for public parking, while the average weight of cars sold in Europe has increased by over 20% since 2001. This trend is true also for electric cars; while in 2017, one-third of EVs on major markets were large cars, pickups or SUVs – it is now over two-thirds. And it may get worse before it gets better; WRI:s compilaton shows that of all new EV models the coming three years, 75% are big. The key reason for carbesity is not technical requirements but popular demand, primarily for SUV:s and crossovers, which again were the fastest-growing segment in the first half of the year, often Chinese plug-in hybrids. Several European manufacturers try to challenge this, including cheerful upstarts like Microlino but also giants like Stellantis which aims to double its production of electric Citroën, Fiat and Opel microcars, helping them to meet emissions standard. But when looking at their whole range of cars, it too has grown and continues to do so. In fact even Caterhams have gotten bigger, but just once, and it was 25 years ago. Then the widebody version was introduced, with a little more room for legs and elbows. 'It's like buying shoes, you choose the ones that fit', says Simon Lambert, the CMO (Chief Motorsport Officer before you ask) and head of customer engagement. A favorite story of his is when a well-known brand of executive cars borrowed a Seven for its engineers to understand the benefits of lightness. The positive spiral of low weight Low weight equals low energy usage which equals low emissions, with a positive spiral as Caterham will explain. A very light car does not need power steering or power breaking, making it lighter still, and then other components can be lighter too, further reducing material usage and energy consumption. Crucially for Caterham, this makes for more enjoyment too, with the driver in control. 'Most modern cars are appliances removing the driver from the drive. We are at the other end of the scale.' This, it seems, is increasingly in demand with sales nudging the company's self-imposed limit, even though Caterham has decided to stick to their guns and not offer other models than the Super Seven. Some of these are build-it-yourself; the car comes in boxes with the difficult bits preassembled and the rest there for about 80-100 hours of work in a normal garage. You do not save very much by doing so, but your relation with the car grows and at least in theory it opens up for alternative solutions such as going electric. It is also currently the only way they can sell in the US, with its otherwise prohibitively expensive type approval processes. The brand will stay true to keeping the weight at a minimum and only add things that have a direct purpose, but Simon emphasizes that 'not every gram counts' – for instance, there is three kilos of paint on the car which few customers would want without (but again few, not none). The interest of lowering weight can also mean extra income for the manufacturer; when others charge extra for larger tyres, Caterham may well be the only one that has 13' inch smaller tyres as an option to reduce weight. Details in carbon also reduces weight and adds cost, and 'When you are at 500 kilos, evert change makes a huge difference.' Small = easy to electrify Remember the early-days EVs? Small commuter cars. Batteries were – and remain – expensive, so it made sense not to use too many, achieved by down-sizing or perhaps right-sizing the car. Then Tesla came and made the EVs desirable, which meant big and heavy. But the basic equation has not changed: The smaller the car, the easier to electrify. This is used to great success by small-car makers such as Swiss-Italian Microlino, whose all-electric is designed around the knowledge that most of the time cars are used by only one or two persons, typically in the city. The Seven caters for a different customer base at times forgot by the EV community; those that really enjoy driving. Its EV prototypes are currently being shown around the world, receiving high praise for being fast, fun and easy to drive. Adding lightness might just do the trick to convince this section of the market. Hybrids means bigger and heavier Why not go plug-in-hybrid, having a combustion engine and an electric motor? It would be a way to meet UK requirements for zero emission capable vehicles by 2030. But in a small, space efficient car, there simply is not room for both combustion and electric parts – and in any car, having two solutions instead of one means added complexity, cost and weight – and with it, higher emissions. An escape route for Caterham and others that may not have everyone on board to go fully EV by 2030 is to liquify the electricity into e-fuels. The EU is considering to revise the 2035-ban on the combustion engine to include such fuels, provided they are made from green hydrogen and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Such e-fuels will be expensive, which makes it logical to use them in energy efficient, light vehicles. Why does carbesity matter? You might think that with cars going electric or potentially driving on e-fuels, it doesn't matter much how big they are. Think again. A bigger car needs more resources, a bigger EV even more so, since it requires larger batteries with more resources in them. No matter how it is powered, a heavier car also means higher energy consumption, higher emissions and a bigger strain on the grid, and with it poorer air quality due to increased energy production. Furthermore, a heavier car leads to increased release of tyre and brake particles. You might also, as so many others, feel safer in a bigger car. But bigger cars aren't safer, as Forbes has pointed out. Heavier vehicles store more kinetic energy, and taller vehicles are more likely to strike pedestrians high, so that they end up under the car rather than in the comparatively benign windscreen. Many accidents in SUV:s come from the driver not being able to see people in front of the car or when turning, with a 45% increased likelihood to cause fatalities in crashes with pedestrians. On a societal level, bigger cars take up more public space, leaving less room for the livable, likeable city and promote urban sprawl. For cars, big is not beautiful. Conclusion: How can carbesity be stopped? Whilst the Caterhams and Microlinos are great fun and even make a lot of sense, they may not be for everyone and they alone will not halt the upsizing trend. But legislation could. Current EU CO2 emission standards do not address vehicle mass, but some countries do. France and Norway have weight-based taxes for cars, with extra allowances for EVs to not punish them for having batteries. Paris triples parking fees for really large cars, the Dutch municipality of Kaatsheuvel has decided to not allow large SUV:s or pick-up trucks where they can be seen – they are not aligned with the image it wants. Japan has K-cars; tiny in size with engines up to 660 cc and 80 horse powers, and given a host of benefits so powerful even Caterham downsized its already diminutive Seven to meet the requirements. What do we as conscious consumers want? A weekend with a Seven might give the answer; people are so endeared with small and light they stop you for selfies with the car. Behind the wheel it is all smiles too; lighter really means more fun. Even refilling the car is cheerful; ultralight means ultralow consumption. Recharging would be an even more positive experience. And if the people at the factory have not registered demand for an electric version previously, well here is my firm expression of interest. But the importance is not whether Caterham does it, it is that others take notice and learn how to go light and stop carbesity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store