Supreme Court hands Trump a win on Consumer Product Safety Commission firings
The ruling was made over the objections of the court's three liberal justices.
'Once again, this Court uses its emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency, as established by Congress,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote. "By means of such actions, this Court may facilitate the permanent transfer of authority, piece by piece by piece, from one branch of Government to another."
The five-member regulatory commission, created by Congress in 1972, aims to keep people from being injured or killed by defective or harmful products.
Commissioners are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate in staggered seven-year terms to protect them from political or industry pressure and to protect the agency from abrupt changes in composition. By law, commissioners can be removed only for 'neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.'
But, in May, Trump fired without cause the three members appointed by President Joe Biden: Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr.
A federal judge in Maryland ordered the commissioners reinstated, saying the threat to public safety from removing them outweighed any hardship the administration might suffer from keeping them on while the firings are being challenged.
In his June ruling, U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox also said the product safety commission is similar in structure and function to another independent agency that was the center of a landmark 1935 ruling − Humphrey's Executor v. U.S. − limiting the ability of the president to remove independent agency officials.
'Humphrey's Executor remains good law and is binding on this Court,' Maddox wrote.
But the Trump administration said Maddox instead should've taken his cue from the Supreme Court's May decision allowing the president to fire Democratic members of two federal labor boards while the former members challenge their dismissals.
The product safety commission is now effectively controlled by Biden's appointees even though Trump is president, lawyers for the government said in a filing.
Decisions made by the commissioners who are 'hostile' to Trump's agenda have 'thrown the agency into chaos and have put agency staff in the untenable position of deciding which Commissioners' directives to follow,' the Justice Department said.
Attorneys for the three commissioners appointed by Biden reminded the Supreme Court that the justices twice in the past year declined to review appeals court decisions that upheld restrictions on the president's ability to remove Consumer Product Safety Commission members without cause.
And Maddox, the district judge, noted that the term of one of the three Biden appointees expires in October, giving Trump the chance to appoint her successor and to 'exert significant influence over the agency.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Joe Rogan Calls Trump Admin Detaining Pro-Palestine Students ‘Kind Of Shifty'
Joe Rogan came out in support of foreign-born university students across the U.S. who have been detained or face deportation for protesting Israel amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza. 'Isn't a university supposed to be a place where someone's allowed to express themselves and have opinions?' Rogan asked comedian Mike Vecchione on Tuesday's episode of 'The Joe Rogan Experience.' Rogan, who endorsed Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential election, joined a growing group of podcasters who have begun to turn on the president. The comedian previously attacked Trump's immigration enforcement in an episode earlier this month, criticizing raids for targeting workplaces instead of violent criminals. Actor Mark Ruffalo subsequently slammed Rogan's about-face in a post on Threads, saying, 'It's a little late now to pretend like project 2025 didn't exist and wasn't the play book all along.' On Tuesday, Rogan denounced the president's aggressive crackdown on immigration once again, this time condemning the Trump administration for detaining visa and green-card holders, despite a campaign promise of focusing on violent criminals. During the episode, Rogan claimed 'friends' and 'cops' in New York City have told him that increases in immigration have resulted in an 'elevated number of assaults and crimes and robberies' in the city. 'And so, what's the response to that? Well, now you have this insane policy where they're going to Home Depot and rounding people up, and it's kind of scary, you know, and people that are American citizens,' Rogan said. Rogan called Trump's aggressive enforcement 'an overcorrection.' 'You got a bunch of people that are totally innocent, they are going to get caught up in that. They have been, you know, they have been,' Rogan said. 'A lot of people that have green cards, a lot of people that are supposed to be over here.' Among those who have been caught up in Trump's immigration enforcement are university students who openly protested against Israel, including Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, a green-card holder who was detained after the administration claimed his beliefs and presence in the U.S. could hurt American foreign policy. Mohsen Mahdawi, another Columbia student who led peaceful pro-Palestinian protests on campus, was arrested during his citizenship interview. He was released after 16 days in detention, but said the administration's 'intimidation' would 'not silence' him. Rogan called it 'fucking crazy' that 'they're kicking students out that like write articles they don't like.' Though he did not name a specific case, the comment seemed to be a reference to Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk, who was taken by federal agents and held for more than six weeks after co-authoring an op-ed in her student newspaper calling on the university to divest from Israeli companies. 'They're writing something down, and they're not calling for violence either. And they're getting challenged. That's supposed to be how it happens,' Rogan said. 'You get challenged. Smarter people have better arguments or your argument stands.' Vecchione said that a university is 'supposed to be a place for discourse,' and Rogan agreed. 'You're deporting people because you don't like who they're criticizing,' Rogan said. 'Like that gets kind of shifty.' Related... Old Clip Of Stephen Miller Praising Torture Resurface Amid Aggressive Immigration Enforcement 'Sensitive' Memo Reveals How Many Border Agents Trump Is Using For Immigration Raids Volunteers Flock To Support Migrants Targeted By ICE At Immigration Courts
Washington Post
28 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump softens stance on China amid trade talks and summit push
The Trump administration has softened its approach to Beijing amid high-stakes trade talks this week and in advance of a potential fall summit between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The moves include dissuading Taiwan's leader from making planned stopovers in the United States next month, postponing a meeting between Taipei's defense minister and top Pentagon leaders in June, and pausing new export controls on China, according to more than a dozen current and former U.S. officials and other people familiar with the actions. Critics of the nascent détente — including both Republicans and Democrats — have warned that the recent moves could undermine U.S. national security and impact regional alliances. Their concern is that Trump's desire to strike a trade deal with China is sidelining administration efforts to more forcefully compete with Beijing economically, technologically and militarily. China is aggressively seeking to displace the U.S. and its western allies in emerging technologies such as AI and quantum computing, which it sees as the key to accelerating its military modernization and global economic dominance. 'The president cares more about American businesses getting access to China's market than he seems to about national security concerns with Beijing,' said Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. The trip by Taiwan President Lai Ching-te, which was tentatively slated for early August to include stops in Dallas and New York City on a visit to diplomatic allies in Latin America, was pulled down after the Trump administration tried to change the itinerary, according to three people familiar with the matter, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation. One person said the administration sought to have Lai avoid major cities and limit public engagement. 'They didn't say absolutely no, but they put so many restrictions on [the stopovers] that it was clear they didn't want it,' a second person said. Beijing, which claims Taiwan as its own and views any U.S. engagement with Taiwanese officials as a provocation, had intensely lobbied the administration and China experts in Washington to discourage the visit. Asked for comment, Taiwan's unofficial embassy in Washington pointed to an earlier statement from Lai's office that 'the president currently has no plans for overseas visits in the near future.' The cancellation of Lai's trip after pressure from the Trump administration was first reported by the Financial Times. 'These concessions send a dangerous signal that America's approach to Taiwan is negotiable,' said Ely Ratner, a former senior defense official in the Biden administration. 'That will only lead to more Chinese pressure and coercion. For Beijing, the hunger will grow with the eating.' The latest round of trade talks in Stockholm concluded Tuesday with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying the president would have to decide whether to extend a trade truce between the two countries. 'President Trump has publicly discussed his desire for a constructive relationship with China, who is sending rare earth magnets to the United States,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement. 'He is focused on advancing American interests, such as leveling the playing field for American industries and getting China to stop the flow of fentanyl into our country.' Lai isn't the first senior Taiwanese official to see his U.S. trip canceled this year. Taiwanese Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo was scheduled to visit Washington in June for high-level meetings with Pentagon officials, including policy chief Elbridge Colby, according to two other people familiar with the situation. Those meetings were abruptly canceled by the U.S. after Xi urged Trump to limit U.S. engagement with Taiwan during a phone call earlier in June, the two people said. Washington has yet to reschedule the meetings. Meanwhile, the administration is weighing whether to directly ship more military equipment to Taiwan. The Defense Department submitted a tranche of aid to the White House for the president's consideration earlier this summer, but it has not yet been approved, according to a U.S. official. Instead, it sent the package to the State Department, which also plays a role in the security assistance process, according to another person familiar with the matter. The Pentagon and State Department did not respond to requests for comment. Critics have also voiced concern about the Trump administration's moves to lift restrictions on the sale of AI semiconductors to China. In July, the administration reversed an April decision to ban the sale of the H20, an AI chip made by the American semiconductor leviathan Nvidia, after CEO Jensen Huang's intensive efforts to persuade Trump. Nvidia has claimed that the H20 chips would not be used to aid China's military and that America benefits when other countries depend on its technology. National security experts and lawmakers from both parties have blasted the H20 decision, saying the technology will help advance China's military-industrial complex, with applications from simulating nuclear weapons to developing unmanned aircraft. 'We believe this move represents a strategic misstep that endangers the United States' economic and military edge in artificial intelligence — an area increasingly seen as decisive in 21st-century global leadership,' said 20 national security experts in a letter Monday urging Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to reverse course. The signatories include former members of both Trump administrations such as David Feith, who spearheaded technology competition policy at the National Security Council until April; and Matthew Pottinger, who served as deputy national security adviser in Trump's first term. The administration has made other moves to mollify China. On May 13, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued guidance on certain chips made by Chinese tech giant Huawei. A press release warned companies that using specific versions of Huawei's Ascend semiconductor chips 'anywhere in the world violates'' U.S. export control laws. Beijing was angered by the move, coming just as it had agreed to resume rare-earth exports, according to Christopher Padilla, a former top export control official in the George W. Bush administration, now a senior adviser with the Brunswick Group consulting firm. Senior Trump administration officials became concerned the Commerce move would undermine ongoing trade negotiations. Shortly afterward, BIS removed the word 'violates' and replaced it with language stating that the agency was 'alerting industry to the risks of using' those chips, said three people familiar with the matter. The linguistic tweak did not affect the application of the rule, but it was a softer, more oblique warning. The Commerce Department did not reply to requests for comment. Shortly after the Huawei announcement, China froze approvals for rare-earth exports to the United States. In late May, BIS imposed export controls on chip design software, certain aircraft parts and ethane to China. In June, both sides met in London and said they had agreed to lift their mutual restrictions. Since then, there has been a de facto pause on new trade controls involving China, several people said. That pause comes in the wake of what some analysts say is the administration's undertaking of an ill-thought out trade war. They point to the president's April tariffs escalation of 145 percent, against which China retaliated with export controls on rare earth minerals. 'China found pain points in the United States that we could not withstand,' Sobolik said. The apparent willingness of the Trump administration to put technology export controls on the trade bargaining table is a troubling development, said Padilla, who also served as undersecretary of commerce for international trade in the George W. Bush administration. 'Since the Carter administration and normalization with China,' the policy has been to deny Beijing's request to lift export controls in return for, say, closing the trade deficit, Padilla said. Using them as leverage in trade talks sets 'a dangerous precedent,' he said, 'and it raises the real possibility that now China will demand relaxation of export controls in exchange for future trade concessions — or for an agreement if the president visits China later this year.' In July, Trump told reporters at the White House: 'President Xi has invited me to China, and we'll probably be doing that in the not-too-distant future.' On Tuesday, Trump posted on Truth Social that he was 'not SEEKING' a summit with Xi. 'I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended,' he wrote. 'Otherwise, no interest!' Eva Dou contributed to this report.
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Axing EPA's ‘endangerment' BS will unleash a new era of US prosperity
Hooray for President Donald Trump and EPA chief Lee Zeldin for moving to roll back trillions of dollars in federal mandates by undoing the Obama-era greenhouse-gas 'endangerment' finding. Back in 2009, Environmental Protection Agency functionaries listed carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases as posing a public-health threat — not for any actual toxicity, but because of their role in speeding global warming. That in turn allowed for unprecedented EPA regulation of factories, power plants and auto emissions — including the hated stop-start feature. None of it ever made sense: Congress created the EPA in 1970 to fight actual poisons in our water and air, not to manage complex bank-shot contingencies as the 'endangerment' finding envisioned. After long teasing the repeal, Zeldin finally made the 'largest deregulatory action in the history of America' official Tuesday; it'll be a huge win for energy sanity. After all, anti-carbon mandates do major immediate harm to public health, by making electricity and other goods far more expensive: This green madness is a major reason why Western Europe has seen next to zero economic growth over the last two decades. And much of it makes little sense even as anti-climate-change policy: The EPA itself admits that the vehicle stop-start feature — which kills internal-combustion engines at red lights — hasn't shown clear reductions in emissions. Yes, cutting carbon emissions is an important long-term goal — but trying to make them zero immediately is nuts, especially when China is still building new coal plants at a record pace. The nation (and the world!) is far better served by Trump's drive to boost US energy production and ensure a plentiful and reliable supply of cheaper electricity to meet the growing demands of manufacturers and AI companies. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters For all progressives' current talk of 'affordability,' energy costs remain by far the single most important issue when it comes to improving public health and quality of life. But the anti-carbon cult has a death grip on the elites who set the Democratic agenda; expect a vast wave of propaganda posing as news and invective pretending to be science in response to Zeldin's move. Lawsuits, as well — since Democrats snuck language declaring greenhouse gases to be 'pollutants' into the utterly mislabeled 'Inflation Reduction Act' three years ago. Republicans in Congress need to put rolling back that absurdity high on their agenda when Congress reconvenes in the fall.
