What price will Taiwan pay to blunt Trump's tariffs? Reports spark worries over US demands
Advertisement
Adding to the uncertainty are reports that planned visits to the US by
Taiwanese leader William Lai Ching-te and Defence Minister Wellington Koo Li-hsiung were deferred at the last minute.
Analysts said the developments were far from coincidental and might mark a deliberate effort by Washington to dial down Taiwan-related tensions as it sought a breakthrough in trade talks with Beijing.
The tariff threat stems from US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff campaign launched in April, which aims to impose duties matching those faced by American exporters. While most major trading partners have reached agreements, Taiwan remains among a small group
still negotiating its final rate.
Citing reports by foreign news outlets, including Bloomberg, Taiwanese media said on Thursday that Washington was demanding that Taiwan match the investment commitments made by Japan and South Korea – US$550 billion and US$350 billion respectively – to qualify for the lowest 15 per cent tariff tier.
Advertisement
Taiwan is reportedly considering a US$300-400 billion package, equivalent to four years of the island's central government budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
Trump-Putin face-to-face meeting could happen very soon
The big news is that US President Donald Trump has pronounced the Special Envoy Steven Witkoff's talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as very productive. He has further announced he will meet with Putin face-to-face as soon as next week. He spoke to Putin by telephone today (August 6). Trump also says that he intends to follow up on his meeting with Putin with a three-way meeting between himself, Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. We have no official word from Russia, but the Trump announcement is in line with predictions coming from Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that there will be 'big surprises.' We have no readout from either side on the terms discussed between the parties, only that there were two subjects: Ukraine and US-Russia strategic cooperation. It may be that the Russians are uncertain about how much political or strategic support they can expect from China, suggesting maybe the Chinese leadership is in flux. Likewise, we also know, at least in part, that preliminary talks took place between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Lavrov and between Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu, acting as a mediator with Trump, and Putin. The Russians have promised a readout of the conversation, although I am not sure it will be enlightening. Certainly, this is a very big development, but it carries plenty of risk for all sides, especially for Trump. The US president will need to control Zelensky, a difficult task because Zelensky has nowhere to go, as he cannot easily make significant concessions. Washington allegedly wants to get rid of him because he is an obstacle to a deal, so we can't rule out a melodrama involving Zelensky's status. Meanwhile, Trump slapped India with a 50% tariff, in part because of its purchases of sanctioned Russian oil. This is a mistake because India will have to fight back and the US will find itself in a position of strengthening the military alignment between India and Russia. Ideologically, it is also counterproductive, as India is a strong democratic country and the US is treating it as a pariah. India will likely quickly make a deal to buy Russia's new Su-57 fighter jets instead of the F-35, something that has been trending anyway. There are other potential 'disrupters.' One potential is the UK. I doubt the UK and French, along with Estonia and some others (maybe not the Germans) will be enthusiastic in supporting a brokered deal on Ukraine. The Russians report the UK is planning a so-called shadow-fleet incident (probably in the Baltic or Sea of Finland) that will trigger a UK and potential NATO response, forcing the US to support a hard anti-Russian position. So some sort of provocation can't be ruled out, notwithstanding whether the Russians have real intelligence on UK planning, or if they are faking it. The 'shadow fleet' are ships carrying Russian oil that are not insured by the London exchange. However, other insurance instruments are available in the maritime trade, so the terminology is intended to characterize these ships in a pejorative manner and does not describe the status of these tankers. Meanwhile, the Estonians and Finns have attempted to thwart the transit of these tankers and have tried to pull them into port for 'inspections.' The Russian Navy is now escorting them, putting a stop to these provocations. More yet may happen. There are many other wild cards, including moves that Ukraine may make. The last time there was a ceasefire that stopped flights of aircraft and drones, the Ukrainians kept up attacks anyway on Russian territory. There are plenty of other possibilities. Even so, it looks like the diplomatic track may, at last, be leading to concrete results in ending the conflict in Ukraine. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared in his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
How this red cap saved US-South Korea trade deal
A red golf cap embroidered with the slogan 'Make America Shipbuilding Great Again' (Masga) has emerged as an unlikely symbol of progress in recent US South Korea tariff negotiations. Advertisement Behind the scenes, the urgent production of the hat by a small Seoul-based manufacturer shows how symbolism and speed converged in diplomacy. The order came suddenly. 'The US and South Korean flags must be stitched side by side above the Masga slogan on the front of the cap,' a Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy official told the Seoul-based hat maker, Moja Factory, located in Dongdaemun district. The design was intended not just as merchandise, but as a key visual aid in high-level talks. The hat was designed to echo Donald Trump's iconic red Maga cap. Photo: Moja Factory The Masga slogan, created by the ministry staff as part of a strategic policy proposal for bilateral shipbuilding cooperation, had helped break a stalemate in tariff talks.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
US debuts Dark Eagle hypersonic missile in Australia with China in mind
The US appears to be strengthening its allied deterrence against China by deploying its Dark Eagle hypersonic missile , a move that could 'further intensify' regional rivalry, Chinese experts have warned. Advertisement The United States Army Pacific, a service component for America's Indo-Pacific Command, confirmed on the weekend that it had deployed a Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) system – commonly referred to as Dark Eagle – to Australia's Northern Territory as part of the three-week Talisman Sabre 2025 military exercise that wrapped up on Monday. It was the first time that the weapon had been used overseas and beyond the continental US. 02:19 Leaders' meeting sees Australia and China call for increased dialogue and cooperation Leaders' meeting sees Australia and China call for increased dialogue and cooperation 'The deployment of the LRHW system to Australia is a major milestone for the army and demonstrates our ability to rapidly deploy and operate advanced capabilities in support of our allies and partners,' Wade Germann, commander of the Hawaii-based 3rd Multi-Domain Task Force which transported the weapon to Australia, said on Sunday. As a land-based, manoeuvrable missile system, Dark Eagle can travel at over 6,100km/h (3,800mph) and strike targets more than 2,700km (1,700 miles) away. The US deployment of the weapon showed a 'flexing of military muscle', according to Xin Qiang, deputy director of the Centre for American Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai. Advertisement He said the move indicated the importance that Washington attached to the US-Australia alliance, including its readiness to strengthen defence coordination and security cooperation with Canberra.
