logo
Elon Musk's DOGE, HHS ended $18 million contract with San Antonio nonprofit over empty migrant housing facility

Elon Musk's DOGE, HHS ended $18 million contract with San Antonio nonprofit over empty migrant housing facility

Yahoo08-03-2025
Since Donald Trump took office, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been on a mission to fight waste, fraud, and abuse in the government. DOGE also has an X account highlighting the actions it is taking to allegedly help taxpayers save money.
In late February, DOGE's X account sent out a message reporting it had ended a contract with a San Antonio non-profit called Family Endeavors, claiming that by having HHS terminate the contract, they'd saved taxpayers over $215 million per year.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Home prices in America could fly through the roof in 2025 — here's the big reason why and how to take full advantage (with as little as $10)
Americans with upside-down car loans owe more money than ever before — and drivers can't keep up. Here are 3 ways to cut your monthly costs ASAP
Endeavors, however, claims it was fulfilling its mandate, and that its contract was not an example of fraudulent spending. The non-profit issued a statement, saying that 'any claims of corruption or mismanagement are baseless.'
So, what exactly happened, and what was the contact DOGE put an end to?
According to the DOGE post, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was paying around $18 million per month to Endeavors to run a facility in Pecos, Texas, that was intended for use housing unaccompanied migrant children. However, at the time, the facility was sitting empty.
DOGE officials felt that paying millions per month for an unused shelter wasn't the best use of taxpayer money — especially as it noted the occupancy of national licensed facilities is now below 20% — so it ended the contract.
Endeavors, however, believes it was acting within the scope of its obligations and that the service it was providing was a valuable one that was in line with its obligations. In an interview with News 4 San Antonio, a source from Endeavors shared that the shelter had been occupied from March 2021 to March 2023, and again from September 2023 to February 2024, over which time it served 40,000 unaccompanied minors.
When the government stopped using the shelter in March 2024, Endeavors said funding was still needed to pay all the expenses associated with keeping the shelter ready to be used again at any time — like its lease, medical facilities, vaccine refrigeration and the hundreds of cameras required for security.
It also said federal officials were on site daily, and that the federal government decided which locations should be used as shelters for migrants and not the nonprofit itself.
Regardless, the contract has now come to an end so Endeavors' work with the government on this issue is halted, at least for now, along with payments to the nonprofit.
Read more: Jamie Dimon issues a warning about the US stock market — says prices are 'kind of inflated.' Crashproof your portfolio with these 3 rock-solid strategies
The DOGE post on X didn't just focus on the emptiness of the facility. It also aimed to highlight the connections Endeavors had with the Biden administration in order to cast doubt on whether the contract was on the up-and-up in the first place.
The X post stated that, 'A former ICE employee and Biden transition team member joined Family Endeavors in early 2021 and helped secure a sole-source HHS contract for overflow housing from licensed care facilities. As a result, Family Endeavors' cash and portfolio of investments grew from $8.3M in 2020 to $520.4M in 2023.'
While this might seem like a conflict of interest, Endeavors' statement indicated the nonprofit had been serving migrant families under contracts with the government since 2012 and that it was just one of 15 organizations contracting with the government in 2021 to try to help house migrants.
'Our selection was based on our proven experience, capacity, and more than a decade of performance,' the nonprofit stated.
Evidence of a connection with former government officials alone isn't, by itself, evidence of corruption or wrongdoing, so readers of DOGE and Endeavors' statements can draw their own conclusions from the competing facts.
It's worth noting, though, that Musk's companies SpaceX and Tesla have been awarded $18 billion in federal contracts since 2015 — although those contracts were largely awarded under the Biden administration. Still, some have questioned whether Musk himself may have a conflict of interest in determining what contracts will be cut as they believe it's unlikely his own company's contracts will be on the chopping block — unlike the contract with Endeavor.
One dozen eggs in America now costs a record high of $4.95 — here are 3 simple ways to inflation-proof your retirement portfolio
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Protect your retirement savings with these 5 essential money moves — most of which you can complete in just minutes
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. Steel plant explosion raises questions about its future
U.S. Steel plant explosion raises questions about its future

Fast Company

timea few seconds ago

  • Fast Company

U.S. Steel plant explosion raises questions about its future

The fatal explosion last week at U.S. Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the U.S. — along with profits, share prices and steel prices — have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump 's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved U.S. Steel's nearly $15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. 'We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley,' David Burritt, U.S. Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. 'You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time.' Will the explosion change anything? The explosion killed two workers and hospitalized 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the U.S. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its 'commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong' and that it sent 'technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support.' Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that 'this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay.' U.S. Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend $100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get U.S. Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two — where the explosion occurred — were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, U.S. Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odor into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organization, said U.S. Steel has been forced to pay $57 million in fines and settlements since Jan. 1, 2020, for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he 'found no indication that U.S. Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance program for the Clairton plant.' The Clairton plant, he wrote, is 'inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design.' U.S. Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said U.S. Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. Will Clairton be modernized? It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest $11 billion into U.S. Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the $2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, U.S. Steel had signaled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that U.S. Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. Relics of steelmaking's past In many ways, U.S. Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, U.S. steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the U.S. has opened a new blast furnace in decades, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favor. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the U.S., there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said.

Mississippi joining 3 other GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to DC
Mississippi joining 3 other GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to DC

The Hill

timea few seconds ago

  • The Hill

Mississippi joining 3 other GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to DC

Mississippi on Monday became the fourth Republican-led state to announce plans to send National Guard troops to Washington, D.C. to bolster President Trump's crackdown on crime in the nation's capital. 'I've approved the deployment of approximately 200 Mississippi National Guard Soldiers to Washington, D.C., to support President Trump's effort to return law and order to our nation's capital,' Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves (R) said in a post on the social platform X. 'Crime is out of control there, and it's clear something must be done to combat it,' he continued. 'Americans deserve a safe capital city that we can all be proud of. I know the brave men and women of our National Guard will do an excellent job enhancing public safety and supporting law enforcement.' West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (R), South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster (R) and Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) all announced over the weekend that they would send hundreds of soldiers from their states to nearly double the 800 D.C. National Guard members already mobilized. All three GOP governors said in their advisories that they were acting on requests from the Trump administration. The president announced a massive crime-fighting effort in Washington last week, with a federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department and infusion of federal agents and National Guard troops. 'Until 4 days ago, Washington, D.C., was the most unsafe 'city' in the United States, and perhaps the World,' Trump wrote in an update on Truth Social early Monday. 'Now, in just a short period of time, it is perhaps the safest, and getting better every single hour!' Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X on Monday morning that federal authorities made 137 arrests over the weekend, bringing the total arrests since the initiative began to more than 400. 'We are not slowing down,' she wrote. 'We are committed to making DC safe again!' Trump has set his sights on tackling crime in the nation's capital, even as local officials have pushed back on characterizations of violent surges. According to the District's statistics, which Trump has deemed 'fake,' violent crime is down about 26 percent compared to this point last year.

Democratic-led states sue Trump admin over restrictions on funding for victims of crimes
Democratic-led states sue Trump admin over restrictions on funding for victims of crimes

USA Today

timea few seconds ago

  • USA Today

Democratic-led states sue Trump admin over restrictions on funding for victims of crimes

Democratic attorneys general said states are being strong-armed into supporting Trump's immigration policies. Democratic attorneys general are suing the Trump administration over its attempt to condition federal funding for the victims of crimes on states' cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. In a suit filed on Aug. 18 in Rhode lsland, the attorneys general called the move a brazen attempt by the Justice Department to 'strong-arm' states into supporting President Donald Trump's immigration policies. 'We won't be bullied or manipulated by the Trump administration,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta told reporters. The Trump administration has threatened to sue and withhold federal funds from more than 20 "sanctuary" states, cities and counties, because of their lack of cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. "Sanctuary policies impede law enforcement and put American citizens at risk by design," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in an Aug. 5 statement. There's no specific legal definition of a sanctuary city, state or other jurisdiction, but Bondi's office criticized policies like failing to collaborate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, providing government benefits to undocumented immigrants or refusing to share immigration information about jail detainees. See Trump's target list Is your community an immigrant sanctuary? The states argue the administration can't threaten to withhold the more than $1 billion in federal grants from a program created in 1984 to bolster support for crime victims. The grants fund compensation programs to cover such costs as medical bills, funeral costs and lost wages for survivors. The federal funding also pays for counseling, emergency shelter, crisis hotlines and legal support. New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin said the administration is using the victims of gun violence, domestic violence, sexual assault survivors and others as political pawns. The attorneys general are asking a judge to block the administration from imposing new estrictions on the funding, arguing the money has already been approved by Congress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store