This Year's Te Matatini Biggest Yet
The festival brought just under $24 million into Taranaki.
, Māori issues reporter
A new impact evaluation report on this year's Te Matatini shows that the 2025 festival was the biggest to date.
The report showed that Te Matatini o Te Kāhui Maunga held in February in Ngāmotu New Plymouth, brought just under $24 million into Taranaki – $3 million less than forecasted but still the highest contribution from a festival to date.
Tane Morgan is a director of New Plymouth based Proof & Stock Coffee which had a stall at Te Matatini. Over the festivals five days they sold 100kgs worth of coffee, he said.
At WOMAD – the only festival in the region of a comparable size – Proof & Stock might go through 35kgs over three days, he said.
Morgan said unlike WOMAD or a concert Te Matatini had a 'peaceful flow about it'.
'The fact that no one was drinking and it had like this unique flow about it, everybody was taking their time there was a lot of courtesy… you could just feel it.'
Morgan said the festival certainly had an impact of the local economy in Taranaki – especially for hotels and camp grounds – but the impact was relative to what you were selling. Cafe's and restaurants in the city center might not have seen the same return on their investment, he said.
'I don't think that the cafe's really benefited from it, but if you were at Te Matatini and you were a vendor or stall holder you would have seen good margins, that's the consensus that the town was kind of saying.
'A lot of the businesses here were ready for the influx but they didn't quite see a return on their investment in terms of people out wining and dining.'
As well as their stall at Te Matatini Proof & Stock also has a coffee shop in New Plymouth, which Morgan said was quieter than during the festival.
But Morgan said his team had an amazing time at the festival. His staff included included some local students learning on the job.
'They walked out with a pocket full of cash and all this confidence they can use into the future,' he said.
Hāwera-based Kiri Erb owns and operates Tika Cafe and Catering and worked providing kai for the festival and for the competitors who were based out of Hāwera.
She told RNZ being awarded a kai stall was both a privilege and a challenge.
The scale of the event meant she had to boost the her staffing numbers from 32 to 50 so the business could accommodate the masses at the Bowl of Brooklands in New Plymouth and the restaurant in Hāwera.
Erb said it was an experience her and the team will never forget.
'This is an experience that will live in memory banks forever. We've taken videos of us working during that week, we had rōpu that would come in and they would perform for us… and we'd go back an look at those. Our hearts still really sing.'
'We all just feel incredibly lucky.' Erb said.
Te Matatini chief executive Carl Ross said the iwi of Taranaki had done a fantastic job catering for a growing festival.
'The Matatini brand internationally has just got so big now, [its] becoming an economic powerhouse for our country, how do we actually utilise what we have now to be able to provide the Matatini festival in the best condition that we can do.'
There has also been an increased interest in kapa haka among non-Māori, 44 percent of attendees in 2025 were Pākehā up from an average of 27 percent over the last decade of festivals. Ross said over the years he has noticed more and more people from diverse communities wanting to share the Matatini experience.
Of the $24m brought into the region more than $2m came from teams traveling to Taranaki to compete and another $17.4m was spent by their supporters.
It's getting more and more expensive to send a team to Te Matatini and some regions don't have that kind of money to spend, Ross said.
'We could have up to $160,000 to move a single team into a rohe and that's with just three supporters per kaihaka (performer).'
Te Matatini now is looking to the future and ensure the festival can be enjoyed by everybody, he said.
'Te Matatini and our Board are still in discussion's on how we can also ensure that we can meet the needs of our smaller rohe, because that's a question that was burning straight after the festival. Did we have our infrastructure in place to be able to try and do this in the next two years?'
Te Matatini announced in May that the next festival in 2027 would not be hosted in Te Tauihu o te Waka-a-Māui/Nelson as had been expected and that they were looking for expressions of interest to host.
Ross was hopeful that there will be an update on where Te Matatini goes next by the end of June.
'[Te Matatini] supports the economy, the local economy and that's what is really cool about being able to travel to different rohe, being able to do that it's getting harder at the moment for sponsorships, we only got half the sponsorship that we usually get and it goes to show the economic environment [we're] currently working in, so I know it's hard out there and it's hard for our people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Mahurangi oyster farmers apprehensive about accepting mysterious $10,000 payments
Tom Walters from Matakana Oysters has been vocal about Watercare taking accountability for the pollution of the Mahurangi River, which flows into the harbour where the oyster crops are. He said while the money was facilitated by Aquaculture New Zealand, it was unclear what the payment's purpose was and if it originated from it or Watercare. Aquaculture New Zealand and Watercare have both been approached for comment. Walters said he worried about what it could mean around liability and any future legal action the farmers could take up with Watercare. 'I fear, and a few of the others fear, they're just going to be played like puppets by Watercare. 'They'll say, oh, we've given you a little bit, maybe here's $50,000 more, and we've fixed the problem, see you later. They haven't fixed the problem yet. 'I'd rather not have accepted it, because to me it was like, obviously, if you're actually doing that, then you're accepting that you've done something wrong here, number one. 'It needs to be $200,000 each for something, just to get through the s*** that we've gone through this year and at times eight or nine, or whatever it is, or 10 oyster farmers, rather than $200,000 between us all, it's an insult,' said Walters. Watercare have consistently said it would not be in a position to directly compensate the farmers financially but did previously put forward $50,000 to support wellbeing initiatives. Jim Aitken from Mahurangi Oysters said the $10,000 would not cover 'basically a couple of weeks worth of bills'. He also said he was not sure whether they should have accepted the money. Farmers have been unable to sell any locally grown oysters from Mahurangi Harbour since Christmas. Photo / Sylvie Whinray 'But again, we're so desperate to keep operating that, of course, anything will help. 'What I'm trying to say is I don't know if there's more coming or if that's a shut up and leave us alone amount,' said Aitken. None of the farmers who RNZ spoke to said they knew where the money was from or what it was for. More than three million litres of liquid discharge has spilled into the Mahurangi Harbour this year. It was more than an entire Olympic swimming pool worth of fluid that would include sewage and stormwater. After each overflow, oyster harvesting was put on hold for 28 days to allow for testing for pathogens like norovirus. Much of the wastewater was thought to come from a pipe on Elizabeth St in Warkworth, which Watercare last month upgraded with a temporary fix. Watercare programme director Rob Burchell told RNZ in a statement he believed it would reduce wastewater overflows at Elizabeth St. 'We completed the installation of a temporary over-pumping solution on Elizabeth St that will reduce the frequency and volume of overflows to the Mahurangi River. 'This solution includes a manhole chamber that is three metres deep and 1.6 metres in diameter, along with two pumps and a pipeline designed to transfer wastewater across the Elizabeth St heritage bridge, bypassing the existing wastewater network. 'We may be able to bring this pumping solution into service ahead of the commissioning of the Lucy Moore Pump Station, transfer pipeline and new Snells Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant in August. Testing will soon take place to confirm if this is possible. Work is also under way as part of the long-term solution – the Warkworth Growth Servicing Pipeline.' Burchell said Watercare was undertaking potholing investigations in and around Great North Rd, Elizabeth St, Queen St and Kapanui St to locate existing underground services, which he hoped to be completed by late August. However, a long-term solution to the piping problem on Elizabeth St in Warkworth was not expected until 2026. Watercare maintains it was being compliant in Warkworth. 'Watercare is permitted to discharge wastewater at the Elizabeth Street overflow site under the Regional Network Discharge Consent (NDC), which allows for an average of 20.5 wet weather discharges per year [based on a five-year rolling average]. 'Watercare remains compliant with the consent. This reflects that we are on a journey to reduce overflows to an average of 2 or less per year at Elizabeth Street by investing in new infrastructure,' a spokesperson said. Watercare also said the reason for the higher volume of wastewater discharged this year, compared to 2024, reflected the wet weather Auckland had been experiencing, saying 'it's important to note that the vast majority of these overflows consist primarily of rainwater'. -RNZ
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Terribly made': NZ buyers and shops hit by fake boutique clothing store scams
By Matthew Hutching of RNZ Online advertisements for fake boutique clothing stores with New Zealand locations in their names have been surging, with hundreds of complaints to Consumer NZ. An attractive photo of what looks like a designer garment can appear in your social media feed, taking you to a website for an apparently independent local clothing store. In many cases, there is an emotional message about the business closing down and all prices are on clearance sale. David Wellington is one of the many fake stores, aggressively targeting New Zealanders on social media. ''Sadly, we are forced to close our boutique,'' it says at the top of the website. ''What began as a simple idea - a father and his daughter wanting to spend quality time together - grew into something truly special. For the past 20 years, we have poured our heart and soul into creating clothing that reflects warmth, care and character. ''From shirts and jackets to trousers, dresses, sandals, blouses and bags - each item was made with love, with the hope of leaving a piece of ourselves in every detail. ''We built our boutique to be more than just a store; we aimed to create a welcoming space for our community here in New Zealand. But as the cost of living has continued to rise, keeping our boutique open has become increasingly difficult - and now, sadly, impossible.'' RNZ staff member Jeremy Parkinson was a recent victim of the scam. ''We read the story, looked at the pictures and made a couple of purchases,'' he said. When the garments arrived, he quickly realised they were fake. ''It was quite funny actually, because I opened them up and they were flimsy. Clearly not wool, really badly made, terribly made... I just laughed out loud. It was just a cable-knit pattern printed on God knows what sort of material.'' It was definitely not worth the $240 they spent, he said. ''They've gone to scammer school and they came top of the class. Initially they said, 'Yes we are a New Zealand company' and blah blah blah, and then they offered a refund, but we had to pay to send it back to China.'' Luckily for him, he had made the purchase through PayPal, which tried to contact the seller. ''It came back with a refund through PayPal because the seller hadn't made contact with them. So that was good. We got the money back.'' Others have not been so lucky. In the same week Mr Parkinson was scammed, RNZ heard from an Auckland woman who had lost $80 when buying an item on the David Wellington website using her credit card. She was not able to get a refund, but Consumer NZ's Sahar Lane said banks should be able to help. ''You can use a credit card or debit card. That way if things go wrong you can request a charge back from your bank,'' she said. ''Something else worth keeping in mind is that if you do go through the purchase, you can act quickly to make sure that your... details aren't compromised. You can call your bank and let them know that you've made a potentially dodgy purchase, or pause your card.'' Unfortunately, it was very difficult to enforce New Zealand's consumer laws on such scammers, she said. ''Under the Fair Trading Act, it is illegal for traders to mislead customers, give them false information or make misrepresentations, and under the Consumer Guarantees Act there's also protections. "If the item is faulty or damaged when it arrives or doesn't match the description, but it can be really challenging to enforce rights against an overseas entity.'' Online boutique fraudsters are also affecting New Zealand's real independent stores. Ms Lane said the best advice was still for the buyer to beware. Consumer New Zealand has a petition open at present called Stamp Out Scams. It wants to put pressure on the government to introduce a national scam framework that holds businesses to account. As for Mr Parkinson, he will be more careful. ''The lesson is to not make purchases in the middle of the night when you can't sleep. Really think about what you want and actually just make sure if you think you're buying locally that you are actually buying locally.''
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Oyster farmers find mystery $10k in bank accounts
By Victor Waters of RNZ A payment of about $10,000 has been deposited into the accounts of Mahurangi Harbour oyster farmers - the only catch is they don't know what the money is for. The 10 marine farms have been in a seven-year battle with Watercare to stop sewage overflowing into the harbour north of Auckland, which contaminates their oyster crops with Norovirus. The farmers have been unable to sell any locally-grown oysters from Mahurangi Harbour since Christmas in 2024, leaving them on the brink all year. RNZ understands this week about 40 people that work across the oyster industry in the Mahurangi Harbour, which was worth nearly $10 million, have been let go. Tom Walters from Matakana Oysters has been vocal about Watercare taking accountability for the pollution of the Mahurangi River, which flows into the harbour where the oyster crops are. While the money was facilitated by Aquaculture New Zealand, it was unclear what the payment's purpose was and if it originated from it or Watercare, he said. Aquaculture New Zealand and Watercare have been approached for comment. Walters said he worried about what it could mean around liability and any future legal action the farmers could take up with Watercare. "I fear, and a few of the others fear, they're just going to be played like puppets by Watercare. "They'll say, oh, we've given you a little bit, maybe here's $50,000 more, and we've fixed the problem, see you later. They haven't fixed the problem yet. "I'd rather not have accepted it, because to me it was like, obviously, if you're actually doing that, then you're accepting that you've done something wrong here, number one. "It needs to be $200,000 each for something, just to get through the shit that we've gone through this year and at times eight or nine, or whatever it is, or 10 oyster farmers, rather than $200,000 between us all, it's an insult." Watercare have consistently said it would not be in a position to directly compensate the farmers financially, but did previously put forward $50,000 to support wellbeing initiatives. Jim Aitken from Mahurangi Oysters said the $10,000 would not cover "basically a couple of weeks worth of bills" and was not sure whether they should have accepted the money. "But again, we're so desperate to keep operating that, of course, anything will help. "What I'm trying to say is, I don't know if there's more coming or if that's a shut up and leave us alone amount." None of the farmers RNZ spoke to said they knew where the money was from or what it was for. More than three million litres of liquid discharge has spilled into the Mahurangi Harbour this year. It was more than an entire Olympic swimming pool worth of fluid that would include sewage and stormwater. After each overflow, oyster harvesting was put on hold for 28 days to allow for testing for pathogens like Norovirus. Much of the wastewater was thought to come from a pipe on Elizabeth St in Warkworth, which Watercare last month upgraded with a temporary fix. Watercare programme director Rob Burchell told RNZ in a statement he believed it would reduce wastewater overflows at Elizabeth St. "We completed the installation of a temporary over-pumping solution on Elizabeth Street that will reduce the frequency and volume of overflows to the Mahurangi River. "This solution includes a manhole chamber that is three metres deep and 1.6 metres in diameter, along with two pumps and a pipeline designed to transfer wastewater across the Elizabeth Street heritage bridge, bypassing the existing wastewater network. "We may be able to bring this pumping solution into service ahead of the commissioning of the Lucy Moore Pump Station, transfer pipeline and new Snells Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant in August. "Testing will soon take place to confirm if this is possible. Work is also underway as part of the long-term solution - the Warkworth Growth Servicing Pipeline." Burchell said Watercare was undertaking potholing investigations in and around Great North Rd, Elizabeth St, Queen St and Kapanui St to locate existing underground services, which he hoped to be completed by late August. However, a long-term solution to the piping problem on Elizabeth St was not expected until 2026. Watercare maintain it was being compliant in Warkworth. "Watercare is permitted to discharge wastewater at the Elizabeth Street overflow site under the Regional Network Discharge Consent (NDC), which allows for an average of 20.5 wet weather discharges per year (based on a five-year rolling average). "Watercare remains compliant with the consent. This reflects that we are on a journey to reduce overflows to an average of 2 or less per year at Elizabeth Street by investing in new infrastructure," a spokesperson said. Watercare also said the reason for the higher volume of wastewater discharged this year, compared to 2024, reflected the wet weather Auckland had been experiencing, saying "it's important to note that the vast majority of these overflows consist primarily of rainwater".
