Repayment administrator must be given back access to Ithala accounts, judges rule
However, it had the option to continue operating its normal businesses if it co-operated with the repayment administrator (RA) appointed by the South African Reserve Bank Prudential Authority (PA).
'Perhaps the migration of the deposits to another bank would help Ithala's cause,' KwaZulu-Natal deputy judge president Zaba Nkosi, writing on behalf of judge Garth Harrison and acting judge David Saks, said in a ruling handed down on Friday.
Ithala held an exemption from the PA which entitled it to take deposits, many of which were Sassa pensions, until December 2023, when it expired.
The PA alleged Ithala continued taking deposits until January when it appointed the RA, Johan Kruger, to take control and secure the deposits for repayment and redistribution.
There has been a flurry of litigation over his powers, including an application by the KwaZulu-Natal government seeking to review and set aside his appointment, and an application by Kruger to liquidate Ithala after it failed to repay more than R2.4bn it held in deposits on demand.
At the heart of the dispute which came before the full bench, sitting in the Durban high court last month, was an order granted in November last year by Pietermaritzburg high court judge Muzi Ncube, who ruled, effectively, Kruger had overstepped his powers by freezing all of Ithala's bank accounts, not only those containing the deposits.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
17 hours ago
- The Herald
Sassa flags 'unlawful' grant deductions by insurance companies
The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has raised concern about the surge in 'unlawful' deductions by financial services providers, such as insurance companies and funeral schemes, targeting grant beneficiaries. The agency said it has been receiving complaints from beneficiaries who have had money deducted using Sassa's name without permission. Sassa CEO Themba Matlou said the agency does not work with financial service providers and has no authority to make deductions without the consent of the beneficiaries. 'We have respect for our beneficiaries and the act governing social assistance and we will never do anything to short change our clients,' he said. 'Your money is your money, If you qualify for a grant the money belongs to you and as Sassa we have no right, nor authority, to dictate how you use it.' He urged beneficiaries who have fallen victim to visit the Sassa local office to report the matter for investigation. 'Alternatively, clients who dispute signing a funeral policy with the financial services provider are advised to dispute the deduction by sending an SMS to 34548 with their identity number and the financial services provider's name. They should also visit the insurer or the services provider to cancel the policy.' According to the Social Assistance Act, the agency only allows one deduction per month of no more than 10% of the grant for a funeral policy issued by an insurer registered under the Long-term Insurance Act to be made directly from a social grant. Funeral deductions are not permitted from child-related grants such as the child support grant, care dependency grant or foster child grant. Temporary grants are also excluded, the agency said. 'The regulation says the beneficiary of the social grant must consent to such deduction by electronic communication or any other means of communication and has submitted such consent by electronic communication or any other means of communication to the agency.' TimesLIVE
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Sassa flags 'unlawful' grant deductions by insurance companies
The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has raised concern about the surge in 'unlawful' deductions by financial services providers, such as insurance companies and funeral schemes, targeting grant beneficiaries. The agency said it has been receiving complaints from beneficiaries who have had money deducted using Sassa's name without permission. Sassa CEO Themba Matlou said the agency does not work with financial service providers and has no authority to make deductions without the consent of the beneficiaries. 'We have respect for our beneficiaries and the act governing social assistance and we will never do anything to shortchange our clients,' he said. 'Your money is your money, If you qualify for a grant the money belongs to you and as Sassa we have no right, nor authority, to dictate how you use it.' He urged beneficiaries who have fallen victim to visit the Sassa local office to report the matter for investigation. 'Alternatively, clients who dispute signing a funeral policy with the financial services provider are advised to dispute the deduction by sending an SMS to 34548 with their identity number and the financial services provider's name. They should also visit the insurer or the services provider to cancel the policy.' According to the Social Assistance Act, the agency only allows one deduction per month of no more than 10% of the grant for a funeral policy issued by an insurer registered under the Long-term Insurance Act to be made directly from a social grant. Funeral deductions are not permitted from child-related grants such as the child support grant, care dependency grant or foster child grant. Temporary grants are also excluded, the agency said. 'The regulation says the beneficiary of the social grant must consent to such deduction by electronic communication or any other means of communication and has submitted such consent by electronic communication or any other means of communication to the agency.'
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Repayment administrator must be given back access to Ithala accounts, judges rule
Ithala had been the author of its own misfortunes in continuing to operate as a bank, taking deposits and co-mingling them in its accounts, three judges have ruled. However, it had the option to continue operating its normal businesses if it co-operated with the repayment administrator (RA) appointed by the South African Reserve Bank Prudential Authority (PA). 'Perhaps the migration of the deposits to another bank would help Ithala's cause,' KwaZulu-Natal deputy judge president Zaba Nkosi, writing on behalf of judge Garth Harrison and acting judge David Saks, said in a ruling handed down on Friday. Ithala held an exemption from the PA which entitled it to take deposits, many of which were Sassa pensions, until December 2023, when it expired. The PA alleged Ithala continued taking deposits until January when it appointed the RA, Johan Kruger, to take control and secure the deposits for repayment and redistribution. There has been a flurry of litigation over his powers, including an application by the KwaZulu-Natal government seeking to review and set aside his appointment, and an application by Kruger to liquidate Ithala after it failed to repay more than R2.4bn it held in deposits on demand. At the heart of the dispute which came before the full bench, sitting in the Durban high court last month, was an order granted in November last year by Pietermaritzburg high court judge Muzi Ncube, who ruled, effectively, Kruger had overstepped his powers by freezing all of Ithala's bank accounts, not only those containing the deposits.
