Report: Petrol engine Volkswagen Amarok here before year-end
As in Australia, the petrol Amarok bound for South Africa will likely only be offered in depicted Aventura spec. Image: Volkswagen
Volkswagen's on-again, off-again petrol-engine Amarok has finally been given approval for South Africa from the fourth quarter of this year.
Prolonged delayed
Supposed to have made landfall in the second quarter of last year, the petrol, which uses the same 2.3 EcoBoost engine as the North American-spec Ford Ranger, went on permanent hiatus for reasons not divulged.
ALSO READ: Report: Volkswagen puts a market hold on petrol-powered Amarok
At the time, a Volkswagen Group Africa spokesperson told CAR Magazine, 'we have decided to put this engine on hold. We believe the current variants of our existing engines are suitable for our market'.
According to the latest report by the publication, the colloquially known 222 kW Amarok, which as recently as Wolfsburg's local annual product Indaba in February still received the thumbs down, will now debut in the mentioned quarter as an alternative to the 3.0-litre Lion V6 turbodiesel.
What to expect?
Besides specialist bakkie such as the Ford Ranger Raptor, Jeep Gladiator and Toyota Land Cruiser 79, it will in effect become the only other mainstream petrol bakkie in South Africa along with the Toyota Hilux 2.7.
A smash-hit success in Australia, despite only one variant being available in flagship Aventura guise, the officially tilted Amarok TSI 452 – made alongside the Ranger at the Silverton Plant outside Pretoria and nowhere else – produces 222 kW, an uptake of 22 kW on the Stateside Ranger, and, as per its nomenclature, 452 Nm of torque.
As with the V6, power is routed to all four wheels through the Ford and General Motors co-developed 10-speed automatic gearbox.
Supposed price
The most powerful but unsurprisingly least torquiest Amarok Down Under, the TSI 452 retails from $79 900, which, without the various taxes included, amounts to a directly converted R933 919.
A $3 000 (R35 065) credit over the comparative V6 Aventura, the petrol could potentially adopt the same line-up structure by being positioned between it and the more off-road focused PanAmericana.
At present, the former starts at R1 252 600 and the latter at R1 190 900, suggesting the petrol as possibly retailing from around R1.2-million.
For the moment, this is purely speculative and while final specification will mostly likely be identical to the V6, expect a clearer picture to only emerge closer to its eventual market reveal.
Additional information from carexpert.com.au.
NOW READ: Work-ready Volkswagen Polo Vivo returns alongside facelift Crafter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
19 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
VW lowers earnings forecast as US vehicle tariffs hit Q2 margins
Volkswagen on Friday gave its first assessment of how US President Donald Trump's trade war with Europe is expected to impact its 2025 earnings after tariffs dealt a blow to the German auto giant's operating profit in the second quarter. Europe's biggest carmaker expects an operating return on sales in the range of 4% to 5%, compared with a previously forecast 5.5-6.5% range, the company said, giving its long awaited assessment of the impact of tariffs on its business. Full-year sales are expected to be level with the year before, versus a previously forecast rise of up to 5%. Volkswagen and its peers are pressing European trade negotiators to strike a deal to replace a 25% tariff on their cars in place since April. Volkswagen reported an operating profit of €3.8bn (R78,677,067,972) in the quarter ended June 30, down 29% on the year before, citing tariffs, restructuring costs and higher sales of lower margin all-electric models. Car sales data for June underpinned a broader slowdown in Europe's struggling auto sector, and showed Volkswagen among the laggards as the company undergoes a major overhaul to cut more than 35,000 jobs by the end of the decade.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Eskom ordered to cough up R1 billion in costs after cancelled Koeberg project
Eskom loses court bid to fend off R1bn payment after cancelling a contract. Image: Supplied Eskom has been ordered to pay close to R1 billion to French nuclear contractor Framatome, after the Western Cape High Court found the utility refused to pay damages after it cancelled a contract to install steam generators at Koeberg nuclear power station. The ruling stems from a 2014 agreement Eskom originally concluded with Areva, which was later ceded to Framatome. The deal covered the design, manufacture and installation of six replacement steam generators – three for each unit at Koeberg. Framatome, which has been in operation for 60 years, was contracted to supply and install two sets of three replacement steam generators, one set to be installed in each of the reactor buildings at units 1 and 2 at Koeberg during separate planned outages of these units. These installations were meant to take place during a scheduled maintenance outage, which kept getting postponed. Two months after the outage was finally scheduled to happen, 'Eskom informed Framatome that it would not be continuing with the steam generator replacement,' the judgement said. As a result of the cancellation of the deal, Eskom's project manager 'acknowledged that Eskom's decision to postpone the work constituted a compensation event,' the judgment read. Although the project manager had acknowledged that Eskom's cancellation triggered compensation, he determined that the value of compensation was nil. The entire matter then went to arbitration, where the adjudicator ordered that Eskom must pay compensation for cancelling the contract, including for storing equipment, as well as implementation activities, which work had been wasted by Eskom delaying the date of the planned maintenance outage. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ After some back and forth between the parties and the adjudicator, during which the parties didn't agree on costs, 'Eskom made it clear that it had no intention of providing the adjudicator with any further information or participating any further in the adjudication process,' the ruling read. As a result, the adjudicator issued a determination of the damages amount, and Eskom decided to take the issue to the Western Cape High Court, arguing that the amount in damages was not determined by the date it was due – voiding his determination. In defending Eskom's legal action, Framatome argued that none of the arbitration proceedings were improper, nor was the adjudicator abusing his power. The Judge ruled that 'there is no basis to set aside the decisions of the adjudicator which are valid and binding. In terms of the parties' contract Eskom was obliged to comply therewith.' Eskom, it found, had to comply with its contractual obligations. The court found that Framatome was entitled to the full amount it sought. In addition to the R1bn payment, Eskom had to pay interest and costs. IOL
The South African
2 days ago
- The South African
Still waiting for your tax refund? Here's what might cause a delay
Tax season 2025 is now in full swing. Auto-assessments were sent out to 5.8 million South Africans and a total of R10.6 billion was refunded. That's an average refund of R1 828. From Monday this week, it's the turn of those who weren't auto assessed to submit their tax returns on the SARS eFiling portal. Auto-assessments: 7–20 July 2025 Individual Taxpayers: 21 July – 20 October 2025 Provisional Taxpayers and Trusts: 21 July 2025 – 19 January 2026 While those auto assessed received their refunds in 72 hours – often quicker than that – those manually uploading tax returns may be experiencing delays. The list below could be the reason why … Banking details under verification If SARS flags your bank details for verification, it can take up to 21 business days from when they receive all the correct supporting documents. from when they receive all the correct supporting documents. Once verified, the refund is typically paid within 72 hours. Return selected for verification If your tax return is selected for a standard verification , the process may take up to 21 business days after submitting all required documents. , the process may take after submitting all required documents. Refunds are usually paid within 72 hours after verification is completed. Multiple tax years submitted for audit/verification When several tax years are submitted and selected for audit or verification , SARS may take up to 90 business days to finalise. , SARS may take to finalise. Only once all years are verified will the refund be issued (within 72 hours thereafter). Return selected for full audit A full audit can take up to 90 business days (from when all complete documents are received), unless SARS communicates otherwise. can take up to (from when all complete documents are received), unless SARS communicates otherwise. Refund follows within 72 hours post-audit. Outstanding tax returns No refund will be paid if you have any unsubmitted tax returns. These must be filed first. Incorrect or outdated banking details Refunds won't be processed if SARS has incorrect banking information. You'll need to update and verify your details. Outstanding SARS debt If you owe SARS money, your refund may be used to offset your debt through a process called debt equalisation. Only the remaining balance (if any) will be paid to you. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
