
House raffles are a big, beautiful, awful sign of the times
told The New York Times
this week.
The miracle she had experienced was not, although you might be forgiven for making the assumption in this broken
housing
market of ours, managing to
buy a house
, but succeeding in selling one.
Collins's joy becomes a bit easier to understand when you see the figures involved. A two-bedroom cottage on 1.75 acres in
Leitrim
which she bought three years ago for €133,000 and spent €147,000 restoring has just grossed her €1.2 million. She did this by selling it in an online raffle hosted by a UK-based company, shifting 206,815 tickets priced at €5.92 a pop.
The €1.2 million doesn't go straight into her pocket – there were marketing costs of €25,000 along the way, €2,600 in affiliate fees, and she has agreed to pay the winner's stamp duty and legal fees as part of the prize. Raffall, the lottery agent she chose (there are several based in the UK, where the raffles are classed as 'prize competitions'), takes 10 per cent. Then there's 33 per cent capital gains tax.
READ MORE
She had hoped to net €400,000 after costs on a house she reckons is worth €300,000. Instead, she'll walk away with over half a million – more than enough to fund her planned move to Italy. Collins is so thrilled by her success, she's considering abandoning plans to teach English and become a full-time internet marketer.
The winner, Kathleen Spangler, a 29-year-old US marine corps officer, is ecstatic too. Coincidentally, as she told The New York Times, she applied for her Irish citizenship through lineage on her father's side last year. Raffall must also be chuffed with its 10 per cent. And even the losers are only out by €6 each.
This can be read two ways: as the a heart-warming tale of a clever woman using her entrepreneurial flair and
marketing skills
to shift a house in Leitrim for four times its value and simultaneously making a young family's dreams come true. And no one really loses out; at least, not by very much. Or – miserable killjoy that I am, the way I can't help reading it – as a bleak statement about the housing dystopia we are experiencing.
House raffles are a big, beautiful, awful idea. Their popularity is a grim reflection on a property market in which your best prospect of owning a house may well be to win one in a lottery. In 1984, George Orwell wrote about the lottery run by the Ministry of Plenty as a way of preventing 'the proles' from dwelling on the misery of their existence. 'It was probable that there were some millions of proles for whom the Lottery was the principal if not the only reason for remaining alive. It was their delight, their folly, their anodyne, their intellectual stimulant.'
[
How to give yourself the best chance of buying a home amid Ireland's housing crisis
Opens in new window
]
If the odds of today's house lotteries are not as small as in Orwell's world, where the largest prizes do not exist at all, they're still less than spectacular. The majority of houses put up for raffle do not meet the minimum threshold of ticket sales. Raffall's founder and chief executive Stelios Kounou told The New York Times that 18 houses have been sold so far on the platform, while 50 others did not make their target.
House lotteries may feel like a contemporary antidote to a modern affliction, but they are not a new idea – though the last time they got this level of attention might also have been the last time decent housing was this difficult to access in Ireland.
In 1948, a giant house raffle was held in Dublin by the government of the day, when families on the social housing list were offered a chance to win one of between 220 and 250 brand new houses in Ballyfermot, according to historian Cathy Scuffil, who says there were lines of prams up and down Dawson Street. 'Every time somebody's name was called out, a big cheer would go up,' she said.
Occasional
'newly wed draws'
were held
up to the 1970s
for recently married couples on the housing list in Dublin. As a means of getting on the housing ladder, it probably beats bidding against wealthy Americans on a cottage in Leitrim.
Today's house lotteries often inspire scepticism online, though, unlike in Orwell's dark vision, the prizes are real – a house if enough tickets are sold, a pile of cash if they're not. That is a fairly big qualifier. If the minimum number of tickets are not sold, the owner can cancel the raffle and keep 40 per cent of the funds and the house, giving 50 per cent of the cash to the winning ticket holder. Or they can give the house away anyway and keep more of the money. In Collins's case, if she had not met her goal of 150,000 tickets, she planned to give 40 per cent to the winner.
[
Dolores McNamara: Whatever happened to the €115m lotto winner?
Opens in new window
]
On Raffall right now, you can buy a ticket for a semi-d in Yorkshire, apparently being raffled for the second time ('after the previous winner received the alternative huge cash prize option'), a villa with a pool in the Algarve or a beachfront villa on the island of Samui. Presumably most sellers are well-meaning people who want to try to pay off their mortgage, but it is not terribly difficult to imagine someone unscrupulous setting a wildly unrealistic ticket sales target – and pocketing 40 per cent of the cash when they don't make it.
Still, browsing the listings, it's hard for even this sceptical prole to resist the temptation to splurge €6 on a ticket or two.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Ryanair adds 600,000 seats to Irish winter schedule
Ryanair will add around 600,000 seats to this year's winter schedule from Irish airports, new figures show, as restrictions at the State's key gateway remain in legal limbo. An analysis of the carrier's plans for winter 2025/26 by aviation data consultancy OAG, which Ryanair confirms as broadly correct, shows that the Irish group intends to grow in most key European countries. From this year, Ryanair will boost the total number of seats out of the Republic of Ireland over the winter season by 15.5 per cent, to 4.89 million. The corresponding figure was 4.23 million last winter. The airline confirmed that it is growing capacity at Dublin Airport , its biggest Irish base, 'thanks to our successful appeal' to the European courts against the 'illegal' cap, which caps passenger numbers there at 32 million a year. READ MORE Ryanair, Aer Lingus and others challenged the cap in the Irish High Court, which referred key issues to the Court of Justice of the EU , suspending the restriction pending the outcome of the airlines' action. Traffic at Dublin Airport could exceed 36 million passengers this year. Ryanair is adding almost 1.6 million seats in Italy, where its capacity will top 16.86 million this winter. The airline has been increasing its presence at bases in Italian regions that are cutting travel taxes and other costs. In another big market for the Irish airline, it will boost capacity in the UK by 6.3 per cent to 12.5 million. Ryanair plans to slash capacity in France this winter by 11.3 per cent to 2.64 million seats. The carrier blames the country's latest tax increase on flights for this. OAG notes that the airline is cutting back at every airport at which it operates in France. The biggest losers in terms of numbers will be Paris Beauvais and Marseille, according to the consultancy. It has pulled out of Strasbourg, Bergerac and Brive. [ Dublin Airport passenger cap to be breached this year, says DAA Opens in new window ] The Government pledged to lift the Dublin Airport passenger cap following 'consultations with stakeholders' in the programme published in January. An Bord Pleanála imposed the limit in 2007, as a condition of allowing the airport build a second terminal, to ease fears about traffic congestion. Darragh O'Brien, Minister for Transport, sought advice from the Attorney General Rossa Fanning, on legislation to lift the planning curb in spring. Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary has criticised the Government for failing to act on the pledge.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The more US tax money we get, the more dysfunctional the Irish economy becomes
From plutocrat to bureaucrat, everyone seems to have an opinion on Dublin's proposed MetroLink . Some argue it's too expensive to build, others that it's too expensive not to build. One opinion that appears to have more purchase in Government circles was articulated recently in this newspaper – and it is the view of corporate United States . The intervention of the multinationals will be critical because the State is captured by them. Being hostage to the concerns of large taxpayers and employers has its pros and cons. The impact on Ireland of boardroom US and its local handler, the Industrial Development Agency (IDA), is important. Most of the time we see only the impressive and unambiguously positive top-line tax and employment numbers. However, there is also a potentially harmful impact of Ireland's foreign investment policy, which explains some of the anomalies from the relative absence of local industrial champions and the attitude of the State bureaucracy, to the price of houses, rates of immigration and the high costs of doing business here. READ MORE The central fact that one sector is favoured over others is also a helpful framework in understanding how the Irish economic policy works, and for whom. In a nutshell, Ireland suffers from what economists term 'Dutch Disease'. In the late-1960s, the Netherlands found large quantities of natural gas in the North Sea. This was largely hailed as a fortuitous windfall, particularly in the 1970s as various Middle Eastern wars and crises sent the price of energy skywards. With its own source of power, the Netherlands didn't need to import energy and was benefiting when many European energy importers were suffering. So far so rosy. [ Growth in Irish living standards is likely to disappoint over the next 20 years Opens in new window ] However, over time the Dutch noticed that other industries in the Netherlands started to suffer. Wages in the booming and high-productivity gas sector began to drag up the wages in other areas of the economy, because workers were getting higher wages in the gas sector and moving or were demanding equivalent wages to their neighbour who was newly employed in the gasworks. Rents and house prices also started to rise, pushed up by the recently enriched workers in the gas sector who could pay more. Dutch society paid for the gas bonanza in a variety of unforeseen ways. Photograph: Getty Images The Dutch currency, the guilder, appreciated, making it more difficult for every industry not associated with gas, to export. Finally, as the gas industry was the sexy new industry, it lobbied the government for preferential treatment in terms of taxes and benefits, and these were granted. Over time not only were other industries and sectors squeezed out by the behemothic natural gas sector but the State itself fell in love with natural gas, to the detriment of the rest of the economy. By the mid-1980s what had been seen as a one-off, fortuitous, everyone's-a-winner, windfall came to be seen as something more complicated. Large parts of the Dutch economy suffered and the society paid for the gas bonanza in a variety of unforeseen ways. This more nuanced analysis, where the dominant new industry elbows out the more plodding but profitable old industries was termed 'Dutch Disease'. In poorer countries, the same dynamic is regularly known as the 'curse of resources', where a developing country finds oil, and the oil industry ends up dominating everything and ultimately lobbies to dictate and bend policy to its whims. All the money of the country is sucked up by the resources industry, and the fruits of the dividend are rarely evenly shared. Ireland is experiencing a form of Dutch Disease. The multinationals are akin to a resource find, a spigot that churns out tax revenue, resulting in other parts of the State bureaucracy trying to get their hands on this cash and divvy it up accordingly. Precisely because there is so much money gushing out of the multinationals and going directly into the public sector, that public sector spending increases dramatically and various lobby groups petition to grab some of the bonanza. The Department of Public Expenditure moves from being the guardian of hard-earned tax money, to the spender of what appears to be free money from the multinationals. In time, the entire public economy mutates into being a reckless spender of American money. There is no budget constraint, just a spend now, worry later mania. This has the effect of pushing up the price of everything, because the State spends over a third of every euro spent in the country. When the economy is already rocking along, prices and wages simply ratchet up. Apple was ordered to pay Ireland €13bn in unpaid taxes by Europe's top court in 2024. Photograph: Getty Images Because they are small, small private businesses can't match multinational wages and public sector wages, which themselves are paid for by the multinationals' tax deluge. Small businesses lose workers or have to pay even more to keep their workers from moving. Rents are pushed up by the higher-paid employees of the high-productivity multinational sector, squeezing the incomes of the rest, pushing down their quality of life in an ever more expensive economy. As long as the tax money keeps flowing, this process reinforces itself at every turn. At the same time, as long as the tax torrent keeps cascading, the entire State apparatus becomes entirely dependent on the whims of corporate United States, and the State becomes captured. The numbers are startling. Apart from the infamous Apple tax money , we collected a total of €28.1bn in corporation tax receipts last year, with a whopping 88 per cent of that revenue paid in by foreign-owned multinationals – despite these companies accounting for only 11 per cent of all companies. But looking just at one side of the balance sheet doesn't give us the whole picture. The bigger picture is one of an excessively dominant and favoured sector bending the economy and the society to its whim. Ironically, the more tax money we get from the US, the more dysfunctional the general Irish economy becomes. [ Three positive metrics point to health of economy Opens in new window ] Some might say this isn't a bad problem to have, and that is absolutely fair enough, but the question remains: where does this end? Most of my economics colleagues are worried about the quantitative aspect. I am concerned about the qualitative aspect of the multinational dominance, what it is doing to the economy in general, innovation and start-up culture, house prices and immigration, as well as the broader society and the way we make public decisions that are supposedly for the greater good. Maybe more importantly, the way the exchequer has become hostage to various lobby groups who have only become more emboldened as the coffers fill up, means Government judgment has become impaired by abundance. 'Dutch Disease' might not be the worst economic malady, but it's a dangerous one and Ireland doesn't seem to have figured out a vaccine.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Ireland's second-smallest county: ‘There are not many of us who live on the street now'
Eileen O'Rourke is the chief executive of Carlow Tourism , which is based in the same building as the local museum: itself a former Presentation convent right in the middle of the town. She has lived in the town for 28 years. Over time, she has seen various changes in Carlow , a town with a population of 27,351 in the 2022 census. 'Maybe this is reflective of all towns in Ireland, but what I would have seen most of all is a sense of pride in the upkeep and presentation of the town,' she says. Before moving to Carlow, O'Rourke had been working in Germany for some years. The contrast was initially a shock. 'Carlow was maybe not the cleanest town in those days.' Does she think that 'county town' still has a meaning, as it applies to Carlow? 'Yes I do. The county town is the hub of a county and where you expect to find employment, facilities, all of which allow people to still live in their own county. But I'd love to see more of people living over the shop in the town centre, because I don't think there's too much of that left in Carlow now.' READ MORE Marcus McCormack is the director of McCormack's estate agency on Tullow Street, where he has worked for 28 years. 'I think the days of people living in town centres, whether they are county towns or not, are gone,' he says. 'The town centres are now places of temporary accommodation rather than homes: investors would be buying apartments for rental.' Are county towns still relevant in Ireland in 2025, I ask. 'Sport is the new boundary,' he says. 'The GAA clubs are very strong in Carlow town, but in the smaller rural towns, the GAA is the town, and the smaller towns cling to their one club. The pub culture is now declining, and sports clubs are increasing. Rather than going for a pint, young people are now going training. Things are changing.' [ This county town is the home of Fab Vinnie, tortilla chips and novelist Laurence Sterne Opens in new window ] What do McCormack's buyers want from housing today? 'Efficiency has become a very important part of the demand. People want modern, efficient houses, not old houses to do up. The days of the do-er upper in town centre are really gone. The cost of renovation is very difficult to take on, and demand is modest enough.' Conal O'Boyle, editor of The Nationalist, with reporters Marie Boran and Elizabeth Lee, at their office in Carlow town. Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill A decade ago, a three-bed semi in Carlow town cost €225,000. It now costs €325,000. A one-bed apartment in the town is €165,000. Houses remain more popular choices than apartments, but he sees very few mortgage applications for houses that are not joint: the price of a house is much more difficult for a single applicant to afford. 'Single applicants are between five and 10 per cent of our entire business.' 'I have never heard anyone calling Carlow a county town,' reflects Conal O'Boyle, editor of the weekly Carlow Nationalist. The paper was founded in 1883, and its office at Hanover Road is the same as newsrooms everywhere: stacks of papers scattered around, a phone ringing, and the intangible sense of deadlines in the atmosphere. 'The idea of what a town in Ireland is, let alone a county town, has changed so much,' says reporter Marie Boran. 'For instance, there is no need any more to come into a county town to do your shopping. Nearly every small town has an Aldi or a Lidl now. I personally have no loyalty to any county when it come to shopping. Carlow doesn't have a TKMaxx, there is no sushi restaurant, there is only a small Boots ...' 'Tullow Street used to be the main shopping street in Carlow, but it maybe doesn't have the same attraction for shoppers now that it once had,' says O'Boyle. Everyone knew everyone else in those days; they all lived over the shops, apart from the big shopkeepers — Betty O'Gorman He mentions that the street is pedestrianised at the weekend, and there is a conversation about the pros and cons of this for local shoppers. Boran's take on the pedestrianisation is that: 'Consumers have got so used to parking where they shop. If people could, they would drive up to the cash register. Consumers have become so lazy.' Putting out a weekly newspaper to the county, they have an excellent insight into what engages their readers when it comes to local news and their county town. 'It's the small stuff,' says reporter Elizabeth Lee. 'Local businesses, local achievements. Stories about Carlow town do the best.' 'There's a lot of local pride in the town, because it is so small,' O'Boyle says. 'Hyper local news does well. Stories from the district court. Sports. But in terms of the town itself, imagination is needed now for its future development.' 'If you look at Dublin Street, there are a lot of artisan shops there, but they are opening and closing all the time,' says Boran. Dublin Street is one of Carlow's oldest and most historic streets. It contains the bones of once-grand and large Georgian houses, and was clearly impressive architecturally in the past. It still is a remarkable street, even though some of the buildings are now unoccupied or derelict, awaiting a kind of new lives. There are some landmark buildings on the street, including the Old Assembly Rooms. The Assembly Rooms on Dublin Street, Carlow town. Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill This building dates from the later 18th century, and as the name suggests, was constructed as a place for social gatherings. Dinners, dances, lectures and concerts were held here. The building was inherited by playwright George Bernard Shaw in 1899 from a family member. Shaw subsequently gave it to the people of Carlow town. One person who still lives on Dublin Street is Betty O'Gorman (89), who is from a third-generation Carlow family. She ran the restaurant Beams and a wine and cheese delicatessen at a premises on the street with her late husband Peter for many years. She continues to live over the former restaurant. 'It was a coaching inn, as far back as 1766,' she says. 'It must be nearly 50 years ago that we opened the first deli in Carlow, The Wine Tavern. We sold smoked salmon from Flanagan in Waterford, and wheels of Wexford cheddar cheese and wine. We supplied pubs and restaurants in Dublin with wine, including Patrick Guilbaud.' O'Gorman was born on Montgomery Street in the town, just off Dublin Street. We are talking over tea in the Seven Oaks Hotel. Part of the hotel was originally a house called Greenbank, which O'Gorman remembers. 'Miss Molly used to be upstairs playing her harp. My mother used to send us to buy apples from the gardener of the house,' she recalls. O'Gorman also remembers when the sugar beet factory was in production. 'It was the first real industry in Carlow, and it made the town because there was very little employment then. Men worked shifts in the factory. I'd be reading in bed and I'd hear them coming off the midnight shift: what sounded like hundreds of bikes going past my window.' Declan McDonald outside his menswear shop, Macs, on Tallows Street, Carlow town, Co Carlow. Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill Dublin Street, Carlow town. Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill She also remembers when a cattle mart was held in the middle of the town, and seeing cattle herded along the streets to where the Fairgreen shopping centre is now located. 'Everyone knew everyone else in those days; they all lived over the shops, apart from the big shopkeepers. Some Catholics wouldn't have shopped in Shaws because it was Protestant-owned. I miss the people who owned the shops. There are not many of us who live on the street now.' Declan MacDonald's family have owned Macs Menswear on Tullow Street for decades. His son Cian is at the front counter as I come in through the handsome mahogany door. 'That door is there since 1948,' Declan MacDonald says, when he has finished serving a customer who was in to buy casual trousers and a sweatshirt. 'It came out of some shop in Dublin. When we put in a new shop front, it was made to go around the door.' I ask MacDonald what he thinks are the elements that make Carlow a county town. 'The independent traders,' he says. According to MacDonald, the last three years have been 'phenomenal' for business, contrary to the story of many other such shops around the country. [ Ireland's county towns: 'There were 300 people living on this street. Now it's 17' Opens in new window ] 'Fashions and colours and styles will change, but the main thing that won't change is service. We know a lot of our customers, so we can offer personal service, and chat away while we are at it. Carlow is the second-smallest county in Ireland so it's not hard to know a lot of people. 'You need to be able to adapt when serving people. One customer could be in because of a funeral, while the next would be looking to get togged out for a wedding. You need be able to adjust.' [ The ancient Irish town battling against decline: 'It used to be the centre of things, but those days are gone now' Opens in new window ] Colleague Seamus Kinsella is on a day off today and not in the shop, but MacDonald tells me he has been working at Macs since 1974. Is it possible that anyone else in the country could have been working in the same shop for 51 years? It's only later, when I have left Carlow, that I remember my parents lived for a time in Carlow town at the start of their marriage. My late father wore either a suit, or a shirt, tie and sweater almost the entirety of his long life. It struck me that he and my mother would almost certainly have been through the same front door of Macs that I myself had gone through that day, to choose some clothes for him during the years they lived therei. It's completely possible that Declan MacDonald's father, Tom, served them: a line of service that continues to this day. Series concludes