logo
HC begins hearing on Proton Mail's appeal against proceedings to block it in India

HC begins hearing on Proton Mail's appeal against proceedings to block it in India

Time of India15 hours ago
The Centre on Tuesday informed a division bench of the Karnataka high court that proceedings under the Information Technology Act were on to block Proton Mail in India.A division bench comprising acting Chief Justice V Mameswar Rao and Justice S M Joshi heard a writ appeal by Proton Mail challenging the single-judge order to ban its services in India.Additional Solicitor General Arvind Kamath informed the bench that the Centre had initiated proceedings under Section 69A IT Act, 2000. The proceeding was going on, but the mail service had not yet been blocked. A government committee will take the final call, he said.Advocate Manu Prabhakar Kulkarni, appearing for Proton, urged the court to direct the government not to 'precipitate' action against Proton Mail. He added that if the block order was passed, no one in India would be able to use the mail service.The High Court had in April directed the Centre to take steps to block the Switzerland-based Proton Mail in India after security threats were flagged by an affected company.Justice M Nagaprasanna passed the judgment on a petition from M Moser Design Associated India Pvt Ltd, seeking a direction to the Union Government to take such steps as are necessary to ban the use of Proton Mail in India.The court issued the direction to the Centre to act under Section 69A of the IT Act, read with Rule 10 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public).The petitioner had sought relief after unidentified miscreants sent vulgar, sexually coloured and obscene emails about its employees to its client as well as other employees, causing widespread reputational damage.The company informed the court that although his client had filed a police complaint to investigate the vulgar emails sent about its employee using Proton Mail, the law enforcement agencies were helpless, as Proton Mail had declined to share details of the senders of the email.The judge had asked the Centre to block the offending URLs till such time steps were initiated to block the mail.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC directs Centre, Meghalaya govt to respond on 2016 recommendations of Linguistic forum
HC directs Centre, Meghalaya govt to respond on 2016 recommendations of Linguistic forum

Hindustan Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

HC directs Centre, Meghalaya govt to respond on 2016 recommendations of Linguistic forum

Shillong, The Meghalaya High Court has directed the Centre and the state government to submit a report if the recommendations on development and welfare of linguistic minorities in the state made by the Commissioner for Linguistic Minorities in 2016 were implemented. HC directs Centre, Meghalaya govt to respond on 2016 recommendations of Linguistic forum Hearing a PIL filed by the Meghalaya Linguistic Minority Development Forum which advocates for the rights of linguistic minorities in the state, the high court noted that while Khasi and Garo-speaking people are dominant, a significant population also speaks Bengali, Nepali, Hindi, Assamese, and other languages. The Commissioner for Linguistic Minorities had in 2016 recommended translation of official documents into minority languages, creation of language preference registers in schools, and official recognition and support for minority language educational institutions among others. A division bench headed by Chief Justice I P Mukerji and Justice W Diengdoh asked both the Centre and the state to clarify the current status of the report before the next hearing scheduled for July 10, 2025. "We direct learned counsel for Union of India and state to take suitable instructions in the matter with regard to the status of the report of the Commissioner dated 29th March, 2016 and report to this court before the returnable date," the order stated. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel also urged the Court to issue instructions to the state government to constitute a Board for Linguistic Welfare which was one of the recommendations made in 2016. In response, the government's counsel argued that the Commissioner for Linguistic Minorities does not hold absolute authority and maintained that the report should be vetted by the President of India and approved by Parliament. The high court has now asked both the state and the Central governments to provide updates and instructions on the matter before the next hearing. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

HC expresses deep concern over Rachakonda police meddling in civil disputes
HC expresses deep concern over Rachakonda police meddling in civil disputes

Hans India

time39 minutes ago

  • Hans India

HC expresses deep concern over Rachakonda police meddling in civil disputes

Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court single bench of Justice Tadakamalla Vinod Kumar on Tuesday expressed deep concern and strongly disapproved action of the Rachakonda police for meddling in civil disputes and settling them in the Nagole police station itself in lieu of Rs.55 lakh. The judge was astonished to know from the counsel for petitioner Pamu Sudershanam that the Nagole police had confined him from morning to evening on June 19. The court while expressing shock at such an appalling action of the police, summoned Sudheer Babu, Rachakonda Commissioner and Nagole SHO to appear before it and explain reasons for the SHO in registering a crime against Sudershanam in a civil dispute, which is pending before a court since 2000. However, in adherence to court orders, Babu appeared before the judge 'through video conference'; the SHO appeared in person. Justice Vinod Kumar found fault with the police in interfering in a civil dispute… showing over indulgence in settling it in the station pertaining to a private property in plot 65, Krushi Nagar, Bandlaguda, despite the fact that three civil cases were in a court, apart from an injunction order in favour of the petitioner. The judge observed how the police can be so oblivious about court orders, showing scant regard… and show deep interest in solving a civil dispute. He observed that 'police stations in the State have became 'settlement addas'. This trend is at its peak, after the Telangana State was formed'. The Nagole SHO detained Sudershanam in PS and threatened him to settle the dispute pertaining to the property with S Janga Reddy, Thurpati Krishna and Thurpati Ramchander, who paid the SHO Rs. 55 lakh to ensure the dispute is settled in their favour. The petitioner was threatened with criminal cases by the police. The judge said the DGP should take action in enlightening the police officers in State on 'civil disputes'. Justice Vinod Kumar adjudicated the writ filed by Sudharshanam, who complained that the Nagole police indulged in settlement of civil disputes in PS pertaining to his plot in Nagole circle with real estate agents by paying Rs 55 lakh. Hearing in the case was adjourned to second week of July. Batch of six writ petitions seeking 'judicial probe' into Group-1 exam On Tuesday the High Court single bench of Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao heard the batch of six writ petitions filed by candidates who were not able to get a rank in the general ranking list of Group-1 Main exam seeking a direction to order a judicial probe into the entire selection process of candidates. Rachna, senior counsel for petitioners in one writ, contended that the Telangana Public Service Commission erred in issuing two different hall-tickets to the candidates. She said all the candidates who cleared the Preliminary Group 1 exam were issued only one hall-ticket, whereas the TGPSC vide its web note of October 9, 2024 had directed the successful candidates to download second fresh hall-ticket, in sheer violation of rules. She contended that the practice of issuing two hall-tickets--one for Preliminary and another for the Mains--is not followed by the UPSC. On April 17, 2025, Justice Rao had directed TGPSC 'not to issue appointment orders' to all selected candidates in Group-1 exam, but directed the TGPSC to go ahead with certificate verification of the selected candidates. Counsels for the petitioners sought a 'stay' on the notification and evaluation process for the recruitment notification no 02/2024, dated February 19, and a 'judicial probe' into the evaluation alleging that several irregularities and inconsistencies had cropped up while conducting the Group-1 exam on October 21. The judge heard the writ filed by Parmesh Matta and 19 others and five other petitions. The hearing was adjourned to Wednesday for further arguments.

TSPSC Group I exam controversy: Pre-printed hall tickets and Centre irregularities alleged; Telangana HC resumes hearing
TSPSC Group I exam controversy: Pre-printed hall tickets and Centre irregularities alleged; Telangana HC resumes hearing

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

TSPSC Group I exam controversy: Pre-printed hall tickets and Centre irregularities alleged; Telangana HC resumes hearing

HYDERABAD: The Telangana high court on Tuesday resumed detailed arguments in the ongoing case challenging the conduct of the Group I Mains examination held by the Telangana State Public Service Commission. The case, filed by multiple candidates, alleges manipulation and favouritism in the exam process. Appearing before Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, the petitioners' counsels alleged that key elements such as hall ticket numbers, examination centres, invigilators and evaluators had been predetermined for certain "favoured" candidates. Particular concern was raised about centres 18 and 19, which produced 14.8% of the qualified candidates. "Neighbouring centres recorded minimal or even zero qualifying percentages," one counsel noted, implying manipulation in centre allocation and evaluation. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The TSPSC claimed that centre allocation was done through randomisation, but the counsel argued that hall ticket numbers were pre-printed on the answer booklets, enabling evaluators to identify candidates and thus compromising their anonymity. Another major allegation concerned the issuance of fresh hall tickets for the main examination. The petitioners claimed that, despite being justified by the TSPSC as being for 'administrative convenience,' this move violated its own notification and allowed room for targeted favouritism. The HC has scheduled further arguments on Wednesday, indicating close judicial scrutiny of one of the state's most prestigious public recruitment exams. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Doctor's Day 2025 , messages and quotes!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store