Wadephul says Berlin should prevent Israel's international isolation
The meeting is expected to address attacks by Israeli settlers on Palestinians and the plans being discussed in Israel to annex the territory. The Israeli Knesset recently signalled its support for a possible annexation in a resolution, a move that has met with sharp international criticism.
The German government is also firmly opposed to such a measure.
Wadephul arrived in Israel on Thursday, where he met with his Israeli counterpart Gideon Sa'ar and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
In Jerusalem, Wadephul said Israel was in danger of becoming internationally isolated.
"I see it as Germany's duty to do everything it can to prevent this," he said.
He referred to Germany's "never-ending historical obligation" for Israel's security.
Both sides must take action, the foreign minister said.
"My mission here today was to tell the Israeli side that they must act now and not just at some point."
He added: "We need clarity - also from Israel - that no policy of expulsion and no policy of active annexation is being pursued."
What is needed is for the remaining hostages to be released from Gaza, where they are being held captive by the militant group Hamas.
"It is time to end this war," Wadephul said in a call directed "first and foremost to the Hamas terrorist organisation."
German aid for Gaza
Amid the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza, Wadephul pledged additional aid during a meeting with representatives of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in Jerusalem.
He announced that Germany would provide the World Food Programme (WFP) with a further €5 million. With these funds, the WFP should be able to provide food and put bakeries and soup kitchens back into operation in order to distribute bread and hot meals.
As Wadephul explained, the daily ceasefires established by Israel in parts of the Gaza Strip will be used to distribute relief supplies via the UN.
The German government is also supporting the construction of a Maltese field hospital in Gaza City to provide urgently needed basic medical care.
Meanwhile, CSU Secretary-General Martin Huber has categorically ruled out sanctions against Israel by the German government.
In an interview with Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland, Huber said that criticising the Israeli government is legitimate, "but sanctions between friends are out of the question."
Huber also rejects measures such as entry bans, such as those imposed by the Netherlands on the far-right Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir.
Berlin also hasn't joined major allies France, Britain, and Canada in saying it will recognise a Palestinian state in September. But in a statement ahead of his departure Thursday, Wadephul underlined Germany's position that a two-state solution is 'the only way' to ensure a future in peace and security for people on both sides.
"For Germany, the recognition of a Palestinian state stands rather at the end of the process. But such a process must begin now. Germany will not move from this aim," Wadephul said.
US President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff also arrived in Israel on Thursday to discuss the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Witkoff and US Ambassador Mike Huckabee will inspect food distribution in Gaza on Friday, the White House said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
11 minutes ago
- Euronews
Haunted by Merkel: Trump still grappling with Europe's lost leader
When US President Donald Trump issued a warning on Tuesday about the trade deal he agreed with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland on 27 July, it was another German – former Chancellor Angela Merkel - who appeared to be on his mind. Despite being out of power for almost four years, the former German leader's complex relationship with Donald Trump - marked at times by respect and dislike – appears to continue to exert influence over the US president. When quizzed on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' via phone Trump said of the trade deal that a pledge for the EU to invest $600 billion (€550 billion) in the US by the end of his second term will need to be honoured by the EU, or 35% blanket tariffs will be applied to the bloc. Before issuing that warning however the US president expounded in general on the benefits of his trade policy. Referring to the EU, Trump appeared to cast his mind back to a conversation with Merkel about the auto sector. 'I said to... let me just say a prime minister, a very nice prime minister, a couple [sic] of years ago, I said: 'How many [US] cars are you taking a year? Let me guess, is it one or two?'' 'She said: 'No, no, no, we don't take any of your cars,' he said, before adding: 'I said: 'That's not right, that's not a nice thing Angela.'' 'And now they take all our cars, all our trucks, 100%, in addition the EU is going to pay us $600 billion dollars,' Trump said. Addressing the 55th Munich Security Conference in February 2019, Merkel rejected Trump's claims that German cars represented a security threat to the US. Merkel told the conference that German auto giant BMW's largest plant is in South Carolina, rather than its home in Bavaria in southern Germany. 'If these cars, which are no less a threat than those built in Bavaria, are suddenly a national security threat to the US, then that's a shock to us,' she said. Last year, Merkel told Italian daily Corriere della Sera in an interview that 'Donald Trump was obsessed by the fact that, in his view, there were too many German cars in New York.' 'He had always said that, if he were to become president, he would have imposed such high tariffs that they [German cars] would have disappeared from the streets of Manhattan,' Merkel told the newspaper in an interview she gave ahead of the publication of her memoir. A see-sawing relationship In August 2015, before his first election, Trump complimented Merkel in an interview with Time magazine, saying "she's fantastic … highly respected'. But he soon changed his mind. By the time the former chancellor visited the White House in 2017 during Trump's first term, he attempted to embarrass her by refusing to shake her hand before the cameras, and then grilled her for allowing around one million refugees – mainly from Syria and Iraq – into Germany. When her memoir, Freedom, was published last year, Merkel said she misread Trump during that first meeting. 'Instead of stoically bearing it, I whispered to him that we should shake hands again,' Merkel wrote, adding: 'As soon as the words left my mouth, I shook my head at myself. How could I forget that Trump knew precisely what he was doing … He wanted to give people something to talk about with his behaviour, while I had acted as though I were having a conversation with someone completely normal.' 'It seemed that his main aim was to make the person he was talking to feel guilty… At the same time I had the impression… that he also wanted the person he was talking with to like him,' Merkel wrote of Trump's mercurial character. Merkel publicly registered regret when Trump did not concede defeat in November 2020's US election, saying: "A basic rule of democracy is: After elections, there are winners and losers. Both have to play their roles with decency and a sense of responsibility, so that democracy itself remains the winner." When German Chancellor Friedrich Merz visited The White House earlier this year, much preparation went into ensuring that the meeting with Donald Trump would not evolve into an on-air fiasco similar to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's earlier Oval Office confrontation. In the end Merz had nothing to worry about. Trump's only criticism was reserved for Angela Merkel, whom he slammed for building the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, and once again for opening up her country to refugees, telling her successor: 'I told her it shouldn't have happened.'
Euronews
11 minutes ago
- Euronews
YouTube misinformation tools are inconsistent in Europe: report says
Two of Google's major tools to fight misinformation on YouTube only work sometimes, and only in certain European languages, a new study has found. When users watch a YouTube video on a topic that is often embroiled in misinformation, such as COVID-19 vaccines or climate change, a label should pop up to direct them to third-party sources with more information on the issue, for example Wikipedia. The information panel is also meant to appear in users' search results in their operating language. However AI Forensics, a Europe-based nonprofit that investigates major tech companies, found that this is often not the case. The researchers built a web crawler to test the panels, and found that across the 83 languages on the video platform, the information panels are applied inconsistently to 12 topics on Wikipedia's list of conspiracy theories as well as four types of publisher labels. All of the panels are available in English. In German, videos on all but one topic – the Armenian genocide – have these labels. Meanwhile, very few panels are available in Icelandic or Lithuanian. AI Forensics said the tests show YouTube pays 'disproportionate attention towards Western languages' and 'neglects' regional languages like Basque, Catalan, and Galician. YouTube's content disclaimers go beyond misinformation-prone topics. It also includes labels for news sources and fact-checkers that explain whether they are partially or fully funded by government sources, as a way to 'help you better understand the sources of news content,' the company says. But public funding was flagged in some countries and not others, the AI Forensics report found. Euronews, for example, receives some funding from the European Union. YouTube flagged this in some countries, but not in Denmark, Greece, Norway, Iceland, Finland, or Portugal. 'We are scared … there might be some group of people that have differential access to safety' measures to fight misinformation on the platform, Salvatore Romano, head of research at AI Forensics, told Euronews Next. 'Instead of increasing [the] trust of users on the platform, it is undermining [it],' Romano added. Unclear whether YouTube will address discrepancies YouTube's website notes that 'information panels may not be available in all countries/regions and languages,' and that the company is working to expand their reach. The AI Forensics team said they have met with YouTube to present their research. During those meetings, YouTube allegedly indicated that the discrepancies between languages were not supposed to happen, and that it didn't have a way to systematically check how the panels are deployed across Europe. AI Forensics said YouTube agreed to address these discrepancies but did not go into detail. YouTube did not respond to a Euronews Next request for clarity on the alleged meetings or the measures it plans to take. YouTube, under parent company Google, is a signatory to the European Commission's Code of Practice on Disinformation, a voluntary agreement that sets standards for tech companies to fight disinformation. In March, YouTube said that as part of its commitment, it will 'assess and update the topics prone to misinformation that receive additional context from information panels'. But Romano believes the haphazard content labeling could be even more extensive than the AI Forensics researchers found, given the report says it shows only a 'partial view' with a small sample of panels. Commission could put 'pressure on YouTube' over inconsistencies: AI Forensics Romano said he's hoping YouTube will correct the discrepancies. If it doesn't, he said he will call on the European Commission, the EU's executive body, to investigate a potential breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA). The Commission could, for example, request more information from YouTube about how it administers its panels, which is the first step of any DSA investigation, he said. 'The EU Commission could put pressure on YouTube to show them that this type of inconsistency is unacceptable across platforms and across products,' he said, noting that it creates 'second-rate markets' throughout Europe where standards meant to protect against misinformation are not being met. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to confirm whether it would be asking for more information from YouTube but did not receive an immediate reply. Romano, at least, will be watching. He said his team built a tool to track how regularly YouTube's information labels come up in various languages. Through the publicly available tracker, people can see which topics have content labels in their language. It will also allow researchers to identify any changes to the information panels, Romano said.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Lebanon: Hezbollah ignores cabinet decision to disarm it
Hezbollah said Wednesday, August 6, that it would treat a Lebanese government decision to disarm the militant group "as if it did not exist", accusing the cabinet of committing a "grave sin". Amid heavy US pressure and fears Israel could expand its strikes on Lebanon, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said Tuesday that the government had tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by the end of the year. The plan is to be presented to the government by the end of August for discussion and approval, and another cabinet meeting is scheduled for Thursday to continue the talks, including on a US-proposed timetable for disarmament. Hezbollah said the government had "committed a grave sin by taking the decision to disarm Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Israeli enemy". The decision is unprecedented since Lebanon's civil war factions gave up their weapons three and a half decades ago. "This decision undermines Lebanon's sovereignty and gives Israel a free hand to tamper with its security, geography, politics and future existence... Therefore, we will treat this decision as if it does not exist," the Iran-backed group said in a statement. 'Serves Israel's interests' The government said its decision came as part of implementing a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, which culminated in two months of full-blown war. Hezbollah said it viewed the government's move as "the result of dictates from US envoy" Tom Barrack. It "fully serves Israel's interests and leaves Lebanon exposed to the Israeli enemy without any deterrence", the group said. Hezbollah was the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war. It emerged weakened politically and militarily from its latest conflict with Israel, its arsenal pummelled and its senior leadership decimated. Israel has kept up its strikes on Hezbollah and other targets despite the November truce, and has threatened to keep doing so until the group is disarmed. An Israeli strike on the southern town of Tulin on Wednesday killed one person and wounded another, the health ministry said. Israel also launched a series of air strikes on southern Lebanon, wounding at least two people according to the health ministry. The Israeli military said it struck "weapons storage facilities, a missile launcher and Hezbollah terrorist infrastructure which stored engineering tools that allowed for the re-establishment of terrorist infrastructure in the area". Hezbollah said Israel must halt the attacks before any domestic debate about its weapons and a new defence strategy could begin. 'Pivotal moment' "We are open to dialogue, ending the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, liberating its land, releasing prisoners, working to build the state, and rebuilding what was destroyed by the brutal aggression," the group said. Hezbollah is "prepared to discuss a national security strategy", but not under Israeli fire, it added. Partner service Learn French with Gymglish Thanks to a daily lesson, an original story and a personalized correction, in 15 minutes per day. Try for free Two ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and its ally, the Amal movement, walked out of Tuesday's meeting. Hezbollah described the walkout as "an expression of rejection" of the government's "decision to subject Lebanon to American tutelage and Israeli occupation". The Amal movement, headed by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, accused the government of "rushing to offer more gratuitous concessions" to Israel when it should have sought to end the ongoing attacks. It called Thursday's cabinet meeting "an opportunity for correction". Hezbollah's opponent, the Lebanese Forces, one of the country's two main Christian parties, said the cabinet's decision to disarm the militant group was "a pivotal moment in Lebanon's modern history – a long-overdue step toward restoring full state authority and sovereignty". The Free Patriotic Movement, the other major Christian party and a former ally of Hezbollah, said it was in favour of the army receiving the group's weapons "to strengthen Lebanon's defensive power". Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a televised interview that any decision on disarmament "will ultimately rest with Hezbollah itself". "We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions," he added, noting that the group had "rebuilt itself" following setbacks during its war with Israel.
