Nelson Mandela Bay seesaws on rates as council battles to pass 2025/26 budget
The Nelson Mandela Bay Council will, again, try to pass the budget on Wednesday and while smaller increases in tariffs for water and sanitation were promised by mayor Babalwa Lobishe last Thursday, it wasn't included in the draft budget. However, by 5pm on Tuesday, a circular indicating that there were conditions to the reduced water and sanitation rates arrived with councillors.
The Nelson Mandela Bay metro's council will again try on Wednesday to approve the budget for the 2025/26 financial year.
Last Thursday, during the council meeting, Mayor Babalwa Lobishe promised a 0.5% reduction in the proposed increases for water and sewage. But in the draft budget received by councillors on Tuesday, it looked like the increase was again set at 5.5% and not at the promised 5%.
But last Thursday night, a circular was signed by Nosipho Xhego, the executive director of corporate services in the metro, stating that the proposed reduced increase can only be put into operation if councillors agreed to scrap the city's scarce skills allowance and also agree to an overtime policy based on regulated thresholds.
The circular states that the municipality currently does not have an overtime policy, and also pays more than the regulated thresholds, and implementing these could save R22-million in the current financial year.
Other increases remain unchanged, including an increase in property rates by 5%.
The proposed increase in electricity prices stands at 12.8%, which is 0.6% higher than the Eskom price. The electricity department is running at a loss of more than a billion and is spending more money on buying electricity than what it makes selling it – because of theft and meter tampering. Allowing this increase, however, is not a decision that can be taken by council though, as it falls within the mandate of the National Energy Regulator. In 2022, the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber successfully applied for an order from the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court in Gqeberha, indicating that Nersa must link price increases to a cost of supply and also was not allowed to pass on municipal inefficiencies to the consumer.
Werner Senekal from the Democratic Alliance, the official opposition in the metro, said the budget's projections were off and it was based on a 76% collection rate while the average collection rate is 72%.
He added that the Integrated Development Plan, setting out ward-based priorities and the budget, also was not in lockstep.
By law, the budget must be passed by 1 July, otherwise the metro's council can be dissolved.
In the latest circular sent on Tuesday afternoon, officials admitted that there must be better planning and also mechanisms in place to include ward councillors in decision-making around ward budgets. The money allocated to ward budgets in the revised budget, in comparison to last week, has increased by just over R44-million and, in comparison to the first draft budget in April, has increased by R452-million.
Ward 1 and 2 in the metro, both in need of critical electrical infrastructure work, both received R4.8-million and R2-million more in their capital budgets. Ward 16, which includes a large section of the metro's manufacturing industry, received a R14-million boost in the new budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Nelson Mandela Bay seesaws on rates as council battles to pass 2025/26 budget
The Nelson Mandela Bay Council will, again, try to pass the budget on Wednesday and while smaller increases in tariffs for water and sanitation were promised by mayor Babalwa Lobishe last Thursday, it wasn't included in the draft budget. However, by 5pm on Tuesday, a circular indicating that there were conditions to the reduced water and sanitation rates arrived with councillors. The Nelson Mandela Bay metro's council will again try on Wednesday to approve the budget for the 2025/26 financial year. Last Thursday, during the council meeting, Mayor Babalwa Lobishe promised a 0.5% reduction in the proposed increases for water and sewage. But in the draft budget received by councillors on Tuesday, it looked like the increase was again set at 5.5% and not at the promised 5%. But last Thursday night, a circular was signed by Nosipho Xhego, the executive director of corporate services in the metro, stating that the proposed reduced increase can only be put into operation if councillors agreed to scrap the city's scarce skills allowance and also agree to an overtime policy based on regulated thresholds. The circular states that the municipality currently does not have an overtime policy, and also pays more than the regulated thresholds, and implementing these could save R22-million in the current financial year. Other increases remain unchanged, including an increase in property rates by 5%. The proposed increase in electricity prices stands at 12.8%, which is 0.6% higher than the Eskom price. The electricity department is running at a loss of more than a billion and is spending more money on buying electricity than what it makes selling it – because of theft and meter tampering. Allowing this increase, however, is not a decision that can be taken by council though, as it falls within the mandate of the National Energy Regulator. In 2022, the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber successfully applied for an order from the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court in Gqeberha, indicating that Nersa must link price increases to a cost of supply and also was not allowed to pass on municipal inefficiencies to the consumer. Werner Senekal from the Democratic Alliance, the official opposition in the metro, said the budget's projections were off and it was based on a 76% collection rate while the average collection rate is 72%. He added that the Integrated Development Plan, setting out ward-based priorities and the budget, also was not in lockstep. By law, the budget must be passed by 1 July, otherwise the metro's council can be dissolved. In the latest circular sent on Tuesday afternoon, officials admitted that there must be better planning and also mechanisms in place to include ward councillors in decision-making around ward budgets. The money allocated to ward budgets in the revised budget, in comparison to last week, has increased by just over R44-million and, in comparison to the first draft budget in April, has increased by R452-million. Ward 1 and 2 in the metro, both in need of critical electrical infrastructure work, both received R4.8-million and R2-million more in their capital budgets. Ward 16, which includes a large section of the metro's manufacturing industry, received a R14-million boost in the new budget.
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Nelson Mandela Bay metro asks council to urgently approve millions for security firm looking after substations
If the company is not paid, the substations are at risk of being left unguarded and, therefore, vulnerable to vandalism, which could cause costly power outages Nelson Mandela Bay's acting city manager, Ted Pillay, has asked for an urgent decision by council to approve the reallocation of more than R20-million from the current year's budget to pay the security firm guarding some of the city's major substations. According to council documents, the urgent payment will avoid the security firm's withdrawal, and leaving the city's substations vulnerable to theft and vandalism. In a metro where cable theft is rife, Nelson Mandela Bay (NMB) now owes its security service provider R21-million, according to a report before council. A payment of R7-million was made last week to avoid the substations being abandoned by guards. The matter is expected to be heard on Wednesday, 18 June, after it was deferred because not all councillors had seen the documents. Adopt-a-substation Wayne Hart, from Atlas Security, said that while his organisation is not the security provider owed millions by the municipality, Atlas does guard crucial substations in several parts of the city as part of the Business Chamber's Adopt-a-Substation programme. As part of this programme, businesses fund private security to protect substations against attacks. Highlighting the importance of security at these substations, Hart said the company protects the large substation at Struandale. Part of its plan involves stationing guards and security vehicles there 24/7. 'This initiative was launched two years ago, and to date we haven't had one single incident. Before our involvement that substation was a target and would often knock half of the industrial areas out,' he said. He added that his company also monitors alarms at other substations and responds accordingly. Other security measures employed under the Adopt-a-Substation initiative include perimeter fencing and the installation of hi-tech security cameras monitored around the clock. Letter to the Presidency In a letter written to the Presidency, several government departments and Eskom in late 2024, the CEO of the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber, Denise van Huyssteen, requested that the government declare the two substations at Chatty in NMB as national key points. She also asked that the government consider sending in the army to protect the infrastructure. In her letter Van Huyssteen highlighted that in 2023 there had been several incidents of cable theft at the municipal substation, and the fence and alarms were tampered with to gain access. It is estimated that damage to the crucial Chatty substations could lead to power outages of several weeks in NMB. In the past 12 months, there have been several reported instances of vandalism at substations in the metro leaving residents without power. Major risk In its 2025 integrated development report, vandalism is highlighted as one of the major risks facing the city. The report also states that the metro's electricity department will have to be subsidised by municipal rates to remain viable. Opposition parties have repeatedly argued in council that the electricity department would bankrupt the city if a successful turnaround plan was not implemented. 'We have not seen a turnaround plan yet,' said Werner Senekal, a Democratic Alliance member in the council . In its application to the National Energy Regulator for tariff increases, the metro said vandalism and cable theft are two of the factors hampering an efficient electricity service in NMB. DM
Daily Maverick
13 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Want a decision from the SA government? Don't hold your breath
There are plenty of cases where the government just takes a long time to make decisions. Even decisions that need to be made by one person can take forever. In some cases, the process is just too technical, with too many steps. And while it can be frustrating, it is also really expensive for our economy. One of the great and terrible certainties about South African life is that you know any kind of government process is just going to take forever. And while it can be frustrating and taxing, in the end it is also hugely expensive for our economy. On Tuesday, 17 June 2025, BusinessLIVE reported on the CEO of Afrimat, who had told shareholders in the annual report that a delay by the Competition Tribunal over its deal with Lafarge SA might have cost the company about R185-million. That's because while the tribunal was considering the case, the equipment, including kilns, fell into disrepair. By the time the tribunal allowed the deal, it was exactly a year since it was first announced. And remember, all the tribunal had to do was consider the recommendations of the Competition Commission — it wasn't as if they were starting the entire case from scratch. Something similar has happened with the Vodacom-Maziv deal, where the two want to work together to roll out fibre. This is something that should greatly benefit our economy. That case took three years before the Competition Tribunal eventually ruled that the merger could not go ahead. And even then, the parties had to wait for months before the final reasons were actually published. Considering how the fibre market has changed in the past three years, this might well have a material impact on whether the deal still has the same value as it did when it was announced. It's easy to pick on the Competition Tribunal. And we should. But there are plenty of other cases where the government just takes a long time to make decisions. In some cases, the process is just too technical, with too many steps. There are also, arguably, too many different forums. For example, Vodacom now has to appeal against the Competition Tribunal ruling in the Competition Appeal Court. It is even possible that if it fails there, it could go to the Constitutional Court. That would mean the whole thing will probably take more than five years. But it is not just our judicial and legal processes that take a long time. Even decisions that need to be made by one person can take forever. Jacob Zuma once took nearly two years just to appoint a new head of the Special Investigating Unit. That was clearly political; he didn't want anyone in the job for reasons that became pretty obvious. But President Cyril Ramaphosa sometimes isn't much better. The head of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), Shamila Batohi, has asked him to suspend the head of prosecutions in Joburg, Andrew Chauke. He is accused of a litany of sins, including sabotaging prosecutions during the State Capture era. Her request was made nearly two years ago. And Ramaphosa has still not made a decision. Considering that he has claimed to want to support our independent institutions, and the NPA, what could his motive possibly be? Two weeks ago, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu withdrew an advert for a new head of the Hawks, after Godfrey Lebeya retired. The process to find a new head will now start again, meaning they will be without a boss for four months. At least. And I'll bet you the cost of a double ticket to see the Springboks at Ellis Park that it will take longer than that. There are many other examples. Former Department of Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Ebrahim Patel was accused by the current head of the National Lotteries Commission, Professor Barney Pityana, of delaying the appointment of the agents who formally assign money to groups that are supposed to benefit from it. The current Health Minister, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, appeared to take forever to publish regulations around the digital nomad visa when he was at Home Affairs. In the end the new minister, Leon Schreiber, had to do it. And was able to claim something for the DA in the process. I think sometimes when there is a long delay we have to ask who is really responsible. In the case of the Competition Tribunal, it is not just that they make decisions businesspeople don't like. It's that the delay is caused because they don't have enough members. As columnist Michael Avery has pointed out, it appears to be seriously understaffed. By the way, they're not the only ones. Mbekezeli Benjamin from Judges Matter once pointed out that the Electoral Court had been without a full complement of staff for a full five years. That's astonishing, no matter how you look at it. And it's only because of the politicians; they are the ones who are ultimately in charge. When there are delays like this, I think we're entitled to ask why. And this is the risk to the politicians. When Ramaphosa can't make up his mind about Andrew Chauke for two years, it looks like he's defending him, even if he's not. When tribunals and courts are left without their full complement of judges and commissioners, it must make them weaker. But sometimes it can be something else. DM
