Nelson Mandela Bay seesaws on rates as council battles to pass 2025/26 budget
The Nelson Mandela Bay metro's council will again try on Wednesday to approve the budget for the 2025/26 financial year.
Last Thursday, during the council meeting, Mayor Babalwa Lobishe promised a 0.5% reduction in the proposed increases for water and sewage. But in the draft budget received by councillors on Tuesday, it looked like the increase was again set at 5.5% and not at the promised 5%.
But last Thursday night, a circular was signed by Nosipho Xhego, the executive director of corporate services in the metro, stating that the proposed reduced increase can only be put into operation if councillors agreed to scrap the city's scarce skills allowance and also agree to an overtime policy based on regulated thresholds.
The circular states that the municipality currently does not have an overtime policy, and also pays more than the regulated thresholds, and implementing these could save R22-million in the current financial year.
Other increases remain unchanged, including an increase in property rates by 5%.
The proposed increase in electricity prices stands at 12.8%, which is 0.6% higher than the Eskom price. The electricity department is running at a loss of more than a billion and is spending more money on buying electricity than what it makes selling it – because of theft and meter tampering. Allowing this increase, however, is not a decision that can be taken by council though, as it falls within the mandate of the National Energy Regulator. In 2022, the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber successfully applied for an order from the Eastern Cape Division of the High Court in Gqeberha, indicating that Nersa must link price increases to a cost of supply and also was not allowed to pass on municipal inefficiencies to the consumer.
Werner Senekal from the Democratic Alliance, the official opposition in the metro, said the budget's projections were off and it was based on a 76% collection rate while the average collection rate is 72%.
He added that the Integrated Development Plan, setting out ward-based priorities and the budget, also was not in lockstep.
By law, the budget must be passed by 1 July, otherwise the metro's council can be dissolved.
In the latest circular sent on Tuesday afternoon, officials admitted that there must be better planning and also mechanisms in place to include ward councillors in decision-making around ward budgets. The money allocated to ward budgets in the revised budget, in comparison to last week, has increased by just over R44-million and, in comparison to the first draft budget in April, has increased by R452-million.
Ward 1 and 2 in the metro, both in need of critical electrical infrastructure work, both received R4.8-million and R2-million more in their capital budgets. Ward 16, which includes a large section of the metro's manufacturing industry, received a R14-million boost in the new budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
7 minutes ago
- IOL News
LIVE: SA marks nearly 90 days without load shedding, minister to provide grid update
Minister for Electricity and Energy, Kgosientso Ramokgopa to brief the media on the state of South Africa's electricity Image: Supplied The Minister of Electricity and Energy, Dr Kgosientsho Ramokgopa, will brief the media on Wednesday in Pretoria, offering an update on the state of the country's electricity grid after a period of improving reliability. South Africa appears to have steadied the lights after years of outages and inconsistent power supply. Reports indicate that by August 12, 2025, the country had experienced no load shedding since May 15, 2025. Only 26 hours of load shedding were recorded between April 1 and July 31, 2025, and from May 15 to August 12, 2025, there was no load shedding. In other words, nearly three months of uninterrupted electricity supply. The electricity utility Eskom issued a statement last Friday highlighting continued grid reliability during winter demand. It noted that when system constraints arise, they are managed through targeted use of emergency reserves during morning and evening peak periods. The statement also provided a snapshot of recent performance: For the week of August 1–7, 2025, planned maintenance averaged 5,343 MW. The Energy Availability Factor (EAF) ranged between 62% and 70%, with the month-to-date average at 65.38%, signaling growing fleet stability and reliability. The figure excludes 720 MW from Kusile Unit 6, which has supplied power to the grid since March 23, 2025, though it has not been in commercial operation. Eskom plans to return 3,280 MW of generation capacity to service ahead of the evening peak on Monday, August 11, 2025, and throughout the coming week. The entity said that between April 1 and August 7, 2025, the Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF) declined to 28.35%, a week-on-week improvement of about 0.23%, though still roughly 2.3 percentage points higher than the 26.06% recorded in the same period last year. The open-cycle gas turbine (OCGT) load factor reached 5.99% for the week, up from 0.31% the previous week. As part of ongoing strategies to bolster grid stability, Eskom stated its efforts to maintain system reliability and to deploy planned capacity in anticipation of evening demand.
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
R12m upgrade for Cape Recife wastewater plant nearly complete
The Nelson Mandela Bay municipality has spent R12m to refurbish the Cape Recife wastewater treatment plant, with 70% of the work completed. This will see the end of sewage flowing into the beach, located in a nature conservancy. Of the R12m, R8m was budgeted for over three years. The last R4m comes from the 2025/2026 financial year. The upgrade forms part of a wider project by the city, which is upgrading all sewerage plants, including those that resulted in the closure of the Brighton and Kings beaches. The beaches have been closed several times since 2024 due to broken infrastructure, resulting in effluent streaming to beaches, negatively affecting bird and marine life. Mayor Babalwa Lobishe conducted an oversight visit at the Cape Recife plant on Tuesday, where a R2.8m generator will be commissioned. 'We've spent more than R8.6m upgrading the plant, it's a multiyear project which we committed to three years ago. 'It's safe to say that all the money has done the work it was meant for.' Lobishe said the additional R4m was to deal with electrical connections for pumps to operate optimally. 'There was a spillage that was happening. It was meant to be attended to within three weeks, but we required a specialist for that kind of work. 'The work is in progress. We are 70% done.' Lobishe said the spills on the beaches were a result of ageing underground pipes, which had reached the end of their lifespan. 'All our engineers are busy with this to prevent a similar occurrence in other beaches.' Lobishe said the Fishwater Flats plant upgrades were due to be concluded in September. 'The necessary machinery has been procured. We are looking forward to getting the plant running fully to prevent further spills into Brighton Beach. 'The pumps are procured in Germany, which means it takes longer for delivery, but we should be ready for the summer season.' She attributed the spills to rampant vandalism. 'The setback in the Fishwater Flats plant is not a result of our failure to plan, but is caused by what I deem as organised crime, where people go there with their vehicles and wreck the facility. 'We have since strengthened security at the plant and others, and replaced the stolen material. 'We also have been doing some work on the [Kings] beachfront where there was also a leak.' The Herald
Daily Maverick
12 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Activists raise concerns as nuclear site close to Cape Town given go-ahead
South Africa is one step closer to a second nuclear power station after Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Minister Dion George last week upheld a contested, almost decade-old environmental authorisation. South Africa's long-running bid to expand its nuclear power capacity has cleared a key and contentious hurdle. Environment Minister Dion George has upheld an environmental authorisation allowing Eskom to develop a new 4,000MW nuclear power station at Duynefontein, about 35km north of Cape Town. The decision affirms a 2017 approval that had been under appeal for years. It paves the way for Eskom to pursue a nuclear build at the roughly 265-hectare site. That, however, does not mean shovels will hit the ground any time soon. 'In the end, my decision was made in respect of the principles of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), and with full appreciation of the environmental, social and economic considerations involved,' said George. He said that the granting of an environmental authorisation 'does not exempt an applicant from complying with any other applicable legal requirements or obtaining permits from other competent authorities'. The news is one step forward after a previous step back on the contested journey towards new nuclear capacity. Daily Maverick previously reported that at the end of 2023, Minister of Energy and Electricity Kgosientsho Ramokgopa announced that all the 'suspensive conditions' to start procuring 2,500MW of new nuclear power immediately had been met. Months later, in August 2024, Ramokgopa announced that he would withdraw that gazette to procure new nuclear power capacity in response to the 'substantive' legal challenges posed by the Southern African Faith Communities' Environment Institute and Earthlife Africa Johannesburg — and that is where things have stood until George's announcement last week. Government and industry proponents have hailed the move as a milestone. The South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa), in a statement, said it reflected confidence in nuclear technology as a contributor to the country's energy mix. Necsa CEO Loyiso Tyabashe added that 'this approval marks an important milestone for the nuclear industry and South Africa's journey towards implementing a balanced energy mix that enables socioeconomic development and is climate friendly. The minister's decision shows rigour of the process that was followed to choose an appropriate site for nuclear new build and reflects confidence in nuclear technology as a safe, clean and reliable energy solution.' While the environmental approval is a prerequisite, Eskom still faces a gauntlet of steps before any concrete is poured. These include securing licences, obtaining design and construction approvals, sourcing financing for what is likely to be a multihundred-billion-rand project, and government sign-off on procurement. This drawn-out pathway is not just procedural. South Africa's last major nuclear procurement drive under former president Jacob Zuma collapsed amid allegations of secrecy and corruption risks and procedural failures. Environmental activists, however, are not as welcoming of the news, warning that the country's financial, operational and governance challenges make a major nuclear build risky and unnecessary. The 2018 Goldman Environmental Prize winners and anti-nuclear activists, Makoma Lekalakala and Liziwe McDaid, said in a statement that 'Earthlife Africa is considering the minister's decision and our next steps. Our concerns include the length of time taken to conduct the environmental impact assessment and to make the appeal decision. 'We are also deeply concerned about the affordability of nuclear power, particularly the high upfront capital costs, the risk of construction delays, and the cost overruns that have been experienced worldwide. 'In addition, there has been no assessment of the socioeconomic impacts of a major beyond-design-basis nuclear incident, nor of the generation of long-lived high-level radioactive waste for which no final disposal solution yet exists.' Peter Becker, a former board member of the National Nuclear Regulator and anti-nuclear activist, told Daily Maverick that above and beyond these concerns, South Africa had bled the requisite nuclear industry expertise to safely operate a nuclear power station. He also questioned the logic and application of timelines as they related to environmental authorisations. 'When an Environmental Assessment (EA) is issued, it has a time limit. This one had a 10-year limit. So the idea of having a 10-year expiry date on environmental authorisation is an acknowledgement that the environment might change. 'The surrounding population might change, the needs and desirability of the projects might change, and that is particularly true when it comes to such a fast-changing environment as the electricity sector where we are seeing disruptive changes. And those disruptive changes are in terms of dramatic learning curves and dropping of prices of alternative sources of energy, such as renewables, battery storage, etc, and also vast changes in demographics. 'So there's a bit of a gap in the legal system in this country in that once an EA is issued, you can appeal it, and that suspends the EA, but when does the expiry start?' Becker explained that depending on how this was interpreted legally, it could either mean Eskom would need to begin construction at the site within less than two years, or the 10-year period started only on Friday after the minister's approval. In the time since the original approval, the underlying expert information that informed that original authorisation may have significantly changed. The July 2023 Review of Environmental Impact Report and Specialist Studies commissioned for Eskom largely confirms as much. That review concluded that the 2017 Environmental Authorisation can still stand without re-assessing impacts, even though much of the underlying data and assumptions are more than 10 years old. This is significant because the review was not a technical re-evaluation. It assumed the original data and impact findings were correct, focusing instead on whether or not they were still relevant. Moreover, the review admits that the original statement that renewables 'could not provide adequate baseload' may 'no longer be correct' due to rapid renewable energy development since the Environmental Impact Assessment was finalised. This is important because it validates a key argument used by those opposed to new nuclear capacity: that the energy context has changed and might affect the rationale for new nuclear energy. DM
