AI and Advanced Analytics Drive Transformation in Physician Revenue Cycle Management: Black Book's 2025 Vendor Rankings by Practice Size and Specialty
Survey findings underscore significant improvements in medical practice denial management, patient engagement, and operational efficiency driven by advanced technologies.
DENVER, CO / ACCESS Newswire / June 27, 2025 / Black Book Research, the independent authority on healthcare technology performance, today announced its 2025 rankings of Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) vendors serving U.S. physician practices. Based on survey responses from 8,018 client users across group practices, MSOs, and solo physicians, Black Book assessed vendor performance from September 2024-June 2025 in these 19 essential RCM categories, segmented by practice size and clinical type:
End-to-End RCM Software Platforms
Primary Care / Medicine-Based Practices Top Vendor: Veradigm Payerpath
Awarded for comprehensive RCM workflow automation, payer connectivity, and EHR interoperability.
Specialty & Surgical Practices Top Vendor: ModMed BOOST (Modernizing Medicine)
Excels in specialty-specific coding automation, surgical billing workflows, and ophthalmology/dermatology integration.
__________
Financial Communications & Patient Satisfaction Tools
Primary Care / Medicine-Based Practices Top Vendor: Phreesia
Praised for large-scale patient intake, digital consent, upfront cost transparency, and patient satisfaction tools.
Specialty & Surgical Practices Top Vendor: Luma Health
Rated highly for referral communications, surgical prep education, and procedure-specific billing notifications.
__________
Patient Engagement & Financial Communications
Top Vendor: InteliChart
Recognized for its comprehensive patient engagement solutions including portals, scheduling, intake, notifications, surveys, virtual care, and billing communication, significantly enhancing patient satisfaction and revenue collection.
__________
Physician Clearinghouse Solutions
Top Vendor: Waystar Clearinghouse
Rated #1 for large-practice scalability, payer EDI integration, and advanced denial tracking.
__________
Patient Financial Access Solutions
Top Vendor: Experian Health
Integrates financial clearance, ID verification, and prior auth into EHR systems at scale.
__________
Outsourced RCM Services
EHR System-Based Practices Top Vendor: Greenway Revenue Services
Offers end-to-end outsourced RCM services designed specifically for ambulatory and primary care practices, with deep analytics, comprehensive denial management, and EHR integration.
EHR-Agnostic RCM Services Top Vendor: R1 RCM
Recognized for EHR-agnostic ambulatory RCM services, providing comprehensive outsourced revenue cycle management solutions across diverse physician practice environments.
__________
AI-Driven RCM Solutions
Top Vendor: IKS Health
Specialty-focused, AI-powered RCM solutions excelling in coding automation, payer rule intelligence, predictive analytics, denial management, and scalable staffing augmentation.
__________
Physician Practice Claim Processing and Billing Optimization
Top Vendor: RapidClaims
Recognized for its AI-driven claim processing efficiency, billing accuracy, rapid reimbursement cycles, and client satisfaction specifically tailored to physician practice needs.
__________
Revenue Cycle Workflow Optimization
Top Vendor: MedEvolve
Awarded for its innovative workflow automation solutions, real-time analytics, productivity enhancement, and operational cost reduction specifically tailored for physician groups and practices.
__________
Insurance Discovery Solutions
Top Vendor: FinThrive
Recognized for its efficiency in identifying missed insurance coverage and optimizing reimbursements.
__________
Patient Financing & Medical Loan
Top Vendor: CarePayment
Awarded for superior patient-friendly financing solutions, zero-interest payment plans, flexible repayment options, enhanced patient satisfaction, and increased collection rates.
__________
Patient Identifier Solutions & EMPI
Top Vendor: Verato
Praised for its advanced patient identification technology ensuring accuracy and compliance across multiple practice locations.
__________
Patient Revenue Intelligence and Analytics
Top Vendor: Innovaccer
Recognized for its AI-powered data activation platform (DAP), patient 360 insights, and advanced analytics, providing actionable intelligence to maximize revenue and support value-based care models.
__________
Revenue Integrity & Billing Compliance Software
Top Vendor: FinThrive
Awarded for robust revenue integrity and compliance software tailored specifically for physician practices, proactively managing coding accuracy, compliance oversight, and reimbursement optimization.
__________
Extended Business Office Services
Top Vendor: Xtend Healthcare
Recognized for scalable extended business office (EBO) solutions tailored for physician organizations and MSOs, Xtend Healthcare delivers high-performance A/R resolution, legacy system support, and end-to-end receivables management that accelerates cash flow and reduces administrative burden.
__________
Government Reimbursement Services
Top Vendor: AdvantEdge Healthcare Solutions
Rated highly for its expertise in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement processes, AdvantEdge supports compliance-driven billing services, encounter data integrity, and appeals management, helping physician practices and FQHCs navigate complex government payer landscapes.
__________
Complex Claims Resolution Solutions
Top Vendor: Knowtion Health
Specializing in complex, denied, or aged claims, Knowtion Health offers robust resolution pathways for high-dollar or regulatory-sensitive A/R, with predictive analytics, payer intelligence, and denial remediation services specifically designed for physician practices and surgical centers.
__________
Charge Capture & Price Transparency Tools
Top Vendor: Vitalware (by Health Catalyst)
Vitalware is recognized for its comprehensive charge capture and pricing transparency platform, enabling physician groups to ensure compliant, complete charge documentation and provide patients with real-time, accurate estimates aligned with No Surprises Act regulations.
__________
Payment Processing & Merchant Services for Providers
Top Vendor: InstaMed (a J.P. Morgan company)
InstaMed leads in secure, compliant payment processing and digital merchant services tailored for physician practices, offering integrated point-of-service collections, online billing, and automated reconciliation across patient and payer transactions.
__________
Key Findings from the 2025 Survey
81% of physician groups are actively replacing at least one RCM technology or service vendor in 2025 due to automation gaps or inadequate support for value-based care contracts.
87% of specialty practices report significant improvements in denial management after switching to a top-ranked clearinghouse or outsourcing vendor.
68% of small/solo physicians say that simplified, low-touch billing technology with live customer support is more important than EHR integration.
'No two physician practices are the same. Our segmented rankings by size and specialty give medical leaders the clarity they need to select the right-fit RCM partner,' said Doug Brown, Founder of Black Book Research. 'As value-based models expand and patient financial engagement becomes critical, vendors that serve solo family doctors must be evaluated differently than those supporting 100-provider surgical networks.'
About Black Book Research
Black Book™ is the leading source for independent, crowdsourced healthcare IT and services vendor performance data. Over 3.4 million healthcare professionals have contributed to Black Book's impartial scoring of over 1,000 RCM software firms and outsourcing partners. Competitive scorecard intelligence reports may be requested through [email protected] . Gratis Black Book industry research reports are available at www.blackbookmarketresearch.com for all healthcare IT stakeholders.
Contact InformationPress Office 8008637590
SOURCE: Black Book Research
press release
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
37 minutes ago
- New York Times
Club World Cup prize money rankings: How much has each team earned so far?
Forty-eight games down, 15 to go. FIFA's new, engorged Club World Cup has completed its group stage, 16 clubs are on their way home and, over the next fortnight, the remaining 16 will tussle to lift a trophy so gaudy even Louis XIV might have turned his nose up at it. Alongside that (notably heavy) trinket, whoever runs out victorious in East Rutherford in mid-July will also bank themselves a hefty cash prize. The winners of this summer's tournament will earn a further $74.1million (£54m), including $40m from the final alone, on top of what they have already pocketed from the competition — and much of FIFA's $1billion prize pot has now been allocated. Advertisement Even before the round of 16 begins, we already know where nearly three-quarters of the money will go: $525m in participation fees were doled out before a ball was kicked and, since then, the results of 48 group games and the identification of 16 progressing teams (who each earned $7.5m for doing so) means a further $216m in performance-related prize money has also been apportioned. A look at the prize money leaders throws up some familiar (some might say obvious) names. Sitting at the top are Manchester City, the only club to exceed $50m so far. Behind them are some of the wealthiest clubs in world football: Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Paris Saint-Germain, and on it goes. While the general theme of European clubs hoovering up much of the bounty is true, there is a caveat to the order of things. Upon announcing how it would distribute the prize pot, FIFA provided participation fee figures for UEFA's qualifying clubs, but not the amounts each of the 12 clubs would get. UEFA clubs qualified either by winning the Champions League between 2020-21 and 2023-24 or through their coefficient ranking over the same period. Participation fees for European clubs in the Club World Cup were "determined by a ranking based on sporting and commercial criteria", according to FIFA. To work out the prize money rankings, we've assumed clubs were ordered by their coefficient ranking, although FIFA's inclusion of "commercial criteria" means our figures might not be exactly right. The Athletic has not been able to establish the exact allocation of participation fees to UEFA clubs. Regardless of the order, it's fairly clear European sides will be taking home most of the spoils. The top eight prize money spots are occupied by European clubs and of the $741m allocated, $424.5m (57 per cent) has gone to UEFA clubs. On average, the 12 competing clubs from football's richest continent have earned $35.4m apiece this summer. Behind them, CONMEBOL's South American teams have picked up an average of $23.9m each, as Brazil's four competing teams lost just one of their 12 group games and all four qualified for the knockout rounds. The failure of the Argentinian sides to do the same, however, brought CONMEBOL's average down. The distribution of participation fees ensured Europe's clubs would always get the biggest slice of the prize. It speaks volumes that Porto and Atletico Madrid were knocked out at the group stage but have earned more than Al Hilal, Inter Miami and Monterrey, who have reached the last 16. Yet between them, the six CONMEBOL teams have banked $143.3m, just under a fifth of the prize pot distributed so far. The remaining four confederations have earned $173.2m combined. The five Concacaf clubs' earnings total $71.8m, even as Pachuca and Seattle Sounders, who both lost all three of their group games, failed to build on their $9.6m in participation fees. Of the three MLS teams competing, only Inter Miami remain, having generated $21.1m before Sunday's meeting with Paris Saint-Germain. In theory, Miami, Seattle and Los Angeles FC each get to enjoy their respective sums, with the prize money remaining in club hands rather than going into a central MLS pot. Less clear is where it will go next. A dispute between MLS, acting on the three clubs' behalf, and the MLS Players Association over player bonuses — subject to a cap that the money from the Club World Cup far exceeds — remains ongoing. Returning to those Brazilian clubs, this summer's tournament has offered quite the boon to at least two of them. Flamengo and Palmeiras already lead the revenue stakes back home, but based on the most recent figures, fellow Club World Cup participants Fluminense and Botafogo were sixth and eighth among their domestic rivals. Each of them has earned $26.7m, a huge proportion of their usual revenues. For Fluminense, it's over a third of their $74m turnover in 2024. For Botafogo, the boost is even higher; their prize money from the last fortnight is almost half of the $55m they generated across the whole of 2023 (they are yet to publish 2024 financials). Get past their respective hurdles of Serie A side Inter and domestic rivals Palmeiras, and each will bank a further $13.1m, as will anyone else who makes the quarter-finals. A huge amount of money has already been divvied up across this summer's 32 Club World Cup teams, but there's plenty left to play for. A further $259m will be allocated between now and the competition's end on July 13.
Bloomberg
38 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Senate Unveils New Trump Tax Draft With Plans to Vote Soon
Senate Republicans unveiled a new version of their $4.2 trillion tax and spending package, moving closer to a vote as they near a July 4 deadline set by President Donald Trump. The new draft reflects compromises among warring factions of the Senate GOP which has been divided over how much to cut safety-net programs such as Medicaid and how rapidly to phase out of renewable energy tax credits enacted under the Biden administration.
New York Times
38 minutes ago
- New York Times
Newsom Signs Budget That Includes Health Care Cuts for Undocumented Immigrants
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a California budget on Friday that relied on scaling back health care for undocumented immigrants, even as he and other California Democrats in recent weeks have condemned the Trump administration for cracking down on immigrant workers. In signing the budget, Mr. Newsom backtracked on his earlier pledge to insure all low-income residents, regardless of their immigration status. But it came as the state faced a $12 billion deficit, driven in part by a large cost overrun in the state's insurance plan for undocumented immigrants, and it would have been politically difficult to cut programs for citizens without reducing benefits for undocumented immigrants. When Mr. Newsom initially proposed the cuts in May, it was seen as a centrist pivot for a governor who is a potential presidential candidate in 2028. But after President Trump sent National Guard troops to Los Angeles nearly three weeks ago to thwart protesters, Mr. Newsom returned to his role as a liberal antagonist of the Republican administration and accused Mr. Trump of endangering American democracy. The California budget for the fiscal year that starts Tuesday relies on prohibiting new enrollment of undocumented immigrants in the state's Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal, starting in January. Adults between the ages of 19 and 59 who were already enrolled will have to pay a new $30 monthly premium beginning in 2027. And the state will eliminate dental care in July 2026 for undocumented adults and other noncitizens. Medi-Cal serves roughly 15 million people, including 1.6 million undocumented immigrants. Because the federal government does not pay for most health care for undocumented immigrants, it costs California more to insure noncitizens than it does to cover citizens. Democrats have argued that the state has a moral responsibility to provide health care to its immigrant work force, and they have said that preventative treatment can avert more costly emergency care down the road. Democrats who control the State Capitol cast their decisions on Friday as a necessary move to help close the budget deficit and said it was not an ideological shift away from supporting immigrants. Some choked back tears in emotional floor speeches about their undocumented family members as they voted for cuts to Medi-Cal. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
