
As Musk exits, he sees his projects unraveling, inside and outside government
WASHINGTON: A Starship spun out of control in suborbital flight on Tuesday, failing to meet critical testing goals set by SpaceX in its plans for a mission to Mars. A poll released last week showed the national brand reputation for Tesla, once revered, had cratered. And later that same day, House Republicans passed a bill that would balloon the federal deficit.
It has been a challenging period for Elon Musk, the world's richest man, who not long ago thought he had conquered the private sector and could, in short order, do the same with the federal government. That all ended Wednesday evening with his announcement he is leaving the Trump administration.
'As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,' Musk wrote on X, his social media platform.
The mission of the program he called the Department of Government Efficiency 'will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government,' he added.
Musk's departure comes on the heels of a ruling from a federal judge in Washington on Wednesday questioning Musk's initial appointment as a temporary government employee and, by extension, whether any of his work for DOGE was constitutional.
'I thought there were problems,' Musk said in a recent interview with The Washington Post , 'but it sure is an uphill battle trying to improve things in DC, to say the least.'
Growing conflicts with Trump
Musk's role as an omnipresent adviser to President Donald Trump began to wane weeks ago, amid public backlash against DOGE's cuts to treasured government programs – from cancer research to the National Park Service – and after Trump bucked Musk's counsel on economic policy, launching a global trade war that jolted supply chains and financial markets.
But the entrepreneur has grown increasingly vocal with criticism of the Trump administration this week, stating that a megabill pushed by the White House proposing an overhaul to the tax code risks undermining his efforts to cut government spending.
Musk responded to a user on X, his social media platform, on Monday lamenting that House Republicans 'won't vote' to codify DOGE's cuts. 'Did my best,' he wrote.
'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk explained further in an interview with CBS Sunday Morning later in the week. 'I think a bill can be big, or it can be beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both. My personal opinion.'
The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' would increase border security and defence spending, renew tax cuts passed in 2017 and extend a new tax deduction to seniors, while eliminating green energy tax benefits and cutting US$1mil (RM4.26 trillion) in funding to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Despite the cuts, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill would add so much money to the debt that Congress may be forced to execute cuts across the board, including hundreds of billions to Medicare, in a process known as sequestration.
Hours after the CBS interview aired, the White House appeared to respond directly to Musk with the release of a press release titled 'FACT: One, Big, Beautiful Bill Cuts Spending, Fuels Growth.' And Trump responded directly from the Oval Office, noting Democratic opposition and the challenges of unifying a fractious GOP caucus. Negotiations with the Senate will result in changes to the legislation, Trump said.
'My reaction's a lot of things,' Trump said. 'I'm not happy about certain aspects of it, but I'm thrilled by other aspects of it.'
'That's the way they go,' he added. 'It's very big. It's the big, beautiful bill.'
Cuts in question
It is unclear whether Musk succeeded in making the government more efficient, regardless of what Congress does.
While the DOGE program originally set a goal of cutting US$2 trillion (RM8.52 trillion) in federal spending, Musk ultimately revised that target down dramatically, to US$150bil (RM640bil). The program's 'wall of receipts' claims that US$175bil (RM746bil) has been saved, but the Treasury Department's Bureau of the Fiscal Service has documented an increase in spending over last year.
'DOGE is just becoming the whipping boy for everything,' Musk said in the Post interview this week. 'So, like, something bad would happen anywhere, and we would get blamed for it even if we had nothing to do with it.'
Musk had been brought into the Trump administration designated as a special government employee, a position limited to 130 days that does not require Senate approval.
But the legal case making its way through the Washington courtroom of US District Judge Tanya Chutkan is questioning the entire arrangement.
The White House attempted to 'minimise Musk's role, framing him as a mere adviser without any formal authority,' Chutkan wrote, while granting him broad powers that gave him 'unauthorised access' to 'private and proprietary information,' like Social Security numbers and medical records. Those actions, Chutkan added, provide the basis for parties to claim Musk inflicted substantial injury in a legal challenge.
'I think I've done enough'
Musk was scheduled to speak Tuesday after SpaceX's Starship test launch, setting out the road ahead to 'making life multiplanetary.' But he never appeared after the spacecraft failed early on in its planned trajectory to orbit Earth.
Starship is supposed to be the vehicle that returns Americans to the moon in just two years. NASA, in conjunction with US private sector companies, is in a close race with China to return humans to the moon for the first time since the end of the Apollo program.
But none of Musk's endeavours has suffered more than his electric car company, Tesla, which saw a 71% plunge in profits in the first quarter of 2025 and a 50% drop in stock value from its highs in December. An Axios Harris Poll released last week found that Tesla dropped in its reputation ranking of America's 100 most visible companies to 95th place, down from eighth in 2021 and 63rd last year.
The reputational damage to Tesla, setbacks at SpaceX and limits to his influence on Trump appear to be cautioning Musk to step back from his political activity.
'I think in terms of political spending, I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' Musk told Bloomberg News on May 20, during the Qatar Economic Forum. 'I think I've done enough.' – Los Angeles Times/Tribune News Service
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
21 minutes ago
- The Star
Hegseth wins praise but Asia still has strong doubts about Trump
SINGAPORE (Bloomberg): After US military allies in Europe were torched by Vice President JD Vance in March over military spending, free speech and the war in Ukraine, America's partners in Asia warily awaited Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's arrival at a security conference in Singapore. Turns out there was little reason to worry, apart from the perpetual anxiety over President Donald Trump's social media feed. While Hegseth delivered Trump's demands for higher security spending on par with Europe, he couched it as necessary to prepare for a potentially "imminent' Chinese invasion of Taiwan. The US wouldn't be pushed out the region, he said, nor let allies and partners "be subordinated and intimidated' - a commitment lauded by many in attendance. But in the hallways of the Shangri-La Hotel, Hegseth couldn't dispel concerns about the erratic policymaking of his boss. Many of the generals, defense ministers and intelligence officers from Asia and Europe - who are key to helping the US counter China - were still reeling from the shock of Trump's sectoral levies and "reciprocal' tariffs. Hegseth "offered a needed level of reassurance to allies and partners that the United States will remain present in the Indo-Pacific and committed to countering China's coercive threats,' said Rory Medcalf, head of the National Security College at the Australian National University. "But this message will remain discounted by the dysfunction we are seeing in Washington.' On his second trip to Asia since March, the Pentagon chief displayed some diplomatic nuance that surprised some officials who expected more grandstanding from the former television personality. Hegseth was also able to capitalize on a huge absence at the annual gathering: China didn't send a defense minister for the first time since 2019, putting Beijing's lower-level officials on the back foot. That void gave US officials space to set the tone and work the room, vowing greater cooperation with countries like Cambodia, Thailand and Indonesia. And it gave America's traditional partners even more room to criticize Beijing, despite their dependence on trade with China. Yet even if Hegseth was more reassuring than Vance, it still wasn't enough to overcome the uncertainty created by Trump's trade policies. That's particularly the case in Southeast Asia, which was among the hardest hit by Trump's tariffs in April. "Trade is not a soft power indulgence - it is part of our strategic architecture,' Malaysia Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said, referring to Southeast Asia. "It must be protected, not from competition but from the onslaught of arbitrary imposition of trade restrictions.' Trump's barrage of tariffs and general volatility - he announced a doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs over the weekend - was the subject of much of the chatter on the sidelines of the annual conference, according to several officials who asked not to be identified, citing private discussions. The officials said they were unsure whether the US president would stand by their side in a moment of need and that any deal reached with him could unravel moments later in a social media post. That uncertainty appeared to be pushing Indo-Pacific nations and Europe toward each other in a stronger sense of shared security and free-trade opportunities based on longstanding global rules. It also sparked pushback against what several nations saw as efforts to establish "spheres of influence' where the US or China can dominate. "Our shared responsibility is to ensure with others that our countries are not collateral victims of the imbalances linked to the choices made by the superpowers,' French President Emmanuel Macron said at the conference's opening on Friday. Macron's words about "strategic autonomy' and his call for Europe and Asia to join forces to "de-risk' supply chains struck a chord with many attendees. Several countries in the region are already having similar debates in their own capitals, some of the officials said. Many governments in the region rely on China economically and on the US for security, and are keen to not antagonize either. However, there's also a desire to be more autonomous and less dependent on either of the world's two-biggest economies, opening up new space for middle powers in Europe and Asia to join hands. Kaja Kallas, the European Union's top diplomat, made that pitch to Asian nations throughout the weekend. "If you reject unilateralism, bullying and aggression, and instead choose cooperation, shared prosperity and common security, the European Union will always be by your side,' she said. Amid the US-China turbulence, smaller nations sought to build ties. Japan's defense minister, Gen Nakatani, touted efforts to build closer relations with India and the Philippines. Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene said on Sunday that her country was working with partners in the region to counter Russian and Chinese cyber threats, as well as Beijing's dominance of drone manufacturing and ship building. Even one of America's closest partners in the region, Australia, signaled some independence from its ally. Hegseth's outreach to the region "is deeply welcome,' Australia's Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said. But he quickly added that "liberal trade has been the lifeblood of the Asian region, and the shock and disruption to trade from high tariffs has been costly and destabilizing.' During his remarks, Hegseth was pressed on the trade concerns and whether there was a contradiction in the Trump administration's message. He sidestepped the question with a smile, saying he was "in the business of tanks, not trade.' Last year, China's delegation surprised observers by repeatedly calling unscheduled press briefings. This year they surprised delegates by barely appearing at all. When they did engage, China's representatives pushed back at Hegseth's accusation that Beijing was destabilizing Asia and sparred with other speakers more broadly. The Pentagon chief aimed to "provoke, divide, instigate confrontations, stir up the region,' said Rear Admiral Hu Gangfeng, vice president of China's National Defense University. Another official, Senior Colonel Lu Yin, decried the atmosphere at the forum, saying that "labeling China, blaming China, verbally attacking China are politically right here.' In one of the sharpest exchanges of the weekend, Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro had a testy exchange with two senior colonels in the People's Liberation Army, receiving applause after he thanked them for "propaganda spiels disguised as questions.' Referring to China, Teodoro said he couldn't trust a country that "represses its own people.' Yet although China's presence was diminished, most countries still wanted to balance ties between Beijing and Washington. "If we have to choose sides, may we choose the side of principles,' Singapore Defense Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Sunday at the final panel of the weekend. "Principles that uphold a global order, where we do not descend into the law of the jungle, where the mighty do what they wish and the weak suffer what they must.' --With assistance from Alastair Gale, Courtney McBride and Alfred Cang. - ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.


The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Australia calls US plan to double steel, aluminium tariffs "unjustified" act of "self harm"
FILE PHOTO: A giant kettle pours molten aluminum into moulds as an employee skims the skin off previously poured moulds at an Alcoa Inc. smelting plant at Point Henry, Australia, on Wednesday, July 30, 2008. Australia's Minister for Trade and Tourism Don Farrell said the federal government would continue to advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs. - Bloomberg CANBERRA: Australia's Minister for Trade and Tourism Don Farrell on Saturday (May 31) described US President Donald Trump's plan to double tariffs on steel and aluminium as "unjustified" and an act of economic "self harm." Trump said on Friday that he plans to increase the tariff on steel and aluminium imports to the United States from 25 per cent to 50 per cent from June 4 to protect the domestic industry from foreign competition. Responding to the announcement, Farrell said in a statement that Australia's position has been "consistent and clear" and that the federal government would continue to advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs. "These tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend," he said. "They are an act of economic self harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade." Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, whose Labor Party won a second term in government in a landslide at the May 3 election, in April described Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs as "not the act of a friend". The US administration in March decided against exempting Australia from the steel and aluminum tariffs. Albanese said at the time that the decision went against the "enduring friendship" of the two countries. - Xinhua


The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
Nawrocki: Nationalist historian vying for Polish presidency
WARSAW: Karol Nawrocki, a nationalist historian who has written about the criminal underworld, heads into Sunday's presidential run-off tied with his opponent, pro-EU Warsaw mayor Rafal Trzaskowski. Nawrocki has been endorsed by the right-wing Law and Justice (PiS) party, which governed Poland from 2015 to 2023. The party is closely allied with outgoing President Andrzej Duda -- who has publicly backed Nawrocki -- and is a long-standing rival of the ruling Civic Coalition. Nawrocki campaigned under the slogan 'Poland first, Poles first'. While he has pledged to continue Poland's support for neighbouring Ukraine against Russia's invasion, he has denounced the benefits given to war refugees. He said in a campaign video in April that 'social benefits will be above all for Poles' and that 'in queues for doctors and clinics, Polish citizens must have priority'. In May, he claimed Ukraine 'has not shown gratitude for what Poles have done' and accused President Volodymyr Zelensky of 'insolence'. He opposes Ukraine's bid to join NATO. - Photos with Trump - Nawrocki is an admirer of Donald Trump and has said Poland should focus on shaping and leading Europe's relations with the US president. Nawrocki met Trump at the White House in May and claimed Trump had told him: 'You will win'. Some lawmakers from the governing coalition have accused Trump of election interference. US Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem also endorsed Nawrocki when she attended a conservative conference in Poland, saying: 'He needs to be the next president.' Nawrocki has called for controls on the border with Germany to keep out migrants, and would like Berlin to pay wartime reparations to Poland. While wooing voters ahead of the razor-edge run-off, Nawrocki signed an eight-point pledge prepared by far-right leader Slawomir Mentzen. The election campaign saw Nawrocki embroiled in a series of scandals. While arguing against a property tax, he claimed to only own one flat. Later it was revealed he had acquired a second one through a convoluted deal with an elderly man. A bombshell news report also alleged he had arranged prostitutes for guests while working as a hotel security guard. Nawrocki called the accusations 'a bunch of lies' and said he would sue the news site. Born in the Baltic port city of Gdansk, Nawrocki boxed and played football in his youth before earning a PhD in history and an MBA. He served as the director of the World War II museum in Gdansk from 2017 to 2021. Since then, he has led the Institute of National Remembrance, which investigates Nazi and communist-era crimes. His research focuses on Poland's anti-communist opposition, organised crime during the communist era and sports history. Last year, Russia added Nawrocki to its wanted list for his alleged efforts to remove Soviet-era monuments in Poland. Nawrocki said he obtained a gun licence and firearm after winding up in Russia's crosshairs. - Dual identity - Nawrocki has written several books, including one under a pen name that landed him in an unusual controversy. In 2018, he secretly published a book about the communist-era gangster Nikodem Skotarczak using the pseudonym Tadeusz Batyr. That same year, a blurred and voice-altered 'Batyr' appeared on state television claiming Nawrocki had inspired the book. Nawrocki later wrote on social media that Batyr had sought his advice and 'thanked me with an interesting book, which I recommend'. But local media recently uncovered that Batyr and Nawrocki were one and the same. One TikTok user said: 'Maybe they'll substitute Batyr for Nawrocki in the runoff. In any case, the one backs the other. That's two votes already.' Political opponents seized on the revelation. Nawrocki has also faced accusations of ties to gangsters and neo-Nazis, which he has rejected as 'deep manipulation', insisting his contacts were for professional purposes. 'No one has ever heard a good word from me about Nazism,' he said. Nawrocki speaks English and still boxes in his spare time. He has said Poland needs 'a strong president for tough times'. He lives with his wife, Marta, and has two children and an adult stepson.