
Romanian run-off the most crucial on Europe's ‘Super Sunday' of elections
The Romanian contest, the most consequential of the three, pits a brash, EU-critical, Trump-admiring populist against a centrist independent in a knife-edge vote that analysts have called most important in the country's post-communist history.
George Simion, a former soccer ultra and ultranationalist agitator who sees his far-right AUR party as a 'natural ally' of the US Maga movement, comfortably won the 4 May first round with a score of 41%, double that of the Bucharest mayor, Nicuşor Dan.
Recent polls have shown the gap between the two candidates closing, with one putting them neck and neck and another placing Dan – who has described the vote as a battle between 'a pro-western and an anti-western Romania' – ahead.
'This election isn't just about the president of Romania but about its entire direction,' said Siegfried Mureşan, a liberal Romanian MEP. Simion would 'weaken Europe's unity, undermine support for Ukraine, and benefit only Vladimir Putin,' he added.
In Poland, 13 contenders are vying to be the country's next head of state in the first round of presidential elections, with the centrist mayor of Warsaw, Rafał Trzaskowski, a senior member of prime minister Donald Tusk's Civic Coalition, the frontrunner.
Polls predict that Trzaskowski and Karol Nawrocki, a historian who is formally independent but has been endorsed by the former national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS) government, will advance to the second round, which is due on 1 June.
A win for the centrist would boost Tusk's ability to push through his reformist agenda, which has been hampered by Polish presidents' power to veto legislation passed by parliament. The outgoing president, Andrzej Duda, is a PiS ally.
Portugal, meanwhile, heads to the polls for its third snap general election in three years after the centre-right prime minister, Luís Montenegro, triggered and lost a confidence vote in parliament over questions about his family's business activities.
Montenegro's Democratic Alliance (AD) platform is forecast to finish first but fall short of a majority, and could struggle to form a government, especially if the Socialist party (PS), likely to finish second, keeps its pledge to oppose his legislative agenda.
Montenegro has vowed not to work with the far-right Chega, whose leader, former TV football pundit André Ventura, was hospitalised on Friday after twice collapsing at rallies, but could be replaced as party leader with someone more Chega-compatible.
Simion's win triggered the collapse of Romania's government of centre-left Social Democrats (PSD) and centre-right Liberals (PNL), and whoever wins will nominate the next prime minister and influence the formation of a new ruling coalition.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
The vote is a rerun of last November's ballot, won by a far-right, Moscow-friendly firebrand, Călin Georgescu, who was barred from standing again after the vote was cancelled amid allegations of campaign finance violations and Russian meddling.
Simion has promised to nominate Georgescu, who is under formal investigation on counts including misreporting campaign spending, illegal use of digital technology and promoting fascist groups, as prime minister if he becomes president.
Romanian presidents have a semi-executive role with considerable powers over foreign policy, national security, defence spending and judicial appointments. They can also dissolve parliament if MPs reject two prime ministerial nominations.
Analysts have said that since neither PSD or PNL would want a snap election with Simion's AUR – the second biggest party in parliament – in the ascendant, a minority AUR-led government, backed perhaps by PSD, is a clear possibility if Simion wins.
Simion opposes further aid to Ukraine and has sharply criticised the EU's leadership. While he insists he wants Romania to stay in the EU and Nato, he could ally with Hungary's Viktor Orbán and Slovakia's Robert Fico as another disruptive force.
'Simion's election would mark a sea change in Romanian politics, creating significant risks to domestic stability, Bucharest-Brussels relations, and EU unity over Ukraine,' said Mujtaba Rahman of the political risk consultancy Eurasia Group.
The prospect of a Simion win has spooked markets and investors, causing the Romanian leu to plunge and major foreign business chambers in Romania have warned of a 'rapid deterioration' in the business climate. Romania has the EU's highest budget deficit.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Where is the progressive Left's outrage over foreign sex offenders?
In doing so, the Reform member lit a rocket in the room. The broadcaster and even the less progressive co-host visibly flinched before letting rip on him. He was using inflammatory language and such language 'has consequences'. This was very ominous. He was, it was seemingly implied, getting awfully close to being racist. He sounded, they agreed, altogether like a Very Bad Man! I liked this chap though I also saw their point. One has to be careful not to dehumanise whole demographics, because one might lose one's own humanity in the process. And there are complexities. The highest number of foreign sex offenders are from India, followed by Romanians, Poles, Pakistanis, and Afghans. The highest number of rape convictions among foreign perpetrators are Pakistanis, Nigerians and Romanians, followed by Sudanese, Afghans and Indians. Romanians and Poles are not coming in on small boats, and the Nigerians, Sudanese and Pakistanis aren't in the top five nationalities coming over that way either: the top five nationalities arriving by small boat in 2024 were Afghan, Syrian, Iranian, Vietnamese, and Eritrean nationals. You hardly ever hear of problems with the Vietnamese arrivals, yet over a thousand crossed to Britain in the first quarter of 2024 alone, many seeking economic opportunity. But it's also true that small boats and a generally broken immigration system import some people who should not be here and who, in strictly economic and, in some cases social, terms are more trouble than they are worth. It is shameful that so many are in hotels, and then in certain cases prisons, awaiting often overly generous asylum decisions, with little fear of being deported. And those who are seeing increased deportation rates are not those you might expect: it's Romanians, Brazilians and Indians that have seen the biggest jump in returns, according to official statistics. Meanwhile, NHS Business Services has handed out nearly a million 'free passes' to asylum seekers in the last five years. This is 59 per cent of all such passes – well over half – entitling low-income residents to eye tests, free prescriptions, dental care, discounts on spectacles, lenses, and travel to and from appointments. Even wigs are funded by the body. I would dearly wish not to have to worry further about migration, but it is relevant that the three top nationalities arriving on the small boats come from states with cultures and belief systems which might be very different to our own. Back in the studio, as the Reform member stood up for the mothers peacefully protesting alongside the thugs outside the migrant hotel in Epping, the progressive broadcaster did, I think, level another decent point at him. This was that there is surely hypocrisy in on one hand being furious on behalf of women and girls, and on the other supporting Nigel Farage, who has in interviews called the misogynist Andrew Tate an 'important voice' who was giving boys 'perhaps a bit of confidence at school'. Tate is the sort of man no right-minded woman would want to encounter – ever. In a not dissimilar vein, there is Donald Trump, with his unpleasant history of allegedly sexually harassing and insulting women. The Magasphere in general is saturated in atavistic sexism and pound-shop traditionalism, yet its proponents are wasting little time condemning, for instance, the grooming gangs scandal here in Britain. This blew up again in large part because Elon Musk picked up on it. It would clearly be much better if those upset by girls and women being treated as prey by new arrivals into Britain – arrivals who in some cases have no right to be here – also recognised the illiberal misogyny of Andrew Tate. But defending women is defending women, whether it's cynically done or not. Unlike my co-panellist, who is a decent man, for many of these anti-immigration men, it's a mixed picture. This moment of men tussling over who is the real defender of women is not a new one. Using the protection of women as a means of justifying inflammatory or controversial policies was something that Blair and Bush governments were lambasted for after 9/11 when they invaded Afghanistan. Whatever the virtues and demerits of this invasion, it is indisputable that women fared better under US rule in Afghanistan. Before America's calamitous withdrawal, women could freely get education and jobs. Now they can't even show their eyes and hands, or become midwives. And on many other issues, the real culprits, when it comes to promoting harm to women and girls – at least in the last few decades – have been the new, hard Left. This devious Left always seems to favour those who mean women harm. It accuses those who question or God forbid protest the arrival of hundreds of thousands of young men of racism and bigotry but refuses to properly condemn any of the sexual crimes committed by them. To do so, they seem to feel, might start them on the slippery slope to racism, xenophobia, and horror of horrors, Brexitism. You never seem to hear a thing from the Left about the sex crimes visited on the Israeli women who were tortured, killed or kidnapped by Hamas. You only hear about how evil Israel – where women actually have full rights – is. When Salman Abedi set off a bomb at the Manchester Arena, killing 22 and injuring over a thousand, his history – and that of his family – was barely acknowledged by the progressive Left. This outrage was similarly difficult to discern when Abdul Ezedi, who came from Afghanistan in 2016, threw acid at a mother and two children in Clapham, and then killed himself. What was much louder was fury at the 'Islamophobia' said to follow such attacks. On the trans rights issues that have arisen in recent years, the progressive position hasn't just been on the side of the trans cause, it has been, in places, virulently against women. People who swear by their enlightened worldview hurled, and still hurl misogynistic abuse at JK Rowling. They demand that people who are biologically male compete against women in sports competitions. This is all a shame as the Left has a proud pedigree, in and beyond feminism, of championing women. But in its contemporary guise it seems more interested in empowering those who mean women and girls harm. This is hypocritical, unjust and, increasingly, scary.


The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
EU chief's texts to a pharma boss during pandemic were likely erased, the NYT reports
Text messages exchanged between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and a pharmaceutical boss during the COVID-19 pandemic were seen by her top adviser and have likely been destroyed, the New York Times reported Friday. Von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla exchanged the messages as COVID-19 ravaged European communities from Portugal to Finland and the EU scrambled to buy millions of hard to find vaccines. She was under intense scrutiny to deliver. The U.S. newspaper took the European Union's executive branch to court after it refused to share the messages under the bloc's transparency laws. In May, the court said the commission had failed to provide a credible explanation for declining access. In a letter to the Times dated July 28, the commission said von der Leyen's head of cabinet, Bjoern Seibert, had last month examined the phone she uses and its Signal app and 'did not find any messages corresponding to the description given' in the newspaper's request. It said Seibert also checked her phone in 2021 and found the messages only helped to ensure that calls between von der Leyen and Bourla could be arranged as needed, so they were not kept as official documents. The commission insists text messages and other 'ephemeral' electronic communications do not necessarily constitute documents of interest that should be saved or made public. Von der Leyen herself was responsible for deciding whether the texts constituted documents of value and worth keeping. The commission also noted in its letter that her phone has been replaced 'several times' since the messages were exchanged, the last time in mid-2024. Her cabinet said the old messages were not saved and the phones were 'formatted and recycled.' Critics accuse von der Leyen and Seibert of centralizing power in the EU's powerful executive branch, tightly controlling who works in the cabinets of the various policy commissioners and vetting communications. Von der Leyen survived a July 10 no-confidence vote in the European Parliament, the first against a commission president in over a decade, which was called in part over the text messaging scandal dubbed Pfizergate, the alledged misuse of EU funds and doubtful allegations about election interference.


Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Poland signs contract to buy more South Korean battle tanks
WARSAW, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Poland has signed a second multi-billion dollar deal with South Korean industrial and defence group Hyundai Rotem ( opens new tab for the supply of battle tanks, as Poland and NATO allies look to beef up their defences following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. As a leading voice calling for members of NATO to spend more on defence, Poland, which borders Ukraine, Russia and Belarus, has allocated 4.7% of gross domestic product to boosting its armed forces in 2025 with a pledge to increase to 5% in 2026. The latest agreement to buy 180 tanks comes after months of negotiations and is Poland's second major deal with the South Korean company, having in 2022 agreed the purchase of a first batch of 180 K2 tanks. But this new agreement involves a large element of manufacture in Poland as it looks to expand its domestic defence industry. No value was given for the new contract but in early July Hyundai Rotem said in a regulatory filing it was worth $6.5 billion. While the first contract focused on Korean-made vehicles that could be quickly supplied as Poland moves swiftly to boost its military, the second batch grants the Korean arms maker a more permanent foothold in Europe. The Polish Ministry of Defence said on Friday 61 of the tanks in the latest order will be produced at a plant in Gliwice in southern Poland owned by Bumar-Labedny, a company that produces heavy equipment, including for the military. "We wanted to ... send a clear signal that we are building arms plants throughout Poland, that technology transfer applies to everyone, and that the arms industry is the driving force of the Polish economy," Polish Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said in a speech broadcast on YouTube following the signing of the contract. The first deliveries of tanks to Poland are planned for the next year, and Polish production is planned for 2028-2030. The agreement signed also covers the delivery of support vehicles and a training, service, and repair package.