logo
Trump Accounts are the savings solution America's parents need

Trump Accounts are the savings solution America's parents need

The Hill29-06-2025
Congress may soon deliver a little bundle of joy to expecting parents and parents-to-be. The House-passed 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act' contains the seed of a new federal investment program that may blossom into opportunity and financial security for millions of American children in the future. Fiscal conservatives have reasons to get on board.
President Trump has formally introduced his plan for the federal government to fund $1,000 in investment accounts for every child born over the next four years. The cash would be deposited into a private custodial account and grow tax-free until he or she reaches adulthood.
Parents, churches, charities and employers can also contribute up to $5,000 a year to the account. At age 18, the young adult gains access to half of the funds to be used for college or skills training, to start a business, or even for a down payment on a home.
Trump Accounts are a marked improvement from the baby bonuses floated last year. Most fundamentally, Trump Accounts reflect a shift in the purpose and outcomes of family-supporting policies. The downstream effects will be minor on the budget but major for the economy and society, such that these accounts should earn broad conservative support.
This plan promotes saving as a virtue that every American can adopt from birth. Different from the yeoman's goal of turning around our declining birth rate, these investment accounts are future-focused. Trump Accounts would democratize investing through its inclusivity. Open to every U.S.-born child with parents who have Social Security numbers with work authorization, children of all income levels and stripes would have skin in the investment game.
While about two out of three Americans currently own stock and retirement accounts, according to Gallup polling, they tend to be degree holders and higher earners. Only 38 percent of Hispanics, 52 percent of Blacks and 28 percent of those earning below $50,000 participate in the stock market. Trump Accounts would skyrocket market participation.
Young Americans would also gain a lesson in financial stewardship. In a culture that thrives on living for the moment, a generation of children would reap the benefits of patience and delayed gratification.
Many parents would rather a one-time $5,000 check or a tax refund bump. However, families are well cared for in Trump's big, beautiful bill. Lowered income tax rates are made permanent, and the doubled Child Tax Credit increased by $500 for the next few years. Additionally, 529 plans are expanded significantly to cover more out-of-pocket K-12 costs, on-the-job training and continuing education.
Trump Accounts would complement 529 plans. Children from poor and working-class backgrounds with little means to invest in 529s would gain access to a government-funded seed account. Brad Gerstner of Invest America posited that, with just $750 of additional savings per year, these accounts would swell to $50,000 by age 18.
By focusing on saving for the future, Trump Accounts blunt inflationary fears and shrink fiscal impacts. Vice President JD Vance proposed a $5,000 baby bonus as a candidate, which Trump supported. Based on the most recent data from the National Center for Health Statistics, there were about 3.6 million births in 2023. A $5,000 baby bonus would have cost roughly $18 billion a year, whereas Trump Accounts are not likely to exceed $3 billion annually. These accounts are also time-limited, from Jan. 1, 2025, to Jan. 1, 2029, although the accounts may be renewed.
I sympathize with supporters of baby bonuses as a policy solution to reversing our declining fertility rates. Demographic changes of fewer babies and longer life expectancies are stressing our Social Security system. However, baby bonuses have been tried in other countries with mixed results at best.
A few thousand dollars is not enough to lure willing adults to procreate. The cost of raising a child from birth to age 17 on average is about $297,000. Children are costly. I know; I have three of them. From cribs to diapers, prenatal vitamins to formula, and child care to sports teams, our expenses compound daily.
I view Trump Accounts as a solution to a different problem: the affordability crisis. Young people feel priced out of generational milestones such as homeownership. Turning age 18 with meaningful savings would help younger people break into the housing market sooner.
The funds could also serve as the capital to spur a new generation of entrepreneurs. When traditional bank loans are not an option for young or risky borrowers, funds from these Trump accounts could purchase tools and equipment, a vehicle, or supplies to get started with one's own endeavor. These future property owners and business owners will pay it forward through the fruits of their ingenuity and hard work.
Some sort of family-supporting policy was guaranteed to be part of the big, beautiful bill. Investment accounts that spread the virtue of saving, democratize investing and promise future economic growth are a generational hand up. That is far better than a handout wrapped up in swaddling clothes.
Patrice Onwuka is the director of Independent Women's Center for Economic Opportunity.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Same-sex marriage is no threat to religious liberty
Same-sex marriage is no threat to religious liberty

Boston Globe

time19 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Same-sex marriage is no threat to religious liberty

This is the ridiculous accusation being made by Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk. In 2015, she was briefly jailed for contempt of court after she refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples as required by law. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up She is asking the Supreme Court, with a more staunchly conservative bench than the one that codified same-sex marriage, to rule that federally recognized unions between two men or two women threaten 'her sincerely held religious beliefs on marriage,' according to her lawyers. Advertisement Davis's challenge to Obergefell stems from her appeal of a $100,000 jury verdict plus $260,000 for attorney fees that she was ordered to pay to the gay couple to whom she denied a marriage license. The nine justices have not yet decided whether to review Davis's appeal. Davis is being represented by the Liberty Counsel, a conservative legal group that specializes in religious liberty cases. In 2018, the group won a 7-2 Supreme Court decision that ruled in favor of a Advertisement In a statement, Mat Staver, the Liberty Counsel's founder and chairman, said the Davis case 'underscores why the U.S. Supreme Court should overturn the wrongly decided Obergefell v. Hodges opinion because it threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman.' Davis herself has entered that sacred union four times with three men. For last year's 20th anniversary of the Goodridge decision that legalized same-sex marriage in Massachusetts, After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, Justice Clarence Thomas ticked off a list of other After Roe was outlawed, 'I remember thinking 'Oh my God, is it possible that all of the rights and privileges that we've won as a community, whether it's women's or LGBTQ rights, will be washed away in the same lifetime in which we won them?'' Julie Goodridge, one of the plaintiffs in the Massachusetts case, told me. There's Advertisement But we're also witnessing the most tumultuous era in modern politics, when things we once believed impossible have now become as commonplace as they are alarming. The end of Roe proved that our civil rights are not sacrosanct. Opponents of reproductive rights chipped away at abortion access for decades until the political climate was primed to erase what had been considered settled law for nearly 50 years. So far, Trump hasn't mentioned Davis's appeal. That could change if the Supreme Court adds her case to its upcoming docket, but perhaps this White House may already be quietly tipping its hand. In 2022, Joe Biden signed into law the Respect for Marriage Act, which requires all states to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. But on the official White House website, instead of remarks from Biden officials about protecting same-sex marriage, there's now only a Here's hoping that a year from now, my friends, and every LGBTQ couple, will still have weddings and anniversaries to celebrate. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at

Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?
Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Boston Globe

time19 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Two decades on, Krauthammer's coinage has been appropriated, rebranded, and defined down — way down. 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is now flung at anyone who objects to President Trump's conduct or opposes his policies. The term is no longer reserved for over-the-top expressions of revulsion — like actor Robert De Niro using a televised appearance at the Tony Awards to Advertisement No — today 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is used as an all-purpose put-down to deride any Trump critics, including those who stick to serious, fact-based analysis. I've lost count of all the times I've been Advertisement A woman seen at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on July 3, when President Trump was speaking there. Scott Olson/Getty The word 'syndrome' notwithstanding, this is merely political trash talk, popularized by Trump and his allies as a way to wave off criticism without having to engage it. Instead of refuting arguments or defending policy, the magic letters 'TDS' turn disagreement into proof of mental defect. Yet if 'derangement' means the loss of proportion and judgment Krauthammer was getting at, then the most severe cases aren't among Trump's critics. They're in the ranks of his most ardent loyalists. The real Trump Derangement Syndrome shows up in three telltale symptoms. First is the cult-like worship that treats Trump as infallible — his acolytes profess adoration not only for what he does, but for whatever could flow from him. Emblematic of that mindset are the Advertisement Second is the abandonment of principles that once seemed non-negotiable. Conservatives and Republicans who used to champion free trade A man with a MAGA tattoo on his stomach attended a rally at Macomb Community College in Warren, Mich., to mark President Trump's 100th day in office on April 29. EMILY ELCONIN/NYT Third is the unsettling delight so many supporters take in Trump's most outrageous behavior — a kind of giddy worship that equates offensiveness with authenticity. Such brazenness has been a hallmark of his political career — from mocking John McCain's Vietnam War heroism to charging undocumented immigrants with ' Advertisement Meanwhile, they reflexively use 'TDS!' as a go-to put-down for anything from mild disagreement to serious moral critique, framing opposition not as argument but as pathology — an easy, cheap discredit. Yes, plenty of Trump-haters go overboard — but in MAGA circles, the 'TDS' tag is sprayed far wider, hitting thoughtful critics just as readily as the genuinely unhinged. What is truly alarming is how some have sought to legalize that insult by casting dissent as disease. In Minnesota this spring, five Republican senators proposed a bill that would Krauthammer's original point in 2003 was that derangement is the breakdown of proportion and prudence. That breakdown isn't found among critics who quote Trump accurately and challenge his claims. The most alarming political derangement today affects those who cannot conceive that there are legitimate reasons to be appalled by the president, and so explain anti-Trump dissent as a sign of mental weakness. If reason is the measure, then those who shout 'TDS!' the loudest are the ones most in need of treatment. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at

On This Day, Aug. 17: Turkish earthquake kills thousands
On This Day, Aug. 17: Turkish earthquake kills thousands

UPI

time20 minutes ago

  • UPI

On This Day, Aug. 17: Turkish earthquake kills thousands

1 of 5 | On August 17, 1999, an earthquake in a densely populated region of northwestern Turkey killed at least 17,000 people and injured about 40,000. UPI File Photo | License Photo Aug. 17 (UPI) -- On this date in history: In 1807, Robert Fulton began the first American steamboat trip between Albany, N.Y., and New York City. In 1915, a hurricane struck Galveston, Texas, killing 275 people. In 1946, George Orwell publishes Animal Farm. In 1969, the Woodstock music festival ended after three days on a 600-acre farm in Bethel, N.Y. In 1978, Ben Abruzzo, Maxie Anderson and Larry Newman completed the first crossing of the Atlantic Ocean by balloon, landing their helium-filled Double Eagle II near Paris. In 1987, Rudolf Hess, Hitler's former deputy, was found strangled in Berlin's Spandau Prison. He was 93. In 1996, the Reform Party nominated Texas businessman Ross Perot for president. He would go on to lose the 1996 general election with 18.9 percent of the popular vote and zero electoral votes. President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, won with 43 percent of the popular vote and 370 electoral votes. Republican George H.W. Bush lost his re-election bid with 37.4 percent of the popular vote and 168 electoral votes. File Photo by Chip Somodevilla/UPI In 1998, addressing the American people, U.S. President Bill Clinton said he had a relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky that was "not appropriate." In 1999, an earthquake in a densely populated region of northwestern Turkey killed at least 17,000 people and injured about 40,000. In 2017, a man drove a van into a group of pedestrians in Barcelona, Spain, killing 14 people and injuring another 130 people. The driver killed a 15th person in a carjacking while fleeing the scene. In a related attack hours later, a group of terrorists drove into more civilians, killing a 16th person. All told, eight attackers were also killed. In 2019, an explosion at a Kabul, Afghanistan, wedding hall killed at least 63 people. The Islamic State claimed responsibility. File Photo by Jawad Jalali/EPA-EFE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store