logo
Medical Academy students gain hands-on experience at Ascension Sacred Heart Bay

Medical Academy students gain hands-on experience at Ascension Sacred Heart Bay

Yahoo28-03-2025

BAY COUNTY, Fla. (WMBB) – When Dr. John Wade retired from medicine 12 years ago, he wanted to create a program for students to learn about healthcare. That's when the Medical Academy at Mosley High School was born.
'They do human biology, human anatomy. And then we do internships where they rotate into clinics and hospitals. They meet doctors, they do procedures. We have premium morning where they meet every morning at 7:00 and they have to do dissection,' Mosley High School Pre-Med Director Dr. John Wade said.
But Dr. Wade says this is more than just teaching medicine; it's about building future leaders.
JCSO arrests suspect after shots fired from vehicle near Grand Ridge
'Not only have we become really proficient in medicine and anatomy and health care, but also in leading groups of people and being empathetic about our leadership and helping engage others,' Mosley High School Senior Chase Peterson said.
50 of his students visited Ascension Sacred Heart Bay Friday. They toured the cath lab, where they saw doctors inserting catheters into a heart attack patient. They saw doctors reading and using x-rays in radiology.
Students learn how to perform CPR at the Regional Educational Lab, and they saw how they treat trauma patients in the emergency room.
'It was really cool. Just like seeing in person, like, you know, all the stuff you just see on TV and like seeing it in real life,' Mosley High School Senior Yva Toole said.
The in-person experience helps students decide if a career in medicine is in their future, and it helps Ascension connect with future employees.
'They are truly our workforce, they're our future. They're the ones that 10 years from now will be staffing the hospital as a nurse, x-ray tech, cardiovascular tech, surgical tech, and even on a path to medical school. So it's so important that we invest in them and their future,' Ascension Sacred Heart Bay President & CEO Robin Godwin said.
Panama City Beach's 7th annual UNwineD event offers food and fun
'I've already saw two of our students are already working in the hospital who was in our program,' Wade said.
The Medical Academy has grown from the original 10 students to more than 150 today.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Missouri's Historic Abortion Victory Is Crumbling Before Our Eyes
Missouri's Historic Abortion Victory Is Crumbling Before Our Eyes

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Missouri's Historic Abortion Victory Is Crumbling Before Our Eyes

Just a few months ago, Missouri voters approved a ballot measure to protect abortion rights. That measure, known as Amendment 3, added a 'reproductive freedom' amendment to the state constitution. It was crafted to offer stronger legal protections for abortion than existed under Roe v. Wade, according to campaigners, and to end the state's near-total abortion ban, which had been triggered by the Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe. Those who voted for it believed that the amendment would allow them to override such past anti-abortion court rulings and to block anti-abortion lawmakers' future efforts—in essence, to reclaim their own rights and political voice. But as of May 27, by way of a two-page order from the state's Supreme Court, the abortion ban voters had been told they defeated was back. The ruling came as a 'surprise' to pro-choice and anti-abortion groups alike, the Missouri Independent reported this week. With it, the Supreme Court of Missouri has effectively allowed the state to enforce a raft of anti-abortion laws that had been challenged by two Planned Parenthood affiliates, which argued that such laws now violated the state constitution, thanks to Amendment 3. After last week's ruling, Planned Parenthood health centers in the state—Missouri's only abortion clinics—canceled upcoming appointments and advised patients that they could instead go to neighboring Kansas or Illinois, where abortion is legal. For now, those patients, and any Missourian who needs an abortion, have found themselves right back where they would have been had Amendment 3 never been on the ballot. The sudden loss of abortion access is an inarguable blow for Missouri's reproductive rights movement. But it's also something more troubling: a sign of flaws in the post-Roe strategy chosen by large national reproductive rights groups like Planned Parenthood and state chapters and affiliates of such groups, including the ACLU and Reproductive Freedom for All (formerly NARAL). For these groups, abortion rights ballot measures have been seen as a path forward in a hostile legal environment, a way to restore access without relying on the courts. Campaigns would go direct to the people, giving energized supporters a tangible goal to work toward, along with some optimism, amid an otherwise crushing assault on reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy. The speed with which Missouri's ballot measure has gone from being a historic victory to yet another legal battle reveals that such election night wins may prove to be far more qualified and complicated to hold onto than campaigners had hoped. For some advocates in Missouri who had worked on Amendment 3, however, there was nothing all that surprising in the state Supreme Court's ruling. They saw it as a reality check. 'There is no way to responsibly sugarcoat what's playing out in the state,' the What's Next for Missouri coalition told me in a statement from the group. The coalition was founded by longtime Missouri reproductive justice advocates, as well as former staff of Planned Parenthood affiliates in Missouri who quit over their concerns about the ballot measure. 'Amendment 3 was a limited and symbolic win,' the coalition said. 'In reality, it has failed to protect pregnant people's bodily autonomy. Inaccessible abortion is just the tip of the iceberg.' Voters in Missouri may have declared that abortion was their constitutional right, but abortion was not going to return overnight to Missouri. In November, state Attorney General Andrew Bailey offered his legal opinion on which anti-abortion laws might still be enforceable. After stating that Amendment 3 'just barely' won by a 'tight margin,' he opined that 'the result may be very different if a future constitutional amendment is put up for a vote,' and detailed circumstances in which he believed some of the laws could still be enforced. In other words, he was not going to accept that Amendment 3 automatically invalidated state anti-abortion laws—and to be fair, the Amendment 3 campaign seems to have anticipated just such a reaction. Not long after the election, the two Planned Parenthood affiliates that have health centers in Missouri challenged many of those laws as 'presumptively unconstitutional,' citing Amendment 3. Their petition, filed in the circuit court of Jackson County by Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri, also requested that the court temporarily block such laws while the case played out. That included the total abortion ban triggered after Roe, as well as laws meant to restrict abortion access even if it were not technically banned, such as mandatory waiting periods and mandatory ultrasounds. In a pair of rulings in December and February, Judge Jerri Zhang granted the affiliates' request for a temporary injunction on most of those laws, after which Planned Parenthood clinics in Missouri began to offer abortion again, with significant limits: only procedural abortion up to 12 or 13 weeks, no medication abortion, in just three clinics across the entire state, operating at limited capacity. Other restrictions remained, including some that were not part of Planned Parenthood's challenge. Mandatory parental involvement laws were later challenged by the practical abortion support organization Right By You, in April. There were also restrictions that Amendment 3 did not touch: The ballot measure allows for abortion to be banned past fetal viability, the legal line after which a fetus is thought to be able to survive independently. This means that people having later abortions were left out of the promises of Amendment 3 from the start. Missouri Attorney General Bailey appealed Judge Zhang's decision, seeking to block abortion in the state during the court challenge—an appeal enabled by a new law giving the state attorney such power to sue to halt injunctions, signed just days before. Meanwhile, the Missouri General Assembly voted to put a new abortion ban on the ballot, an effort to overturn Amendment 3. The constitutional right protecting abortion that voters believed they had succeeded in installing was being rapidly undermined across multiple fronts—by the state attorney general, in the courts, and in the legislature. This legal undermining depends in part on voters not knowing that it's even happening. The proposed anti-abortion ballot measure language did not refer to Amendment 3, nor to banning abortion, hiding its ban behind claims of ensuring women's 'safety during abortions.' For good measure, it added a ban on gender-affirming care for minors—care that is currently banned in the state. Democrats in the state legislature had tried to block the anti-abortion ballot measure proposal from advancing, but Republicans broke their filibuster with 'a rare procedural maneuver to shut down debate and force a vote on a measure that would repeal Amendment 3,' as St. Louis Public Radio reported. Amendment 3 campaign leaders forcefully denounced both the new ballot measure and the legislature's underhanded attempt to reverse the will of Missouri voters. 'This deceptive amendment is a trojan horse to reinstate Missouri's total abortion ban,' Tori Schafer, director of policy and campaigns at the ACLU of Missouri, said in a statement. At protests on the steps of the state Capitol in Jefferson City, Amendment 3 supporters were now fighting to hang onto their victory, as they have had to many times this session. 'This past November, more than 1.5 million Missourians made their voices heard at the ballot box,' Mallory Schwarz, executive director of Abortion Action Missouri, said. 'Missourians are used to fighting back and are prepared to keep showing up.' Two weeks later, abortion access in the state would be all but nonexistent again, after Missouri Supreme Court Chief Justice Mary Russell ordered Judge Zhang to vacate her temporary injunction and to reevaluate the Planned Parenthood affiliates' request, this time using a stricter standard. The ACLU of Missouri, which is co-counsel in the legal challenge, told The New Republic that it had 'immediately' responded to the order by sending correspondence to the court, 'highlighting that our arguments met this standard.' Tom Bastian, ACLU of Missouri director of communications, added that while the group 'can't predict when the court will act, we anticipate new orders … granting the preliminary injunctions blocking the ban and restrictions, once again allowing Missourians access to abortion care.' For now, then, those Missourians will be doing what they did before election night, before Dobbs: going out of state or self-managing their abortion with pills. In this, the reality for abortion in Missouri looks a lot like it did back when the near-total ban passed. The difference is that now more than $30 million has been spent on a ballot measure meant to reverse that ban. As the legal scholar Mary Ziegler pointed out this week, it is possible that Missourians' abortion rights will prevail, that Planned Parenthood will get its injunction, or even that the new anti-abortion ballot measure may fail. However, as she wrote, 'what is happening in Missouri is still a sign about the limits of ballot measures.' Advocates in other states should be asking: What is such a 'win' worth? The legal battle over Amendment 3 is nothing new, as Planned Parenthood's initial filing in this legal challenge acknowledged. 'The State of Missouri has spent decades attempting to eliminate or severely reduce abortion access,' its petition stated. 'This means that Plaintiffs have spent decades challenging these laws.' The lengths that Missouri lawmakers have been willing to go since the election, unfortunately, indicate that this is not a fair fight in fair courts. 'It's time for simple honesty,' What's Next said to me this week. People will have unreliable and irregular access to abortion 'until we shift power away from fascist politicians.' The reality is that this fight for the constitutional right to abortion was playing out at the same time that our constitutional rights were being ignored and undermined on a regular basis. Before we fundraise millions more dollars to replicate the fight in other states—fundraising that will be justified as 'restoring' access to abortion by making it a right—we might consider other, more immediate ways to give people what they need. That money might be better spent on paying for actual abortions, as abortion funds across the country do, helping people in the many states with abortion bans to access care. In a legal system that cannot be counted upon, there may be no more direct way of supporting a fundamental right.

6 "Bad" High-Protein Foods You Should Eat to Gain Muscle If You Have Diabetes, According to Dietitians
6 "Bad" High-Protein Foods You Should Eat to Gain Muscle If You Have Diabetes, According to Dietitians

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

6 "Bad" High-Protein Foods You Should Eat to Gain Muscle If You Have Diabetes, According to Dietitians

Reviewed by Dietitian Karen Ansel, M.S., RDNProtein can help build muscle, improve insulin sensitivity and help manage blood sugar. Some high-protein foods have been unfairly categorized as off-limits for diabetes. Dietitians say many of these muscle-building proteins may have diabetes you've been diagnosed with diabetes, it can often feel like you're on a diet of don'ts. A nagging voice in your head might constantly warn you away from a slew of foods that are high in sugar, carbs or even fat. Yet many foods traditionally thought of as 'bad' for diabetes are actually loaded with high-quality protein that can help you build muscle. And since more muscle mass means better insulin sensitivity and a stronger, faster metabolism, getting plenty of protein is a key part of a healthy diabetes diet. If you have diabetes and have been avoiding these protein-rich foods, dietitians say it's time to welcome them back to the table. Depending on the nutrition advice you've received, you might believe that eating anything but low-fat dairy is a big no-no for diabetes. But diabetes expert Erin Palinski-Wade, RD, CDCES, says a higher fat percentage in yogurt isn't as worrisome as you might think. 'People with diabetes are often told to opt for non-fat dairy,' she says. However, full-fat Greek yogurt's combo of slowly-digested fat plus roughly 21 grams of protein per cup can make it a filling option that helps stabilize blood sugar, she says. In fact, some studies have shown people who consume more calories from dairy fat may have a lower risk of diabetes, especially when compared to calories from carbohydrates. Gone are the days when health experts recommended steering clear of nuts due to their fat content. Current evidence shows that nuts are an excellent choice in a diabetes-friendly diet. One top-notch option: pistachios. 'Pistachios can be a good plant-based protein source for people with diabetes,' says Palinski-Wade. A 2-ounce serving of pistachios delivers roughly 12 grams of protein. One small study found that volunteers with prediabetes who consumed 2 daily ounces of pistachios (1 ounce before breakfast and another ounce before dinner) for 12 weeks experienced improvements in blood sugar, visceral fat and markers of heart health. Despite its generally positive reputation, shellfish has received criticism for its high cholesterol content, says Sheri Gaw, RDN, CDCES. This has led some people with diabetes (and, therefore, increased risk of heart disease) to avoid shellfish like crab, clams, shrimp and oysters. However, Gaw says people with diabetes can say yes to shellfish on a regular basis. 'Shellfish is a low-saturated fat, high-quality protein that promotes blood sugar control,' she explains. There's more good news. One study found that two weekly servings of fish or shellfish may help protect people with a history of cardiovascular disease from future cardiac events and cardiovascular disease-related death. Try a 3-ounce serving of canned crab for 15 grams of protein. Believe it or not, beef can be beneficial for health, even for people with diabetes. It all comes down to choosing the right cut. While fatty cuts aren't advised, Gaw says the high protein content of a lean cut of beef like chuck, sirloin, round or top loin can help build muscle while keeping dietary fat to a minimum. Three ounces of trimmed sirloin steak, for example, contains roughly 17 grams of protein with a reasonable 3 grams of saturated fat. Ever heard that soy is a bad actor for your health? While rumors abound that soy increases breast cancer risk, impairs mineral absorption or adversely affects male sex hormones, research has shown that these soy myths simply aren't true., , Truth is, soy is actually a healthy choice for muscle-building, especially if you prefer a plant-based meal plan. 'Soy foods are sometimes avoided for containing phytoestrogens and being processed, but foods like tofu are a great source of plant-based protein,' says diabetes expert Vandana Sheth, RDN, CDCES. 'Tofu contains all the essential amino acids and supports muscle growth without blood sugar spikes.' One cup of cubed tofu contains an impressive 18 grams of protein. When it comes to diabetes, there's a lot of confusion around beans and lentils. Their relatively high carb content can give the impression that they're off-limits for people with blood sugar issues. But Shah says these legumes have a unique saving grace, specifically their fiber. 'While they are higher in carbs, they have a lower glycemic load because of their high fiber content,' she explains. This means they won't raise your blood sugar quickly. In fact, many dietitians consider beans to be among the best high-fiber foods for diabetes. Try a cup of cooked lentils for 18 grams of plant-based protein plus a bonus 16 grams of blood sugar-regulating fiber. As beneficial as protein is, you need to combine it with resistance training to effectively build muscle. The resulting increased lean mass can deliver a surprising number of diabetes-related health benefits, like these: Better blood sugar control. Muscle is where the majority of glucose uptake happens, says Palinski-Wade. 'This means that having more muscle mass makes it easier for the body to use glucose after eating, improving blood sugar control,' she adds. Easier weight management. Muscle burns more calories than fat, so having more muscle can help with weight management, an important aspect of diabetes care, Sheth says. Improved insulin sensitivity. Protein's ability to help with weight management may also prevent the buildup of visceral fat, the harmful fat that wraps around your internal organs, says Palinski-Wade. Research has found that reducing visceral fat may promote better insulin sensitivity. If you're living with diabetes, it may be time to rethink your go-to list of high-protein foods. Research reveals that lean protein may help build muscle, manage weight, and improve insulin sensitivity and blood sugar control. Dietitians say that some of the high-protein foods people with diabetes sometimes avoid–such as full-fat yogurt, nuts, shellfish, beef, soy, beans and lentils—can actually be a part of a healthy eating plan for diabetes and can help build the muscle you need. If you could use more muscle-building strategies, check out our 7-Day Bodyweight Training Plan for Beginners, Created by Certified Trainers. Read the original article on EATINGWELL

Jackson County Sheriff's Office hosting its next Teen Driver Challenge
Jackson County Sheriff's Office hosting its next Teen Driver Challenge

Yahoo

time30-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Jackson County Sheriff's Office hosting its next Teen Driver Challenge

JACKSON COUNTY, Fla. (WMBB) – The Jackson County Sheriff's Office has announced its next Teen Driver Challenge for Friday, June 20. According to a Jackson County Sheriff's Office Facebook post, the course will start at 8 a.m. at the Jackson County Ag Center on Highway 90. The course is free to any teen driver with a learner's permit or driver's license and will be taught by the School Resource Deputies. JCSO said that the course will teach young drivers the nuts and bolts of safe driving, the dangers of texting and driving, how to change a tire, how to check their oil, hands-on experience behind the wheel with instructors and more. Those who are interested in signing up and want to secure their spot need to email teendriver@ as soon as possible. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store