Goa vigilance department suspends chief town planner pending ‘disciplinary proceeding'
'Now, therefore, the Governor of Goa, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 10 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, hereby places said Rajesh J Naik, the Chief Town Planner (Planning), Town and Country Planning Department, Panaji – Goa, under suspension with immediate effect,' the order said.
The suspension comes over two months after a petition was filed in the High Court of Bombay at Goa by some environmental activists. The petitioners sought disciplinary action against the chief town planner for allegedly causing loss of several crores to the exchequer by undervaluing assessment fees for the correction of a zone change of a plot under the contentious section 17 (2) of the Goa TCP Act.
The petitioners also sought directions to the state to initiate an inquiry to ascertain the loss caused to the exchequer in the assessment of fees in respect of 120 cases published in the official Gazette for change in zoning under section 17 (2) since April 2024. The activists had also lodged a complaint with the police and vigilance department in February in this regard.
Last month, the state government informed the HC that it found 46 beneficiaries of zone change wherein the fees for correction was underassessed. The state had said that a preliminary inquiry had been initiated by the vigilance department and a report would be submitted to the HC.
Rajesh J Naik did not respond to calls for a comment.
In October last year, members of several citizens' collectives, civil society and villages across the state had staged a protest outside the office of the Town and Country Planning department demanding Naik's resignation. The people had alleged that the chief town planner 'approved, endorsed and signed on' conversion of lakhs of square metres of land in the state under some contentious changes in land use laws, including under section 17 (2) and section 39 (A) of the TCP Act, causing severe damage to the coastal state's ecology.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Will Old Pension Scheme benefits be given to these government employees? Here's what finance ministry says
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills What does OM No. 57/05/2021-P&PW(B) say? SBI employees' eligibility for Old Pension Scheme What is Old Pension Scheme (OPS)? What is National Pension System (NPS)? There have been continuous attempts by central government employees whose appointments were done on the basis of vacancies advertised before implementation of NPS , that they should be allowed to get Old Pension Scheme . This question was raised in Lok Sabha to which the government Finance Ministry has said that Old Pension Scheme (OPS) benefits won't be extended to central government employees who were appointed against the vacancies advertised before the issuing of the notification of National Pension System (NPS) on December 22, Chaudhary, Minister of State for Finance, said in a Lok Sabha session on Tuesday (August 13, 2025) that in light of various court judgements, the government had issued instructions vide OM No. 57/05/2021-P&PW(B) dated 03.03.2023, giving a one-time option to central government civil employees for inclusion under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021).Also Read: Old Pension Scheme benefits in UPS: Central Govt employees can claim OPS benefits in Unified Pension Scheme for these cases The minister clarified that no proposal is under consideration for extended OPS benefits to such employees, whether they are employed in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) or Public Sector a memorandum dated March 3, 2023, Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare said that in consultation with the Department of Personnel & Training, Department of Expenditure and Department of Legal Affairs, in the light of the various representations/references and decisions of Hon'ble Courts, issued instructions vide OM No. 57/04/2019-P&PW(B) dated 17.02.2020, giving a one-time option to Central Government employees who were declared successful for recruitment in the results declared on or before December 31, 2003, against vacancies which occurred before January 01, 2004, and were covered under the National Pension System on joining service on after January 01, 2004, to be covered under the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 (now 2021). There was a fixed time schedule for different activities under the aforesaid OM dated Read: Central government employees, in NPS, can choose OPS under certain conditions; Check eligibility, forms to submit Chaudhary was referring to the query of Dharamvira Gandhi, a member of Parliament from the Patiala constituency, who also asked whether the government ensures that all the employees of State Bank of India , whose recruitment process was conducted before August 1, 2010, but whose appointments were delayed due to unavoidable circumstances and took place after August 1, 2010, are also included in the Old Pension Scheme?Chaudhary said, 'As per the State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Regulations, 2014, the old pension will not be applicable to those who joined the services of SBI on or after 01.08.2010.'Old Pension Scheme (OPS) is an age-old pension system in India that dates to the 19th century. It went through many changes ever since and got its present form post independence in 1947. The striking change was when the retirement age was increased from 58 to 60. The scheme provides a defined pension at retirement. It also has the features of pension commutation and family scheme was discontinued by the central government in January 2004 and replaced with New Pension System (NPS). However, many states still follow Old Pension Scheme (OPS).NPS replaced OPS for central government employees on January 1, 2004. It is a defined contribution system where employees get market-linked returns. Unlike OPS, it doesn't provide a defined pension. Central government employees can open a Tier I NPS account. At 60 years of age, they can withdraw up to 60 per cent of their corpus as a lump sum amount. From the remaining amount, they need to purchase an annuity plan, which provides them a monthly pension.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Stray Dogs Being Picked Up Even Though SC Order Not Uploaded, CJI Told. His Response
Last Updated: Supreme Court urged to intervene as Delhi-NCR civic authorities begin relocating stray dogs before official order is posted. CJI Gavai to review the situation. An urgent appeal was made to the Supreme Court on Wednesday, following its recent directive on relocating stray dogs in the Delhi-NCR region, stating that the civic authorities have already started removing community dogs, even though the official court order had not yet been uploaded. Advocate Garima Sharma informed the bench of Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran that local authorities had already started to relocate dogs, even though the official Supreme Court order from August 11 had not yet been posted online, LiveLaw reported. CJI Gavai noted that he would look into the matter. In her argument, she cited an earlier judgment by Justices JK Maheshwari and Sanjay Karol opposed the 'indiscriminate killing of canines." Earlier today, another matter relating to stray dogs was mentioned before the CJI for urgent listing. The petition was filed by an organisation named Conference for Human Rights (India) in 2024, challenging a Delhi High Court's order in its PIL seeking directions for sterilisation and vaccination of community dogs in Delhi as per the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, LiveLaw report said. While hearing a suo motu case into rising dog-bite incidents in the national capital region, the apex court on Monday issued strong directions to the Delhi civic body to round up stray dogs, sterilise them, and move them permanently to shelters, noting that the order should be enforced strictly to make New Delhi and its adjoining National Capital Region (NCR) safe. Calling the stray dog menace 'extremely grim", the top court ordered the authorities to permanently relocate all strays from streets to shelters 'at the earliest", and warned of strict action against anyone obstructing the drive. The bench also instructed civic bodies to build shelter capacity for at least 5,000 dogs as an immediate step, hire staff for sterilisation and vaccination, install CCTV in shelters, create a helpline for bite reports, and consider a dedicated task force. This ruling applies to Delhi, Noida, Gurugram, and Ghaziabad, and covers both sterilised and unsterilised animals. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Decision is correct: Abu Azmi backs SCs order on relocation of stray dogs
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], August 13 (ANI): Maharashtra Samajwadi Party president Abu Asim Azmi on Wednesday backed the Supreme Court's order to relocate stray dogs, stating that the decision was 'very correct" as dog bites often lead to serious medical treatment, including 14 injections.'This decision is very correct… People with pet dogs often find their dogs biting people on the road. People love dogs and often carry them in their cars. When a dog bites, 14 injections are needed… However, when we bring a goat into our house, they become very sad, even though the goat never bites…" Azmi told ANI. Earlier in the day, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai stated that he would examine the ongoing issue related to the relocation of the dogs after an advocate mentioned the matter and said that different benches of the Supreme Court had issued conflicting directions. The matter relating to stray dogs was mentioned before a bench headed by the CJI for urgent listing, to which the CJI said, 'I will look into this."Advocate Nanita Sharma said two benches of the apex court have passed different orders on the stray dogs issue.'This is with regard to the community dogs issue… There is an earlier judgment of this court, of a bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Sanjay Karol, which says there cannot be indiscriminate killing of canines and that compassion for all living beings has to be there," the lawyer was referring to the recent order passed by a bench headed by Justice JB Pardiwala, where the court had ordered relocation of the stray dogs in Delhi to dog shelters and another order passed by a Justice JK Maheshwari-led bench in May 2024, whereby the petitions relating to the stray dog issue were relegated to the respective High Courts. Justice Maheshwari had said, 'Under all circumstances, there cannot be any indiscriminate killings of canines and the authorities have to take action in terms of the mandate and spirit of the prevalent legislation(s) in place".Sharma today mentioned the petition filed by an organisation named Conference for Human Rights (India), challenging a Delhi High Court's order in its PIL seeking directions for sterilisation and vaccination of community dogs in Delhi as per the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules. (ANI)
