Watch out black cabs! Tesla's Robotaxi has arrived in London
A new video posted on X shows a Tesla Model 3 being driven around London (almost) completely hands-free; the software shown is what Tesla describes as 'Full Self Driving (Supervised)' – or autonomous Level 2 in more official terms – meaning a person needs to sit in the driver's seat in order to take control in case of something going awry. Advertisement - Article continues below
Elon Musk's EV brand says the cars used within this test share the same hardware as those that consumers can buy; the self-driving functionality is provided via a special software update. The software also enables the car to autonomously navigate an unmapped car park using AI – much like the Autopilot 'Summon' function that's only available in the United States.
If you prefer to drive yourself, our Find A Car service can help you find top deals on a new or used Tesla Model 3 ...
The video also shows the Model 3 taking on the infamous Magic Roundabout in Swindon without any intervention from the driver. Tesla says the software is ready to go, although current Government legislation only permits testing for now, with self-driving taxi services allowed in the UK from next year in trial form. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
All of this signals that we could potentially see Tesla's Robotaxi service launch in the UK in the next couple of years; this has already soft-launched in Texas using modified versions of the Tesla Model Y SUV. Much like the test in the UK, these require a supervisor to be present, although they will eventually be replaced by the fully autonomous Tesla Cybercab, which was shown in London last year.
Tesla has said, however, that it expects its Full Self Driving (Supervised) tech to go live in Europe later this year, meaning while you may not be able to hail an autonomous Tesla taxi, owners will be able to try the tech for themselves.
With Uber also set to launch its own self-driving taxi service in London in Spring next year, the UK Government recently launched its consultation on self-driving vehicles, asking the industry and public to provide their own views.
Future of Roads Minister, Lilian Greenwood, dubbed self-driving vehicles 'one of the most exciting opportunities to improve transport for so many people, especially those in rural areas or unable to drive'.
She added: 'We want to work with passengers and industry to make this new form of transport safe and accessible, as we take our next steps towards adoption.'
Come and join our WhatsApp channel for the latest car news and reviews...
Find a car with the experts Dacia's baby EV due in 12 months with a tiny £15k price tag
Dacia's baby EV due in 12 months with a tiny £15k price tag
Dacia's new model will be developed in double-quick time, and it'll be built in Europe to avoid China tariffs MG4 and MGS5 EV prices slashed in reply to Government Electric Car Grant
MG4 and MGS5 EV prices slashed in reply to Government Electric Car Grant
In order to boost sales, MG is announcing its own a £1,500 grant for some of its EVs Renault will 'stick to the plan' as it hits number 2 in Europe
Renault will 'stick to the plan' as it hits number 2 in Europe
Renault has no plans to fight Volkswagen for sales supremacy, despite huge growth in EV sales due to new Renault 5
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's super PAC has ballooned to $200M thanks to Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights
President Donald Trump's super PAC holds nearly $200 million after donations from Elon Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights. The funds may be spent to take on rivals in both the Democratic and Republican parties. During the first half of this year, the Trump group MAGA Inc. gathered about $177m in total from Musk, TikTok investor Jeffrey Yass, Silicon Valley executives Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen, and others, a Thursday filing with the Federal Election Commission states. Trump has held several fundraisers this year, costing as much as seven figures a seat, The New York Times noted. The dinners, which have often been held at one of the president's properties, have allowed lobbyists and executives to make their case to Trump about their business interests. The filing states that the super PAC has $196.1m in cash on hand. Politicians haven't previously been so meticulous about raising money when they don't have a campaign in the future. Comparatively, a group backing term-limited former President Barack Obama raised $356,000 in the first half of 2013. That June, it had $3.4 million in cash on hand. MAGA Inc. has collected almost double the money as the Republican National Committee. But the RNC is restricted by contribution limits. Yass donated $16m to MAGA Inc. while Horowitz and Andreessen jointly contributed $6m. Trump has boosted the crypto industry from which his group collected several seven-figure donations. The group also received a $5m donation from a crypto entity co-founded by Sam Altman, the chief of OpenAI. Some Republicans have grown confused as to why Trump has been raising so much money for the group. Some of the president's top supporters have pushed for him to run for an unconstitutional third term. Trump aides have said it would be unwise not to take money that is essentially up for the taking. The funds can be used to attack the president's enemies. With such a sizable money pot, MAGA Inc. is set to play a significant role in Republican primaries, boosting the value of an endorsement from Trump. Some conservatives have grown worried about the amount of money collected by the Super PAC, with the group likely to be a bigger spender in the 2026 midterm elections than groups connected to the Republican leadership in Congress. As of June 30, the Congressional and Senate Leadership Funds held $32.7m and $29.7m. Filings show that a super PAC supported by the crypto industry, Fairshake, had $140m on hand, according to filings. Musk at first said he would spend roughly $100m on Trump's political operation, but in the end, he spent only $5m. Musk and Trump's close relationship has since come to an apparent end. Musk also contributed $5m each to the Senate and Congressional Leadership Funds some weeks after his public feud with the president. But soon after, following the passage of Trump's budget bill, Musk said he would leave the Republican Party to start his own party.
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $243 million in fatal Autopilot crash
Aug 1 (Reuters) - A Florida jury on Friday found Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab liable in the 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S and ordered Elon Musk's automaker to pay $243 million to the family of a deceased woman and an injured survivor. Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon and her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo $129 million in compensatory damages, of which Tesla is responsible for 33%, plus $200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. The plaintiffs had sought $345 million. Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. A judge rejected Tesla's efforts to dismiss the case earlier in the summer, and experts said this may encourage other litigants against the EV maker. 'I think it's a big deal," said Alex Lemann, a professor at Marquette University Law School, who said this may make future settlements more expensive for Tesla. "This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its auto-pilot technology." Friday's verdict could impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. Shares fell 1.8% on Friday. Tesla plans to appeal, according to published reports. The Austin, Texas-based company and its lawyers did not immediately respond to several requests for comment. The trial concerned an April 25, 2019 incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 62 mph (100 kph) through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. "We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash," said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. "The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software. That's a big deal." Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 75 feet to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. "Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. "Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries," he added. Last month, Tesla posted its biggest quarterly sales decline in more than a decade, and profit fell short of Wall Street forecasts.
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Federal jury finds Tesla partly liable for fatal Autopilot crash
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Macan will return with gas power, only it won't be the Macan at all. Tesla Could Now Be On The Hook For Other Autopilot Cases A jury in Miami has determined that Tesla should be held partly liable for a fatal 2019 crash involving the automaker's 'Autopilot' driver-assist system, and is requiring Tesla to pay $329 million in damages to the family of the deceased and an injured survivor, multiple news outlets reported Friday. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:10 Full screen Rivian R1T delivers on this EV feature that Tesla forgot Watch More The payout includes $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages against Tesla, according to CNBC, while attorneys for the plaintiffs had asked the jury to award damages of around $345 million. The trial, which began in the Southern District of Florida July 14, is the first involving an Autopilot-related case in a federal court. Technological Vs. Human Error Source: Tesla By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. The case involved an April 2019 crash in Key Largo, Florida. A Tesla Model S driven by George McGee sped through a stop sign and struck Naibel Benavides and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. Benavides was killed, while Angulo was left with a traumatic brain injury and broken bones. The couple were standing near their parked car stargazing as McGee approached in his Tesla with the 'Enhanced Autopilot' system engaged. He had dropped his phone and was trying to pick it up. During the trial, McGee reportedly said he believed Enhanced Autopilot would brake if an obstacle was in the way. Instead, the Model S continued at over 60 mph, striking the car and its owners, according to testimony. Tesla has argued that the fatal crash was wholly due to driver error, and continued to argue that its driver aids were safer than manual driving even as the trial went on, but the jury did find the automaker partly responsible in the end. More Trouble For Tesla? Source: Tesla Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. As CNBC notes, the verdict could set a precedent for other Autopilot-related suits against Tesla. There are currently around a dozen cases in progress alleging that Autopilot or Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' system contributed to fatal or injurious crashes. The California DMV has also asked a state court to suspend Tesla's sales license for 30 days and levy financial penalties against the automaker due to alleged misleading promotion of its driver-assist tech. The DMV is reportedly concerned not only with names like Autopilot and Full Self-Driving, but also Tesla statements implying capabilities these systems don't have, such as one claiming that they are 'designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver's seat.' All of this comes as Tesla CEO Elon Musk doubles down on promises that the future of the company lies in automation, and that it can pivot from being primarily an automaker to operating fleets of autonomous vehicles. Musk has been making similar promises for at least nine years, but Tesla's declining sales and minimal product updates indicate very little effort is being put into the existing parts of its business. About the Author Stephen Edelstein View Profile
