
Nepalese PM Oli to visit India on Sept 16-17: Foreign Ministry sources
A wide range of issues, such as trade, tourism, information technology, connectivity, hydropower, and border, will be discussed during the visit, they added.
The Foreign Ministry is currently working towards finalising the agenda and itinerary for the proposed high-level visit, said the Foreign Minister's Press Advisor Ek Raj Pathak.
On Monday, Foreign Minister Arzu Rana Deuba, who would be part of Oli's delegation, said that direct flights between Nepalgunj and Delhi will be on "top" of her agenda during the upcoming visit to India.
"Direct air connectivity between Nepalgunj, a Western Nepal city, and New Delhi will be my top agenda," Deuba said at a meeting with political leaders, lawmakers and industrialists at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
Iran says talks with IAEA will be technical, complicated
Tehran [Iran], August 12 (ANI): Iran's talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will be 'technical" and 'complicated," the country's foreign ministry said ahead of a visit by the officials of the United Nations nuclear watchdog, marking the first since Tehran cut ties last month following the June conflict triggered by Israeli strikes, the Al Jazeera Baghaei, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, told reporters on Monday that a meeting may be organised with Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi during the IAEA's visit, 'but it is a bit soon to predict what the talks will result since these are technical talks, complicated talks," Al Jazeera visit by IAEA officials comes after President Masoud Pezeshkian ordered Iran on July 3 to suspend cooperation with the nuclear watchdog after an intense 12-day war with Israel. The conflict saw the United States launch massive strikes on Israel's behalf against key Iranian nuclear sites, Al Jazeera an interview with Al Jazeera last month, Pezeshkian said his country is prepared for any future war Israel might wage against it, adding he was not optimistic about the ceasefire between the countries. He confirmed Tehran's commitment to continuing its nuclear programme for peaceful said in the interview that Israel's strikes, which assassinated leading military figures and nuclear scientists, damaged nuclear facilities and killed hundreds of civilians, had sought to 'eliminate" Iran's hierarchy, but 'completely failed to do so."Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi told Iran's state-run IRNA news agency on Monday that Massimo Aparo, the IAEA's deputy director general and head of safeguards, had left Iran after meeting with an Iranian delegation including Foreign Ministry officials and the IAEA to discuss 'the method of interaction between the agency and Iran."Gharibabadi said consultations would continue in the future but did not provide further details. The IAEA did not immediately issue a statement about Aparo's visit, which did not include any planned access to Iranian nuclear between Iran and the IAEA deteriorated after the watchdog's board said on June 12 that Iran had breached its non-proliferation obligations, a day before Israel's air strikes that sparked the conflict, Al Jazeera criticised the IAEA's lack of response to the Israeli strikes, stating, 'Peaceful facilities of a country that was under 24-hour monitoring were the target of strikes, and the agency refrained from showing a wise and rational reaction and did not condemn it as it was required," according to Al had previously said cooperation with the agency, which will now require approval by Iran's highest security body, the Supreme National Security Council, would be about redefining how both sides cooperate. This decision will likely further limit inspectors' ability to track Tehran's nuclear programme, which had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade has had limited IAEA inspections in the past during negotiations with the West, and it remains unclear when talks between Tehran and Washington over its nuclear programme will resume, if at intelligence agencies and the IAEA have assessed that Iran last had an organised nuclear weapons programme in 2003. Although Tehran has enriched uranium up to 60 percent, this remains below the weapons-grade level of 90 per cent. (ANI)


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Leaves Us With No Choice": After Asim Munir, Pak's Bilawal Bhutto Threatens India
New Delhi: Pakistan continued to issue war threats to India, this time with politician Bilawal Bhutto warning New Delhi over Operation Sindoor and the suspension of the decades-old Indus Water Treaty following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. The former Pakistani foreign minister claimed that India had caused "great damage" to Pakistan and urged all Pakistanis to "unite" against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "The actions of the Indian government, under the leadership of Narendra Modi, have caused great damage to Pakistan. It is necessary that we, as a united people, stand together against PM Modi and these aggressions," Bhutto said while speaking at a function organised by the Culture Department of the government of Sindh on Monday. He went on to warn that if India continues to suspend the Indus Water Treaty, then Pakistan would have "no choice" but to consider war. "You people (Pakistanis) are strong enough for war to get back all six rivers. If India continues on this path, it leaves us with no choice except to consider all options, including the possibility of war, to protect our national interests," he said. "We did not start the war. But if you think of carrying out an attack like Sindoor, then know that the people of every province of Pakistan are ready to fight you - and this is a war that you will definitely lose. We won't bow down," Bhutto warned. Bilawal Bhutto requests Pakistani people to unite against Modi, bcz of the damage India did to Pakistan. Threatens war against India if India continues to put Indus Water Treaty on hold. In India, opposition is asking what did Modi do to Pakistan? — Ankur Singh (@iAnkurSingh) August 11, 2025 Bhutto's remarks come a day after Pakistani army chief Asim Munir warned of a nuclear war and threatened to take down "half the world" if Islamabad faced an existential threat in a future war with India. "We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us," he said. Munir also warned of destroying any infrastructure that India builds on the Indus water channels that could impede water flow to Pakistan. "We have no dearth of missiles. We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, we will destroy it with 10 missiles. The Indus River is not the Indians' family property," he reportedly said. The Pakistani army chief also claimed that the suspension of the Indus Water Treaty could put 250 million people at risk of starvation. India's strong response to Asim Munir India strongly condemned Munir's threat of a nuclear war, saying that the nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's "stock-in-trade". The Foreign Ministry, in a statement, also expressed regret that the remarks were made from the soil of a friendly third country. "The international community can draw its own conclusions on the irresponsibility inherent in such remarks, which also reinforces the well-held doubts about the integrity of nuclear command and control in a state where the military is hand-in-glove with terrorist groups," the Ministry said. It also reaffirmed New Delhi's position of not giving in to "nuclear blackmail" and assured that it will continue to take all necessary steps to safeguard national security.


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Former U.S. Official Michael Rubin Challenges Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir and Opposes Donald Trump's Stance on India
Ex-US official Michael Rubin Pakistan army chief Asim Munir over his recent nuclear rhetoric. He accused Islamabad of behaving like 'a rogue state' and being on the warpath. Michael Rubin compared Pakistan's de facto military ruler with Osama bin Laden, the terrorist mastermind of the 9/11 attack. Notably, he also said Asim Munir criticism comments were the same that the world has heard from the Islamic State. The controversy centres on Field Marshal Asim Munir's recent remarks threatening that if Pakistan 'goes down, it would take half the world down' with it. According to reports, the comments were made at a meeting in Tampa, Florida in the presence of some US military officials. Donald trump India stance has formally condemned Pakistan army chief Munir's threat of a nuclear war. The Foreign Ministry said that nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade and it was unfortunate that such a statement was made from the soil of a friendly third country. Rubin said a future US government may have to send special operations forces into Pakistan to protect its nuclear weapons. "We can't take the consequences of that as a given," he said. "We have to recognize the strategic level game being played here." One of his key points was that Pakistan's nuclear threats could give a false sense of security to terrorist elements that they could 'go rogue' with nuclear weapons. He said Pakistan is a different challenge altogether than diplomatic spats. "The US sees this largely in terms of grievance without seeing the ideological underpinnings," he added. "Asim Munir is the manifestation of a more institutionalized face of that." Rubin also noted that Munir's remarks are 'raising in the minds of many' whether Pakistan can meet the requirements of being a state. 'The Field Marshal's rhetoric is reminiscent of what we've heard from the Islamic State,' he stated. Rubin has previously advocated what he called 'managed decline' for Pakistan, which he suggested should include other countries recognizing Balochistan, a movement for an independent Balochistan within Pakistan.