
Shoppers are wary of digital shelf labels, but a study found they don't lead to price surges
Digital
price labels, which are rapidly replacing paper
shelf tags
at U.S. supermarkets, haven't led to demand-based pricing surges, according to a new study that examined five years' worth of prices at one
grocery chain
.
But some shoppers, consumer advocates and lawmakers remain skeptical about the tiny electronic screens, which let stores change prices instantly from a central computer instead of having workers swout paper labels by hand.
"It's corporations vs. the humans, and that chasm between us goes further and further," said Dan Gallant, who works in sports media in Edmonton, Canada. Gallant's local Loblaws supermarket recently switched to digital labels.
Social media is filled with warnings that grocers will use the technology to charge more for ice cream if it's hot outside, hike the price of umbrellas if it's raining or to gather information about customers.
Democratic U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania fired off a letter to Kroger last fall demanding to know whether it would use its electronic labels as part of a dynamic pricing strategy.
Lawmakers in Rhode Island and Maine have introduced bills to limit the use of digital labels. In Arizona, Democratic state Rep. Cesar Aguilar recently introduced a bill that would ban them altogether.
The bill hasn't gotten a hearing, but Aguilar said he's determined to start a conversation about digital labels and how stores could abuse them.
"Grocery stores study when people go shopping the most. And so you might be able to see a price go down one day and then go up another day," Aguilar told The Associated Press.
Researchers say those fears are misplaced. A study published in late May found "virtually no surge pricing" before or after electronic shelf labels were adopted. The study was authored by Ioannis Stamatopoulos of the University of Texas, Austin,
Robert Evan Sanders
of the University of California, San Diego and Robert Bray of Northwestern University
The researchers looked at prices between 2019 and 2024 at an unnamed grocery chain than began using digital labels in October 2022. They found that temporary price increases affected 0.005% of products on any given day before electronic shelf labels were introduced, a share that increased by only 0.0006 percentage points after digital labels were installed.
The study also determined that discounts were slightly more common after digital labels were introduced.
Economists have long wondered why grocery prices don't change more often, according to Stamatopoulos. If bananas are about to expire, for example, it makes sense to lower the price on them. He said the cost of having workers change prices by hand could be one issue.
But there's another reason: Shoppers watch grocery prices closely, and stores don't want to risk angering them.
"Selling groceries is not selling a couch. It's not a one-time transaction and you will never see them again," Stamatopoulos said. "You want them coming to the store every week."
Electronic price labels aren't new. They've been in use for more than a decade at groceries in Europe and some U.S. retailers, like Kohl's.
But they've been slow to migrate to U.S. grocery stores. Only around 5% to 10% of U.S. supermarkets now have electronic labels, compared to 80% in Europe, said Amanda Oren, vice president of industry strategy for North American grocery at Relex Solutions, a technology company that helps retailers forecast demand.
Oren said cost is one issue that has slowed the U.S. rollout. The tiny screens cost between $5 and $20, Oren said, but every product a store sells needs one, and the average supermarket has 100,000 or more individual products.
Still, the U.S. industry is charging ahead. Walmart, the nation's largest grocer and retailer, hopes to have digital price labels at 2,300 U.S. stores by 2026. Kroger is expanding the use of digital labels this year after testing them at 20 stores. Whole Foods is testing the labels in nearly 50 stores.
Companies say electronic price labels have tremendous advantages. Walmart says it used to take employees two days to change paper price labels on the 120,000 items it has in a typical store. With digital tags, it takes a few minutes.
The labels can also be useful. Some have codes shoppers can scan to see recipes or nutrition information. Instacart has a system in thousands of U.S. stores, including Aldi and Schnucks, that flashes a light on the digital tag when Instacart shoppers are nearby to help them find products.
Ahold Delhaize's Albert Heijn supermarket chain in the Netherlands and Belgium has been testing an artificial intelligence-enabled tool since 2022 that marks down prices on its digital labels every 15 minutes for products nearing expiration. The system has reduced more than 250 tons of food waste annually, the company said.
But Warren and Casey are skeptical. In their letter to Kroger, the U.S. senators noted a partnership with Microsoft that planned to put cameras in grocery aisles and offer personalized deals to shoppers depending on their gender and age.
In its response, Kroger said the prices shown on its digital labels were not connected to any sort of facial recognition technology. It also denied surging prices during periods of peak demand.
"Kroger's business model is built on a foundation of lowering prices to attract more customers," the company said.
Aguilar, the Arizona lawmaker, said he also opposes the transition to digital labels because he thinks they will cost jobs. His constituents have pointed out that grocery prices keep rising even though there are fewer workers in checkout lanes, he said.
"They are supposed to be part of our community, and that means hiring people from our community that fill those jobs," Aguilar said.
But Relex Solutions' Oren said she doesn't think cutting labor costs is the main reason stores deploy digital price tags.
"It's about working smarter, not harder, and being able to use that labor in better ways across the store rather than these very mundane, repetitive tasks," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘I would certainly invoke it': Trump signals readiness to use Insurrection Act as LA immigration protests escalate
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he is prepared to invoke the Insurrection Act if protests in Los Angeles escalate into what he defines as an "insurrection." The comment comes amid ongoing demonstrations now entering its fourth day against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, following his recent deployment of around 700 US Marines to Los Angeles in a bid to quell the protests. The National Guard had already been mobilised over the weekend, despite objections from California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump doubled down on his criticism of Newsom, saying they had spoken just a day earlier. He described scenes of destruction during the protests, alleging that demonstrators used hammers to break curbs and repurpose chunks of concrete and granite as weapons. 'They were taking that concrete, going up in bridges and dropping it into the roof of a car... They were throwing it at our police... at our soldiers... Los Angeles right now would be on fire,' Trump said. 'We're not playing around.' Asked how he would determine if the situation qualified as an insurrection, Trump pointed to 'paid insurrectionists' and 'paid troublemakers' among the crowd. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo 'You take a look at what's happening,' he said. 'It was terrible.' The Insurrection Act, a rarely used 1807 law, allows the president to deploy military forces within the United States to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion. Trump's statement marks one of his most direct public signals of willingness to use the statute since nationwide protests began in response to his policies. The legal and political ramifications of invoking the act remain unclear, but experts note that such a move could ignite a constitutional standoff between federal and state authorities. What is Insurrection Act of 1807 The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a federal statute that empowers the US president to use military force within the United States to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or armed rebellion. It serves as one of the few legal exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which generally prohibits the use of federal troops in civilian law enforcement. Under the Insurrection Act, the president can: Deploy active-duty military forces across state lines Federalise National Guard units from individual states Bypass state governors' objections in cases deemed severe enough to threaten national security or civil order When has it been used before? Historically, US presidents have used the Insurrection Act sparingly — most notably during: The 1957 Little Rock crisis to enforce school desegregation The 1992 Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King verdict After Hurricane Katrina (though the act itself was not formally invoked, expanded powers were considered)


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Mexican police cross over into Guatemala amid border shootout, 4 dead
Mexican state police killed four gunmen near the border with Guatemala, then pursued more suspects into that country in three armored police vehicles, where they engaged in a shootout in the streets of a border town. Authorities in both countries said Monday they were investigating. The rare case of Mexican law enforcement crossing the border into Guatemala on Sunday in La Mesilla was captured by onlookers in videos widely circulated online. With the border crossing a short distance in the background, armed men in ballistic vests and carrying rifles can be seen shouting at the open driver side door of a Chiapas state police armored vehicle. Suddenly, another such vehicle comes speeding through the border crossing from behind, scattering the armed men. The initial vehicle reverses back toward Mexico and a third armored police vehicle enters from a side street slamming a civilian vehicle into the side of the other armored police truck. Gunfire erupts with the police trucks and civilian vehicles getting hit by bullets. All the while, a Guatemalan military truck with a soldier in the turret, sits in the middle of the melee. It was the latest flare-up of violence along a section of the border that has become a flashpoint as rival Mexican drug cartels and their local affiliates battle for control of valuable smuggling routes for migrants, guns and drugs. Asked about the events, Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum said Monday that everything appeared to show that Mexican authorities entered Guatemala. 'They are investigating it and it is not all right that has happened,' she said. Chiapas state Gov. Eduardo Ramírez Aguilar criticized what he suggested were Guatemalan authorities protecting members of organized crime. His security chief, Oscar Aparicio Avendaño, told The Associated Press on Monday that police had used a drone to detect armed men crossing the border into Mexico. Police intercepted them, killing four, including a local gang leader. 'They try to cross (back to Guatemala) to evade justice and that's where we intercept them and there's the shooting,' Ramírez said. The police involved were part of a state police force called the Pakales, which have also been accused of wrongdoing. Across the border in Guatemala, authorities were cautious in their initial response. Guatemala Vice President Karin Herrera said Monday that the Guatemalan government was talking to Mexican authorities about what happened, 'but there are many things that must be confirmed.' Guatemala Defense Minister Henry Sáenz said none of the Guatemalan soldiers present in La Mesilla fired their weapons and that it remained under investigation. The stretch of the Mexico-Guatemala border has seen near continuous violence in the past two years as the Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation cartels battle for control. Last year, the violence spurred hundreds of Mexican residents to flee into Guatemala for safety. At other moments, towns have seen their power cut and cartel convoys parade through their communities. Sunday's shootout was occurring on a narrow street lined with businesses. Opening fire with the machine gun mounted on the Guatemalan military truck in such confines or against Mexican police could have also exacerbated the situation. For Arkel Benitez, a Guatemalan security analyst and lawyer, the problem is that what's visible in the videos circulating is, at best, passivity by Guatemalan police and soldiers and, at worst, collusion in the face of something that was an obvious threat to Guatemalan citizens. 'It's not about whether they followed protocol or not, it's more the doubt generated by a confluence of circumstances that gives the appearance of the (Guatemalan) police not being there to repel a border incursion,' he said. 'In the videos it appears the police are supporting these armed suspects.'


News18
an hour ago
- News18
In New Video, US Spy Chief Tulsi Gabbard Slams Warmongers, Warns Of Nuclear Holocaust
Last Updated: In a foreboding video clip released on X, Gabbard warned of a 'nuclear holocaust' and blamed certain leaders for bringing the world closer to a nuclear war. US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has warned the world is closer than ever to 'nuclear annihilation" in a stark three-minute video shared on social media this week. The video shows Gabbard walking through Hiroshima, Japan, where she recently travelled to learn about the aftermath of the 1945 US atomic bombing. Archival footage from the nuclear attack, including images of victims, is interspersed with Gabbard's direct-to-camera remarks. She blamed 'political elite warmongers" for escalating tensions between nuclear powers and claims many of them feel immune from the consequences. 'They believe they'll be safe in nuclear shelters," she says. She then calls on the public to act: 'It's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness. We must reject this path to nuclear war and work toward a world where no one has to live in fear of a nuclear holocaust." I recently visited Hiroshima, and stood at the epicenter of a city scarred by the unimaginable horror caused by a single nuclear bomb dropped in 1945. What I saw, the stories I heard, and the haunting sadness that remains, will stay with me forever. — Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) June 10, 2025 It remains unclear when the video was recorded. Gabbard's office has not clarified whether it was made using government resources. She visited Japan last week and toured a US military base with Ambassador George Glass. Her earlier trip to Japan in March did not include a stop in Hiroshima. The former Democratic congresswoman and 2020 presidential hopeful has long criticized foreign interventions and warned about the threat of nuclear conflict. Her comments this week echo earlier warnings. In 2019, during her campaign launch, she said the world was 'on the precipice of nuclear war." She later supported Trump's candidacy and switched parties in 2023. In a post last year, she said: 'The warmongers are trying to drag us into WW3, which can only end in one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we passively allow them to lead us into this holocaust like sheep to the slaughter." First Published: June 10, 2025, 22:50 IST