logo
Zuckerberg's AI dream team is all built by immigrants: Will visa walls break Silicon Valley's AI backbone?

Zuckerberg's AI dream team is all built by immigrants: Will visa walls break Silicon Valley's AI backbone?

Time of India6 hours ago
The United States of America, sobriqueted as the "land of opportunities," now stands at the precipice reeking of irony. What if we told you that America's tech supremacy, the very capability it is globally championed for, rests not on homegrown talent, but on the passports of the immigrants? Historical facts have added their weight to it, and now present affirms it further.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Mark Zuckerberg's newly announced AI Superintelligence Lab tells the story emphatically: Eleven scientists, eleven immigrants, not a single US-born engineer in sight.
What is striking is not that America depends on immigrants: It is how profoundly that dependency is knitted into the architecture of its future. Their names are not etched on billboards. Their accents may differ. But from Princeton to Peking University, from IIT Kanpur to Carnegie Mellon, these minds are carrying the bastion of artificial intelligence for the Silicon Valley.
The global minds behind American machines
Meta's all-immigrant dream team reads like a map of intellectual migration. Trapit Bansal, an alumnus from IIT Kanpur, honed his brilliance at UMass Amherst and OpenAI. Shuchao Bi, born in China, gave GPT-4o its voice. Huiwen Chang invented architectures that made machines 'see.' Ji Lin made AI cheaper and faster.
The journeys trace their roots back to overcrowded classrooms in Beijing, Delhi, or Pretoria, survived the crucible of elite admissions, and culminated in a foreign land where visa renewals were as stressful as debugging code.
They trained in the US, built foundational models, and are now constructing the scaffolding of AI's future.
This isn't an exception. It is the rule. From Google's Bard to OpenAI's GPT-4, from Microsoft's Azure to Amazon's Alexa, the architects of American AI are more likely to have roots in Chennai than Chicago, in Wuhan than Washington.
Silicon Valley's immigrant skeleton
America's tech economy has always run on imported intellect. Over 70% of H-1B visas are granted to Indian nationals alone, according to data shared by USCIS.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Some years, the number has crossed 75%. And it's not just engineering cubicles. Sundar Pichai (Google), Satya Nadella (Microsoft), and Arvind Krishna (IBM), the corner office is increasingly accentuated.
The journey started in the 1990s when coders flocked the Silicon Valley, which has now translated into an artery system of AI architects, cloud infrastructure pioneers, and cybersecurity leaders. They do not just solve technical problems; they set the global agenda for what AI is and what it has become.
And yet, these very professionals are being subjected to a political climate that casts suspicion on foreign workers, tightening visa controls, and erecting bureaucratic minefields that threaten to break the very backbone of American tech.
Visa battles and broken promises
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) received over 780,000 applications for just 85,000 H-1B slots in FY 2024, according to USCIS data. The odds are absurd, the process increasingly punitive.
A proposed beneficiary-based lottery model aims to curb mass applications, but it also risks shutting out legitimate talent.
Add to that the rising wage thresholds, compliance red tape, and anti-immigrant rhetoric that predictably peaks during election years, and you begin to see why America's AI future is hanging by a bureaucratic thread.
The tightening immigration policies might cast a shadow on the tech progress that America is witnessing right now.
The Indian engine of the AI age
The effect of this reliance is more pronounced in India. Post-liberalisation, our country developed an obsession with engineering, catalysed by the IITs and fuelled by social aspiration, creating a goldmine of global tech workers.
Over the years down the line, India has lost its talent to offshore and, in a way, contributed enormously to building the American tech empire. The irony deepens: Indian engineering graduates built apps for the world, but couldn't find jobs at home.
Their futures, and sometimes their families' fortunes, hinged not on innovation but immigration.
A tectonic shift or a temporary snag?
Today, that engine is sputtering. Visa regimes are unstable. The H-1B system is outdated. International students, once America's intellectual capital in waiting, now live under a cloud of uncertainty.
And as Meta's immigrant-only team shines bright, the tech juggernaut is exposed well enough. If tomorrow, the gates narrow further, or worse, if talent stops navigating to the country, the US will not only lose developers, but with them the crucial direction as well.
Already, there are numerous murmurs among graduates about staying back. Startup India, AI missions, and semiconductor initiatives, the incentives are growing. With the right policy push, India could convert its brain drain into a brain return. Maybe, the global tech power can be rescripted, this time from Bengaluru and not Boston.
Innovation is not a nationality
The American edge in AI owes a lot to the passports that have flown from distant countries with a utopian vision of building a future.
They showed up with foreign degrees, accents that were often mocked, and dreams that carried enough weight.
However, dreams need visas. And revolutions, especially technological ones, need the freedom to cross borders. The question before America now is simple: Will it remain the world's most powerful magnet for minds? Or will it build walls so high that even superintelligence can't climb over?
If it picks the latter, it may soon find that the AI of tomorrow and the accompanied power may find an abode somewhere else and might not be in America.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trade talks on, but India responds to Trump tariffs on auto with a ‘right' to retaliate at WTO
Trade talks on, but India responds to Trump tariffs on auto with a ‘right' to retaliate at WTO

First Post

time33 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trade talks on, but India responds to Trump tariffs on auto with a ‘right' to retaliate at WTO

India has informed the WTO of its plan to impose retaliatory duties on the US in response to steep American tariffs on auto imports. The move comes as both countries attempt to finalise a trade deal by July 9, with India insisting on its right to protect key export sectors. read more India has formally notified the World Trade Organisation (WTO) of its intention to impose retaliatory duties on the United States in response to Washington's 25% tariffs on automobiles and certain auto parts. According to the notification, the American measures are expected to impact approximately $2.89 billion worth of Indian exports, prompting New Delhi to claim its right to suspend equivalent trade concessions. 'India reserves the right to suspend concessions or other obligations… that are substantially equivalent to the adverse effects of the measure to India's trade,' the statement submitted to the WTO read. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While the Indian government has not yet detailed the specific tariff rates or the list of U.S. goods to be targeted, it has indicated that the retaliation would match the estimated $725 million in duties the US will collect annually from these measures. The development comes amid ongoing efforts by both nations to conclude a trade deal before a July 9 deadline set by US President Donald Trump. Trump has warned that if no agreement is reached, a sweeping 26% tariff could be imposed on all Indian imports. India has expressed willingness to reduce some of its high tariffs for American goods but has held firm on sensitive sectors like agriculture and dairy, where it has resisted Washington's demands for wider market access. The move was detailed in a WTO Council for Trade in Goods meeting, where India stated that it intends to suspend certain trade concessions and obligations under various WTO provisions. The US imposed the 25% tariff on March 26, applying it to imports of passenger cars, light trucks, and select automobile components. These duties, which took effect from May 3, 2025, will continue indefinitely. India maintains that these US tariffs amount to safeguard measures, a trade tool typically used to protect domestic industries from import surges. However, New Delhi has pointed out that Washington has not formally registered the measures as safeguards with the WTO—a requirement under international trade rules. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to India, the US action violates the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 and the WTO's Agreement on Safeguards. Since Washington has not responded to India's call for consultations, New Delhi has now exercised its right to seek compensation through retaliatory trade measures. This isn't the first time India has used this approach. Earlier in March, it adopted similar retaliatory measures in response to US tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium exports. India's latest move highlights its intent to defend its trade interests at the multilateral level even as it engages bilaterally to resolve differences with the United States. With inputs from agencies

Indian stocks settle in green on Friday, but log weekly losses amid US trade deal uncertainty
Indian stocks settle in green on Friday, but log weekly losses amid US trade deal uncertainty

India Gazette

time42 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

Indian stocks settle in green on Friday, but log weekly losses amid US trade deal uncertainty

New Delhi [India], July 4 (ANI): Keeping the intraday gains intact, Indian stock indices settled in the green on Friday, despite continued foreign portfolio investor (FPI) outflows. This marks the first jump in the domestic indices after multiple sessions of losses. The Sensex closed at 83,432.89 points, up 193.42 points or 0.23 per cent. The Nifty closed at 25,461.00 points, up 55.70 points or 0.22 per cent. Sensex and Nifty on a cumulative basis declined 0.4-0.7 per cent during this week. Among the sectoral indices, Nifty FMCG, Nifty IT, Nifty media, Nifty pharma, Nifty PSU bank, Nifty realty, Nifty oil and gas were the top movers, while Nifty metal and Nifty auto were the top losers, NSE data showed. 'The Indian market is experiencing a pause as investors adopt a wait-and-watch strategy ahead of the impending US tariff deadline, with mixed global cues. Ongoing FII outflows reflect a risk-off approach, while DII inflows are offering partial support,' said Vinod Nair, Head of Research, Geojit Investments Limited. 'Following the recent rally, main indices are hovering near peak valuation levels, limiting further upside, which is highly dependent on Q1 earnings and details of the trade deal. In the mid- and small-cap space, the market has shifted to being more stock-specific following the recent recovery,' Nair added. Barring Friday, India's stock benchmarks remained in the red this week, which analysts attribute to profit booking by investors. 'After 5 straight sessions of losses, the market remained in a consolidation phase as investors stayed on the sidelines ahead of the July 9 deadline set by U.S. President Donald Trump for trade tariff negotiations,' said Sundar Kewat, Technical and Derivatives Analyst, Ashika Institutional Equity - Ashika Stock Broking part of Ashika Group. Analysts earlier opined uncertainties around extension in Trump reciprocal tariffs beyond July 9, and an India-US bilateral trade agreement weighed on the Indian stock indices this week. Last week, Indian stock indices stayed in the green for the fourth straight session, lending support from positive global cues, relative peace on the Israel-Iran conflict front, and hopes of a possible extension of the July 9 tariff deadline by the US administration. At a broader level, India's strong domestic fundamentals, a responsive RBI, and good monsoon conditions have been supporting the financial markets. US markets are hitting all-time highs, and the US dollar is weakening; as a result, emerging markets like India are benefiting. A comfortable inflation number in India is another positive. In 2024, Sensex and Nifty accumulated a growth of about 9-10 per cent each. In 2023, Sensex and Nifty gained 16-17 per cent, on a cumulative basis. In 2022, they gained a mere 3 per cent each. (ANI)

On US Independence Day, 44% in California, the world's 4th largest economy, want to secede - is a breakaway vote next?
On US Independence Day, 44% in California, the world's 4th largest economy, want to secede - is a breakaway vote next?

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

On US Independence Day, 44% in California, the world's 4th largest economy, want to secede - is a breakaway vote next?

California independence: Is the Golden State ready to go its own way?- A new YouGov poll commissioned by the Independent California Institute has revealed striking numbers that reflect a growing sense of disconnection between Californians and the federal government. Conducted between June 11 and June 23, 2025, the poll shows a significant tilt toward California autonomy, with many residents favoring more control over borders, law enforcement, immigration, and even tax revenue. Do Californians trust Sacramento more than Washington? Yes—and by a big margin. According to the poll, 50% of Californians say they trust the state government in Sacramento more than the federal government in Washington, D.C. Only 23% said the opposite. The rest either trusted both equally or weren't sure. This marks a steep collapse in trust for the federal government, particularly since President Donald Trump took office earlier this year. Californians' identity has also shifted. More residents now say they feel "more Californian than American" than ever before. Though most still feel equally both, the shift toward a distinct Californian identity may be a sign of what's to come. Could California really become an autonomous state within the U.S.? That idea is gaining strong traction. A record-high 71% of Californians say they believe the state would be better off if it had 'special autonomous status' within the United States. This would mean more control over federal tax dollars paid by Californians and greater decision-making authority on key issues. Support for forming a state commission to push for that goal remains steady. Nearly two-thirds want this commission to focus on negotiations with Congress to achieve greater autonomy. However, with California underrepresented in the U.S. Senate and Electoral College, gaining such autonomy may require strong leverage in the House of Representatives. Live Events Are Californians seriously considering secession? Maybe not yet—but they're thinking about it. The poll shows 56% of respondents believe California would be better off as an independent country through peaceful secession. But when asked if they would vote for a ballot measure declaring California's intention to secede legally and peacefully, only 44% said yes, while 54% said no. Why the gap? Pollsters suggest that while people believe secession would improve life in California, fewer think it's actually possible. Many believe Congress would never approve such a move. Even so, support for peaceful secession is growing, especially among those who believe federal overreach is harming the state. Are Californians ready to control their own borders and law enforcement? In a surprising show of strength, 80% of Californians say the state should control its own borders 'like a country.' That includes using Border Control Stations to screen for illegal guns, drugs, and contraband—not just agricultural pests. Support for challenging federal authority is also high. A full 72% of Californians say state police should arrest federal immigration officers who act maliciously or exceed their legal authority. This is based on legal precedent, including the federal appellate case Clifton v. Cox, which ruled that federal agents aren't immune from state prosecution if they act outside the law. On immigration, 74% support state citizenship for long-term residents who aren't U.S. citizens. Meanwhile, 72% want to hold California officials civilly accountable if they help federal agents violate immigrants' due process rights. Is a California secession vote on the horizon? There is no formal ballot initiative, legislation, or scheduled vote to put secession on the ballot in California. The idea remains largely symbolic and protest-driven, fueled by deep political divides and increasing friction between Sacramento and Washington D.C. Legally, any attempt to secede would face immense constitutional barriers. The U.S. Supreme Court's 1869 ruling in Texas v. White made it clear: no U.S. state can unilaterally leave the Union. To legally secede, California would need: A constitutional amendment Two-thirds approval in Congress Ratification by at least 38 state legislatures In today's polarized political climate, this is nearly impossible. How Trump's actions are intensifying California's breakaway sentiment President Trump's ongoing confrontations with California Governor Gavin Newsom have only deepened the state's desire for autonomy. Most recently: Trump granted U.S. military control over a federally owned strip of land along California's border—part of his aggressive southern border policy. His administration continues to challenge California's environmental and immigration laws. Tensions peaked when Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles during protests, prompting Newsom to push back on federal overreach. Though some critics claim Trump is 'taking land' from California, what's really happening is a federal assertion of authority over national lands and border zones—actions that are legal, but politically inflammatory. This dynamic is creating a narrative in California that Washington is increasingly at odds with the will of its people, especially on climate, immigration, and civil rights. Why California's economic power changes the secession conversation California isn't just any state—it's the world's fourth-largest economy, trailing only the U.S. as a whole, China, and Germany. With a GDP surpassing $4.3 trillion, California: Leads the U.S. in technology, agriculture, and entertainment exports Hosts more Fortune 500 companies than most countries Collects more federal tax revenue than it receives in return Secession advocates argue California could survive—even thrive—as an independent nation. But experts warn of serious challenges: Loss of access to federal defense and infrastructure funding Trade and border complications Legal fights over water rights, airspace, and currency So, while the economy gives California leverage, independence would still carry enormous risks. What do Californians think about reclaiming federal land and water? The poll also found strong support for taking back control of public land and water systems. About 63% of respondents want the state to gain authority over nearly all federal land and water infrastructure within California. This sentiment rose sharply after the Trump administration ordered the Army Corps of Engineers to waste over 2.2 billion gallons of water in January 2025—an incident many Californians saw as a political stunt. Supporters argue that state and local governments are more likely to preserve public land and manage resources efficiently. The idea isn't to sell off the land but to bring it under California's management, especially as the state faces recurring droughts and wildfires. How far are Californians willing to go on immigration policy? Very far. Here are some key findings from the poll's immigration section: 72% support arresting ICE agents who act with malice or outside legal limits. 76% want to give county boards power to remove sheriffs who violate state law. 57% want full non-cooperation with federal immigration authorities. 58% would support a government shutdown to stop mass deportations. 74% want a path to state citizenship for immigrants living in California long-term. These results show a deep desire for California to chart its own path on immigration, especially under a federal administration seen as hostile to immigrant communities. What economic policies are Californians backing for independence? If California were to stand more on its own, it would need financial tools to support its autonomy. The poll found strong support for several economic policies: 69% favor raising taxes on millionaires to recoup Trump-era tax cuts. 77% support expanding the state's Rainy Day Fund, possibly through a constitutional amendment (ACA 1). Many also support creating a sovereign wealth fund, similar to the Alaska Permanent Fund, to generate long-term state income. These measures show that Californians are thinking beyond ideology—they want concrete fiscal policies to support greater state self-reliance. Do Californians want to bypass the U.S. Supreme Court or stop flying the U.S. flag? Surprisingly, no. While many Californians support independence in practice, symbolic gestures are less popular. Only 28% favor removing the U.S. flag from government buildings. This suggests that while frustration with Washington is high, residents still see themselves as Americans—at least for now. On the legal front, Californians are split on whether their state Supreme Court should bypass federal court decisions they see as unconstitutional. This highlights a tension between legal realism and idealism in how far Californians want their state to go. What's next for the California independence movement? The poll results show clear support for greater autonomy and even soft secession—but full independence is still a step too far for most voters. However, the sentiment is growing. Californians are tired of federal interference, especially under Trump's administration, and want to take more control of their resources, immigration policy, and tax revenue. Whether through secession, autonomy, or just assertive state governance, California seems ready to redefine its relationship with Washington. FAQs: Q1. What is the California independence movement about in 2025? It's about Californians wanting more control over laws, borders, and federal funding. Q2. Do most Californians support California becoming an autonomous state? Yes, 71% support California negotiating special autonomous status within the U.S.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store