logo
El Salvador approves indefinite presidential reelection and extends terms to 6 years

El Salvador approves indefinite presidential reelection and extends terms to 6 years

SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador — The party of El Salvador President Nayib Bukele approved constitutional changes in the country's Legislative Assembly on Thursday that will allow indefinite presidential reelection and extend presidential terms to six years.
Lawmaker Ana Figueroa from the New Ideas party had proposed the changes to five articles of the constitution. The proposal also included eliminating the second round of the election where the two top vote-getters from the first round face off.
New Ideas and its allies in the Legislative Assembly quickly approved the proposals with the supermajority they hold. The vote passed with 57 in favor and three opposed.
Bukele overwhelmingly won reelection last year despite a constitutional ban, after Supreme Court justices selected by his party ruled in 2021 to allow reelection to a second five-year term.
Observers have worried that Bukele had a plan to consolidate power since at least 2021, when a newly elected Congress with a strong governing party majority voted to remove the magistrates of the constitutional chamber of the Supreme Court. Those justices had been seen as the last check on the popular president.
Since then, Bukele has only grown more popular. The Biden administration's initial expressions of concern gave way to quiet acceptance as Bukele announced his run for reelection. With the return of U.S. President Donald Trump to the White House in January, Bukele had a new powerful ally and quickly offered Trump help by taking more than 200 deportees from other countries into a newly built prison for gang members.
Figueroa argued Thursday that federal lawmakers and mayors can already seek reelection as many times as they want.
'All of them have had the possibility of reelection through popular vote, the only exception until now has been the presidency,' Figueroa said.
She also proposed that Bukele's current term, scheduled to end June 1, 2029, instead finish June 1, 2027, to put presidential and congressional elections on the same schedule. It would also allow Bukele to seek reelection to a longer term two years earlier.
Marcela Villatoro of the Nationalist Republican Alliance (Arena), one of three votes against the proposals, told her fellow lawmakers that 'Democracy in El Salvador has died!'
'You don't realize what indefinite reelection brings: It brings an accumulation of power and weakens democracy ... there's corruption and clientelism because nepotism grows and halts democracy and political participation,' she said.
Suecy Callejas, the assembly's vice president, said that 'power has returned to the only place that it truly belongs ... to the Salvadoran people.'
Bukele did not immediately comment.
Bukele, who once dubbed himself 'the world's coolest dictator,' is highly popular, largely because of his heavy-handed fight against the country's powerful street gangs.
Voters have been willing to overlook evidence that his administration like others before it had negotiated with the gangs, before seeking a state of emergency that suspended some constitutional rights and allowed authorities to arrest and jail tens of thousands of people.
His success with security and politically has inspired imitators in the region who seek to replicate his style.
Most recently, Bukele's government has faced international criticism for the arrests of high-profile lawyers who have been outspoken critics of his administration. One of the country's most prominent human rights group announced in July it was moving its operations out of El Salvador for the safety of its people, accusing the government of a 'wave of repression.'
Alemán writes for the Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Edited news graphic misrepresents ruling on Philippine VP impeachment
Edited news graphic misrepresents ruling on Philippine VP impeachment

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Edited news graphic misrepresents ruling on Philippine VP impeachment

The Philippine Supreme Court blocked the impending impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte but did not clear her of charges, contrary to false online claims. The posts included a manipulated news graphic that misrepresented the tribunal's ruling. "Du30 are (sic) innocent. It is not our duty to favor any political result. Ours is to ensure that politics are framed within the Rule of Just Law," reads text written on an apparent news graphic shared July 26, 2025 on Facebook. The post appears to attribute the remarks to Supreme Court Justice Marvic Leonen, whose picture is included in the image. He penned the tribunal's July 25 ruling that blocked Duterte's trial, saying it violated a constitutional provision against multiple impeachment proceedings within a single year (archived link). The House of Representatives impeached Duterte in February, charging the vice president with graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against one-time ally and former running mate President Ferdinand Marcos. "They just can't accept that SARA DU30 is innocent, no stain of corruption," says the image's Tagalog-language caption, using a popular nickname for the vice president. The top court's 13-0 ruling came just days before the Senate was to begin its new session, with the vice president's political future hanging in the balance (archived link). Widely expected to run for president in 2028, a Senate trial conviction would have barred Duterte permanently from public office. The claim -- earlier debunked by Rappler -- has also spread on TikTok, YouTube and Threads (archived link). Several users appeared to have been misled. "Yes Dutertes are innocent," one user commented. Another user said: "Good decision, Supreme Court. Thank God!" But the posts share a manipulated news graphic and misrepresent the Supreme Court's decision on the case. "Our ruling does not absolve petitioner Duterte from any of the charges. Any ruling on the charges against her can only be accomplished through another impeachment process, followed by a trial and conviction by the Senate," the court said in its decision published on its official website (archived link). It added a new impeachment process can only be initiated against Duterte starting February 6, 2026. A reverse image search on Google found the original graphic published on the Facebook page of local media News5 on July 25, 2025 (archived link). It does not include the quote, "Duterte are innocent". Duterte's impeachment trial has triggered a flurry of false posts, many of them debunked by AFP here.

Ghislaine Maxwell Moves Forward With Appeal Days After Trump DOJ Meeting
Ghislaine Maxwell Moves Forward With Appeal Days After Trump DOJ Meeting

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ghislaine Maxwell Moves Forward With Appeal Days After Trump DOJ Meeting

Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team moved forward with appealing her case to the Supreme Court on Monday, three days after the accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein met with a top Justice Department official. The convicted child sex trafficker's team filed a new brief with the Supreme Court urging it to overturn her conviction. Maxwell's team has argued that the government failed to live up to its obligation to honor a plea and non-prosecution agreement. The partner of the late convicted sex offender and disgraced financier is serving 20 years in prison after being convicted in December 2021. But in the brief, her lawyer argued that 'this case is about what the government promised, not what Epstein did.' In a statement to the Daily Beast, Maxwell's lawyer David Oscar Markus argued the government promised immunity in Florida but violated that agreement when it moved in New York to prosecute her. He also made a direct appeal to President Donald Trump, who has not ruled out pardoning Maxwell. 'We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the President himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's crimes, especially when the government promised she would not be prosecuted,' Markus said. Maxwell's appeal effort comes amid ongoing fallout over the Justice Department's failure to release the Epstein files despite Trump's campaign promise. The president has been furiously trying to distance himself from both Epstein and Maxwell, who he was known to have a relationship before he ever ran for office. Last week, it was revealed in a bombshell Wall Street Journal report that Trump was informed this spring by the Justice Department that his name appeared in the Epstein files multiple times. As Attorney General Pam Bondi struggled to respond to outrage over the botched release of documents, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell over two days last week for about nine hours to question her over the Epstein case. It was a highly irregular move for the deputy attorney general of the United States. Blanche also previously served as Trump's personal defense attorney, raising further questions as the president pushes back on a series of damaging Epstein reports. During their lengthy sitdown, Maxwell answered all of Blanche's questions and provided information on about 100 different people, according to her lawyer. When asked about potentially pardoning Maxwell on Friday, Trump claimed he had not thought about it, but he did not rule it out, telling reporters that he was 'allowed' to do it. Hours later, Maxwell's lawyer indicated they could seek a pardon. Markus, speaking to reporters, noted Trump's comments about it and said the president should do what is 'just.' Trump on Monday reiterated that he is 'allowed' to pardon Epstein's co-conspirator when asked about it again during his visit to Scotland, but he insisted no one had asked him to issue one. 'Nobody's asked me about it. It's in the news about that, that aspect of it, but right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it,' Trump said. In the briefing to the Supreme Court on Monday, Maxwell's lawyer argued that the lower courts were split over whether the government broke its promise on plea and non-prosecution agreements. Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to state prostitution charges. He was indicted on federal sex trafficking charges in July 2019 but died by suicide in prison a month later. The Supreme Court will likely decide whether to grant the case this fall when it returns. Solve the daily Crossword

Racial Gerrymanders in the Dock
Racial Gerrymanders in the Dock

Wall Street Journal

time9 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Racial Gerrymanders in the Dock

Get ready for what could be another landmark Supreme Court case. On Friday the Justices agreed to consider whether majority-minority Congressional districts drawn to comply with the Voting Rights Act are compatible with the Constitution's equal protection guarantee. In June the Court announced it would rehear a redistricting challenge (Louisiana v. Callais) in the term that begins in October. On Friday they broadened the case by asking parties to address the question of whether the state's creation of a second majority-minority Congressional district violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store