logo
Are prize bonds still a good investment?

Are prize bonds still a good investment?

Irish Times2 days ago
I have been a steady holder of
prize bonds
over the last number of years, and, together with winnings, have built up a fair amount.
A few months ago,
State Savings
changed their policy by introducing larger prizes each week. (€50,000 each Friday, with €500,000 on the last Friday of the month).
This has reduced dramatically the number of winners, and it has become like a lottery, except you do not lose your money! This has probably been further influenced by interest reductions.
State Savings also started to notify winners by email, as well as sending winnings by mail the following Tuesday/ Wednesday. I am disturbed to see emails used to be sent at 2.40pm
on the Friday, but now have become totally irregular, sometimes taking a few days.
READ MORE
As this prize-winning has become a lottery, are there independent observers as for the National Lottery, and previously with the Irish Sweepstakes? In addition, has the holding of brize bonds, lost its attractiveness?
Mr M.T.
Are prize bonds a good investment? That seems to be the kernel of your query. To be fair, your personal experience, at least until recently, appears to suggest they have been for you. I'm not sure that's a universal view.
Certainly, in recent years, prize bond investors have been voting with their feet and walking away.
Figures released a couple of weeks ago show that just shy of €351 million of new prize bonds were sold last year. That's a sharp 28 per cent fall on the previous year. That 2023 figure was itself down 20 per cent year-on-year and annual sales are now less than half the €735.7 million sold at the company's peak during Covid in 2020.
An even bigger number came from people selling their investments. Requests for repayment came to €538.2 million last year. That is up just over 1 per cent year-on-year but 90 per cent up over the past five years.
Having fallen for the first time in a decade in 2023, the overall prize fund fell for a second successive year. For all the company's guff about the figures 'reinforcing the product's long-standing appeal as a unique and secure savings choice', they're clearly worried.
The number of prizes awarded last year was up more than 53 per cent and that followed a 31 per cent rise the previous year. There was an even bigger jump in the value of those prizes – 89 per cent last year on top of a 51 per cent rise in 2023 – bringing them to a level not seen since 2012.
You talk about changes in the prize structure but those are not that recent. They date back to October 2023 and in fact the number of prizes on offer has increased sharply in recent years as you can see above.
The key factor affecting the number of prizes is not the headline figure for prizes at each level but the interest rate that determines the size of the prize fund. This is currently 1 per cent – hardly over generous but almost three times the 0.35 per cent rate that applied immediately before October 2023.
The other factor, obviously, is the size of the fund and that, as the figures show, is falling in recent years.
Essentially, 1 per cent of the fund is given in prizes each year. As the top prizes – €500 and above – are set, the real difference is in the number of €75 prizes drawn each week.
So, what are your odds?
With 713.6 million prize bonds in issue at the end of last year, your chances of winning a prize in any draw is comfortably more than 20,000/1 – on the basis of the minimum investment in bonds of €25 for four €6.25 bonds. Winning the weekly jackpot is a 178.4 million-to-one shot.
For comparison, the chances of winning the jackpot in the
Lotto
since 2015 when it was expanded to 47 numbers is one in 10.74 million – although, in fairness, as least you do not lose your stake with the prize bonds.
Clearly, the more bonds you hold, the better the odds, though they are still fairly daunting.
If you don't win, you do have the right to get your investment back at full face value but it will be worth less than when you bought those bonds due to inflation.
Inflation over the past five years in Ireland means that the €25 you choose to withdraw this year by redeeming that minimum level of prize bond investment is worth just €20.20 in buying power – barely 80 per cent of what it was if you bought those bonds back in 2020.
If you bought the bonds back in 2000, your €25 is worth just under €15 in terms of 2025 prices.
So for the hundreds of thousands of bondholders who do not win a prize, this is a poor investment.
If that gives the impression that I'm not a massive fan, you'd be right. Unless you are averse to taking any level of risk at all, you'd be better looking elsewhere. Even the risk-averse can get a better return on their cash with other State Savings options – unless they're lucky, and then we're back to the Lotto analogy.
Oversight
As to oversight, the Prize Bond Company is apparently a joint venture between
An Post
and
Fexco
to run the scheme on behalf of the State – or more precisely the
National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA)
, which is the State agency charged with managing the State's debt.
An official from the NTMA oversees each weekly draw, which is done electronically – with the numbers generated randomly – and the results of those draws are apparently then analysed by another company that specialises in statistical and data validation, according to the Prize Bond Company.
At the time of writing, the most recent draw was the last weekly draw in June when there were a total of 8,823 prize-winners who shared almost €1.24 million in prizes. Obviously this was skewed by the monthly €500,000 win. The prize fund in other weekly draws is just shy of €740,000.
Once a month (the final draw of the month), there is one winner of €500,000, as you say. Otherwise, there is a weekly winner of €50,000, 20 winners of €1,000 each, and another 20 who get €500.
After that there is a much larger number of winners of €75. How many precisely is based on the size of the price bond fund. As of now, it is 8,781 winners each week.
Prizes are paid into your bank account if that is the option you have chosen or, as a default, used to purchase more prize bonds.
Part of the issue, especially for people with small holdings of prize bonds, is that they are passive investments, rarely looked at. The Prize Bond Company does notify winners by post and, more recently, by email but if you have not updated your details with the Prize Bond Company – and especially if the bonds were acquired before email details were relevant – any information about winnings may have gone to a long-irrelevant address and the bin.
This is especially true, I'm guessing, for people who were not active buyers of bonds but who received them instead as gifts from family.
Clearly, that group does not include you but, for other readers, that is why it is important if you own prize bonds to make sure the operators have your correct details. You can find and download a change of address/change of name form
here
.
What happens any unclaimed prizes? After six months, they are put in a special fund of unclaimed prizes. A winning bondholder can still claim that prize at any time. At the end of last year, there was €3.4 million in unclaimed prizes.
That might sound like a lot but when you consider that €45.6 million was issued in prizes last year alone and that the unclaimed prize fund dates back to 1957, it's clear the vast majority of prizes do find their way to the bond owners.
You can check with the Prize Bond Company by phone or online and the site also has a Check My Numbers feature although this can be a little more finicky.
So is it worth the investment? The bottom line is that the State is paying just 1 per cent 'interest' for 'borrowing' the money you pay for the prize bonds. And unless you're a winner, you're not even getting the benefit of any part of that 1 per cent.
Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to
dominic.coyle@irishtimes.com
, with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Irish Times view on Paschal Donohoe's Eurogroup presidency: an important role - but don't forget the day job
The Irish Times view on Paschal Donohoe's Eurogroup presidency: an important role - but don't forget the day job

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on Paschal Donohoe's Eurogroup presidency: an important role - but don't forget the day job

Paschal Donohoe's re-election as president of the Eurogroup reflects a strong performance in the role over his previous two terms and the confidence of his euro zone colleagues Donohoe successfully campaigned for a third term and before the vote was even taken other candidates had thrown in the towel. France and Germany supported Donohoe, along with enough other ministers to give him a majority. Chairing the Eurogroup, an informal but important gathering of the 20 finance ministers from euro zone countries, is effectively an exercise in consensus-building, as countries try to move key issues forward, mostly for decision by the European Council. Reflecting the need to broker compromises between the major players, the job has never been held by one of the biggest member states – the previous incumbents were from Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Portugal. Donohoe chaired the group through the turbulence of Covid-19, the outbreak of the Ukraine war and the cost-of-living crisis, all of which inevitably took some focus off longer-term projects, such as creating a fully-functioning capital markets and banking union. These strategic developments are likely to be a key focus of Donohoe's third term. The Eurogroup also has an important role in the proposed digital euro – a project which has yet to grab the public's imagination. And it will remain a key sounding board for countries as they negotiate the fall-out from Trump's tariffs. READ MORE It is undoubtedly of value to Ireland to have a senior figure in such a central role, particularly given the access granted to the president of the Eurogroup to other vital gathering, such as those of the G7. This will, for example, have helped Donohoe plot a way for Ireland through the OECD corporate tax process, though unfortunately this deal is now in danger of collapse. That said, Donohoe also had a vital role to play at home, with tense budget negotiations ahead and uncertainty over the outlook for the public finances. He must, in other words, also continue to focus on the day job.

US may limit Aer Lingus flights because of Dublin Airport passenger cap, industry group warns
US may limit Aer Lingus flights because of Dublin Airport passenger cap, industry group warns

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

US may limit Aer Lingus flights because of Dublin Airport passenger cap, industry group warns

The Government may have just months to axe the 32-million-a-year cap on passengers at Dublin Airport before the US limits Aer Lingus flights to its airports, a North American industry group warns. Airlines for America (A4A), whose members include US and Canadian carriers that fly from the US to the Republic, maintains that the passenger limit on Dublin Airport breaches European Union-North American open-skies air-travel treaties. According to Keith Glatz, A4A's senior vice-president of international affairs, the US could respond to the cap by limiting Irish airlines' access to the US. Aer Lingus is the only Irish carrier offering regular scheduled transatlantic flights. Mr Glatz explained that he was not speaking for the US government, but noted that 'typically' Washington's department of transportation can respond to an illegal breach of the treaty by limiting the number of cities to which a country's airlines can fly. READ MORE He cautioned that the time left for the Irish Government to end the cap and avoid such a sanction was narrowing. 'We're talking about a couple of months to get this done, and not a year,' Mr Glatz said. The pressure from the US administration on the Government to act is likely to increase as time progresses, he predicted. [ Dublin Airport passenger cap to be breached this year, says DAA Opens in new window ] Mr Glatz stressed that A4A believed that Darragh O'Brien, Minister for Transport and the Government, wanted to keep a pledge to lift the cap and ensure the Republic complied with air-travel treaties. He also maintained that his organisation had good relationships with both Mr O'Brien and the Department of Transport. 'We're working closely with them, they're working with the US government, they're moving, but slower than we would like them to move,' he said. How the wealthy are buying up land to avoid inheritance tax Listen | 22:03 'They understand that they have to do this, and that now is the time to get this done, before a small issue becomes a larger, international dispute.' A4A believes that legislation to lift the cap is drafted, meaning that it is simply a matter of time before the Oireachtas passes it and the cap is lifted. Planners imposed the limit in 2007 as a condition of allowing airport operator, DAA, to build a second terminal at Dublin, to address fears of traffic congestion. Shortly after taking office in January, Mr O'Brien confirmed that he had sought the advice of Rossa Fanning, Attorney General, on resolving the row through legislation. The Minister subsequently predicted this would be ready by the autumn. A department spokesman said on Monday that the Minister was examining a range of issues relating to the passenger cap and was continuing to 'engage with key stakeholders'. The High Court suspended the cap's implementation when it referred questions raised in a legal challenge by airlines to the European courts. A4A is a party to that challenge, initiated by Aer Lingus and Ryanair, but Mr Glatz said that the referred issues related to European and Irish competition law, not to European Union-North American air-travel treaties. He argued that those treaties made possible the Republic's relationship with the US, worth trillions of dollars, and predicted that lifting the cap would spark further growth. Aer Lingus did not comment on any likely sanctions but the airline has consistently warned of the economic damage that it threatens.

Fianna Fail TD joins opposition to Dundrum drone hub plan
Fianna Fail TD joins opposition to Dundrum drone hub plan

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Fianna Fail TD joins opposition to Dundrum drone hub plan

Dublin Rathdown TD, Fianna Fáil's Shay Brennan, has joined the chorus of disapproval over plans by drone delivery service, Manna Air Delivery to establish a new aerial food delivery hub for Dundrum south Dublin. Last month, Manna Drones Ltd lodged the plans with Dun LaoghaDún LaoghaireCounty Council for the aerial delivery hub on lands at an existing car park site to the rear of Main Street and the rear of Holy Cross Church in Dundrum. To date, 57 submissions have been lodged with the council with the vast bulk opposed to the proposal. In his submission deputy Brennan told the council 'there is a strong sense locally that the interests of a small group of commercial operators could be prioritised over the interests of thousands of residents in this densely populated area'. READ MORE The prospect of drones flying overhead 'has created anxiety particularly among young families with children, older people and those working from home,' he said. Deputy Brennan stated that 'residents are concerned that the cumulative impact of frequent drone activity will erode the character and amenity of the Dundrum area.' The concerns over the new aerial hub extend beyond the local area as the Griffith Avenue Residents Association (GARA) which represents over 1,000 homes on Dublin's Northside has lodged an objection. Chairwoman, Una Caulfield told council that 'commercial drones delivering lattes and food have yet to be shown to be anything but a noise nuisance in the areas that they are already up and running'. Ms Caulfield states that in the absence of legislation, 'planning policy must not permit the unchecked growth of a novel, intrusive and commercially driven industry that has the potential to significantly harm public well being'. Head of regulation at Manna Air Delivery, Kevin Houston said on Monday: 'We welcome deputy Brennan's call for public consultation and to be clear, it's something we already do in every area before starting operations. 'In Dublin 15, for example, we held multiple meetings and have operated there for 18 months. We will do the same in Dundrum, though operations are not imminent given the rigorous regulatory process: we are regulated nationally by the Irish Aviation Authority (IAA) and at European level by EASA. He said: 'Local communities and local representatives have clear information through our dedicated community page, including Trinity College data showing our noise levels are lower than local traffic, and details of the strict privacy standards we follow as a responsible operator and global industry leader.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store