
Netflix Earnings: Ads Could Continue Growth After Exceeding Expectations
Netflix is 'off to a good start in 2025," the company said in its first-quarter earnings release on Thursday afternoon. Indeed, revenue was up 13%, and operating income up 27%, both ahead of the company's typically conservative guidance thanks to 'slightly higher' subscription and ad revenues, and the timing of expenses.
But it's Netflix's still-nascent ad operation that will drive growth going forward, especially if the economic climate in the United States and beyond worsens amid ongoing trade, tariff and other uncertainties.
Tucked into the investor letter that accompanied the earnings call was perhaps the most important news affecting growth: the April 1 launch of Netflix's own in-house ad-tech platform, the latest big step since the company announced after a disastrous earnings call three years ago that it would crack down on password sharing and launch an ad-supported tier.
The password crackdown is largely in place globally now, and credited by analysts for driving the previous quarter's astonishing addition of 19 million subscribers, taking the company to 301 million total. But Netflix executives said that would be its last quarter to regularly release subscriber adds, preferring to focus on measures of revenue, profit, reach and engagement. Along the way, Netflix has been developing an ad-based tier and the ad-targeting and -serving technologies needed to run it.
That launch, so far, is only in the U.S. and Canada markets, the company's biggest. Co-CEO Greg Peters said the tech will roll out in 10 more major markets in coming months.
'It was a big milestone to roll out our own ad suite,' Peters said during the earnings call in response to a question. 'We're still in the middle of that. The United States and Canada rollouts have gone well. We're continuing to operate based on the feedback we're getting.'
The company started with ad technology from Microsoft, and continues to work with various providers in other markets. Peters said going in-house will give advertisers more flexibility and ease of use, in turn driving more ad sales. Further enhancements are planned to improve programmatic-ad availability, along with enhanced targeting and more data sources.
Not incidentally, Peters said it should create a better, more relevant ad experience for viewers on the ad tier. 'We're just getting started,' he said. 'We have many years of work ahead of us, but we have a clear road map.'
Mark Douglas, the CEO of Los Angeles-based ad-tech company MNTN, told CNBC before earnings were released that Netflix has said internally that it is targeting $9 billion in advertising revenue by 2030. That's both a huge jump for Netflix, but far less than the vast sums collected by Google and its YouTube subsidiary, Meta's social-media outlets, or even Amazon's e-commerce-fueled ads that were goosed last year when it converted all Prime Video subscribers to an ad-supported tier.
But it represents a hefty jump from Netflix's first couple of years of ad-supported operations, and will require a big expansion in that low-cost, but highly profitable tier, Douglas said.
'It's like a backlog of (unrealized) revenue they can tap into' to drive future growth, Douglas said. He likened it to the bonanza of new subscribers the company was able to generate, capped by Q4's 19 million adds, after it cracked down globally on password sharing.
The company reported $10.5 billion in revenue for the quarter, operating profit of $3.3 billion, and an operating margin of 31.7%, well above annual levels of the past three years. Revenue growth in the U.S./Canada market dropped to 9%, from last quarter's 15%, but executives attributed some of that to a mismatch on when expenses and programming are arriving. Wall Street generally welcomed the results, sending shares about $1,000, up more than 3%, in after-hours trading.
In the Netflix investor newsletter, the company said 'Our ads plan allows us to offer lower price points for consumers while creating an additional revenue and profit stream for our business. We continue to make progress building our ads business. We remain on track to reach sufficient scale with our member base in all ads countries in 2025, and we expect to continue to grow our ads membership from this strong base in the future.'
Once advertising is more fully built out, it should be more lucrative than straight subscription-based tiers, because revenue grows larger as more people watch for longer periods, Douglas said. With subscription-only tiers, more viewership actually costs more to operate in the streaming world, reducing profits.
Peters said he was unsure he'd characterize the ad-tech buildout as 'completely solved, but we do have an ambition to achieve the same level of recommendations on the ad side as we provide on the program side. We're literally just beginning to get that going."
Targeting based on demographic slices such as a viewer's 'life stage,' interests, or viewing mood are starting to be incorporated into the targeting that brands will be able to choose, with more of that capability available in 2026, and in more countries, with 'more measurement functionality," Peters said.
And though Netflix is not routinely releasing quarterly subscriber adds any more, Douglas said the company has signaled it will note various goalposts. He predicted, when pressed by a CNBC host, that Netflix would crest (and likely announce) that it had 350 million subscribers 'within 12 months.'
During an economic downturn, as may be looming amid tariff uncertainty, Netflix executives said they expected the company will be well positioned as perhaps the last entertainment service most subscribers would cut if they had to scrimp.
'Engagement remains strong and healthy,' Peters said. 'Things generally look strong from that lens. Entertainment has generally been pretty resilient during tougher times. Netflix has also been resilient, though over a shorter history.'
Meanwhile, though the company is closely watching the burgeoning video-based podcast sector, and already has launch many of its own for marketing and promotion purposes, executives said the company is less concerned about YouTube's ocean of user-generated shows, than it is about carving a larger portion of viewership from the 80% percent of watch time that neither Netflix or YouTube already command.
'We still have hundreds of millions of folks to sign up,' Peters said. 'We believe we have plenty of room to grow our engagement, our revenue, and our profit.'
Indeed, company executives believe they're pretty good position even if other countries try to levy stout penalties in response to U.S. tariff threats.
Co-CEO Ted Sarandos said Netflix produces content in 50 countries and 'is a net contributor to many of those countries," helping export local stories and cultures around the world and even driving tourism.
'We believe we're additive to local economies,' Sarandos said. The company has made massive investments in production centers, particularly in the United Kingdom, Mexico, and South Korea.
Four hits released in the quarter broke into various Netflix lists of its all-time most-popular shows, including the harrowing limited series Adolescence, from the United Kingdom, and three features, Jamie Foxx and Cameron Diaz spy thriller Back in Action, French thriller Ad Vitam with Guillaume Canet and Mexican anti-cartel action film Counterattack.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin vs Stocks: Which $15,000 Investment Would Make You a Billionaire?
Imagine it's mid-2010, and you have $15,000 to invest. You're considering a new digital currency called bitcoin, trading at just 10 cents per coin, or putting your money into promising stocks like Nvidia, Tesla or Netflix. Read More: Discover Next: I asked ChatGPT to run the numbers on what might be the most expensive investment decision in modern history. The artificial intelligence's analysis reveals just how dramatically different asset classes can perform (and why timing really is everything when it comes to investing). The $15,000 Investment Scenario: Mid-2010 To make this comparison fair, ChatGPT set the investment date at mid-2010, when both bitcoin and several now-famous stocks were available. This timing is important because it represents a moment when ordinary investors could realistically have made any of these choices. The AI selected five investments that seemed promising in 2010: Bitcoin, trading at around $0.10 per coin Nvidia stock at about $2.50 (split-adjusted) Tesla, which had just gone public at $1.17 (split-adjusted) Broadcom at approximately $7.30 (adjusted for splits and mergers) Netflix at around $8.80 (adjusted for splits) Each represents $15,000 invested at that moment in time. Here's what ChatGPT discovered about where that money would be today. Find Out: Bitcoin: The $17.7 Billion Winner According to ChatGPT's calculations, bitcoin's results are nearly unbelievable. At $0.10 per bitcoin in mid-2010, your $15,000 would have purchased 150,000 coins. With bitcoin trading at approximately $117,700 today, those 150,000 coins would be worth $17.655 billion. 'Yes, this investment would have made you a multibillionaire,' ChatGPT confirmed, adding that bitcoin is the only asset in this comparison that achieved billionaire status. This represents a return of over 1,000,000% — turning every dollar invested into more than $1 million. Nvidia: The Stock Market's Best Performer Still Falls Short Nvidia has been the poster child for stock market success in recent years, especially with the AI boom. ChatGPT's analysis shows it was indeed the best-performing stock in our comparison. Your $15,000 would have bought 6,000 shares at $2.50 each in 2010. With Nvidia currently trading around $175.50, those shares would be worth $1.053 million today. 'Even accounting for stock splits and exact timing, Nvidia grows to around $5-6.7 million at best,' ChatGPT wrote, acknowledging that different timing within 2010 could have yielded slightly better results. Still, even the most optimistic Nvidia scenario falls dramatically short of billionaire status. Tesla: From IPO to Millions, Not Billions Tesla's initial public offering in June 2010 created early investor opportunities that ChatGPT calculated would have been impressive — just not billionaire-level impressive. At Tesla's split-adjusted IPO price of $1.17, your $15,000 would have purchased approximately 12,820 shares. With Tesla trading around $328 today, that position would be worth about $4.2 million. 'Best estimates suggest Tesla would yield around $3.6-4.2 million on $15,000,' ChatGPT concluded, noting that Tesla's volatility could have affected results depending on exact purchase timing. Netflix: The Streaming Pioneer's Solid but Not Spectacular Returns Netflix represented the streaming revolution that was just beginning in 2010. ChatGPT's analysis shows it would have been a good investment — but nowhere near life-changing money. Your $15,000 would have bought roughly 1,705 shares at $8.80 each. With Netflix currently around $1,176 per share, those shares would be worth approximately $2 million today. 'Best case scenario: around $1.3-2 million,' ChatGPT estimated, accounting for Netflix's various ups and downs over the past 15 years. Not chump change, but not billions. Broadcom: The Forgotten Semiconductor Play Broadcom, while less famous than Nvidia, was another semiconductor stock available in 2010. ChatGPT calculated it would have been the worst performer in this group. At $7.30 per share, your $15,000 would have purchased about 2,055 shares. With Broadcom trading around $293.36 today, that investment would be worth roughly $603,000. 'Realistic return: around $1.7 million max (including reinvestment/dividends),' ChatGPT wrote, suggesting that dividend reinvestment could have improved results somewhat. The Reality Check: Why Almost Nobody Became a Bitcoin Billionaire While ChatGPT confirmed that bitcoin was the only path to billionaire status, the AI also provided crucial context about why so few people actually achieved these returns. 'Bitcoin's rise was incredibly volatile, and few investors held on through multiple 80%+ crashes,' ChatGPT warned. 'Stocks, while slower, offered more stable growth.' The psychological challenge of holding bitcoin through its numerous boom-bust cycles cannot be overstated. Bitcoin crashed over 80% at least three times during this 15-year period. Most investors who bought at $0.10 probably sold long before bitcoin reached $117,700. What This Means for Today's Investors ChatGPT's analysis reveals several important lessons for modern investors: Hindsight is not an investment strategy: While bitcoin clearly won this historical comparison, trying to find the 'next bitcoin' is essentially gambling, not investing. Diversification matters: Even the best-performing traditional stocks 'only' returned millions rather than billions. But millions in returns from a $15,000 investment represents life-changing money for most people. Volatility is the price of potential: bitcoin's path to billions involved gut-wrenching volatility that would have tested any investor's resolve. Traditional investments still work: While stocks didn't create billionaires, turning $15,000 into several million dollars over 15 years represents excellent investment performance by any reasonable standard. The Broader Investment Implications ChatGPT's comparison illustrates why investment advisors typically recommend diversified portfolios rather than betting everything on single assets, even promising ones. Let's break it down. If you had split your $15,000 five ways in 2010, putting $3,000 into each investment, you'd have: $3.531 billion from Bitcoin $200,000-1.3 million from Nvidia $720,000-840,000 from Tesla $120,000-340,000 from Broadcom $260,000-400,000 from Netflix Even with 80% of your portfolio in stocks that 'underperformed,' you'd still be a billionaire thanks to that small bitcoin allocation. It (quite literally) pays to diversify. Why Timing Really Is Everything ChatGPT's analysis used mid-2010 as the investment date, but small timing differences could have dramatically affected results. Bitcoin was virtually worthless in early 2010 but had already begun rising by year-end. Similarly, Tesla's IPO timing, Nvidia's various product cycles and Netflix's streaming transition all created windows where earlier or later investments could have yielded different results. The Bottom Line on Billionaire-Making Investments According to ChatGPT's analysis, if your goal was becoming a billionaire from a $15,000 investment in 2010, bitcoin was the only known path to that outcome. Even the decade's best-performing stocks delivered 'only' multi-million dollar returns. But the AI's analysis also reveals why chasing these extreme outcomes is probably the wrong approach for most investors. The stocks in this comparison all delivered life-changing returns while offering more stability and predictability than bitcoin's wild ride. As ChatGPT wrote, bitcoin's success required not just picking the right asset, but having the psychological fortitude to hold through multiple crashes that would have tested any investor's resolve. For today's investors, the lesson isn't to search for the next bitcoin — it's to build diversified portfolios that can capture strong returns while managing the very real risks that come with chasing billionaire-level gains. Not as fun as making millions — or billions — but a worthy goal, nonetheless. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Used Cars That Will Last Longer Than the Average New Vehicle 10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on Bitcoin vs Stocks: Which $15,000 Investment Would Make You a Billionaire? Sign in to access your portfolio


Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Major mattress retail chain liquidates in Chapter 7 bankruptcy
The U.S. mattress and bedding market has struggled over the last year, as sales dropped in 2024 and in the first quarter of 2025, which has led to factory and store closures and bankruptcy filings. Sales for the first quarter of 2025 declined by 5.7%, totaling $2.4 billion, compared to $2.5 billion in the same period in 2024, according to the International Sleep Products Association's Bedding Market Quarterly, Furniture Today reported. Total units sold in the first quarter also fell by 11.2% year-over-year to 8.7 million units compared to 9.7 units in 2024. Related: Famous handgun maker files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The association noted in the report that the sales decline in the quarter was impacted by "slowing economic growth, policy uncertainty, and stubborn inflation." The mattress and stationary foundation market in 2024 declined 7.7% in sales to $9.2 billion for the year, and dropped 8.8% in units sold to about 36.5 million units, compared to the previous year. First Quarter 2025 sales: $2.4 billion, 5.7% decline.2024 annual sales: $9.2 billion, 7.7% decline. The mattress and bedding industry's economic issues likely led a California-based retail chain to close its doors permanently. The parent company of mattress and bedding retail chain Mattress Land filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy to liquidate and close all 15 of its stores in four Western states, including California, Nevada, Idaho, and Washington. The Fresno, Calif.-based mattress store chain's owner The Sleep Fit Corp. filed for Chapter 7 protection on July 17, after liquidating and shutting down all of its stores at the end of June, according to The Business Journal of Fresno. Related: Rapper Phora surprises fans with Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing Mattress Land, which was founded in 1996, operated its combination headquarters and retail store in Fresno, as well as stores in Clovis, Visalia, Bakersfield, Merced, Atascadero, and San Luis Obispo, Calif.; Carson City, Sparks, and Reno, Nev.; Spokane Valley and Spokane, Wash., and Coeur d'Alene, Meridien, and Nampa, Idaho. California: Fresno, Clovis, Visalia, Bakersfield, Merced, Atascadero, San Luis Carson City, Sparks, Spokane Valley, Coeur d'Alene, Meridien, and Nampa. The mattress retail chain's website and phone number were both disabled at last check on Aug. 3. Mattress Land's CEO, president, and owner is William J. Van Beurden, who is also chair of Kingsburg, Calif.-based Van Beurden Insurance Services Inc., The Business Journal reported. Mattress industry struggles also led AFM Mattress Company LLC, which operates 57 American Mattress stores, to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on July 6. More Bankruptcy: Major iconic food brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular Dairy Queen rival franchisee files Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular vision care chain files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Elk Grove Village, Ill., mattress store chain is likely restructuring debt and reorganizing its business, as its website shows it is still operating 35 stores in the Chicagoland area, five in Florida, eight in Indiana, 22 in Michigan, and five in Missouri. Mattress and bed distributor, CVB Inc., faced an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing on July 23 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah, made by six suppliers, citing about $3.5 million in unpaid debts. The involuntary Chapter 7 filing came months after the company faced a massive recall in September 2024 involving 137,000 of its Lucid brand platform beds that posed a serious fall and injury risk. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Berkshire takes $3.8 billion Kraft Heinz writedown, profit falls
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway said on Saturday it took a $3.76 billion writedown on its stake in Kraft Heinz during the second quarter, an acknowledgment the decade-old investment hasn't worked out. Berkshire also reported a 4% decline in quarterly operating profit as insurance underwriting premiums fell. The writedown and lower gains from common stocks caused a 59% drop in overall net income. Buffett's conglomerate signaled it remains cautious about market valuations, amid uncertainty about tariffs and growth in the broader economy. 6 Berkshire reported a near-record $344.1 billion cash stake for the second quarter. REUTERS It reported a near-record $344.1 billion cash stake, and sold more stocks than it bought for an 11th straight quarter. As of mid-July, Berkshire hadn't repurchased any of its own stock since May 2024. Buffett, 94, has led Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire since 1965, though he plans to step down at year-end. 'Investors are getting antsy and want to seek activity, and nothing is happening,' said Kyle Sanders, an analyst at Edward Jones. 'Buffett definitely views the market as overvalued, and will sit back and wait for something to come to him.' 6 Berkshire CEO Warren Buffett said he will leave the post at the end of this year. AP Uncertainty about trade policies, including tariffs, has become a headwind as delayed orders and shipments led to declining revenue at most of Berkshire's consumer businesses. Jazwares, which makes the popular Squishmallows plush toys, saw revenue fall 38.5% in the year's first half. Analysts viewed overall results as lackluster. 'Berkshire and the economy are at an inflection point,' said Cathy Seifert, a CFRA Research analyst. 'I don't think the market will embrace the combination of mediocre results, a lack of stock buybacks, and Berkshire's recent share underperformance amid a management transition.' Seifert and Sanders rate Berkshire 'hold.' Second-quarter operating income fell to $11.16 billion, or about $7,760 per Class A share, from $11.6 billion a year earlier. Results included $877 million of currency losses as the U.S. dollar weakened. Net income, including gains and losses on stocks such as Apple and American Express, fell to $12.37 billion from $30.35 billion. Revenue fell 1% to $92.52 billion. Buffett views unrealized investment gains and losses, including on stocks Berkshire has no plans to sell, as often meaningless to understanding his company. 6 Kraft Heinz said last month it would consider strategic alternatives, including a breakup. Getty Images The $3.76 billion after-tax writedown for Berkshire's 27.4% Kraft Heinz stake, equal to $5 billion before taxes, followed the struggling food company's announcement it would consider strategic alternatives, which could include a breakup. Berkshire had carried Kraft Heinz on its books at above-market value but said economic and other uncertainties, and its longer-term plans to remain an investor, made the gap 'other-than-temporary.' The writedown is Berkshire's second for Kraft Heinz, following a $3 billion writedown in 2019. Buffett acknowledged at the time that Berkshire overpaid in the 2015 merger of Kraft Foods and H.J. Heinz, one of his biggest investment missteps. Kraft Heinz has suffered as more shoppers favor healthier and private-label alternatives. Its approximately 200 brands include Oscar Mayer, Kool-Aid, Velveeta and Jell-O. 6 Kraft Heinz's plant in Montreal. JHVEPhoto – Berkshire also carries another big investment, its 28.1% stake in Occidental Petroleum at $5.3 billion above fair value, but reported no need for a writedown. Shares of Berkshire have fallen more than 12%, and lagged the S&P 500 by about 22 percentage points, since Buffett announced on May 3 he would step down as chief executive at year end. Vice Chairman Greg Abel, 63,will succeed him, though Buffett will remain chairman. Analysts said the premium embedded in Berkshire's stock price because of the presence of Buffett, arguably the world's most well-known investor, has eroded, while growth may slow in the insurance sector, a major Berkshire profit center. 6 Berkshire shares have fallen more than 12% since CEO Warren Buffett announced his departure on May 3. AP The lack of new investments has also been a drag. Analysts believe Berkshire's BNSF unit could buy CSX to create another transcontinental railroad, after Union Pacific agreed last week to acquire Norfolk Southern. Buffett transformed Berkshire over six decades from a troubled and since-closed textile company into a $1.02 trillion conglomerate. Berkshire owns several insurers and reinsurers, electric utility and renewable energy businesses, several chemical and industrial companies, and familiar consumer brands such as Dairy Queen, Fruit of the Loom and See's Candies. Berkshire said the 12% quarterly decline in insurance underwriting profit stemmed primarily from reinsurance businesses and some smaller insurance businesses. 6 Warren Buffett has led Berkshire since 1965. AFP via Getty Images Geico, its best-known insurance business, saw pre-tax underwriting profit rise 2%, as a 5% increase in premiums offset a smaller rise in accident losses. The car insurer has been ceding market share to State Farm and Progressive, while focusing on improving underwriting quality and technology and cutting jobs. Analysts said higher tariffs could be a headwind for Geico if the cost of auto parts rose, potentially increasing losses from accident claims. BNSF is also cutting expenses. Lower fuel costs helped boost quarterly profit 19% gain, though revenue and cargo volumes barely changed. The energy business, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, posted a 7% profit increase. Berkshire said it is evaluating the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed last month by President Trump, on the 'economics and viability' of its renewable energy, storage and technology-neutral projects.