Martinelli's Escape Is Testing Panama's Government—and Its Democracy
In early May, former Panamanian President Ricardo Martinelli quietly boarded a flight from Panama City to Bogota. The move ended Martinelli's 15-month stay at the Nicaraguan Embassy in Panama, where he had taken refuge to avoid serving a 10-year prison sentence for money laundering. His departure, which was sanctioned by a discreet safe-conduct granted by Panama's Foreign Ministry and transformed into territorial asylum upon his arrival in Colombia, marks more than the exit of a fugitive politician. It underscores the fragility of democratic institutions in Panama and the tactical resilience of its political elite.
The entire episode, with its opaque legal maneuvers and strategic calculations, reveals a convergence of judicial evasion, partisan brinkmanship and international complicity. It forces a reckoning with how Panama's institutions function under pressure—and for whom.
Martinelli's predicament stems from his conviction in 2023 in the 'New Business' case, a high-profile corruption scandal involving public funds funneled into the purchase of a media conglomerate. Martinelli initially counted on a return to the presidency and the immunity it would provide as a way out of his legal troubles, and in June 2023 he announced his candidacy for the country's presidential election, scheduled for May 2024.
To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter.
But in February 2024, after a court ordered his pre-trial detention while his appeal was decided, Martinelli sought asylum at the Nicaraguan Embassy. When his final appeal failed later that same month, resulting in him being barred from running for office, Martinelli pivoted to a new strategy, remaining in the embassy while working toward leaving Panama for political asylum abroad.
Initially, the administration of President Jose Raul Mulino granted Martinelli safe-conduct to travel to Nicaragua in March 2025, but that plan collapsed amid reports of an unresolved Interpol red notice for Martinelli's arrest and Nicaragua's sudden withdrawal of landing clearance. A second safe-conduct was quietly issued in May, and only after Martinelli's arrival in Colombia was the operation made public, raising public debate about transparency and elite influence.
Martinelli's maneuver was far from a retreat—it was a recalibration. Even from his refuge in the Nicaraguan Embassy, where his movements and associations were restricted under the rules of diplomatic asylum, he continued to exert political influence through social media and orchestrated visits, directing his Realizing Goals, or RM, party and pushing legislation tailored to secure his legal reprieve. Chief among these efforts was a controversial amnesty bill that would nullify his conviction along with those of other political allies. The bill has stalled in the National Assembly, but its mere proposal exposes the depths of Panama's institutional vulnerabilities and the lengths to which Martinelli's faction is willing to go to secure his political future.
Complicating matters is the increasingly tense relationship between Martinelli and Mulino, who was initially Martinelli's vice presidential running mate in last year's election but became his handpicked successor when Martinelli was barred from the race. While Martinelli's support was instrumental in Mulino's electoral victory, fissures have emerged since then. Martinelli loyalists have accused Mulino of betrayal, and the legislative alliance between RM and Mulino's broader coalition is fraying.
Amid the tensions, the amnesty debate has become a litmus test. Backing it signals loyalty to Martinelli. Opposing it signals a commitment to legal accountability and institutional integrity, but comes at a political cost. Disavowing the bill distances Mulino from Martinelli's legacy, allowing him to assert his independence, but it also risks alienating RM's legislative bloc and inviting retaliation from Martinelli's still-powerful network.
Beyond its domestic repercussions, the circumstances surrounding Martinelli's departure have taken a toll on Panama's global standing. Observers across the region view the episode as emblematic of elite impunity. While legal under the 1954 Caracas Convention, Martinelli's transition from diplomatic to territorial asylum reads to many as a procedural workaround to avoid accountability.
Territorial asylum means protection granted by a country when the individual is physically on its soil, allowing greater freedom than diplomatic asylum inside an embassy. In Colombia, Martinelli gained rights such as freedom of association, and his designation as a 'politically persecuted' individual blocks extradition efforts for now.
Unsurprisingly, Colombia's role in his flight has raised eyebrows. By accepting a convicted ex-president on grounds of political persecution—a claim widely disputed by legal analysts—President Gustavo Petro's government broke with precedent and triggered criticism at home and abroad. Colombian journalist Daniel Coronell summed up the sentiment succinctly, declaring that '[t]he only winner is Martinelli.'
The optics since Martinelli's arrival in Colombia have only worsened the backlash. Having previously claimed serious health issues, Martinelli appeared smiling in Bogota and even posed with Panama's ambassador, who was later reprimanded by the Mulino administration. The performative nature of Martinelli's public appearances not only contradicted his asylum narrative but also undermined the seriousness of his legal case. Rather than a fugitive in hiding, Martinelli projected the image of a seasoned operator playing the system.
Martinelli's ambitions remain unchanged: a return to the presidency, but in 2029 rather than 2024. Achieving that goal hinges on either overturning his conviction or rendering it irrelevant through legislation like the amnesty bill. His continued control over RM—the second-largest party in the National Assembly—gives him considerable influence within the legislature, and by all indications he has every intention of using it.
Despite his legal troubles, Martinelli remains very popular in Panama. Before he was forced to withdraw from the race, he was favored to win the 2024 presidential election. While sheltered in the Nicaraguan Embassy, he used social media prolifically and strategically, sharing political commentary alongside casual, relatable content like videos of barbecues and selfies with his dog. That kept him visible and engaged with supporters, fueling his influence even in exile.
All of this sets the stage for a high-stakes political struggle in the years ahead. Should the amnesty effort succeed, Panama risks institutional backsliding and a further erosion of public trust. If it fails, Martinelli could leverage his exile as a rallying cry, positioning himself as a persecuted leader poised for a comeback. Either way, Mulino must continue to manage complex relationships among Panama's political elites, including with his predecessor.
Martinelli's escape to Colombia marks not the end of his political story, but the beginning of a new chapter—one where exile is used as part of a calculated political strategy. Whether he will continue to shape Panama's political landscape through 2029 remains uncertain, largely dependent on the fragile dynamics within the National Assembly and the country's resilience in this test of its democratic institutions.
The broader regional implications are, of course, sobering. The use of political asylum to protect convicted elites could further weaken judicial independence across Latin America, where corruption and impunity already test the resilience of democratic systems.
Cristina Guevara is a Latin America policy analyst and writer. She previously served as a policy and legislative adviser in Panama's National Assembly. In addition to World Politics Review, she has written for Foreign Policy, The Miami Herald, Rolling Stone, Americas Quarterly and The Dallas Morning News, among other outlets. A Chevening scholar, she is currently pursuing her second master's degree focused on inequality and governance in Latin America at University College London.
The post Martinelli's Escape Is Testing Panama's Government—and Its Democracy appeared first on World Politics Review.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelenskyy-Putin-Trump meeting may take place after second Istanbul talks, says Turkish Foreign Ministry
During his visit to Kyiv on Friday 30 May, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has said that Türkiye is proposing to host a meeting between the leaders of the United States, Russia and Ukraine to bring the war in Ukraine closer to an end after potential second talks in Istanbul. Source: European Pravda, citing Hurriyet Daily News, a Turkish English-language newspaper Details: Fidan said Türkiye believes negotiations involving the three leaders and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan could occur following possible second talks between Ukraine and Russia in Istanbul, which may take place next week. Quote from Fidan: "We sincerely think that it is possible to cap the first and second direct Istanbul talks with a meeting between Mr. Trump, Mr. Putin and Mr. Zelenskyy, under the direction of Mr. Erdoğan. Progress is certainly possible if we remain at the negotiating table." Background: Earlier this week, Fidan held talks with senior officials in Moscow, particularly Putin. The Kremlin said on Friday that Putin would consider a summit with Zelenskyy, Trump and Erdoğan only if talks with Kyiv yielded results. Moreover, Fidan said in Kyiv that the Russo-Ukrainian war is approaching a turning point. Earlier, Ukraine's Foreign Ministry noted that in Kyiv, Fidan had shared the results of his visit to Moscow. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Turkish foreign minister says war in Ukraine approach "turning point"
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, at a press conference in Kyiv on Friday after meeting with Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, has said that Russia's war against Ukraine is approaching a turning point. Source: Ukrinform, as reported by European Pravda Quote: "We are approaching a turning point in the war. As noted at the beginning of the talks held in Istanbul on 16 May, we have two paths: either we close our eyes to the continuation of this war, or we achieve lasting peace within this year." Details: Fidan reported that the negotiations between Ukraine and Russia in Istanbul, which took place in May, added a new dimension to diplomatic efforts. Türkiye also considers the prisoner exchange following the Istanbul meeting a sign that negotiations can lead to concrete results. The minister also noted that Russia announced its readiness to continue negotiations on 2 June, and now the exchange of views on the next meeting is taking place in Kyiv. "We believe that the next round is possible on the basis of a fundamental decision taken by the parties in Istanbul. We are ready for the next meetings... We want the war between Ukraine and Russia to end fairly and finally as soon as possible," Fidan said. Background: Earlier, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry reported that Fidan spoke in Kyiv about the results of his visit to Moscow. On 26-27 May, Türkiye's foreign minister visited Moscow, where he met with Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin and the chief Russian diplomat at the Istanbul talks, Vladimir Medinsky. Fidan also held talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. On Thursday 29 May, Erdoğan urged Russia and Ukraine not to close the door on dialogue ahead of a likely meeting between representatives of both countries on Monday in Istanbul. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Turkish foreign minister visits Kyiv to discuss his talks with Russia
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha has welcomed Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan in Kyiv on 30 May after the minister's visit to Moscow this week. In Kyiv, the Turkish diplomat shared the results of negotiations in Russia. Source: European Pravda, citing the press service of the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Details: The ministers discussed in detail the bilateral and international agenda, the peace process, and the need for a complete ceasefire. "Minister Fidan has just returned from Moscow and informed me in detail about what he heard and saw there. We discussed steps that will bring peace to Ukraine," Sybiha said. Details: The ministers paid special attention to the issue of security in the Black Sea region, the Foreign Ministry noted. "Ukraine and Türkiye have a common goal: the Black Sea should be a space of peace, free trade and freedom of navigation," he added. The diplomats also discussed joint work on the implementation of the agreements following the results of the first meeting of the Ukrainian-Turkish working group on reconstruction. In addition, Sybiha expressed special gratitude to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for his role in peace efforts. "We appreciate that Türkiye unconditionally supports the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine, in particular the return of Crimea, and also defends the rights of the Crimean Tatar people," the minister said. Background: On 26-27 May, Türkiye's foreign minister was in Moscow, where he met Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin and Russia's chief negotiator for the Istanbul talks, Vladimir Medinsky. Fidan also held talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Russia proposed that the second round of negotiations with Ukraine be held in Istanbul on 2 June, said Lavrov. At the same time, Kyiv noted that, to achieve results at the meeting, it needs to review Russia's "peace memorandum" in advance. On Thursday 29 May, Erdoğan urged Russia and Ukraine not to close the door on dialogue ahead of a likely meeting between representatives of both countries on Monday in Istanbul. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!