
How Duke's defense shut down Alabama's offense in Elite Eight to reach Final Four
On the Alabama sideline, coach Nate Oats clapped his hands and bent over, hands on knees like an infielder, watching his team. Behind him, many of the fans in the Crimson Tide section rose to their feet.
Advertisement
This was Alabama's chance, but the top-seeded Blue Devils didn't let the Tide score another point for the next 5:15 of game time.
With long arms, quick feet and a tenacious commitment to making every dribble and pass difficult for Alabama, Duke drained the life out of the nation's fastest-moving and highest-scoring offense Saturday night. The Blue Devils beat the Tide 85-65 in the NCAA Tournament to earn the program's 18th trip to the Final Four.
'To hold them to 65 points is incredible,' third-year Duke coach Jon Scheyer said.
Alabama entered the Elite Eight averaging 91 points per game.
Two days after Oats' high-powered offense dropped 113 points and a tournament-record 25 3-pointers on BYU, the Tide shot 35.4 percent from the field, 25 percent from 3-point range (8-for-32) and topped their lowest-scoring game of the season by just one point.
'They did a good job of taking away our 3-ball,' said Tide guard Mark Sears, who went 2-for-15 from the field after scoring 34 points and making 10 3s against BYU.
Nobody expected a repeat of Thursday night's performance by Alabama against Duke, which entered the game with the fourth-best Kenpom defensive efficiency rating in the country.
But considering how well Arizona handled the Blue Devils' defense in Thursday's region semifinal (93 points on 45 percent shooting), everybody was gearing up for a race to 90 against the Tide. BetMGM set the total at 174.5.
'We just got back to what we do,' said Kon Knueppel, Duke's other star freshman.
What Duke does better than any team in the country is combine size and quickness. The Blue Devils are huge, with every player in the rotation at least 6-foot-5 and 7-2 center Khaman Maluach often the last line of defense with a reach that measures a few inches short of 10 feet when he raises his arms.
Advertisement
'At the rim, we shot 48 percent; we only made 12 shots at the rim tonight. We were 12 of 25. You know, he made that tough,' Oats said.
Alabama had 10 offensive rebounds but turned them into eight second-chance points. Oats tried to lure Maluach away from the basket in the first half, inserting Aiden Sherrell, a 6-10 stretch forward who knocked down a couple of 3s when Maluach dropped into the paint.
Scheyer's counter was to use a smaller lineup, but there is no such thing as a small ball with Duke.
Superstar freshman Cooper Flagg is 6-9. Knueppel is 6-7, and Duke guards Tyrese Proctor and Sion James are both 6-6. Guard Caleb Foster was the most-used reserve against Alabama. He's 6-5. And backing up Maluach is 6-11 freshman Patrick Ngongba. One of Duke's best and most versatile defenders, 6-9 Maliq Brown, has been nursing a left shoulder injury and played three minutes on Saturday.
Eventually, Duke started switching on ball screens, at times leaving Flagg or even Maluach on small Alabama guards such as Sears, Chris Youngblood and Aden Holloway. Those three combined to make 21 3s against BYU. They were 3-for-16 from long range against Duke.
'We were switching a lot, especially in the second half, so Khaman was on Sears just as much as me or Tyrese was,' James said. 'The big thing for him was showing them bodies, making sure whoever was guarding the ball knew they weren't on an island by themselves and making sure Sears knew that he wasn't on an island with our big or whoever else. And I think we did a good job for the most part of keeping him off the foul line, where he gets a lot of his points from.'
Foster added: 'Khaman, Malik, Pat, they can slide their feet, man. It just elevates the level of our defense. It makes us different. I mean, you don't really find bigs like that anywhere.'
Advertisement
Alabama's smaller offensive players were unable to blow by Duke's big defenders without being swallowed up by help.
'They switched, and we kind of went to iso ball. That's not how we play,' Oats said.
Scheyer credited his players for not getting 'spooked' by Alabama's 3-point barrage against BYU.
'I'm sure we'll look back, and we're fortunate that they missed some open ones, as well. But really I think the versatility for our guys is a big thing for us,' Scheyer said.
During the decisive stretch when Alabama couldn't manage a point, the Tide missed seven straight shots, including five layups.
To compound the damage, Duke played patiently on offense, Scheyer often holding up the stop sign like a third-base coach as his team took the ball up the court. The Blue Devils drained the clock even if the possession didn't result in points, and they didn't allow Alabama to get anything easy in transition. The Tide managed just eight fast-break points.
By the time the Tide snapped the drought with a free throw by Sears, Duke led 78-59 with 2:47 left.
For Alabama fans, the slow suffocation must have felt oddly familiar. In the early years of Nick Saban's football dynasty, the Tide would grind teams down with defense and play low-risk, methodical offense. It was the type of physical domination that left opponents feeling helpless even as the scoreboard suggested — almost mockingly — the game was still in reach.
That was Duke on Saturday night. The Blue Devils never trailed, and for most of the game, the lead hung between eight and 11 points. And just when it looked as if Alabama might provide some late-game drama, Duke instead squeezed even harder and pulled away.
'We want to use our length and size, and these guys did an incredible job,' Scheyer said of his defense. 'Couldn't be more proud.'
(Top photo of Sion James (14) and Mark Sears: Patrick Smith / Getty Images)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
Auburn's claim of 7 football titles is a throwback to a flawed system. Don't blame the Tigers
Not so long ago, in a land not so far away, what sounds like a fairy tale was reality. An SEC team won every game it played. It beat four top 15 teams. Only two wins came by single digits. The BCS computers said, 'Thanks, but no thanks,' and tapped undefeated USC and Oklahoma teams to play for the national title. Advertisement That was 2004. Two decades later, Auburn is — why now? who knows! — rewriting history. Tuesday, it announced plans to recognize that 2004 team as a national champion, one of seven new titles the program will now commemorate. With one decision, it also added national championships 1910, 1913, 1914, 1958, 1983 and 1993, taking it from two to nine all time. It might be absurd. But I say let Auburn cook. College football has never made sense. It's never been fair that a team can win every game on its schedule and not get to compete for a national title on the field. It's infuriating. It's unlike other sports. It'll likely never happen again after the College Football Playoff expanded from four teams to 12, a new world from the two-team BCS National Championship Game that locked out Auburn 21 years ago. Auburn's decision Tuesday harkens back to a bygone era of the sport, where national championships could routinely be claimed and disputed. Ironically, in 2017, Auburn failed to end UCF's undefeated season in the Peach Bowl, which gave the Knights the impetus to controversially hang '2017 National Champions' signage in the Bounce House after the season. Auburn, welcome to the club. 'For too long, Auburn has chosen a humble approach to our program's storied history — choosing to only recognize Associated Press National Championships,' athletic director John Cohen said. 'Starting this fall, we have made the decision to honor the accomplishments of our deserving student-athletes, coaches, and teams from Auburn's proud history.' The 2004 team, led by future first-round picks Jason Campbell, Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams, could make a case. Not all of the seven new titles are as legitimate. In 1993, Terry Bowden led the Tigers to an undefeated season, but the program was under NCAA sanctions and unrecognized by the coaches' poll and bowl games. It ranked fourth in the AP Top 25. Advertisement I'll begrudgingly allow it. The 1910 Auburn team, which went 6-1, was named champion by the Maxwell Ratings and College Football Rankings. It's important to note that neither of these rankings existed at the time. They're run by Loren Maxwell and Kyle Matschke. They are not grizzled pre-World War I college football sickos who died decades ago. They're men living in 2025 who built ratings systems and crowned retroactive champions. Now, a school is recognizing them. The same is true of the Howell Ratings System, which gave Auburn the 1914 title. Auburn lost a game in 1910. Champion Pitt did not. It tied a game in 1914. Champion Army was unbeaten and untied. But a sport with no one in charge has no mechanisms to prevent teams from claiming titles out of thin air. And while the legitimacy of Auburn's titles is questionable, it's not like those teams went head to head. There's at least some debate, even if it's being spawned by ratings models decades later. It's all silly, but credit to Auburn for recognizing it and giving their program more things to celebrate and honor from the past. Don't hate the player. Hate the game. Alabama fans — so long as no one takes a closer look at the dubious claims behind many of their 18 titles — will laugh. So will fans of other rivals like Georgia. Anyone associated with Auburn should ignore the complaints and derision and join the parade. Hundreds of players from the proudest teams in Auburn history are more revered than they were yesterday. Ultimately, that's what this is about. That and making Jordan-Hare Stadium feel a little cooler and more historic. Come and take the signage down. Try it. They'll just put it back up again. Auburn got a little prouder on Tuesday. And there's nothing anybody can do to change that. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Alabama football 2025 season preview, predictions: Jaylen Mbakwe
One of the top overall athletes on the Alabama Crimson Tide's roster, Jaylen Mbakwe is certainly an intriguing name to monitor as we enter the 2025 season. A former top recruit, Mbakwe is making a position change during his second season with the Crimson Tide this fall, moving from the defensive side of the ball to offense. With this, Mbakwe moves from cornerback to wide receiver. Playing both ways in high school as well, wide receiver is a position that Mbakwe has past experience in, leaving reason to believe that the former in-state star could certainly make an impact for the Crimson Tide offensive this season. An intriguing player on the Crimson Tide's roster, here is everything you need to know about Alabama wide receiver Jaylen Mbakwe entering the 2025 season. Jaylen Mbakwe player information Position: Wide Receiver Jersey Number: No. 3 Height: 5'11 Weight: 190 Class: Sophomore Hometown: Clay, Alabama High School: Clay-Chalkville Jaylen Mbakwe career stats Mbakwe is entering his second season at Alabama this fall, as well as his first on the offensive side of the ball. Last season, Mbakwe appeared in 12 games for the Crimson Tide where he had 15 tackles, one TFL, one interception, and two PD, while also returning two punts for 46 yards, as well as a kickoff for 15 yards. Jaylen Mbakwe 2024 stats As mentioned previously, Mbakwe saw action for the Crimson Tide a year ago as a true freshman with 15 tackles, one TFL, one interception, and two PD across 12 games. Mbakwe also saw time on special teams where he had two punt returns for 46 yards, as well as a kick return for 15 yards. Jaylen Mbakwe recruiting ranking According to the 247Sports Composite rankings, Mbakwe was considered as the nation's No. 12 overall prospect in the 2024 recruiting class, as well as the No. 2 cornerback nationally. A five-star prospect, Mbakwe committed to the Crimson Tide in July 2022, and was rated as the No. 3 player in the state of Alabama out of in-state Clay-Chalkville High School. Jaylen Mbakwe 2025 season outlook Similar to his freshman season, Mbakwe is likely to make an impact for the Crimson Tide in 2025, but in what exact role could that be? Entering the season, Mbakwe does not currently project as one of Alabama's starting wide receivers, but is however among the top backup options. One of the top athletes on Alabama's roster, Mbakwe should see action throughout the season at receiver, as well as on special teams, and could potentially emerge into a larger role offensively as the season goes along. Overall, expect to see a lot of Mbakwe once again this season, but for the former five-star prospect to likely not rank among Alabama's top two-to-three leading receivers. Jaylen Mbakwe 2025 season prediction 2025 Prediction: 15 receptions, 200 yards, 2 TD, 5 kick/punt returns, 50 yards Contact/Follow us @RollTideWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Alabama news, notes and opinion. This article originally appeared on Roll Tide Wire: Alabama football 2025 preview, predictions: Jaylen Mbakwe
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Auburn is completely justified in claiming 4 more national titles
The Auburn Tigers just closed the gap on the University of Alabama in the national title debate, and they didn't have to take a single snap to do it. Claiming four new national titles in one swoop, in the year 2025, has to rank as Auburn's greatest victory since the Kick Six. Thing is, based on the precedent already set down by that school across the state, Auburn is completely justified in claiming most, if not necessarily all four of the new titles. What's good for the Tide is good for the Tigers, after all. 'For too long, Auburn has chosen a humble approach to our program's storied history — choosing to recognize only Associated Press national championships,' Auburn athletic director John Cohen told On3 in announcing the new title windfall. Two banners, for the 1957 and 2010 seasons, hang in Jordan-Hare Stadium, and prior to this week the Tigers also acknowledged the 1913, 1983 and 1993 seasons as meeting national championship qualifications. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Effective immediately, Auburn will now claim the 1910, 1914, 1958 and 2004 seasons as national championship ones, because, as Cohen notes, the Tigers' recognitions 'now align with the well-established standard used by the NCAA's official record book and our peers across the nation.' Auburn can justify the new rings on two fronts: first, because pre-21st-century college football was a chaotic nest of competing rankings and ad hoc justifications, and second, because Alabama already went there. Reason #1: Nobody knows anything The Tigers are taking advantage of 20th century college football's inherent absurdity. Then as now, the soul of college football lies in argument, the furious and fiery debate over unanswerable questions of strength and worth. But for all the good that the College Football Playoff and its predecessor postseason series have brought the game, they've robbed us of the debate of which team really would've come out on top in a winner-take-all matchup. When you determine your postseason rankings via polls rather than games, there's ample room for debate … and ample territory to claim championships on your own a century after the fact. Multiple contemporaneous and after-the-fact polls have attempted to make sense of college football's anything-goes era, some with far more statistical rigor and validity than others. Still, finding a poll that breaks your way is like finding a $100 bill on the ground; you might not be entitled to it, but you're going to keep it anyway. Auburn does have history in its corner. The Auburn of the 1910s was a fearsome unit, led by a diminutive Irishman named Mike Donahue and featuring players with spectacular names like Fatty Warren, Baby Taylor and Moon Ducote. In the three national championship seasons Auburn now claims, the Tigers won 22 games, lost one and tied one. Auburn and Alabama weren't playing at that time due to hard feelings on both sides, which was good news for the Tide, a mediocre 15-11 over the same stretch. The 1958 team played under a total blackout — no television, no bowl appearances — but still managed to go 9-0-1. That was only good enough for fourth in the final rankings, behind LSU (10-0), Iowa (7-1-1), and Army (8-0-1). The 2004 team went 13-0 but was not included in the two-team BCS, losing out on a berth by mere percentage points to USC and Oklahoma. Auburn and Oklahoma were tied going into the regular season's final week, but because Auburn didn't beat Alabama badly enough in the Iron Bowl, winning by 'only' eight points, Oklahoma moved ahead only to get shellacked by USC in the Orange Bowl. (Incidentally, I cover all this in my new — and apparently already dated — book Iron In The Blood: How the Alabama vs. Auburn Rivalry Shaped the Soul of the South, on sale next Tuesday. Feel free to correct the appropriate passages by hand.) Reason #2: Alabama did it first If you're mad at Auburn for claiming four new titles, you might want to reserve a good measure of your scorn for their rival. Back in the 1980s, an Alabama sports information director went diving in the record books and in one swoop, awarded Alabama five pre-Bear Bryant-era titles. These range from defensible and acceptable to absurd, like the 1941 season where Alabama went 9-2 and finished 20th (!) in the AP poll … but ranked No. 1, tied with Minnesota, in a single, much smaller poll. Nothing Auburn did Tuesday is anywhere near as egregious as that, and yet the 1941 team remains canonized on Alabama's Walk of Champions in front of Bryant-Denny Stadium. Now, granted, there's the question of an incredibly slippery slope here. If Auburn is going to claim a national title for 2004, why can't Utah — which also went undefeated at 12-0 — also claim one? Why couldn't 2017 Central Florida or 2023 Florida State, which, like 2004 Auburn, were both left out of the postseason dance despite going undefeated? For that matter, why can't Alabama claim the 1966 title and jump up to 19? That season, Alabama went 11-0 with six shutouts, but finished behind two teams — Notre Dame and Michigan State — that went 9-0-1 and played to a tie in late November. The suspicion, then and now, was that pollsters of the day were punishing the Crimson Tide for the state of Alabama's woeful record on civil rights in the turbulent 1960s. (Politics and sports have always intertwined.) Yes, Auburn's ring-grab could well set off a new wave of schools retroactively seeking to claim national titles won by their great-grandfathers. We could see new banners hanging in stadiums all across the country as enterprising researchers whip up dissertation-length justifications for why their school deserves titles from the days before cars or TV. But so what? We now have in place a means of determining, once and for all, a season's indisputable national champion. And as college football sins go, a bit of reapportioned valor ranks pretty low on the list. We've got to hold onto something to argue about, after all.