Nebraska Lottery results: See winning numbers for Mega Millions, Pick 3 on July 11, 2025
Lottery players in Nebraska can choose from popular national games like the Powerball and Mega Millions, which are available in the vast majority of states. Other games include Lotto America, Lucky For Life, Pick 3, Pick 5, MyDaY and 2 by 2.
Big lottery wins around the U.S. include a lucky lottery ticketholder in California who won a $1.27 billion Mega Millions jackpot in December 2024. See more big winners here. And if you do end up cashing a jackpot, here's what experts say to do first.
Here's a look at Friday, July 11, 2025 results for each game:
12-23-24-31-56, Mega Ball: 01
Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.
4-4-4
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
17-20-22-28-37
Check Pick 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Red Balls: 19-25, White Balls: 11-18
Check 2 By 2 payouts and previous drawings here.
01-06-08-18-47, Lucky Ball: 11
Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Month: 04, Day: 16, Year: 53
Check MyDay payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
Pick 3, 5: By 10 p.m. CT daily.
Lucky For Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
2 By 2: By 10 p.m. CT daily.
MyDaY: By 10 p.m. CT daily.
Lotto America: 9:15 p.m CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
Winning lottery numbers are sponsored by Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network.
Tickets can be purchased in person at gas stations, convenience stores and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.
You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network, in these U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington D.C., and West Virginia. The Jackpocket app allows you to pick your lottery game and numbers, place your order, see your ticket and collect your winnings all using your phone or home computer.
Jackpocket is the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue for audience referrals to Jackpocket services. GAMBLING PROBLEM? CALL 1-800-GAMBLER, Call 877-8-HOPENY/text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 18+ (19+ in NE, 21+ in AZ). Physically present where Jackpocket operates. Jackpocket is not affiliated with any State Lottery. Eligibility Restrictions apply. Void where prohibited. Terms: jackpocket.com/tos.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a USA Today editor. You can send feedback using this form.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Nebraska Lottery results, winning numbers: Mega Millions, Pick 3, more
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
6 minutes ago
- CNN
On GPS: Nvidia CEO on whether AI will lead to job losses
Fareed speaks with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang about the productivity gains from the AI revolution — and whether people should be concerned about job losses.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Investor's $6K Bitcoin Gift Is Now Worth $13K—But Should They Cash Out Or Double Down?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A Reddit debate reveals the eternal crypto dilemma: Is understanding the technology essential for investment success, or can faith in digital scarcity be enough? When a Reddit user recently shared their dilemma about a gifted Bitcoin investment that had more than doubled in value, the response illuminated one of the most fundamental debates in modern investing: Do you need to understand an asset to profit from it? The investor received $6,000 worth of Bitcoin several years ago, watched it grow to over $13,000, but admits they 'don't understand the monetary value of crypto.' Now they're considering cashing out to cover living expenses or maximize retirement contributions—a decision that sparked hundreds of responses revealing the deep philosophical divide in the crypto community. Don't Miss: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's , starting today. $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. The 'hold' camp presented compelling arguments beyond mere speculation. Bitcoin's hard cap of 21 million coins creates genuine scarcity, with an estimated 5 million-6 million coins already lost forever. This scarcity model stands in stark contrast to traditional fiat currencies, where central banks can increase supply at will. Multiple commenters positioned Bitcoin as 'digital gold'—a decentralized savings account operating independently of government monetary policy. The network effects and security of what supporters call 'the most decentralized, powerful, and secure network ever created' only strengthen as adoption increases. The historical performance argument is hard to ignore: Bitcoin has consistently outperformed traditional asset classes over extended periods, leading many to argue that selling early often results in missed opportunities for significant future gains. Trending: BlackRock is calling 2025 the year of alternative assets. The 'sell' advocates presented equally valid reasoning. Conventional wisdom suggests maxing out retirement accounts before pursuing higher-risk investments. With tax-advantaged accounts offering guaranteed benefits, the opportunity cost of holding volatile crypto assets deserves consideration. The high volatility of cryptocurrencies can create 'sleepless nights' for investors who don't fully understand the asset. The 'invest in what you understand' principle remains a cornerstone of sound investing—if you can't articulate why you own an asset beyond price appreciation, you may be speculating rather than investing. Perhaps the most intriguing debate centered on whether understanding Bitcoin's technology is necessary for investment success. The 'you don't need to know' camp argued that most people don't fully understand how traditional money or electricity work, yet benefit from these systems daily. They suggested focusing on economic principles rather than technical details. The 'know what you own' advocates emphasized that investment success requires understanding value propositions and fundamental price drivers—knowledge extending beyond technical Reddit debate offers actionable insights: Assess Your Risk Tolerance: If cryptocurrency volatility causes anxiety, consider reducing exposure regardless of potential returns. Prioritize Tax-Advantaged Accounts: For most investors, maximizing 401k and IRA contributions provides guaranteed benefits that often outweigh speculative gains. Consider Partial Liquidation: Rather than all-or-nothing, selling a portion to fund retirement accounts while maintaining crypto exposure offers balanced risk management. Beware of Echo Chambers: Seeking advice from crypto-specific communities may yield biased perspectives. The Bitcoin investment dilemma reflects broader questions about modern portfolio construction and risk management. While Bitcoin's scarcity model and network effects present compelling arguments for long-term appreciation, the fundamental principle of investing within one's understanding and risk tolerance remains paramount. For investors facing similar decisions, the key lies in honest self-assessment: Can you sleep soundly with assets you don't fully understand? Are you prepared for speculative investment volatility? Most importantly, does your strategy align with your broader financial goals? The answer to these questions—rather than Bitcoin's price action—should ultimately guide your decision. Read Next: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O'Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are . Image: Shutterstock This article This Investor's $6K Bitcoin Gift Is Now Worth $13K—But Should They Cash Out Or Double Down? originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump allies open new front with Powell over building rehab
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump and his allies have seized upon a new way to criticize the head of the US central bank: his handling of an expensive renovation of the Federal Reserve's headquarters. Singer Akon's Failed Futuristic City in Senegal Ends Up a $1 Billion Resort Why Did Cars Get So Hard to See Out Of? How German Cities Are Rethinking Women's Safety — With Taxis Philadelphia Reaches Pact With Workers to End Garbage Strike The construction project offers the clearest example yet of how Trump and those in his orbit are looking for every opportunity to scrutinize Jerome Powell's leadership at the central bank, even beyond his economic stewardship. Some administration officials also appear to be building a case that the renovation is the opportunity Trump needs to meet the high legal standard required to remove Powell from the Fed's Board of Governors. The heightened pressure coincides with Trump's relentless calls for the Fed to lower interest rates — which Powell and fellow policymakers have so far ignored this year. Trump has lambasted the Fed chief in turn and made clear he'll replace Powell when his term as chair expires in May 2026 with someone who wants lower rates. 'I think what we need is regime change at the Fed, and that's not just about the chairman, it's about a range of people,' former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh said on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures. 'It's about breaking some heads, because the way they've been doing business is not working.' Warsh, who also called for rate cuts, has been widely mentioned as a possible replacement for Powell. In recent days, administration officials and some congressional Republicans have zeroed in on the renovation project, taking issue with its rising costs, what they consider extravagant design features and Powell's recent testimony about the construction before Congress. Kathryn Judge, a law professor at Columbia University who studies the Fed, said the questions 'could feed a negative stereotype that the Fed is too far removed from the realities that most people are facing.' That dynamic, she said, could 'undermine its credibility with the broader public and potentially actually serve President Trump's claims that what we need is a Federal Reserve who is more accountable to the president and to the people that elected him.' Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council at the White House, said Powell's future depends on how the Fed chair answers questions about the renovation costs. 'It was never envisioned by the people that voted for the construction of the Fed, that the Fed could print money and toss it around willy nilly,' Hassett said on ABC's This Week. The Fed has said its renovations of two historic buildings at its Washington headquarters are designed to reduce costs over time by consolidating its operations. But Powell's critics have homed in on the growing costs, along with media reports that have characterized several of the renovation's design features as lavish. 'It's outrageous,' Warsh said on Fox. 'Maybe a new paint job, maybe some fresh computer terminals, maybe some brand new models at the Fed so we can improve the conduct of monetary policy.' Fed budget documents show cost estimates for the project have risen to $2.5 billion this year, compared with $1.9 billion in 2023. The project's 'construction cost estimates have continued to increase, particularly within the mechanical, electrical and plumbing trades, due to competitive bid pricing,' the Fed's 2025 budget says. In a July 10 letter addressed to Powell, Russ Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, demanded Powell provide more details. 'Instead of attempting to right the Fed's fiscal ship, you have plowed ahead with an ostentatious overhaul of your Washington DC headquarters,' Vought said in the letter posted to social media. In the post, Vought also asserted that Powell had 'grossly mismanaged the Fed.' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement that the president 'can both call out the Fed for failing to do its job by its own stated objectives and ensure that taxpayer money is not wasted on things that do not benefit the American people.' This specific line of criticism comes as Powell has declined to answer questions about whether he will depart the central bank when his chairmanship is over. His underlying term as a governor extends into 2028. With one exception, past Fed chairs have exited when they surrender their leadership role. Should Powell stay on, it could pose a roadblock to Trump's ambition to exert more influence over monetary policy once he installs a new chair. That will already prove difficult given that interest rates are set by a majority vote of the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee. If Powell remains, he'll deny Trump the opportunity to fill another open governor seat. It would also introduce the possibility that Powell retains more influence over the committee than its new chair, who may lack credibility among Fed officials. The drama developing around the Fed also follows a May Supreme Court ruling that signaled it would likely shield the Fed in any decision that allows Trump to oust top officials at two other independent federal agencies. Although legal challenges in that case continue, the decision suggested that the removal of any Fed governor would still require cause, which has been interpreted by the courts to mean inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office. Trump has continued to say he won't fire Powell but said the Fed chief should resign if allegations that he lied to lawmakers prove true. 'What they're trying to manufacture is some 'cause' not related to monetary policy disagreements,' said Scott Alvarez, a former general counsel at the Fed, who added he did not believe the renovation rose to the level of cause for dismissal. Powell and the Fed have sought to counter the criticisms leveled over the renovations. On Friday, the central bank added a 'Frequently Asked Questions' page about the project to its website. It describes why costs have increased and disputes some of the design features that critics have targeted. 'The Federal Reserve takes seriously the responsibility to be a good steward of public resources,' the page says. A Fed official said that Powell had been truthful during last month's Senate Banking Committee hearing where he discussed the project. Powell acknowledged cost overruns for the renovations in response to Republicans' questions, but pushed back on the notion the project is extravagant. 'There's no VIP dining room, there's no new marble,' Powell said. 'There are no special elevators — there's just, there are old elevators that have been there — there are no new water features, there's no beehives and there's no roof terrace gardens.' Powell added that the project has 'continued to evolve' and that some earlier features 'are no longer in the plans.' He also agreed that Fed staff would brief Senate Republicans' staff about the project. That briefing is expected to happen later this month. The OMB's Vought, in his letter to Powell, said the testimony raised 'serious questions' about whether the project is in compliance with a law governing such construction. 'Although minor deviations from approved plans may be inevitable, your testimony appears to reveal that the project is out of compliance with the approved plan with regard to major design elements,' Vought wrote. A 2021 document from the National Capital Planning Commission – the federal agency that reviews and approves projects like the Fed's – is the most recent, publicly available review of the full scope of the renovation. The Fed official said an external architect and engineering firm had not advised that the planned changes needed to be resubmitted to the NCPC. Meanwhile, Trump recently appointed three White House officials to serve on the NCPC. One of them, James Blair, a White House deputy chief of staff, said recently on social media he would request a review of the project and a site visit immediately. 'At a time when the Fed is running an operating deficit, maintains high interest rates and is receiving significant public scrutiny, one has to wonder whether the so-called 'Taj Mahal near the National Mall' project is in the best interests of the board & the public it serves,' Blair wrote. Judge, the Columbia professor, said it is appropriate for the White House to scrutinize the Fed's spending to ensure accountability. But in this case, the context is relevant, she said. 'It's very hard to believe that that is what the administration is doing, given how hard the administration has fought to get Powell to lower rates and to lower rates more quickly, and to get Powell out of office more quickly,' Judge said. 'It makes the concerns about the cost of renovation look like a pretense and that's not a healthy way to ensure ongoing credibility.' —With assistance from María Paula Mijares Torres. 'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions Trump's Cuts Are Making Federal Data Disappear Soccer Players Are Being Seriously Overworked Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub? Trade War? No Problem—If You Run a Trade School ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
