
YouTuber Kamal Kaur's murder, morality and silence: Is Punjab drifting backwards?
This is not the first time an act of extrajudicial violence in Punjab has found implicit—or even explicit—support from the Sikh clergy. In 2021, a Dalit man was lynched at the Golden Temple premises after being accused of sacrilege. His murder was caught on camera, yet no one from the Sikh institutions or political leadership condemned it outright.advertisementIn 2023, Sudhir Suri, a Hindu outfit leader, was gunned down in Amritsar. The alleged assailant, Sandeep Singh, was valorised on social media by fringe elements as a defender of the faith. He was showered with flower petals by Sikh groups. Again, silence—or at best mealy-mouthed justification—followed from the religious quarters.Earlier this year, the Amritsar Pride Parade, scheduled for April 27, was cancelled due to strong opposition from Sikh organisations and concerns about religious sanctity. Paramajit Singh Akali, a Nihang Sikh, led the objection, and the clergy supported the protests. The parade has been organised since 2019 as a connecting platform for the LGBTQIA+ community in the city.In the Kamal Kaur case, there's now evidence that the accused, Mehron, had fled to Dubai. Some of his accomplices have been arrested and sent to judicial custody. But what about the broader message? When a religious authority cloaks a murder with moral legitimacy, it is not just justice that is delayed but society that is endangered.This spiral of intimidation and vigilante justice is not confined to one incident. Last year, a Nihang Sikh publicly harassed and threatened the popular social media couple behind the 'Kulhad Pizza' brand. In October 2024, Nihang Sikhs, led by Baba Maan Singh, had threatened these Jalandhar-based social media influencers, Sehaj Arora and Gurpreet Kaur, accusing them of posting 'lecherous' videos that offended religious sentiments.advertisementThe Nihangs reportedly demanded that Sehaj either remove his turban or take down the content. The coupled had approached the Akal Takht. Despite sustained intimidation and growing unrest in the community, the Punjab police remained passive. It was only after the couple moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court that they were granted legal protection.Until then, the law enforcement agencies chose silence over action. The harassment escalated to such a level that they were forced to leave Punjab and seek safety elsewhere. The police response was tepid, at best. An FIR was filed, but the narrative—that religious orthodoxy allows for moral policing—remained unchallenged.Moderate and liberal voices in Punjab have started raising red flags. 'Are we now deciding morality with swords?' asks one activist. 'Where is the line between personal freedom and public violence?'Some critics highlight the dangerous absence of institutional guardrails. Thespian Pali Bhupinder Singh argues: 'Kanchan Kumari made low-quality videos, but there was clearly an audience for them. And while her murder can never be justified, the debate that followed has not been a debate at all—it has become a contest of entrenched opinions, motivated by hate, outrage or ideological agendas.'advertisementThe silence of the Sikh institutions is not seen as accidental. These recurring episodes recall Punjab's darkest era of the 1980s, when militancy rose not just from separatist demands but a deeply intolerant climate that branded poets, artists and reformers as enemies of the faith.Poet Avtar Singh Pash, known for his radical humanism, was gunned down in 1988. Actor Varinder Deol and singer Amar Singh Chamkila, whose lyrics celebrated life in all its rough-edged reality, were murdered by extremists. Their crime? Dissent. Expression. Popularity.Even the then Akal Takht jathedar, Bhai Ranjit Singh, was convicted in the assassination of Baba Gurbachan Singh, head of the Nirankari sect, in 1980. That killing catalysed a wave of sectarian violence in Punjab. Yet Ranjit Singh is not perceived as a villain in the society.Four decades on, Punjab's wounds have not healed; they've only been papered over. And now, dangerously, the old script is reappearing. Several people in the Sikh clergy are actively pushing the community toward radical agendas, squeezing the space for moderate Sikhs and liberal voices. The glorification of Khalistan militants, the erasure or underplaying of the role of those who opposed them, and the selective invocation of Sikh pride all point to a deeper malaise.advertisementNone of this is happening in vacuum. It is enabled, even accelerated, by the dwindling credibility of Sikh institutions—both religious and political—that once held moral authority, but now appear either complicit or compromised.What makes the situation more alarming is the failure of institutions—religious, political and administrative—to draw the line. The Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), politicians and Sikh religious leaders have all failed to issue a full-throated condemnation of such acts. Even in cases like Kamal Kaur's murder, where the perpetrator is named and the act itself horrific, the narrative is being twisted into one of moral justification.It is a slippery slope. What begins as cultural regulation quickly morphs into legitimised violence. The state's complicity—through inaction—only emboldens the self-appointed guardians of morality.Punjab, a land of poets and reformers, deserves better. The promise of freedom, of faith without fear, cannot be sacrificed at the altar of orthodoxy. When the clergy justifies killing and institutions look the other way, it is not just the victim who suffers but the soul of Punjab itself.advertisementSubscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
19 minutes ago
- The Print
Blanket ban on online money games to e-sports push, how new Bill proposes to alter gaming space
The bill is understood to have been considered in light of not just gaming addiction among the youth, but also concerns over cross-border and inter-state operations by extremists facilitating money laundering and terror financing. It proposes to outlaw all online betting and gambling activities, online fantasy sports, online casino games, including poker and blackjack, and online lotteries. New Delhi: From completely prohibiting 'online money games', including fantasy sports like Dream11, to promoting e-sports, like DOTA 2, the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 tabled in the Lok Sabha Wednesday proposes to alter the multi-billion-dollar online gaming industry. Notably, a Financial Action Task Force (FATF) report released last month had flagged that terrorists and extremists are increasingly using platforms for online gaming as a hunting ground for new recruits as well to raise and move funds. Mumbai-based technology and gaming lawyer Jay Sayta told ThePrint that traditionally, there has been a difference between skill-based and chance-based games, and that any game played online, if it was a game of skill, was permitted so far, even if it involved money. Sayta has represented online gaming companies in courts. 'But this bill makes no difference between online games of skill and chance. It says whether it is a game of skill or chance, any game played for stakes or money or money's worth is called an online money game, and there is a prohibition on such games, including endorsement, banking services, etc for them,' he said. The bill, therefore, proposes a complete ban on any online game played with money or money's worth, with the expectation of winning anything. This would impact all real money gaming apps, including Dream11, Rummy, Ludo, Winzo or Zupee. The bill carves out an exception, allowing e-sports like Dota 2 or Counter-Strike, and online social games, like Candy Crush or Ludo, which are purely for recreational or educational purposes, and don't involve money. India has a patchwork of laws on the issue currently, with several states, including Karnataka, having enacted different laws on online gaming, and high courts having given different rulings on such laws. This is because gambling & betting is a state subject under the Constitution of India. What the bill bars The new bill intends to prohibit 'online money games', which allow users to deposit money in the hope of making more money, and online money gaming services. According to the definition sought to be introduced in law, an 'online money game' would include an online game—irrespective of whether such a game is based on skill or chance or both— in which users pay fees, deposit money, or other stakes, in expectation of monetary returns. Anybody offering online money gaming services can be punished with a three-year jail term or a fine of up to Rs 1 crore or both, according to the draft bill. It also prohibits advertisements related to online money games in any media, purportedly including WhatsApp, or by social media influencers. Anybody who contravenes this can be punished with a two-year jail term or a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh or both. Additionally, the bill prohibits banks and financial institutions from facilitating any transaction or funds towards payment for any online money gaming service. Violation of this provision allows for punishment of up to three years or a fine of Rs 1 crore or both. Repeat offences can attract enhanced penalties, including imprisonment of three to five years, and fines up to Rs 2 crore. The bill also allows for blocking access to unlawful gaming platforms under the Information Technology Act, 2000. What the bill allows The draft bill proposes to empower the central government to take steps to recognise e-sports as a legitimate form of competitive sport in India. According to the draft bill, e-sports means an online game which may involve organised competitive events between individuals or teams, conducted in multiplayer format. These include games recognised by the National Olympic Committee or National Paralympic Committee or National Sports Federation or Regional Sports Federation. However, such an e-sport should not involve placing of bets, wagers or any other stakes by any person. Several Esports tournaments have come up in the past few years, including the Commonwealth Esports Championship 2022, in which the Indian Dota 2 team won the bronze medal. The bill also empowers the central government to take steps to recognise, categorise and register 'online social games' and facilitate their development and availability for recreational and educational purposes. 'Online social game' may include an online game which does not involve staking of money or other stakes, or participation with the expectation of winning in return of money. Such games are offered solely for entertainment, recreation or skill-development purposes. The game may allow access through payment of a subscription or a one time access fee, as long as the payment is not in the nature of a stake or a wager. The draft bill goes on to establish or designate an authority for recognition, promotion and development of e-sports and online social games. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: Spotlight on online gaming amid fraud, money laundering cases. MHA, MeitY & ED to firm up regulations


India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
BJP should introspect...: AAP's take after attack on Delhi Chief Minister
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Anurag Dhanda on Wednesday condemned the attack on Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, while also urging the ruling BJP to reflect on its own conduct.'There is no place for violence in a democracy. We condemn the attack on the Chief Minister of Delhi,' Dhanda wrote on Gupta was attacked on Wednesday morning at her residence during a 'jan sunwai' (public hearing) session. Police sources said a man lunged at her, tugging at her hair, before security personnel overpowered him. The attacker was identified as Rajesh Sakariya, 41, a resident of Rajkot in Gujarat. He was handed over to the police and is being In a video message, Dhanda said there was rising frustration among Delhi residents over unresolved issues, but that it was no excuse for violence.'Certainly, in recent days, there's been a rise in Delhi residents' frustration as they have had to face problems and their issues aren't getting resolved. But that is no justification for violence,' he was a hint of schadenfreude as the AAP leader referred to the BJP's treatment of AAP supremo and former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. From taking 'sheesh mahal' jibes over opulent renovations to his official bungalow to accusing him of rampant corruption in connection with the Delhi liquor policy scam, the BJP went after Kejriwal hammer-and-tongs at the slightest provocation.'The BJP should introspect, as it used to politicize every attack on Kejriwal ji while he was Chief Minister,' Dhanda added. Kejriwal, who has been slapped in public and had ink thrown at him on several occasions, also condemned the assault on Rekha Gupta.'In a democratic system, differences of opinion and opposition are acceptable, but there can be no place for violence,' he wrote on X. 'I am confident that Delhi Police will take appropriate action. I hope the chief minister remains completely safe and healthy.'Senior AAP leader Atishi echoed the sentiment. 'The attack on Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta is highly condemnable. In a democracy, there is space for dissent and opposition, but none for violence,' she said in a Hindi post on also called on police to take 'the strictest action' against those responsible and wished Gupta good health.- EndsMust Watch


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
1984 anti-Sikh riots: SC to hear Sajjan Kumar's plea against punishment on September 24
The Supreme Court has postponed the hearing to September 24 for Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar's appeals against their sentences in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case. The CBI's response was sought on Khokhar's plea for reprieve, whose life sentence was upheld by the Delhi High Court in 2018. Khokhar's furlough request was earlier rejected due to concerns about potential unrest. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred to September 24 the hearing on the pleas filed by former Congress leader Sajjan Kumar and the party's former councillor Balwan Khokhar against sentences awarded in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.A bench of Justices J K Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi deferred the matter as Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for CBI, was not July, 2024, the apex court asked the CBI to respond to Khokhar's plea seeking the life sentence was upheld by the Delhi High Court in 2018 whereas it reversed Kumar's acquittal by a trial court in 2013, in a case related to the killings of five Sikhs in the Raj Nagar Part-I area in Palam Colony in southwest Delhi on November 1-2, 1984, apart from the setting ablaze of a gurdwara in Raj Nagar his plea, Khokhar said the jail authorities had rejected his plea for furlough on September 26, 2024, saying his release would invite adverse repercussions and disturb peace and tranquillity in the society, prompting said he had moved a bail plea and had already undergone a 8.7 years' sentence but the plea was dismissed by a court on February 3, violence and killings of persons from the Sikh community took place in the national capital following former PM Indira Gandhi's assassination by her bodyguards in 1984 and the cases stemming from the incident have seen some major twists and turns 40 years on.