Plans for flexible energy tariffs to help households cut electricity bills
The Government wants to offer consumers new ways to take advantage of off-peak, lower electricity prices, through flexible tariffs and smart technology.
This includes helping electric vehicle (EV) drivers get discounts on their electricity when using public chargers at off-peak times.
It also plans to ensure suppliers make information on smart tariffs more accessible to consumers, while taking the next steps to offer tailored products and services based on electricity usage.
The so-called Clean Flexibility Roadmap comes as part of the UK's net-zero aims, while also helping lower bills and boosting the resilience of the power network.
Britain will need to shift towards more flexible energy use as the UK becomes more dependent on wind and solar power, such as charging EV batteries when wind is generating a lot of electricity.
Mr Shanks said: 'This roadmap gives households and businesses the choice and control over when and how they use their energy.
'The flexible electricity system we are working to build will help make that a reality for consumers across the country, by supporting them to bring down their bills through using new tariffs and technologies.
'In this way we will protect working people's pockets and ensure they are the first to benefit from our clean power mission.'
A flexibility commissioner will be appointed to lead the policy work, and an annual forum will be set up to track progress on the initiative.
Akshay Kaul, Ofgem's director general for infrastructure group, said: 'A more flexible energy market will be a real game changer, giving households more control over what they pay for their energy.
'Small lifestyle tweaks such as programming a dishwasher or tumble dryer to run overnight when costs are low or charging your electric car during high winds can have a material impact on people's bills.
'At Ofgem we're opening up flexibility markets to bring better tariffs and products to consumers to make cheaper bills a reality.'
The Government has also launched a two-month consultation looking at how more consumers can be supported to use energy flexibly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Inner London to lose out in funding rebalance, says IFS report
Councils in inner London are set to become the biggest losers under a government plan to update council funding rules, a think tank Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) found some London boroughs could see their funding levels drop up to 12% once inflation is taken into areas in outer London are set to gain from the changes, the researchers found, along with urban areas outside the capital including Nottingham, Wolverhampton and government argues the overhaul is necessary because councils' funding has become out of step with local demand for services. The new funding system, to be phased in over three years from 2026, will see changes to the formulas used by government to capture levels of demand for council-run services, along with the differing cost of delivering them.A greater share of funding will be redirected towards areas with a higher share of properties in lower council tax bands, whilst the portion of business rates income that councils have been allowed to keep since 2013 will be IFS predicts the proposed changes are set to redistribute around £2.1bn in annual government funding, with 186 authorities losing out and 161 will not be possible to say exactly what the changes will mean for each area until the plans are finalised later this the think tank said Camden, Hammersmith and Fulham, Kensington and Chelsea, Wandsworth and Westminster would see their overall funding drop by 11–12%, even accounting for a proposed funding floor to limit areas are set to lose out under the government's proposed method to even out differences in council tax revenues, given they have low rates and many properties in higher bands, it added. Outside London, the East Midlands and Yorkshire and the Humber regions are set to see the biggest increases in funding, according to the with relatively high - but not the highest - population densities are also set to fare well, it estimates, including outer London boroughs and councils in Blackpool, Nottingham and added that the widest range of outcomes would be seen in shire district councils, where some councils where business rate income has grown most, such as Mid Suffolk and North West Leicestershire, would lose such districts in more urban areas, such as Harlow, Crawley and Norwich, are among the biggest share of funding going to the very poorest areas will be substantially larger, it added, than for the least deprived. 'Moving the pain' The shake-up will affect the share of central government funding distributed to councils in England, including income they are allowed to keep from business currently represents around half of their income, with councils raising the rest locally, subject to a 5% cap on yearly is allocated according to a complex mix of formulas taking into account factors like population and ministers argue the current rules, which have not been updated in over a decade, are failing to reflect higher demand for council services in poorer Liberal Democrats said the changes would "come as a shock to the system for many councils," branding the changes "robbing Peter to pay Paul"."The government is moving the pain of chronic council underfunding from one community to another instead of delivering the economic growth that would deliver the revenue to fund local services everywhere," added deputy leader Daisy Cooper. 'Decisive action' A spokesperson for the local government department said: "The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded means the link between funding and need for services has broken down, leaving communities left behind."That's why we are taking decisive action to reform the funding system so we can get councils back on their feet and improve public services". Although there is widespread agreement among councils that the current system is badly in need of updating, designing a new one poses a political headache for ministers ahead of a significant set of local elections due next local leaders have warned that current funding levels do not cover the rising cost of mandatory services such as adult social care and special educational needs, despite real-terms funding increases in more recent years. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Honda Shifts Gears on EVs Following Massive Quarterly Loss
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Silverado EV more than doubled its EPA range with zero hardware changes. Demons beware, this 2022 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Hennessey Exorcist Convertible has come to slay you. For sale now on Exotic Car Trader, this very example could be yours. View post: Walmart Is Selling a 'Must-Have' $50 Jump Starter for 46% Off, and Shoppers Say It's 'by Far the Best' The 'Power of Dreams' brand is taking a massive loss Japanese automotive giant Honda is rethinking its strategy regarding electric vehicles as it absorbed red-ink losses stemming from their development and the impact of U.S. tariffs. In the first quarter of its 2025-2026 fiscal year (April 1 to June 30, 2025), Honda took a one-time charge of ¥113.4 billion (~$780 million) related to its EV-related troubles. In total, the impact of the EV charge and its exposure to tariffs took a toll on Honda's operating profit during the quarter, as earnings fell to ¥244.1 billion (~$1.69 billion) from ¥484.7 billion (~$3.35 billion) just one year ago. During a press conference on August 6, Tokyo time, Honda Managing Executive Officer Eiji Fujimura attributed the nearly $780 million charge regarding EVs to its mistakes, adding that they aren't 'optimistic' about the future of electric vehicles. Honda is struggling to sell EVs profitably Although Honda still plans to launch its 0 Series line of EVs in the U.S. in 2026, the company has delayed product development and investment in a Canadian EV production hub. However, it struggles to come to terms with the loss of the U.S. federal tax credit incentive and the cooling growth in EV demand. Currently, Honda sells two EVs in the States, the GM Ultium-based Honda Prologue and Acura ZDX crossovers, which have had healthy sales numbers. Through June, American Honda moved 16,317 Prologues, while Acura sold 10,335 ZDX; numbers that were only possible with heavy incentives. According to industry marketing promotion data from Motor Intelligence cited by Automotive News, Honda spent an average of more than $12,000 on each Prologue and $21,000 on each ZDX it moved during the April-June quarter. In addition, Honda's attempts to break into the mecha-competitive Chinese EV market with its line of locally developed EVs have not been a fruitful experiment for the automaker. In remarks, Fujimura noted that Honda's Chinese-market EVs were too expensive amidst a sea of local brands competing in local price wars, and that their cars lacked important connected car technology features that Chinese consumers found on less costly models. 'We are struggling with EVs there,' he said. 'We are underachieving against the initial plan.' Source: Getty Images Trump Admin.—Japan trade deal saved $1.38B from Honda's tariff outlook In addition to its EV woes, U.S. tariffs are making a significant dent in the Power of Dreams brand's pocketbook, as Honda took a ¥124.6 billion (~$861.6 million) operating profit loss from U.S. tariffs during the last fiscal quarter. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. However, Honda officials believe that the recent trade deal between the Japanese government and the Trump Administration in the U.S., which reduced tariffs on automobiles and auto parts from 25% to 15%, will have a slight positive impact on its financial performance in the foreseeable future. Previously, the automaker projected that tariffs would hurdle a full fiscal year blow of ¥650.0 billion ($4.49 billion) at a minimum; however, its latest outlook shows that the new policy would save ¥200 billion ($1.38 billion), down to ¥450.0 billion ($3.11 billion). However, to further mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs, Honda says it will increase prices and adjust its supply chain to produce more domestic vehicles for the U.S. market. Fujimura hinted that the automaker may expand its two-shift operation at U.S. plants to three to keep up with demand, requiring more coordination with suppliers. 'We might change it to a three-shift operation in the States, so that we can increase production volume without spending too much on capital investment,' Fujimura said. Final Thoughts Despite this, one thing to note is that Honda remains exposed to potential trade issues with Mexico and Canada, as a formal agreement with the respective countries has not been finalized. For the full fiscal year to March 31, 2026, Honda estimates it will incur ¥190 billion ($1.31 billion) in tariff costs on complete vehicles imported to the U.S., with the most significant chunk coming from the USMCA nations. Honda sources a third of its vehicles from tariff-targeted Mexico and Canada, including popular models such as the compact HR-V crossover, the Acura ZDX, and Honda Prologue EVs from GM's Ramos Arizpe plant, as well as select units of the Civic and CR-V from Alliston, Ontario. About the Author James Ochoa View Profile
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
A long-term plan is needed to get the country out of its financial hole
SIR – Whether by raising income tax rates, a wealth tax or through less overt measures, the Government will try to extract more money from the people that it serves ('Reeves facing £50bn black hole as tax pressure mounts ', report, August 6). However, such measures risk being self-defeating. Those who are unable or unwilling to leave the country will bear the brunt of the tax rises. That includes standard and higher-rate taxpayers. Every pound the Government extracts from their bank accounts is a pound that cannot be spent on businesses that provide goods and services. Thus, businesses will take another hit which, in turn, will reduce their tax payments. Since the failure of the Truss administration, there has been no long-term plan to get the country out of its financial hole. Eventually, there will have to be one and it will likely involve curbing the insatiable appetite of government to control and spend. When such a plan sees the light of day we may be surprised at the boost it gives to confidence and investment. David Porter Plymouth, Devon SIR – Labour dug itself a financial hole when it pledged not to increase National Insurance (NI), VAT or income tax rates. Instead of imposing VAT on private schools and possibly even on private health, a simple 1 or 2 per cent rise on NI and/or the basic rate of income tax would have solved the Chancellor's problems. Now she is having to cast her net wider – and creating more problems as a result. John Tilsiter Radlett, Hertfordshire SIR – Taxing jobs and taxing capital is not going to result in economic growth. Is it too much to expect a former Bank of England economist to grasp this? Patrick Loxdale Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SIR – There is a limit to which any economy can be taxed. The UK is at that limit. The British public understands this. It is plain that public sector expenditure must be cut to balance the books. Given the Government throws billions around like confetti – on the Chagos Islands, the immigration fiasco, welfare, public sector pay rises, excessive numbers of civil servants – there is much low-hanging fruit. The economy is being badly managed as never before. Enough is enough. Please can we have some economic sanity. Stuart Moore Bramham, West Yorkshire SIR – Having continually criticised the Conservatives for the last 12 months for creating a £22bn black hole in the public finances, I trust Labour will now be constantly criticising itself for doubling the deficit. Paul Webster Dyserth, Denbighshire
