
Ukraine's Kyivstar to raise up to $200 million in landmark US listing, sources say
Ukraine's biggest telecoms operator Kyivstar expects to raise between $50 million and $200 million through a landmark stock market listing in New York this year, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Kyivstar will become the first Ukraine-based company listed on a U.S. stock exchange when it joins
Nasdaq
via fintech entrepreneur
Betsy Cohen
's special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) Cohen Circle, thereby avoiding some of the complexities of a traditional initial public offering.
The Ukrainian company's Dubai-based parent
VEON
has said the listing was expected by the third quarter of 2025 and that it will retain a minimum of 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of the telecoms business.
VEON has already secured $52 million in non-redemption agreements with institutional investors, representing the minimum it expects to raise, the sources said. The maximum could reach $200 million depending on redemptions.
LEADING UKRAINE'S RECONSTRUCTION
While U.S. President Donald Trump continues his efforts to end the Russian war in Ukraine and Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskiy enlists support from Europe and NATO, VEON hopes the Kyivstar listing will help to stoke investor appetite for Ukrainian assets ahead of the country's reconstruction.
VEON Chief Executive Kaan Terzioglu said after the company reported earnings last Thursday that it had extremely strong support for the Kyivstar listing from U.S. authorities, Ukraine and the European Union.
He dubbed the listing "the people's IPO", expressing his hope that investors around the world show their support for Ukraine.
Telecoms group VEON, which exited the Russian market in 2023, had its corporate rights in Kyivstar restored by a Kyiv court last year after they had been seized over the previous involvement of sanctioned Russian individuals.
Kyivstar, which has been given a pro forma valuation of $2.21 billion (1.89 billion euros), is the market-leading mobile operator in Ukraine with 24 million subscribers. Its revenue and core profit have surged since Russia's invasion, weathering cyberattacks and power outages during the conflict.
ACTIVIST INVESTOR SUPPORT
Cohen Circle and Kyivstar shareholders will hold separate meetings on Tuesday to vote on the planned listing, the final step before completing filings with the market regulator.
Activist investor Shah Capital, VEON's fourth-largest shareholder with a 6.7% stake, told Reuters in an emailed statement that the IPO can be a success "in light of increased pressure on Russia to settle the conflict".
Shah had publicly urged VEON to pursue the Kyivstar listing before the telecoms group made the final decision to float its Ukrainian unit in the U.S. despite previous hints at London or Warsaw as possible venues.
Edison Group equity analysts Nick Paton and Dan Ridsdale said the deal's narrative is built around Ukraine's postwar reconstruction and digital infrastructure's role in that recovery.
However, the move is not immune to risks, particularly geopolitical ones, they said.
"Though VEON has exited Russia, lingering concerns over legacy shareholder links and ongoing exposure to volatile jurisdictions may cap upside. Any re-emergence of reputational or compliance risks could reintroduce a governance discount," Paton and Ridsdale said in a note.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Crude lessons: Reversing slide in domestic output now a strategic necessity
India can, if necessary, switch to many alternate suppliers without much additional cost Ranjan Mathai Listen to This Article United States President Donald Trump's tariff barrage against India for buying Russian oil might be a crude strategy — both to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin on Ukraine and to extract concessions from our trade negotiators. But Mr Trump's claim that a US company could unlock Pakistan's 'massive' oil reserves — and that some might get sold to India — adds insult to our injury! India can, if necessary, switch to many alternate suppliers without much additional cost. (Official statements suggest the 5 million barrels per day we import are now sourced from 40 different


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Contract manufacturing startup Zetwerk takes majority stake in KRYFS Power Components
Synopsis Mumbai-based KRYFS, which was set up in 1992, offers products, including CRGO laminations, transformer cores and tanks, turnkey solutions, and solar projects. Its 10 manufacturing plants across India will be integrated into Zetwerk's ecosystem. Meanwhile, Zetwerk serves over 2,000 customers through over 10,000 suppliers across India, the US, Vietnam, and Mexico.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'I don't see Russia being serious about negotiations': Estonia's permanent secretary general of ministry of defence Kaimo Kuusk
Kaimo Kuusk - Estonia's permanent secretary general of ministry of defence Trump and Putin are slated to meet in Alaska on Aug 15 to try and facilitate a ceasefire in the Ukraine war. However, many in Ukraine and Europe remain sceptical that the Alaksa talks will yield anything substantial since neither Zelenskyy nor European representatives are going to be present. Estonia, a frontline state in the Baltics, has stakes in this war. Kaimo Kuusk , Estonia's permanent secretary general of ministry of defence, who was also Estonia's ambassador to Ukraine, spoke to Rudroneel Ghosh during a visit to Tallinn in May, about the trajectory of the war, Russia's gameplan and Nato's startegy for the future: Do you think a ceasefire could be achieved in Ukraine in the near future? Not on equal terms because Russia is not negotiation on goodwill. From our own Estonian experience we know that Russia is a chronic liar. It just doesn't stick to international treaties. From our independence 100 years ago, they started to violate the treaty almost immediately. In this case as well, I was in Ukraine as ambassador so I saw the Minsk agreements, the Normandy format of negotiations, and how Russia played with the process and did not respect any of the truce agreements. So I don't see Russia being serious in negotiations. The only way to get fair peace for Ukraine is through additional pressure on Russia. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Become Fluent in Any Language Talkpal AI Sign Up Undo Only when Russia understands that time is not on their side and the cost of aggression will rise on the frontline through military aid for Ukraine – which Estonia is giving – and through sanctions and economic pressure on Moscow, will there be any results. What do you make of drones in this war? The role of drones in modern warfare is definitely one of the key lessons of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine. Different drone types have different tasks, so they have brought almost limitless combinations for their use on the battlefield. Staying ahead of developments is now more important than ever. 'I don't see Russia being serious in negotiations. The only way to get fair peace for Ukraine is through additional pressure on Russia' . Do you have any evidence that Russia is planning a physical attack against Estonia in the near future? We in Estonia through our intelligence work have been able to obtain information about Russia's military plans – separate from defence plans – against the West. They have actually had those plans for years, from the 1990s. This is nothing new for us. We know what we should be prepared for. We know what to expect. But if you are asking whether we have an imminent, clear and present danger, then I am saying no. Because we are well prepared. We are in Nato. And Russian manpower and military equipment are being destroyed on the Ukrainian front because Ukrainians are defending their own country ferociously. But as I mentioned, if Russia gets peace on their terms, the situation beyond our border can start to change rather rapidly. It seems that Russia is testing Nato's resolve to invoke Article 5 or even Article 4 through tactics below a certain threshold across the region. Has Nato responded to these sufficiently? Outside Ukraine, we have reacted absolutely well. Measures for vessels in the Baltic Sea, to protect undersea infra, our intel services are working well together to catch and thwart saboteurs targeting assets on Western soil. How to measure how successful we have been? Well, we are living in peace. With fears lingering that Trump might completely pull US support for Ukraine, do you think European members of Nato can step up and fill that gap? US support for Ukraine has been absolutely important throughout the years of Russian aggression. I think US has seen, as we all, that this aggression has connections to other regions as well. Russia is supported by China, and we are already in Asia with that connection. So, if we want to face the threats in the Indo-Pacific region, then we have to deal with this aggression in Ukraine as well. You can't just ignore and leave saying now I am going to fire fight the fire at the other side of the house although the fire is still burning on this side of the building. So, it's logical that we continue to support Ukraine collectively. Which also makes it clear that Europe needs to do more. To not only invest in our own defence but also help Ukraine more. If we are talking about possible security guarantees – again, I would continue to say never trust Russia – for peace then Kyiv's allies and friends from different regions need to do more. Estonia is ready to allocate also military units, which will be relevant to our compact size. We will be inside those forces because what is happening in Ukraine is important for security in our region Russia and China seem to have formed an unbreakable compact. What is Europe's gameplan for Beijing? Well, it's not unbreakable. I sometimes compare it to interests of criminal activists. When their interests are matching, then they cooperate. When one of the group members feels that the leader is not suitable anymore, a struggle can start among them. I think we in Europe have become more realistic about looking on China and that will also shape our foreign policy in the future.