Paving the Way for Europe's competitive green future
The event was a satellite event of the EU Research and Innovation (R&I) Days 2025 of the European Commission's Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. It brought together policymakers, researchers, investors, industry and civil society actors to explore how green transition-related R&I can drive a fair, sustainable, and competitive future for Europe.
At the Euractiv policy dialogue of 23 June as well as the full-day conference on 24 June, speakers aligned on the enabling role of R&I in transforming a green necessity into a green opportunity. Clean and green technologies help reduce emissions and heal our planet, but they also boost our global leadership in new markets. Cleaner business models reduce our companies' environmental footprint, but they also create better jobs and they build stronger and more resilient supply chains.
The closing remarks at the conference were delivered by Director-General Marc Lemaître, who reflected on the outcomes of the event and the role of R&I in providing tangible solutions for Europe's green transition and competitiveness.
The text below is a lightly edited and shorter version of his closing remarks.
The European Union's green transition is no longer an abstract concept. Across Europe, research and innovation are already delivering tangible results — from transforming food systems and restoring biodiversity, to building circular economies and advancing climate adaptation. These achievements reflect the collective efforts of scientists, innovators, and entrepreneurs working for a more sustainable, competitive, and resilient Europe.
Yet we find ourselves in a world increasingly defined by geopolitical instability, climate disruption, and economic uncertainty. Europe must double down, accelerate its transition and scale up investments in research and innovation. To do so effectively, we must ensure that the brightest minds and boldest ideas can thrive within Europe's borders.
Three pillars — delivering real results, urgency for acceleration, and unlocking Europe's potential — must guide our work going forward.
Research and innovation are already delivering
Since the launch of the European Green Deal in 2019, the EU has placed R&I at the heart of its policy agenda. The climate contribution of Horizon Europe, the EU's flagship research programme, will reach 35%, or more than €30 billion by 2027. Spending on biodiversity-related R&I has increased to 8.7% and will reach 10% by 2027. Over €3 million contributed to improving air quality.
This funding is translating into real-world impact. R&I projects are actively piloting net-zero farming, restoring ecosystems, and developing real-time digital tools for climate adaptation. Full-scale demonstrators are showing how circular production can be applied to materials and textiles. In the bioeconomy, European startups are generating more sustainable alternatives to intensively-farmed food, and fossil fuel-based plastics, chemicals and fuels — helping build new industrial value chains, technologies and jobs. In water-related cleantech, Europe leads the world, accounting for approximately 40% of water-related technology patents. In addition to underpinning Europe's frontier businesses in water technologies and services, EU R&I funding helps find solutions that make our farms more resilient to drought, our energy, mining and agrifood business more water-smart, and our rivers, lakes and groundwater resources less impacted.
These initiatives demonstrate that the green transition is already underway!
Changing context, changing needs
At the same time, the context in which we operate has changed dramatically. In the six years since the European Green Deal was announced, the EU has faced multiple overlapping crises — from the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine to devastating floods and fires, conflicts, humanitarian and environmental crises that are shaking our world. Alarmingly, 2024 was the first on record to exceed 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures.
This evolving context calls for a new level of ambition. To safeguard Europe's resilience and the well-being of EU citizens, we must become more competitive and resource-efficient, strengthen our supply chains, and reduce dependencies. Moreover, the EU has a political, moral and legal commitment to reach climate neutrality by 2050.
To stay on track, the EU must accelerate the implementation of the European Green Deal and leverage new initiatives such as the Clean Industrial Deal and the Competitiveness Compass. EU R&I Missions and Partnerships are already fostering collaboration across all levels of governance and helping engage citizens and industry in transformative change. Overall, however, progress remains partial. More ambition is needed to achieve our 2030 climate and environmental objectives.
The message is clear: R&I works. R&I delivers. And it must be scaled up to meet the urgency of the moment.
Creating the conditions for innovation to thrive
Delivering a competitive green transition requires more than funding. It demands a thriving research and innovation ecosystem that attracts and retains talent, supports startups, and protects scientific freedom.
To make Europe a destination of choice for researchers worldwide, structural improvements are necessary. Challenges such as limited job security, uncompetitive salaries, and mobility barriers must be addressed. The Choose Europe initiative is an important step in this direction. Through the ERA Act, we intend to improve working conditions for researchers and address administrative hurdles including visa processes. We will propose to enshrine scientific freedom in law. And provide €500 million in funding for the period 2025–2027 through the European Research Council, Horizon Europe, and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions.
The EU must live up to its commitment to investing 3% of GDP in research and development. At the same time, we must create the right framework conditions to support the scale-up of green and clean technologies. While Europe leads globally in clean tech patents — accounting for 22% of the total — we must build on this advantage. In 2023, green tech was the only area where EU venture capital investment levels matched those of the US.
To maintain this momentum, the recently announced EU Startup and Scaleup Strategy will help clean and green innovators grow faster and further by cutting red tape, improving access to financing, and facilitating market access across the Single Market.
Conclusion
Europe has the tools, the talent, and the technological edge to lead the global green transition. The progress we've seen so far shows what is possible when research and innovation are placed at the heart of our policy agenda. To fully deliver on this promise — and to ensure the benefits reach all corners of our society — we must scale up our efforts.
Only by harnessing the full power of research and innovation can we deliver a competitive green transition and a better future for EU citizens.
Let's continue working together to make it happen.
Marc Lemaître is the Director-General at DG for Research and Innovation, European Commission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
Hungary's opposition leader accuses Russia of election meddling
The parliamentary election set for spring 2026 is shaping up Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's toughest challenge to date Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Magnus Lund Nielsen Euractiv Aug 19, 2025 11:24 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Hungarian opposition leader Péter Magyar accuses Moscow of attempting to interfere in the country's 2026 parliamentary elections, warning that Russian operatives are using 'disinformation campaigns, cyber operations, or intimidation' to sway voters. In an open letter published Sunday, Magyar demanded 'clear assurances' that Moscow would refrain from interfering in Hungary's domestic affairs, including through cyber operations or intimidation of politicians and citizens, Reuters reports. Magyar, whose Respect and Freedom (Tisza) party is polling ahead of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Fidesz, made the remarks after Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) claimed the European Commission was plotting 'regime change in Budapest' with him as its preferred candidate. In recent polls, Orbán is trailing Magyar's opposition party by around 10%. 'The last Soviet soldier left our country in June 1991. Now their operatives are back – sometimes working undercover, sometimes openly,' Magyar said in a Facebook post, calling on Russia's ambassador to explain the SVR's comments. Orbán, who has maintained close ties with Moscow since 2010 and opposed EU military aid to Ukraine, has accused Brussels of seeking to install a 'puppet government' in Hungary himself. The parliamentary election set for next spring is shaping up to be Orbán's toughest challenge in his nearly two decades as prime minister. (vib)
Euractiv
6 hours ago
- Euractiv
Europeans divided over where to spend their new military budget bonanza
As Europe prepares for a decade-long arms shopping spree to rebuild neglected militaries and narrow the gap with US firepower, its spending choices will shape the continent's industrial base for years to come. In June, NATO countries agreed to spend 3.5% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defence in order to meet the military capability requirements outlined in the alliance's defence plans. For the 23 EU members of NATO, this means a whopping annual increase of nearly €270 billion, according to calculations from the Bruegel think tank. These funds are expected largely to flow into the defence industry and military recruitment. A central question is now whether European countries will invest in developing their domestic defence industry or continue to rely heavily on US-made equipment. The NATO spending commitments are simple targets, leaving each ally relatively free to decide what exact weapons to buy and from whom. European allies are splitting along a spectrum, from those leaning heavily on US weapons to those insisting on buying European, with each path offering both short-term fixes and longer-term strategic bets. On the spectrum US-made systems have a clear attraction. High-end options such as the F-35 fighter jet or Patriot air-defence batteries carry eye-watering price tags but can help governments hit NATO's spending target quickly. For underfunded militaries, big-ticket purchases have long been the fastest way to show progress after years of neglect. The Patriot is a case in point. One battery costs around $1 billion, and each interceptor missile comes with a roughly $4 million price tag. In August, a small group of European countries agreed to purchase more Patriots, further increasing their defence budgets and reliance on US-made gear. A European alternative to the Patriot, the Franco-Italian SAMP/T battery and Aster 30 missiles, is around a third cheaper. France and Spain in particular have argued that building a robust European defence industry is an essential security priority. To that end, France has long avoided buying US-made weaponry whenever possible. The two countries joined with Germany on the ambitious and expensive Future Combat Air System (FCAS) next-generation fighter jet project, a European alternative to foreign options, particularly those produced in the US. At the other end of the spectrum, Poland has seen its national security priorities centred on quickly acquiring military hardware in large quantities, regardless of the source. Europe's clear defence spending champion, Warsaw has more than doubled its military budget in just five years, hired tens of thousands of additional soldiers and modernised its fleet of F-16 fighters while also buying new fifth-generation F-35 jets. The Polish armed forces also stocked up on rocket launchers, more than 100 new helicopters, scores of heavy tanks and much more. The country has prioritised speed in deals for military equipment, a key motivation behind Warsaw's burgeoning relationship with South Korean arms makers. Poland has been more wary of big-ticket European defence projects while maintaining deep ties to a number of US defence contractors. Is reliance on the US healthy? Most European NATO forces have extensively purchased American gear for years, assuming it would guarantee them a better relationship with Washington, the military alliance's dominant power. But Donald Trump's return to the White House earlier this year, and his administration's reluctance to promise Europeans unambiguous support in case of war, has forced governments to question whether buying American really buys influence or favourable treatment. Critics warn that purchasing further US-made equipment does little to resolve Europe's dependence on American technology or foster the growth of the European defence industry. NATO's spending target also contains no incentives to purchase European-made products to build up local industrial capacity. Instead, the GDP-based target can reward splurging on the priciest gear or enormous quantities of useless gear to show money is being spent, or favour exporters that can deliver fastest – often from the US or South Korea – while many European production lines face backlogs, especially in missile and ammunition production. That spending race has already pushed up prices in the global arms market, where costs have soared since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The price of NATO-standard 155mm artillery shells has quadrupled, from around €2,000 before the war to about €8,000 recently. However, focusing on budget figures alone risks prioritising optics over efficiency and real war-fighting capacity. That was a criticism voiced by Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez when he rejected NATO's new GDP-based targets, arguing that Spain could deliver the required military capabilities while spending significantly less. But NATO countries signed up to the task at The Hague summit in June, and will spend the next years trying to meet expectations. The alliance grades progress in yearly updates, adding pressure to deliver on their promises. (mm, bts, cp)
Euractiv
6 hours ago
- Euractiv
Asian buzz kill: The killer hornet threatening Europe's honey
A single hornet can kill up to 50 bees per day Euractiv is part of the Trust Project The Asian hornet has terrorised Europe's honeybees – and their keepers – for over two decades. But scientists may have found a way to stop them from spreading. The black-and-orange Vespa velutina , around three centimetres long with yellow legs, first arrived in France in 2004, likely hidden in a shipment of pottery from China. Since then, it has spread to a dozen other European countries. Beekeepers in affected regions have reported hive losses of up to 50%, with each hornet able to kill 50 bees a day. And with several thousand hornets per nest the maths doesn't look good. For Cyndy Adolphe, policy consultant at pollinator NGO BeeLife, it's a grim gift that France gave to the EU's beekeeping industry. Last week, Ireland announced its second-ever sighting of the hornet and warned of a threat to biodiversity. Meanwhile, Belgian media reported that the region of Flanders is pouring millions into fighting the species, whose garden sightings have doubled this year. Like wildfire The insect's major threat to the European bee population is no secret to scientist, either. 'They spread like wildfire,' said Sophie Gray, a researcher at the University of Southampton in the UK. A single hornet nest can wipe out an entire beehive in days – and they are not easy to spot as they can be underground, in bird boxes, bushes or perched 15 metres up a tree. Global warming worsens the threat, allowing more hornets to survive winter and stay active from June to November. 'There is no respite for beekeepers any more,' Adolphe warned. And the consequences are clear. In the worst-case scenario, Asian hornets are estimated to cost the French economy €30.8 million per year. Tracking the buzz But Gray and her team believe they have discovered a breakthrough that could help solve these challenges: tracking the hornet's distinctive hum. Their research shows that Asian hornets buzz at around 51 decibels, with a fundamental frequency of 125 Hz. Using a directional microphone, nests can be detected from up to 20 metres away – and can be distinguished from bees or European hornets. The ability to quickly spot hornets nests may be a major breakthrough for beekeepers as it is a race against time once a hornet is spotted. 'It typically takes two to three days to find a nest after a sighting,' Gray explained. 'By then, the hornets may have wiped out a hive of 20,000 bees.' With Europe's pollinators already under pressure, this new tool could enable to detect the killer buzz of the beekeepers' buzz killer early.
