logo
Factbox-The key promises of the main parties contesting Canada's election

Factbox-The key promises of the main parties contesting Canada's election

Yahoo16-04-2025

By David Ljunggren
OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada's general election will take place on April 28, with polls indicating a tight race between the ruling Liberals and the official opposition Conservatives.
The candidates will participate in evening debates on Wednesday and Thursday.
Here are some of the key planks of the two largest parties:
LIBERALS
DEALING WITH TRUMP - Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada's reciprocal tariffs on more than C$60 billion worth of U.S. imports will remain in place until Washington removes its import duties. Carney, who says there is a limit to how far Canada can go in imposing dollar-for-dollar tariffs, has promised Canada will thrash out a new economic and security relationship with the U.S. after the election. He has not spelled out how this effort would affect the existing United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on free trade.
TAXES - Reduce the marginal tax rate on the lowest tax bracket by one percentage point. Carney's campaign says this move will save two-income families up to C$825 a year and directly benefit more than 22 million Canadians, with middle- and low-income people enjoying the biggest savings.
Eliminate the Goods and Services Tax, a value-added tax, for first-time home buyers on properties at or under C$1 million, saving Canadians up to C$50,000 on such purchases.
SECURITY - Push through "an unprecedented acceleration" of investment in the armed forces, expanding the Royal Canadian Navy's capabilities with new submarines and additional heavy icebreakers to defend the North and increasing the Coast Guard's reach and abilities. All military personnel would get a raise and the recruitment process for Canada's Armed Forces would be modernized to eliminate a shortage of 14,500 service members. Carney is also promising an overhaul of Canada's troubled defense procurement system to speed up major military purchases.
TRADE DIVERSIFICATION - Stunned by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war, the Liberals vow to inject C$5 billion into a new Trade Diversification Corridor Fund. The aim is to build out infrastructure that will diversify Canada's trade relationships around the world, create good jobs and drive economic growth.
ENERGY - Aggressively develop natural resources projects that are in the national interest and set up a Major Federal Project Office that would issue a decision on major projects within two years instead of five.
HOUSING - The government would act as a developer to build affordable housing at scale, including on public lands, while providing more than C$25 billion in financing to innovative prefabricated home builders. In addition to eliminating the Goods and Services Tax for first-time home buyers on properties at or under C$1 million, the Liberals want to cut municipal development charges in half for multi-unit residential housing.
HELP THE AUTO INDUSTRY - Create a C$2 billion strategic response fund to boost the sector's competitiveness, protect manufacturing jobs and build a fortified Canadian supply chain – from raw materials to finished vehicles.
CRIME - Recruit 1,000 more police officers to tackle drug and human trafficking, foreign interference, cybercrime, and the organized criminal gangs that steal cars. Train 1,000 border guards to crack down on drugs, illegal guns, and stop gangs from stealing cars. Toughen the criminal code and make bail laws stricter in cases involving violent and organized crime, home invasions, car theft, and human trafficking.
CONSERVATIVES
DEALING WITH TRUMP - The Conservatives are proposing a deal in which Canada and the U.S. simultaneously drop their tariffs and counter-tariffs. Party leader Pierre Poilievre also would propose an early renegotiation of the USMCA ahead of a planned review in 2026.
ENERGY POLICY - Set up a rapid resource project office to handle all regulatory approvals across all levels of government. Create a national energy corridor to fast-track approvals for transmission lines, railways, pipelines, and other critical infrastructure. Approve 10 natural resources projects that have been stuck for years in the federal approval process.
HOUSING - Eliminate the federal sales tax on new homes under $1.3 million, which will save home buyers up to C$65,000. Incentivize municipalities to cut building taxes, for total savings of C$100,000 on an average home in Canada's big cities.
SECURITY - Double the number of Canadian Rangers in the Arctic, building a new permanent base in Iqaluit, the capital of the Canadian territory of Nunavut, and acquire two additional polar icebreakers for the Royal Canadian Navy.
TAXES - Cut the lowest income tax bracket by 15%, saving each Canadian taxpayer C$900 per year.
Any person or business selling an asset will pay no capital gains tax when they reinvest the proceeds in Canada. Companies that reinvest in active Canadian businesses will also be able to defer any capital gains tax.
Allow Canadians to contribute an extra C$5,000 a year to a Tax-Free Savings Account for investments in Canadian companies. Enable working seniors to earn up to C$34,000 on a tax-free basis, C$10,000 more than currently allowed.
CRIME - Impose life sentences for anyone who is convicted of five or more counts of human trafficking, importing or exporting ten or more illegal firearms, and fentanyl trafficking. Give judges the power to sentence multiple murderers to consecutive prison sentences without parole eligibility beyond 25 years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German defence minister: not considering sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine
German defence minister: not considering sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

German defence minister: not considering sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine

BERLIN (Reuters) -German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Thursday that Germany is not considering delivering Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine despite Kyiv's repeated requests. Although Germany is one of Ukraine's main military backers, Berlin has never supplied Taurus missiles, which have a range in excess of 300 miles (480 km). Answering a journalist's question during his fifth visit to Kyiv since the start of the war, Pistorius said, "Since you asked me whether we are considering this, my answer is no." In the same news conference, the minister said his country's military support for Ukraine had reached 7 billion euros ($8.12 billion) this year and a further 1.9 billion euros were pending parliamentary approval. ($1 = 0.8621 euros) (Writing by Friederike HeineEditing by Madeline Chambers)

Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal in long-running Facebook privacy case
Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal in long-running Facebook privacy case

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court of Canada to hear appeal in long-running Facebook privacy case

OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to review a ruling that concluded Facebook broke federal privacy law by failing to adequately inform users of risks to their data when using the popular social media platform. Last September, the Federal Court of Appeal found Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, did not obtain the meaningful consent required by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act between 2013 and 2015. The decision overturned a 2023 Federal Court ruling. The Court of Appeal said Facebook invited millions of apps onto its platform and did not adequately supervise them. It found that the Federal Court's failure to engage with the relevant evidence on this point was an error of law. Privacy commissioner Philippe Dufresne called the Court of Appeal decision an acknowledgment that international firms whose business models rely on users' data must respect Canadian privacy law. Facebook applied for a hearing at the Supreme Court, arguing the Court of Appeal took the wrong approach to consent and security safeguards under the privacy law. It said in a written application that, rather than evaluating Facebook's multi-layered efforts to obtain meaningful consent, the Court of Appeal focused myopically on the platform's privacy policy alone. The Supreme Court, following its usual practice, gave no reasons Thursday for agreeing to hear the case. A 2019 investigation report from then-federal privacy commissioner Daniel Therrien and his British Columbia counterpart cited major shortcomings in Facebook's procedures and called for stronger laws to protect Canadians. The probe followed reports that Facebook let an outside organization use a digital app to access users' personal information, which was then passed to others. The app, at one point known as "This is Your Digital Life," encouraged users to complete a personality quiz but collected information about the people who installed the app and data about their Facebook friends. Recipients of the information included the British consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, which was involved in U.S. political campaigns and targeted messaging. About 300,000 Facebook users worldwide added the app, leading to the potential disclosure of the personal information of approximately 87 million others, including more than 600,000 Canadians, the commissioners' report said. The commissioners concluded that Facebook violated PIPEDA by failing to obtain valid and meaningful consent from installing users and their friends, and that it had "inadequate safeguards" to protect user information. Facebook disputed the investigation's findings. The company has said it tried to work with the privacy commissioner's office and take measures that would go above and beyond what other companies do. In early 2020, Therrien asked the Federal Court to declare Facebook had violated the law. A judge ruled the commissioner failed to establish that Facebook breached the law on meaningful consent. He also agreed with Facebook's argument that once a user authorizes it to disclose information to an app, the social media company's safeguarding duties under PIPEDA come to an end. In its decision, the Court of Appeal noted Facebook's contention that users read privacy policies presented to them when they sign up to social networking websites — something the judges called "a dubious assumption" given such documents can run to thousands of words. "Terms that are on their face superficially clear do not necessarily translate into meaningful consent," Justice Donald Rennie wrote for a three-member panel. "Apparent clarity can be lost or obscured in the length and miasma of the document and the complexity of its terms." In this case, Rennie said, a central question was whether a reasonable person "would have understood that in downloading a personality quiz (or any app), they were consenting to the risk that the app would scrape their data and the data of their friends, to be used in a manner contrary to Facebook's own internal rules (i.e. sold to a corporation to develop metrics to target advertising in advance of the 2016 U.S. election)." This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio

US files lawsuit against New York for blocking immigration officials near court
US files lawsuit against New York for blocking immigration officials near court

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US files lawsuit against New York for blocking immigration officials near court

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department said on Thursday that it has filed a lawsuit challenging a New York state law that blocks immigration officials from arresting individuals at or near New York courthouses. "Specifically, the complaint challenges a law, called the Protect Our Courts Act, that purposefully shields dangerous aliens from being lawfully detained at or on their way to or from a courthouse and imposes criminal liability for violations of the shield," the Justice Department said in a statement. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said New York was employing policies similar to those used by California to prevent "illegal aliens from apprehension." "This latest lawsuit in a series of sanctuary city litigation underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to keeping Americans safe and aggressively enforcing the law," she said. Demonstrators once again took to the streets in major U.S. cities on Thursday to protest President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. A federal judge in San Francisco will hear arguments later in the day as part of California's lawsuit against Trump's deployment of U.S. troops in Los Angeles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store